
Can you pass the new Army fitness test?
The U.S. Army requires that all active-duty soldiers prove their physical prowess by passing a rigorous fitness test. There have been multiple versions of the test over the years, and the Army recently announced that a new version has been adopted.
On June 1, 2025, the military branch will roll out its new Army Fitness Test (AFT) as a replacement for the current Army Combat Fitness Test (ACFT).
The new test, based on '18 months of data analysis and feedback from thousands of test iterations,' will introduce updated scoring standards that emphasize 'readiness and combat effectiveness,' according to an Army press release.
Soldiers will have until Jan. 1, 2026, to meet the new AFT requirements without facing 'adverse actions.'
AFT scores are recorded during basic training for soldiers and initial training for officers, the Army states on its website.
Active-duty soldiers are required to complete the test twice a year, while soldiers in the Army Reserve and Army National Guard must record scores once a year.
'The AFT is designed to improve soldier readiness and ensure physical standards [and] prepare soldiers for the demands of modern warfare,' said Sgt. Maj Christopher Mullinax, senior enlisted leader, deputy chief of staff for Operations, Army Headquarters, in the release.
6 On June 1, 2025, the military branch will roll out its new Army Fitness Test (AFT) as a replacement for the current Army Combat Fitness Test (ACFT).
WavebreakmediaMicro – stock.adobe.com
'It emphasizes holistic fitness over event-specific training and is grounded in performance.'
Scoring requirements are more demanding for the new test, with soldiers in combat roles held to the highest standards.
'Combat standards are sex-neutral for the 21 direct combat roles, a change designed to ensure fairness and operational readiness,' the release states.
5 components of the test
The AFT consists of the following five events, as described on the Army's website.
6 Active-duty soldiers are required to complete the test twice a year, while soldiers in the Army Reserve and Army National Guard must record scores once a year.
WavebreakMediaMicro – stock.adobe.com
1. Three-repetition maximum deadlift
In this challenge, the soldier must lift the maximum weight possible three times using a 60-pound hex bar and plates.
This move assesses muscular strength, balance, and flexibility.
'Deadlifts require a person to recruit glute and hamstring strength in order to lift a barbell off the ground to waist height,' said Miles Hill, a certified personal trainer and boxing instructor at Rumble in New York City. 'It is the most effective technique for picking heavy weights off the ground.'
The deadlift can also be dangerous for civilians if they use improper form, warned Dr. Hooman Melamed, an orthopedic spine surgeon and sports medicine expert from Beverly Hills.
'If your posture or form is off, the risk to your lower back and hips is high — it could be a career-ending injury for some,' he told Fox News Digital.
2. Hand-release push-up
The soldier must complete as many hand-release push-ups as possible in two minutes, using proper technique.
'Hand release push-ups require a person to drop all the way to the ground, lift their hands in the air for a second, and then push themselves back up to high plank,' said Hill, who is also a second-degree black belt in Taekwondo.
Melamed noted that while hand-release push-ups are great for building upper body strength, if the person is not already strong, the sudden force can damage the shoulders.
The hand-release push-up tests muscular endurance and flexibility.
3. Sprint-drag-carry
With the sprint-drag-carry (SDC), the soldier is tasked with completing five 50-meter shuttles (sprint, drag, lateral, carry, sprint) as quickly as possible, using two 40-pound kettlebells and a 90-pound sled.
6 The new test will introduce updated scoring standards that emphasize 'readiness and combat effectiveness,' according to an Army press release.
WavebreakMediaMicro – stock.adobe.com
'The sprint-drag-carry is probably the toughest sequence here, since it requires explosive strength, muscular endurance, and cardiovascular endurance,' Hill said.
Melamed calls the SDC a 'brutal test of speed and explosive power.'
'If you're not conditioned, tearing a hamstring or pulling something mid-run can happen,' he said.
4. Plank
The soldier must maintain a proper plank position for as long as possible, testing muscular endurance and balance.
6 Soldiers will have until Jan. 1, 2026, to meet the new AFT requirements without facing 'adverse actions.'
LIGHTFIELD STUDIOS – stock.adobe.com
'A plank is an ultimate test of core strength and endurance, as it requires a person to hold their body weight for as long as they can,' said Hill. 'It can be challenging, but it is the time requirement that determines the challenge.'
Melamed noted that while this move looks simple, holding a proper plank for time is extremely challenging. 'It exposes weaknesses in the back, core, and shoulder girdle.'
5. Two-mile run
The soldier must complete a timed two-mile run on a flat outdoor course in a test of aerobic endurance.
'Two-mile runs are relatively easy for any able-bodied human; however, the time constraints are what make it challenging,' Hill said.
The standing power throw event, which was part of the previous version of the test, is no longer included as a requirement.
'We eliminated the standing power throw because it wasn't effectively promoting fitness and readiness as well as we would like,' Mullinax said.
'Furthermore, it presented an elevated risk of overuse injury and encouraged soldiers to focus on technique rather than demonstrating true power.'
