B.C. Health Coalition urges province to end contract with U.S. owner of LifeLabs
Social Sharing
A public health advocacy group is urging the B.C. government to end its contract with the American company that owns LifeLabs, the province's main provider of outpatient lab services.
The B.C. Health Coalition has issued an open letter asking Premier David Eby to follow through on a directive he issued last week for all government bodies to review their connections to U.S. firms amid the tariff dispute, and cancel its contract with Quest Diagnostics.
The American firm acquired LifeLabs locations across Canada last year for $1.35 billion, and is now involved in a labour dispute with its B.C. workers, who are eight weeks into strike action.
The 1,200 striking workers, who are members of the B.C. General Employees' Union (BCGEU), have been conducting rotating job action, temporarily closing labs on certain days.
WATCH | Rotating strikes continue at LifeLabs in B.C.:
Rotating strikes continue at LifeLabs in B.C.
4 days ago
Duration 6:16
It's been over seven weeks since workers began job action against their employer LifeLabs, which provides diagnostic care under contract to the government. Union president Paul Finch said the company, whose ownership is based in America, should be reviewed as part of the B.C. government's directive to rip up contracts with U.S. companies.
The B.C. Health Coalition, which has about 800,000 members, says laboratory services should be fully brought into the public system. It says doing so would reduce wait times, save public money and improve both working conditions and patient care.
Coalition members and striking LifeLabs workers rallied outside the B.C. Legislature on Wednesday, calling on the province to take action.
"There is no economic justification to allow a U.S. corporation to provide outpatient diagnostic services in the province," BCGEU president Paul Finch said in a statement earlier this week. "Workers and the public are already noticing a decline in services since Quest took over last year."
A poll commissioned by the employees' union suggests 74 per cent of British Columbians oppose American companies running health services in the province.
In a statement to CBC News, the Ministry of Health said the province is currently in a 10-year contract with LifeLabs, which runs through March 2031.
"Cancelling the province's contract with LifeLabs right now would cause significant delays in basic lab testing and put patients at risk," the ministry said. "It would also cost hundreds of millions of dollars and take resources away from frontline services elsewhere."
While LifeLabs is now owned by Quest, the ministry noted it remains a Canadian-incorporated company. It is responsible for more than two-thirds of outpatient lab tests in B.C. — about 42 million, annually.
The province said it will ensure LifeLabs complies with all contract terms to maintain the quality, accessibility and cost of lab services.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Vancouver Sun
4 hours ago
- Vancouver Sun
Opinion: Exercise improves cancer survival — and a Canadian study leads the way
Last week, history was made in the world of cancer research — not with a new drug, but with something far more accessible and powerful: exercise. A landmark study published in The New England Journal of Medicine has confirmed, for the first time in a randomized controlled trial, that a structured exercise program can significantly improve survival for people treated for early-stage colon cancer. The Challenge trial showed that a three-year structured exercise program initiated after chemotherapy reduced the risk of cancer recurrence or death by 28 per cent, and improved overall survival by 37 per cent. Compared to health education alone, this was a 7.1 per cent improvement in the likelihood of being alive at the eight-year mark. Let that sink in: Brisk walking a few times a week can improve survival as much — or more — than many modern cancer drugs, with none of the side effects and at a fraction of the cost. A daily roundup of Opinion pieces from the Sun and beyond. By signing up you consent to receive the above newsletter from Postmedia Network Inc. A welcome email is on its way. If you don't see it, please check your junk folder. The next issue of Informed Opinion will soon be in your inbox. Please try again Interested in more newsletters? Browse here. For years, observational studies hinted that physically active cancer survivors tended to live longer and feel better. But these studies were limited by their design — confounded by the fact that healthier people might be more likely to exercise. Now, the Challenge trial provides the gold-standard evidence we've been waiting for — led by Drs. Christopher Booth and Kerry Courneya through the Canadian Cancer Trials Group, this 'first-in-class' trial enrolled 889 patients in Canada, Australia, and the UK and confirmed that supervised exercise with behaviour change support improves both disease-free and overall survival, while enhancing physical functioning and quality of life. This has profound implications for cancer care — and for our health system. First, it's time to redefine 'treatment.' Cancer care has long focused on surgery, chemotherapy, and radiation. But what happens after treatment is often an afterthought. Survivors may be left with side effects, fatigue, and fear of recurrence, and limited resources to support them. The Challenge trial flips that paradigm: recovery isn't passive. Exercise is not a 'nice to have' — it is a powerful, life-prolonging intervention. Second, access to structured exercise programs are not currently a standard-of-care for cancer survivors in Canada. That must change. These programs require relatively modest investment compared to the high costs of systemic therapies — yet they deliver survival