
Can you pass the new Army fitness test?
'Army Strong' is more than just a tagline — for soldiers, it's a requirement for duty.
The U.S. Army requires that all active-duty soldiers prove their physical prowess by passing a rigorous fitness test. There have been multiple versions of the test over the years, and the Army recently announced that a new version has been adopted.
On June 1, 2025, the military branch will roll out its new Army Fitness Test (AFT) as a replacement for the current Army Combat Fitness Test (ACFT).
The new test, based on '18 months of data analysis and feedback from thousands of test iterations,' will introduce updated scoring standards that emphasize 'readiness and combat effectiveness,' according to an Army press release.
Soldiers will have until Jan. 1, 2026, to meet the new AFT requirements without facing 'adverse actions.'
AFT scores are recorded during basic training for soldiers and initial training for officers, the Army states on its website.
Active-duty soldiers are required to complete the test twice a year, while soldiers in the Army Reserve and Army National Guard must record scores once a year.
'The AFT is designed to improve soldier readiness and ensure physical standards [and] prepare soldiers for the demands of modern warfare,' said Sgt. Maj Christopher Mullinax, senior enlisted leader, deputy chief of staff for Operations, Army Headquarters, in the release.
6 On June 1, 2025, the military branch will roll out its new Army Fitness Test (AFT) as a replacement for the current Army Combat Fitness Test (ACFT).
WavebreakmediaMicro – stock.adobe.com
'It emphasizes holistic fitness over event-specific training and is grounded in performance.'
Scoring requirements are more demanding for the new test, with soldiers in combat roles held to the highest standards.
'Combat standards are sex-neutral for the 21 direct combat roles, a change designed to ensure fairness and operational readiness,' the release states.
5 components of the test
The AFT consists of the following five events, as described on the Army's website.
6 Active-duty soldiers are required to complete the test twice a year, while soldiers in the Army Reserve and Army National Guard must record scores once a year.
WavebreakMediaMicro – stock.adobe.com
1. Three-repetition maximum deadlift
In this challenge, the soldier must lift the maximum weight possible three times using a 60-pound hex bar and plates.
This move assesses muscular strength, balance, and flexibility.
'Deadlifts require a person to recruit glute and hamstring strength in order to lift a barbell off the ground to waist height,' said Miles Hill, a certified personal trainer and boxing instructor at Rumble in New York City. 'It is the most effective technique for picking heavy weights off the ground.'
The deadlift can also be dangerous for civilians if they use improper form, warned Dr. Hooman Melamed, an orthopedic spine surgeon and sports medicine expert from Beverly Hills.
'If your posture or form is off, the risk to your lower back and hips is high — it could be a career-ending injury for some,' he told Fox News Digital.
2. Hand-release push-up
The soldier must complete as many hand-release push-ups as possible in two minutes, using proper technique.
'Hand release push-ups require a person to drop all the way to the ground, lift their hands in the air for a second, and then push themselves back up to high plank,' said Hill, who is also a second-degree black belt in Taekwondo.
Melamed noted that while hand-release push-ups are great for building upper body strength, if the person is not already strong, the sudden force can damage the shoulders.
The hand-release push-up tests muscular endurance and flexibility.
3. Sprint-drag-carry
With the sprint-drag-carry (SDC), the soldier is tasked with completing five 50-meter shuttles (sprint, drag, lateral, carry, sprint) as quickly as possible, using two 40-pound kettlebells and a 90-pound sled.
6 The new test will introduce updated scoring standards that emphasize 'readiness and combat effectiveness,' according to an Army press release.
WavebreakMediaMicro – stock.adobe.com
'The sprint-drag-carry is probably the toughest sequence here, since it requires explosive strength, muscular endurance, and cardiovascular endurance,' Hill said.
Melamed calls the SDC a 'brutal test of speed and explosive power.'
'If you're not conditioned, tearing a hamstring or pulling something mid-run can happen,' he said.
4. Plank
The soldier must maintain a proper plank position for as long as possible, testing muscular endurance and balance.
6 Soldiers will have until Jan. 1, 2026, to meet the new AFT requirements without facing 'adverse actions.'
LIGHTFIELD STUDIOS – stock.adobe.com
'A plank is an ultimate test of core strength and endurance, as it requires a person to hold their body weight for as long as they can,' said Hill. 'It can be challenging, but it is the time requirement that determines the challenge.'
