TikTok given permission to challenge €530m fine over data transfers to China
The fine was imposed on the video-sharing site
in May
, for what the DPC described as an infringement on data protection regarding its transfers of European users' data to The People's Republic of China via remote access to data stored in the US and Singapore by personnel based in China.
In addition to the €530 million fine, the censure also included an order suspending TikTok's transfer of data to China if its processing was not brought into compliance with European directives on transparency within six months.
At the High Court today, Ms Justice Mary Rose Gearty granted permission for TikTok to pursue a legal challenge against the DPC decisions and put a stay on them pending the outcome of the legal review.
The High Court action is being taken by TikTok Technology Limited, with an address at The Sorting Office, Ropemaker Place, Dublin 2, and by TikTok Information Technologies UK Limited, Kaleidoscope, Lindsey Street, London, UK, against the DPC, Ireland and the Attorney General.
TikTok Ireland is a private company limited by shares incorporated in the Republic of Ireland and is a wholly-owned subsidiary of TikTok UK.
Both TikTok entities seek the quashing of the decision of the DPC of 30 April 2025.
Lawyers for the applicants appeared in the High Court today on an ex-parte basis, where only one side is represented.
They submitted that the sections of the Data Protection Act under which the DPC made their decision are invalid when viewed in relation to the Constitution, the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR) and the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the EU.
Advertisement
In papers lodged to the High Court, TikTok says that the Ireland and UK arms are 'joint controllers' for the processing of personal data of users based in Europe but add that TikTok UK is 'the entity that will ultimately bear the cost of the administration fines imposed in the decision'.
Ireland and the Attorney General are joined as respondents to the proceedings.
TikTok submits that the imposition of 'administrative' fines of €485M and €45M 'constitutes the imposition of a sanction that in its nature and severity is properly characterised as 'criminal' or penal'.
TikTok contends that 'even if the imposition of the fine did not constitute a sanction of a criminal nature, the DPC was nonetheless not exercising merely limited functions and powers of a judicial nature within the meaning of Article 37.1 of the Constitution'.
Article 37.1 aims to validate the delegation of certain judicial powers to administrative bodies without infringing on the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts in criminal matters.
TikTok claims that the fines 'cannot be said to be of a limited nature'.
TikTok submits that the ECHR provides that 'in the determination of civil rights and obligations or of any criminal charges, an individual is entitled to a fair and public hearing within a reasonable time by an independent and impartial tribunal established by law'.
The applicants further claim that the fine 'constitutes an interference with the applicants' right to private property protected under Article 40.3 or 43, or both, of the Constitution'.
'The decision to impose a fine, the amount of the fine and the absence of a full right of appeal constitutes an unjust, unjustified and disproportionate interference with the applicants' right to private property,' TikTok claims.
Ms Justice Gearty granted leave for the judicial review and adjourned the matter to October.
Readers like you are keeping these stories free for everyone...
A mix of advertising and supporting contributions helps keep paywalls away from valuable information like this article.
Over 5,000 readers like you have already stepped up and support us with a monthly payment or a once-off donation.