benefits on par with expensive drugs. And unlike drugs, exercise can also reduce cardiovascular risk, improve mental health, and enhance overall quality of life. Third, this is a Canadian success story. The Challenge trial was conceived, led, and executed by Canadian investigators. The Canadian Cancer Society, together with global partners, funded this 15-year effort — a testament to the power of sustained investment in publicly funded clinical research. At a time when Canada's health research ecosystem faces financial strain, the success of Challenge highlights what's possible when we back bold ideas with the resources they deserve. Finally, the findings call on all of us — policymakers, cancer agencies and clinicians — to act. We must embed exercise into survivorship care across the country and simply telling people to exercise is not enough. This will require funding to support exercise professionals in cancer centres and the community, build incentives for survivor-focused programming, and eliminate structural barriers to participation. Survivorship care is not optional — it's essential. Of course, exercise is not a cure-all. Some patients may be unable to participate due to comorbidities or limitations. But for the majority, supervised aerobic activity like walking or cycling can and should be part of the care plan. Importantly, the Challenge program was designed to be adaptable and accessible — guided by behavioural science, delivered by trained consultants, and tailored to each patient's fitness level. We should applaud the Challenge investigators, the Canadian Cancer Trials Group, and the hundreds of patients who participated in this transformative trial. Their commitment will change how we support people after cancer — not just in Canada, but around the world. Now, it's our turn to rise to the challenge. Dr. Sharlene Gill is a medical oncologist at B.C. Cancer, professor of medicine at the University of B.C., and chair of the GI Disease Site for the Canadian Cancer Trials Group.
Global News
9 hours ago
- Global News
Cost of living has half of Canadian pet owners skipping vet visits: survey
Half of Canadian pet owners are skipping visits to the veterinarian's office because of financial concerns, a new survey shows. According to a survey conducted by PetSmart Charities of Canada and Gallup, half (50 per cent) of Canadian pet parents have either skipped or declined necessary veterinary care for their pets. Financial pressure was the leading cause of people skipping the vet's office, the survey of 2,033 dog and cat owners from the 10 provinces in Canada found. Of those who said they were declining or skipping those visits, 67 per cent said they did so because it was not affordable, they did not believe the services were worth the cost or a combination of both. 0:59 Global Okanagan Adopt A Pet: Diesel The rate of pet parents skipping the vet was higher among younger Canadians (59 per cent). Story continues below advertisement Even higher-income Canadians were facing financial pressures in dealing with pet care, with 27 per cent of pet owners who make more than $90,000 a year saying they have skipped vet visits. Get daily National news Get the day's top news, political, economic, and current affairs headlines, delivered to your inbox once a day. Sign up for daily National newsletter Sign Up By providing your email address, you have read and agree to Global News' Terms and Conditions and Privacy Policy Of the Canadians who declined pet care, 21 per cent said their veterinarian offered them a payment plan and 66 per cent said an interest-free plan could double what they are able to spend on life-saving care for their furry friends. Another major reason for Canadians skipping pet care is that their vet is simply too far away. Just under half (46 per cent) of those who travel under 10 kilometres to the veterinarian report skipping or declining care, but that figure rises to 54 per cent for those who travel more than 10 kilometres. 2:48 Global Peterborough's Shelter Pet Project June 6 Nearly one in five (18 per cent) pet owners said they rely on non-vets when their pet is sick. This includes consulting the internet, friends or pet professionals, such as trainers and groomers. Story continues below advertisement Four in 10 pet owners said they would be open to services like telemedicine or home visits by vets. 'These data suggest that services like community clinics and telemedicine — where permitted and available — could help make care more accessible, and many pet parents would use them if they could. But awareness and regulation of these services still vary across regions, pointing to opportunities for expanded infrastructure and support,' said Julie Ray, Gallup's managing editor for world news. A recent Ipsos poll showed that inflation and cost of living was the top issue for Canadians. That issue was considered the top domestic news story in Canada by 71 per cent of Canadians, according to the polling conducted exclusively for Global News on what people considered the biggest stories of this year. 4:44 Adopt a Pet: New Hope Dog Rescue fostering dogs for wildfire evacuees Results for the PetSmart Charities of Canada-Gallup State of Pet Care study are based on a combined web- and phone-based survey conducted with 2,033 dog and cat owners from the 10 provinces in Canada. Gallup surveyed 1,804 Canadian adults who indicated they currently owned at least one dog or cat via a web-based survey Nov. 28-Dec. 31, 2024. Gallup also surveyed an additional 229 dog and cat owners via a telephone survey Dec. 5-23, 2024, to reach pet owners who may not have access to the internet. For results based on the total sample of 2,033 Canadian dog and cat owners, the margin of sampling error is ±2.3 percentage points at the 95 per cent confidence level. Margins of error for subgroups are larger.