Melamed noted that while this move looks simple, holding a proper plank for time is extremely challenging. 'It exposes weaknesses in the back, core, and shoulder girdle.'
5. Two-mile run
The soldier must complete a timed two-mile run on a flat outdoor course in a test of aerobic endurance.
'Two-mile runs are relatively easy for any able-bodied human; however, the time constraints are what make it challenging,' Hill said.
The standing power throw event, which was part of the previous version of the test, is no longer included as a requirement.
'We eliminated the standing power throw because it wasn't effectively promoting fitness and readiness as well as we would like,' Mullinax said.
'Furthermore, it presented an elevated risk of overuse injury and encouraged soldiers to focus on technique rather than demonstrating true power.'
How tough is it?
The toughness of a workout or fitness test is relative to the overall fitness of an individual, according to Dr. Jason Perry, M.D., primary care sports medicine physician with Baptist Health Orthopedic Care in Deerfield Beach, Florida.
'Generally speaking, the AFT is challenging, but not impossible for the average person with a basic fitness foundation,' Perry, who is unaffiliated with the Army, told Fox News Digital.
'It's designed to test full-body strength, muscular endurance, speed, agility, and cardiovascular stamina — all elements essential for combat readiness, but also relevant to functional fitness for civilians.'
Compared to a typical gym workout, the AFT is more demanding because it combines different physical domains into one test, he said.
'Compared to elite athletic training, it's moderate—but not easy,' Perry added.
For civilians who regularly strength train, run, or do functional workouts (like CrossFit or HIIT), this test is well within reach, he said.
6 AFT scores are recorded during basic training for soldiers and initial training for officers, the Army states on its website.
DZiegler – stock.adobe.com
For a civilian who exercises three to four times a week, the AFT is 'realistically achievable' with focused training over an eight- to 12-week period.
'About 30 to 50% of healthy, recreationally active adults could likely pass it with little to moderate training,' he predicted. 'Sedentary adults or those with chronic conditions would have a harder time and would likely need a focused eight-to-12-week (or possibly longer) conditioning plan to pass.'
Melamed wasn't quite as optimistic, estimating that less than 5% of civilians could pass the AFT.
'These aren't weekend-warrior workouts — this is military-level conditioning,' he told Fox News Digital. 'You have to work your way up to this level of intensity training.'
6 For a civilian who exercises three to four times a week, the AFT is 'realistically achievable' with focused training over an eight- to 12-week period, according to reports.
vectorfusionart – stock.adobe.com
The expert also noted that there is a mental component to the test, but said mindset alone isn't enough.
'If you try this unprepared, you could get seriously hurt,' he cautioned. 'It's doable — but only with smart, progressive training. You have to work up to it gradually.'
'And this test is as much about strategy and recovery as it is about raw strength.'
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
16 hours ago
- Yahoo
Cancer Risk at Air Force Missiles Sites Low 'But Not Zero,' Latest Service Data Shows
Airmen who watched over America's nuclear intercontinental ballistic missiles in Cold War-era facilities faced marginally higher risk of cancer due to contaminants found there and more workplace oversight is needed, according to the latest findings of an Air Force health study. Air Force Global Strike Command, during a town hall event Wednesday, released the latest data showing the slightly elevated cancer risk as part of its ongoing probe into health concerns for America's missileers, maintainers and other support roles at several bases in the Midwest and Western U.S. The lifetime cancer risk for all Americans is around 39%, and the Air Force's Health Risk Assessment found rates of 39.9% to 40.13% for men and women if they would have served anywhere from eight to 70 years in those jobs. Service officials said consistent workplace inspections and monitoring would likely be necessary to address the risks, which are caused by the presence of chemicals and toxins. Read Next: Army Faces Backlash over Plan to Divert Barracks Funds to Border Mission Contaminants linked to cancer were found during a series of environmental studies at F.E. Warren Air Force Base in Wyoming, Malmstrom Air Force Base in Montana, and Minot Air Force Base in North Dakota. "In summary, this health risk assessment characterizes the health risk as low but not zero," Col. Ric Speakman, the commander of the U.S. Air Force School of Aerospace Medicine, said during the town hall presentation. "Therefore, the appropriate action is to include missile alert facility workers in an occupational surveillance." Air Force Global Strike Command is still in the process of an ongoing epidemiological study and is gathering more data from states as well as national cancer registries before more definitive cancer