Learn More
Support The Journal
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Irish Independent
11 minutes ago
- Irish Independent
Pharma crucial to Ireland, Simon Harris tells US bosses as Taoiseach says tariffs threat already hitting investment
Ireland's position is that it should be addressed in the course of general discussions on tariffs between the EU and USA - and not set aside for later attention. US president Donald Trump has threatened separate sanctions on pharma, which could be very great in light of his stated intention to put a 30pc tariff on European goods in genral. The online meeting was an opportunity for the Tánaiste to hear first-hand the views of the pharmaceutical sector, his officials said. The Zoom call comes at a critical juncture in EU-US trade talks. Mr Harris said it was "a chance to gain key insights." He added: "Ireland is clear that the integrated supply chain in pharma products between the EU and the US supports - rather than threatens - our collective transatlantic economic security. 'Ireland's position is that the treatment of pharma should be within negotiations with the EU on an agreement in principle and we have made this point on both sides of the Atlantic over the recent weeks and months,' Mr Harris said, adding that there is no doubt that pharma "is a crucial sector for our economy'. He repeated his argument that US pharmaceutical companies are here for many reasons rather than tax treatment alone. "They have access to a highly talented, skilled labour market, they have access too to an EU market of over 450 million people,' he said. "The value that the industry places on this access and their bases in Ireland was clear to me from the call." He added: "Ultimately when it comes to pharma, this is about achieving the best outcomes for patients and citizens on both sides of the Atlantic. 'It is because of that that the main focus at this stage must be on avoiding an escalatory higher tariff outcome that will be deeply detrimental to both the EU and the US." It is fair to say that the EU "has shown considerable constraint when it comes to counter tariffs" so far, Mr Harris said. "This h underscores our desire to reach a negotiated settlement that results in mutually beneficial transatlantic trade and investment as soon as possible before August 1,' he said. Tánaiste Simon Harris has told senior pharmaceutical bosses based in the United States that it is "a crucial sector for our economy". Ireland's position is that it should be addressed in the course of general discussions on tariffs between the EU and USA - and not set aside for later attention. US president Donald Trump has threatened separate sanctions on pharma, which could be very great in light of his stated intention to put a 30pc tariff on European goods in genral. The online meeting was an opportunity for the Tánaiste to hear first-hand the views of the pharmaceutical sector, his officials said. The Zoom call comes at a critical juncture in EU-US trade talks. Mr Harris said it was "a chance to gain key insights." He added: "Ireland is clear that the integrated supply chain in pharma products between the EU and the US supports - rather than threatens - our collective transatlantic economic security. 'Ireland's position is that the treatment of pharma should be within negotiations with the EU on an agreement in principle and we have made this point on both sides of the Atlantic over the recent weeks and months,' Mr Harris said, adding that there is no doubt that pharma "is a crucial sector for our economy'. He repeated his argument that US pharmaceutical companies are here for many reasons rather than tax treatment alone. "They have access to a highly talented, skilled labour market, they have access too to an EU market of over 450 million people,' he said. "The value that the industry places on this access and their bases in Ireland was clear to me from the call." He added: "Ultimately when it comes to pharma, this is about achieving the best outcomes for patients and citizens on both sides of the Atlantic. 'It is because of that that the main focus at this stage must be on avoiding an escalatory higher tariff outcome that will be deeply detrimental to both the EU and the US." It is fair to say that the EU "has shown considerable constraint when it comes to counter tariffs" so far, Mr Harris said. "This underscores our desire to reach a negotiated settlement that results in mutually beneficial transatlantic trade and investment as soon as possible before August 1,' he said. Meanwhile, the uncertainty around US tariffs is 'very worrying', Taoiseach Micheál Martin has said, adding that it was also 'problematic' for the budgetary process. Over the weekend, US president Donald Trump threatened 30pc tariffs on EU imports from August 1. On Tuesday, Mr Trump said he would also consider imposing tariffs on pharmaceutical goods and semiconductors as soon as August 1. Speaking to reporters, he added that tariffs on pharma would start low but go 'very high' after a year. 'We're going to start off with a low tariff and give the pharmaceutical companies a year or so to build, and then we're going to make it a very high tariff,' Mr Trump said. In response to the latest announcement from Mr Trump, Mr Martin said the ongoing uncertainty was 'very worrying'. 'A lot of uncertainty has been created by this new policy from the United States. It's very important for economies everywhere, including the United States, to end the uncertainty and to bring clarity,' the Taoiseach said. "We understand America's issues, but these can be resolved through the negotiation, but Europe also has prepared countermeasures to be deployed if necessary, but that would be very damaging to everybody if we get to that situation.' Mr Martin said the uncertainty was already impacting future investment. 'I'm increasingly meeting people now who are commenting on the pause on investment and a lack of investment decisions because of a fundamental lack of uncertainty about the future landscape,' the Taoiseach said. 'That is very worrying. That in itself will trigger lower economic growth across the world. So it is very worrying that this is continuing, this uncertainty, this volatility, is continuing,' he added. On the budget, Mr Martin said it was problematic for preparations, but the processes couldn't be paused in order to wait for clarity. 'We're keeping everything under review, but in the context of this year, we have fair ideas to where revenue will land and where expenditure will land,' he said. 'We can't abolish the budgetary process, we still have to go and prepare the budget, and we have to prepare estimates, and there has to be negotiations and so on. 'And there are very significant downside risks given what's happening and in terms of the tariff threat. 'Potentially, if we've got it resolved it could be an upside, we'll have to wait and see.'