10 hours ago
This U.S. doctor is making the move to B.C. — here's why
For one Canadian-born doctor, who has been practicing family medicine in Colorado for the last six years, his next career move is a sort of homecoming. It's been kind of a long-time dream of mine to come back to Canada, said Muthanna Yacoub. For me it's hockey and being in the hills that are basically my antidepressant. The province has been working to make it easier for U.S.-trained doctors and nurses to have their credentials recognized in B.C., a process the Ministry of Health says now takes days instead of months. After speaking to a few physician recruiters at a conference in Vancouver, Yacoub almost signed on with a clinic in Ontario, where he was born and spent part of his childhood. But it was the natural beauty of B.C. that enticed him, his wife and their dog, Hudson. WATCH | B.C. fast tracks process for U.S. health care workers: Début du widget Widget. Passer le widget ? Fin du widget Widget. Retourner au début du widget ? B.C. fast-tracks process for U.S. nurses to get registered in province Premier David Eby is touting the province's work recruiting U.S.-trained doctors and nurses to B.C., in an effort to address the health-care worker shortage. CBC's Katie DeRosa talked to one nurse who is starting the journey to move here. He will join a medical clinic owned by the City of Colwood, near Victoria, this fall. He wants to give back and come back home, said Health Minister Josie Osborne, during a press conference in the clinic on Friday. The clinic is trying to recruit out-of-province or out-of-country doctors to avoid poaching from other parts of B.C. Demoralized by the U.S. private health care system Yacoub had become increasingly demoralized with the U.S.'s private health care system, where insurance companies often dictate the kind of care a patient receives. Some days it really feels like you're treating the insurance company and not the patient and beckoning to their demands in spite of what's in the patient's best interest, said the 36-year-old. And so you're having to choose between your conscience and just being compliant — and most of us are kind of getting sick of it. WATCH | U.S. doctor making the move to B.C.: Début du widget Widget. Passer le widget ? Fin du widget Widget. Retourner au début du widget ? Canadian-born U.S. physician moves back to B.C., as province attempts to recruit doctors The province is betting big that it can recruit doctors and nurses from the U.S. to fill the gaps in B.C.'s health-care system. Katie DeRosa talks to one family doctor who is making the move from Colorado to Colwood on Vancouver Island. The biggest catalyst though, was the election of U.S. president Donald Trump and the anti-vaccine position of his health secretary, Robert F. Kennedy Jr. Are we going to be able to act ethically and treat patients as we really ought to, following the science? Yacoub asked. Or are we going to have to be forced into compliance? And given the administration's heavy-handed nature, we're really worried that it's going to be the latter. The B.C. government is capitalizing on that sentiment, with a $5 million ad campaign targeting health care workers in Washington State, Oregon and California. WATCH | Ad from B.C. government targets U.S. health care workers Début du widget Widget. Passer le widget ? Fin du widget Widget. Retourner au début du widget ? The Colwood clinic's co-medical director, Jesse Pewarchuk, is optimistic B.C.'s strategy to recruit U.S. doctors and nurses will bear fruit. This is the first of what we hope will be many recruits, said Pewarchuk, who also runs Aroga Lifestyle Medicine Clinic in nearby View Royal. The province's strategy to recruit out of Washington, Oregon and California — and I would put forward they should also be looking at Colorado — is really a stroke of genius. Pewarchuk said B.C. simply cannot train enough doctors and nurses to keep up with the growing demand of our aging and growing population. The number of health care practitioners in the U.S. dwarfs Canada. So it is a very rich ground to recruit from. For Yacoub, who has dual Canadian and U.S. citizenship, the process of moving to Canada is straight forward. However, American-born doctors would have to navigate Canada's immigration system, adding another possible roadblock. This year, the federal government slashed the number of skilled workers B.C. can bring in through the provincial nominee program, from 8,000 to 4,000. Osborne says that's an issue the province has raised with Ottawa. It has been a challenge that the provincial nominee program — the only way that British Columbia has any control over who is able to come in and work in our province — has had a decrease in its capacity. The province plans to reserve a quarter of those spaces for health care workers. As for questions about a pay gap between Canada and the U.S., Yacoub says the salary being offered by the Colwood Clinic is comparable to what he was making in Colorado. He says the pension was also a major draw. But the final decision came down to values and quality of life. I think one of the strongest things actually kind of pulled us to the area was the people. Katie DeRosa (new window) · CBC News