and health conclusions can be made. Last year, reported in an investigative series that past probes by the Air Force into cancer concerns roughly two decades ago went ignored, and past and current missileers and nuclear missile maintainers raised alarms about the environmental conditions, toxins and chemical dangers they faced while in uniform. They believe the conditions made them sick. In the wake of reporting, the service announced changes that included new workplace inspections and health record tracking, and the spouse of a missileer who died from non-Hodgkin lymphoma was able to secure Department of Veterans Affairs benefits related to his death. While polychlorinated biphenyls, or PCBs, were one of the known outlawed carcinogenes that the Air Force's remediation efforts focused on, research shown during Wednesday's town hall showed there were other toxins detected as well that were factored into the service's health risk assessment. "Although only PCBs were detected at levels above the Environmental Protection Agency's standards for cleanup and remediation, the environmental sampling was sensitive enough to detect chemicals such as benzene and chloroform at levels well below standards for remediation," a Thursday news release from Air Force Global Strike Command following the town hall said. The Torchlight Initiative, a grassroots organization that began shortly after a Space Force officer and former Air Force missileer raised concerns about non-Hodgkin lymphoma rates at Malmstrom, released its own independent study in April examining the rates of blood cancer reported in its online health registry. That study found that service members were diagnosed at younger ages compared to the wider population. Air Force Global Strike Command officials briefly mentioned that study at the town hall, stating that, "while this study is separate from the missile community cancer study, it does add to the work advocacy and the well-being of the missile community." Representatives from the Torchlight Initiative were on Capitol Hill in early April alongside other advocacy groups, and made a plea to lawmakers in hopes of expanding the PACT Act -- a 2022 law that mostly covered veterans sickened by toxic exposure in war zones -- to cover those who experienced health issues stateside as well. "The Torchlight Initiative is happy to hear that Global Strike and U.S. Air Force School of Aerospace Medicine are still working on their long-term study and research," the organization said in a statement to on Thursday. "However, our focus and energy remains with the families who are disproportionately affected by these cancers and illnesses." The remaining data in the ongoing health study is slated to be released in late 2025. Gen. Thomas Bussiere, the head of Air Force Global Strike Command, said during the town hall he would advocate for a registry, if the VA also supported such a move, based on the study's findings. "The level of interest and oversight with the Department of the Air Force and Congress has not waned, and I'm very thankful and happy with the interest and actions on the part of the VA," Bussiere said in a news release after the town hall. "They've been great partners, and I anticipate they will continue to be great partners." Related: Independent Study Raises Alarm About Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma at Malmstrom Air Force Base
Yahoo
20 hours ago
- Yahoo
Can you hold a plank longer than others your age? Fox hosts test their core strength
How long can you hold a plank — and how does it stack up to others in your age group? That's the question that was posed on "Fox & Friends" Thursday morning, when co-hosts Brian Kilmeade and Lawrence Jones competed in a plank challenge. A plank is an isometric move where the person holds a push-up position for a set period of time. Army Unveils New Fitness Test With Tougher Standards — Could You Pass It? Both held a low plank for well over a minute, exceeding the thresholds for their ages, although Kilmeade held his for a few seconds longer. A fitness expert at Lifetime in New York City provided the below targets for how long you should be able to hold a plank by age. Read On The Fox News App 20s: 1 to 2 minutes 30s: 1 to 2 minutes 40s: 1 minute or longer 50s: 30 to 60 seconds 60s and above: 20 to 30 seconds Planks are often touted as an abdominal exercise, serving as an alternative to traditional sit-ups and crunches, which can strain the back and neck. However, the isometric move benefits the body in many other ways beyond just sculpting a six-pack. In addition to working the abdominals, planks also strengthen the muscles in the arms, legs, chest and back, according to Healthline. They can also help improve posture while sitting or standing and can boost flexibility by stretching the lower half of the body, the above source stated. While Kilmeade and Jones both held low planks, some may opt for a high plank, which is where the arms are straight and the person balances on the palms of the hands. Click Here To Sign Up For Our Health Newsletter For those who are still working up to holding a full plank, the move can be modified by dropping the knees to the floor. There are also variations of the plank that target different parts of the body. Those include side planks, knee touches (touching alternating knees to the ground), hip dips and leg/arm extensions. For more Health articles, visit If you've just started planking, experts recommend starting with 15 to 30 seconds and gradually increasing the duration, with two minutes generally regarded as a good article source: Can you hold a plank longer than others your age? Fox hosts test their core strength