How tough is it?
The toughness of a workout or fitness test is relative to the overall fitness of an individual, according to Dr. Jason Perry, M.D., primary care sports medicine physician with Baptist Health Orthopedic Care in Deerfield Beach, Florida.
'Generally speaking, the AFT is challenging, but not impossible for the average person with a basic fitness foundation,' Perry, who is unaffiliated with the Army, told Fox News Digital.
'It's designed to test full-body strength, muscular endurance, speed, agility, and cardiovascular stamina — all elements essential for combat readiness, but also relevant to functional fitness for civilians.'
Compared to a typical gym workout, the AFT is more demanding because it combines different physical domains into one test, he said.
'Compared to elite athletic training, it's moderate—but not easy,' Perry added.
For civilians who regularly strength train, run, or do functional workouts (like CrossFit or HIIT), this test is well within reach, he said.
6 AFT scores are recorded during basic training for soldiers and initial training for officers, the Army states on its website.
DZiegler – stock.adobe.com
For a civilian who exercises three to four times a week, the AFT is 'realistically achievable' with focused training over an eight- to 12-week period.
'About 30 to 50% of healthy, recreationally active adults could likely pass it with little to moderate training,' he predicted. 'Sedentary adults or those with chronic conditions would have a harder time and would likely need a focused eight-to-12-week (or possibly longer) conditioning plan to pass.'
Melamed wasn't quite as optimistic, estimating that less than 5% of civilians could pass the AFT.
'These aren't weekend-warrior workouts — this is military-level conditioning,' he told Fox News Digital. 'You have to work your way up to this level of intensity training.'
6 For a civilian who exercises three to four times a week, the AFT is 'realistically achievable' with focused training over an eight- to 12-week period, according to reports.
vectorfusionart – stock.adobe.com
The expert also noted that there is a mental component to the test, but said mindset alone isn't enough.
'If you try this unprepared, you could get seriously hurt,' he cautioned. 'It's doable — but only with smart, progressive training. You have to work up to it gradually.'
'And this test is as much about strategy and recovery as it is about raw strength.'
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Medscape
3 days ago
- Medscape
Weight Loss Before Military Training May Cut Injury Risk
TOPLINE: Army recruits who lost excess weight to enter military training experienced fewer musculoskeletal injuries (MSKIs), particularly in the lower extremities, during basic combat training than those who did not lose weight to join the service. METHODOLOGY: The nation's obesity epidemic means that fewer individuals meet the US Army's weight and body-fat standards for entering basic combat training. Only 29% of 17- to 24-year-olds in the country would have qualified to join the military in 2018, with overweight and obesity among the leading disqualifying factors. Researchers analyzed data from 3168 Army trainees (mean age, 20.96 years; 62.34% men; mean maximum-ever BMI, 26.71) to examine the association between weight loss before enlistment and rates of MSKI during basic combat training. Trainees completed a baseline questionnaire that asked whether the person lost weight to enter the Army and included follow-up questions about the amount of weight lost, duration of weight loss, methods used, and prior physical activity. MSKIs were classified as any injury to the musculoskeletal system and further categorized by body region (lower extremities, upper extremities, spine/back, and other areas, including the torso and head/neck). Researchers identified MSKIs from medical records collected throughout basic combat training and for up to 6 weeks afterward to capture injuries that occurred during training but were documented only after its completion. TAKEAWAY: Overall, 829 trainees (26.16%) reported losing weight to enter the Army, and they tended to have higher mean maximum-ever BMI, body-fat percentage, and lean mass compared with those who did not lose weight to join the service. The mean weight loss was 9.06 kg at a rate of 1.27 kg/wk among the 723 trainees with complete data. The most commonly reported weight-loss methods were exercising more (83.72%), changing diet (61.04%), skipping meals (39.32%), and sweating using a sauna or rubber suit (25.57%). Trainees who lost weight to join the service had a lower risk of any MSKI (hazard ratio [HR], 0.86) and lower extremity MSKIs (HR, 0.84) during training than those who did not lose weight to enter the Army. No difference was found between the two groups in the risk of upper extremity, spine/back, or other MSKIs. Among trainees who lost weight to join the Army, the amount of time it took to lose weight was not associated with the risk for any MSKI or region-specific MSKIs. IN PRACTICE: "The findings highlight that losing excess weight before entering military training may reduce MSKI risk for incoming recruits, enforcing the benefits of healthy weight loss programs," the authors wrote. SOURCE: The study, led by Vy T. Nguyen, MS, DSc, Military Performance Division, US Army Research Institute of Environmental Medicine, Natick, Massachusetts, was published online in Obesity. LIMITATIONS: The study did not assess whether the association between weight loss and the rate of MSKIs persisted over long-term military service. How the two most frequently reported weight loss methods — increased exercise and dietary changes — may have influenced the observed association remains unclear. Medical records may not have captured all MSKIs if trainees did not seek medical care due to concerns about graduating on time or being placed on limited duty. DISCLOSURES: The study was supported by the US Army Medical Research and Development Command's Military Operational Medicine Program. Two authors received support from the funder. This article was created using several editorial tools, including AI, as part of the process. Human editors reviewed this content before publication.