Irish Independent
41 minutes ago
- Irish Independent
Pharma is crucial to the Irish economy, Simon Harris tells US bosses in Zoom call
Ireland's position is that it should be addressed in the course of general discussions on tariffs between the EU and USA - and not set aside for later attention. US president Donald Trump has threatened separate sanctions on pharma, which could be very great in light of his stated intention to put a 30pc tariff on European goods in genral. The online meeting was an opportunity for the Tánaiste to hear first-hand the views of the pharmaceutical sector, his officials said. The Zoom call comes at a critical juncture in EU-US trade talks. Mr Harris said it was "a chance to gain key insights." He added: "Ireland is clear that the integrated supply chain in pharma products between the EU and the US supports - rather than threatens - our collective transatlantic economic security. 'Ireland's position is that the treatment of pharma should be within negotiations with the EU on an agreement in principle and we have made this point on both sides of the Atlantic over the recent weeks and months,' Mr Harris said, adding that there is no doubt that pharma "is a crucial sector for our economy'. He repeated his argument that US pharmaceutical companies are here for many reasons rather than tax treatment alone. "They have access to a highly talented, skilled labour market, they have access too to an EU market of over 450 million people,' he said. "The value that the industry places on this access and their bases in Ireland was clear to me from the call." He added: "Ultimately when it comes to pharma, this is about achieving the best outcomes for patients and citizens on both sides of the Atlantic. 'It is because of that that the main focus at this stage must be on avoiding an escalatory higher tariff outcome that will be deeply detrimental to both the EU and the US." It is fair to say that the EU "has shown considerable constraint when it comes to counter tariffs" so far, Mr Harris said. "This h underscores our desire to reach a negotiated settlement that results in mutually beneficial transatlantic trade and investment as soon as possible before August 1,' he said.
The Irish Sun
2 hours ago
- The Irish Sun
‘It's a fact' – Crystal Palace owner Steve Parish gives major update on Eagles being kicked out of Europa League
CRYSTAL PALACE will appeal Uefa's decision to remove them from the Europa League next season. The Eagles earned a spot in Europe's second tier following their 1-0 FA Cup final victory over Manchester City in May - however last week they were officially banned and relegated to the Conference League. Advertisement 3 Parish says Palace will mount a legal challenge against the decision Credit: Getty 3 Palace fans have protested against Uefa's rulings on Tuesday evening Credit: Getty 3 Their FA Cup victory has been marred by the controversy Credit: PA At the time of the final, now-former Palace co-owner John Textor held stakes in both the south London club and Lyon, who are in the Europa League next season after finishing sixth and Ligue 1 . Eagles fans have already begun Speaking on court for arbitration and, you know, we're very hopeful. We think we've got great legal arguments. 'We don't think this is the right decision by any means. We know unequivocally that John didn't have decisive influence over the club. Advertisement Read more 'We know we proved that beyond all reasonable doubt because it's a fact.' Uefa rules state no owner or co-owner can have a controlling interest in more than one club competing in the same European competition during the same season. Palace dispute that Textor did not have sufficient enough control. As it stands, Palace will be replaced in the Europa League by Nottingham Forest , who finished seventh last term. Forest will be £3.9million better off as a result of the decision. Advertisement Most read in Football Exclusive Exclusive BEST ONLINE CASINOS - TOP SITES IN THE UK Parish continued: 'We feel that there are a lot of very genuine mitigating circumstances and more than enough wriggle room to put us in the competition. 'It does look bad. This is the dream right? This is what keeps football alive. Crystal Palace fans protest against Europa League demotion 'This is why everybody goes, because they think one day they might win a cup and they might qualify for Europe . Advertisement 'These things can be defining moments for a club and completely change the course of history forever. 'Hopefully when we go to CAS we get the right answer. 'We get the written version of (the ruling) with the detail then apparently the appeal is 10 days.' In a statement, Uefa said its Club Financial Control Body confirmed the decision by French financial chiefs had cleared Lyon's path to take up their place in the Europa League. Advertisement The governing body said: 'Consequently, the CFCB pursued the assessment of the documentation submitted by Lyons and 'For this reason the CFCB First Chamber decided: To accept Lyons' admission to the 2025/26 Europa League. 'And to reject Crystal Palace's admission to the 2025/26 Uefa Europa League and to accept Crystal Palace's admission to the 2025/26 Uefa Conference League.'