Yahoo
a day ago
- Yahoo
Navy offers early retirement to more sailors with gender dysphoria
The Navy is offering more sailors with gender dysphoria the opportunity to take early retirement, according to a notice from the service released this week. Under the new rule, sailors with as few as 15 years on active duty can now apply for early retirement. The cash and benefits of a formal military retirement package, which troops must usually serve 20 years to earn, are significantly more generous than those offered to those who separate earlier in their careers. Announced Wednesday in a NAVADMIN message, the 15-year rule matches similar policies in the Air Force and Army for troops facing separation under gender dysphoria rules. The offer is a change from the Navy's March guidance for separating sailors with gender dysphoria, in which the service said that active duty sailors with 18 to 20 years of service who volunteered for separation could be eligible for early retirement. The Wednesday message allows sailors with 15 to 18 years of service to request retirement under an exception to the early retirement policy. The Pentagon has said troops with gender dysphoria who voluntarily separate will be eligible for more separation pay than those who are eventually involuntarily separated. In mid-May, the Pentagon set a deadline of June 6 for service members on active duty and with gender dysphoria to self-identify for voluntary separation. The Navy's new early retirement guidance notes it would be in effect 'until superseded or canceled,' but it was unclear if it would extend past the Pentagon's June 6 deadline. Also unclear was if troops with 15 to 18 years who have already agreed to separate could now apply for the exemption. Virtually all service members are eligible to retire from the military after 20 years of active duty service or equivalent careers in the guard or reserve. However, the military has previously offered earlier retirements under a process called Temporary Early Retirement Authority, or TERA. For instance, from 1993 to 2001, troops with 15 to 20 years could apply for TERA. That temporary policy ended in September 2002. In previous versions of TERA, service members granted early retirement received full retirement packages, including healthcare benefits, but collected a lower monthly retirement pay. The new Navy guidance appears to match the approach taken by both the Army and Air Force. A May 23 Air Force memo lays out guidance on voluntary separation, which allows airmen with 18 to 20 years of service to request early retirement and also notes an exception process for those with 15 to 18 years of service. An Army spokesperson told Task & Purpose that Inquiries sent to the Marine Corps and Army about early retirement policies were not immediately returned. The Pentagon estimates that there are more than 4,200 service members with gender dysphoria. Around 1,000 have self-identified, a defense department official told reporters May 15. Troops who do not leave voluntarily, officials have said, could be involuntarily separated from their military branch through information on their annual health assessment that identifies a previous or current diagnosis of gender dysphoria. Officials have also said commanders will be able to use their 'discernment and judgment in how to interpret and apply the guidance.' The Pentagon has said that troops who agree to voluntary separation, and who are not eligible to retire, will be eligible for twice the amount of separation pay as those who are involuntarily separated. For example, an E-5 with 10 years of service who is forced to separate would get a payment of just under $51,000 compared to $101,000 for voluntarily separating. An O-3 with seven years of service would receive a one-time payment of close to $62,000 if involuntarily removed from the military, versus roughly $125,000 if they leave voluntarily. Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth has trumpeted the policy as a ban and removal of trans service members throughout the military services. 'Trans is out at the DOD,' Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth said in a public message on X. The Pentagon's guidance centers around troops with gender dysphoria, a medical diagnosis developed by the American Psychiatric Association. Not all transgender people exhibit or have diagnoses of gender dysphoria, according to the APA. Navy SEAL Team 6 operator will be the military's new top enlisted leader Veterans receiving disability payments might have been underpaid, IG finds Guam barracks conditions are 'baffling,' Navy admiral says in email Navy fires admiral in charge of unmanned systems office after investigation The Pentagon wants troops to change duty stations less often