USA Today
05-08-2025
- USA Today
Are you hot, fit and tan? Get ready for liberals to label you a MAGA fanatic.
Since President Donald Trump's return to the White House, I've noticed a steady stream of rhetoric that attempts to make health and fitness partisan. It's the heart of summer, and the days are long and toasty. Beaches on the coasts (or Lake Michigan, closer to where I live) are packed and clothing is minimal. Some people look good showing extra skin. Most of them don't. The reality is that more than 70% of Americans are overweight or obese, and the trend has been moving rapidly in the wrong direction, leading to a plethora of preventable health problems and costs associated with them. It's concerning, and the effort to combat obesity should be something we can all agree on. Sadly, it's not. Since President Donald Trump's return to the White House, I've noticed a steady stream of rhetoric that attempts to make health and fitness partisan. If you're fit and enjoy working out (or even sport a tan), chances are there's a progressive who will eye you with suspicion of being MAGA. Sydney Sweeney's jeans ad triggers liberals. She looks good. They don't. | Opinion It's an extreme example of the 'if-Trump-is-for-it, we-must-be-adamantly-against-it' mentality that has infected the left. To borrow a phrase from former Democratic vice presidential contender Tim Walz, it's weird. Trump wants kids to be more fit. Why is that a negative? Trump brought physical fitness into the limelight on July 31 by signing an executive order reestablishing the Presidential Fitness Test for America's public school students. The test had been around for decades until the 2012-13 school year, when President Barack Obama replaced it. The order states: 'We must address the threat to the vitality and longevity of our country that is posed by America's declining health and physical fitness. For far too long, the physical and mental health of the American people has been neglected.' The rise in obesity and the decline in health is especially disheartening when it comes to the country's kids. According to a Centers for Disease Control and Prevention 2024 report, about 20% of children are obese (2 in 5 adults are obese). That's a sharp increase from when childhood obesity rates were 5% in the 1970s. Not only is this a national health concern, it's a national security one, as Trump acknowledges in his executive order. The CDC report found that only 2 in 5 young adults are weight-eligible and active enough to serve in the military. 'The military has experienced increasing difficulty in recruiting soldiers as a result of physical inactivity, obesity, and malnutrition among our nation's youth,' retired Army Lt. Gen. Mark Hertling said in the report. Yet, Trump's commonsense approach to boost fitness was met with consternation among media progressives. 'Trump is reviving an outdated and problematic practice for American schoolkids,' proclaimed MSNBC. 'Generations of Americans who struggled to complete a pull-up in front of their classmates winced as President Trump announced that he was reinstating the annual assessment,' The New York Times opined. Opinion: Trump is racking up GOP wins no one else could. What do Never Trumpers say now? Doing Pilates does not make you an authoritarian. Nor does having a tan. Leftists also have thoughts about fitness for adults and what it says about conservatism. Earlier this year, fitness influencer MaryBeth Monaco-Vavrik posted a video that went viral connecting the 'popularization of Pilates & running instead of strength training … and the rise of extreme American authoritarianism.' She also equated conservatism with 'smaller bodies.' Leno's right: Colbert got canned because Americans are tired of left's lectures | Opinion Men, on the other hand, must avoid looking too manly and the trap of toxic masculinity and the "manosphere," which liberals tell us have flourished under Trump. For instance, actor Sacha Baron Cohen's appearance on the August cover of Men's Fitness UK sparked criticism over his newly chiseled body. One headline said his physique 'is repellent to most women.' (It must be because I'm a conservative woman, but I found Baron Cohen's new look the opposite of repellent.) In 2024, a columnist in The Guardian warned, 'There is a dark side to wellness, which I always, for shorthand, thought of as political: getting fit makes you more rightwing.' And now, enjoying sunshine and getting a tan could mark you as a MAGA fanatic. After all, Trump and his health secretary, Robert F. Kennedy Jr., sport a perennial bronze shade. As The Atlantic recently observed: 'Tanning is back. Only this time, it's not just about looking good − it's about embracing an entire ideology.' I'd wager the vast majority of people who are fit and spend time outdoors do so because they know it's beneficial for their health and simply enjoy it. It has nothing to do with Trump or how they vote. Progressives trying to demonize fitness to "get back" at Trump are hurting themselves − and the next generations of Americans. Ingrid Jacques is a columnist at USA TODAY. Contact her at ijacques@ or on X: @Ingrid_Jacques


Washington Post
04-08-2025
- Washington Post
A Mississippi monkey sanctuary helps veterans with PTSD find peace
PERKINSTON, Miss. — In the embrace of a cheerfully chittering spider monkey named Louie, an Army veteran who grappled for decades with post-traumatic stress disorder says he finally feels at peace. 'Being out here has brought a lot of faith back to me,' said John Richard. 'There's no feeling like it.'