
Police investigating ‘migrant boat' on loyalist bonfire in Moygashel as ‘hate incident'
Police said they had received a number of reports regarding the pyre.
"The PSNI has received a number of reports regarding the bonfire in Moygashel and the material that has been placed upon it,' said a spokesperson.
'Police are investigating this hate incident.
'Police are here to help those who are or who feel vulnerable, to keep people safe.
"We do this by working with local communities, partners, elected representatives and other stakeholders to deliver local solutions to local problems, building confidence in policing and supporting a safe environment for people to live, work, visit and invest in Northern Ireland, but we can only do so within the legislative framework that exists.'
It comes after a senior Protestant church leader condemned the effigy as 'racist, threatening and offensive'.
Church of Ireland Archbishop of Armagh John McDowell quoted from the book of Leviticus (19:34) which states 'the stranger who resides with you shall be to you as one of your citizens; you shall love him as yourself, for you were strangers in the land of Egypt' which he described as 'the words from the Law of God to his people'.
'If we compare them with the effigy of a boat of migrants which sits, to our humiliation and lasting shame, on top of a bonfire in Moygashel, it exposes that effigy for what it is – racist, threatening and offensive," the clergyman added.
'It certainly has nothing whatsoever to do with Christianity or with Protestant culture and is in fact inhuman and deeply sub-Christian.
'I hope that the many people from other countries, who live in that area, and who contribute so much to the economy and to the diversity of Dungannon, can be reassured that it does not in any way represent the feeling of the vast majority of their neighbours.'
Speaking on BBC Radio Ulster on Thursday, loyalist activist Jamie Bryson insisted the effigy was an 'act of artistic political protest', arguing it was not illegal, even if 'inevitably controversial'.
'Every year with this bonfire there's two conceptually different things; there's the cultural expression of the bonfire and then there's the act of artistic political protest and this bonfire combines the two concepts together,' he told Good Morning Ulster.
"It's inevitably controversial; there will be questions in respect of taste and that will be up for debate but it's certainly not unlawful and I think a lot of the people who are criticising this are the same people who are defending Kneecap, and we don't need to go through each of Kneecap's controversies.'
Last year there was criticism after a mock-up of a PSNI vehicle was placed on top of the bonfire.
Many have hit out at the latest stunt, branding it 'racist', while the PSNI has said it is 'aware of an item placed on a bonfire at the Moygashel area' and 'enquiries are continuing'.
First Minister Michelle O'Neill described the display as 'openly racist'.
"Many people will celebrate their culture and traditions this week,' she said.
"Unfortunately, we have seen incidents that pose serious risks to life, property, the health of residents and vital public services, alongside openly racist displays that are sickening and deplorable.
"Political leadership is essential to ensure the safety of residents, patients and the wider public.
"It is entirely wrong, and completely unacceptable for these bonfires to take place in a way that endangers property, infrastructure, public services or lives.
"It's time for leadership to be shown.'
Patrick Corrigan, Amnesty International's Northern Ireland director, described the bonfire as a "vile, dehumanising act that fuels hatred and racism".
"It cruelly mocks the suffering of people who risk everything to flee war, persecution, and hardship in search of safety,' he said.
"Beyond being morally reprehensible, it incites hostility toward already marginalised and vulnerable communities.
"Amnesty International urges the authorities to ensure its immediate removal and calls on the PSNI to investigate and hold those responsible to account.
"A clear and unequivocal message must be sent that xenophobia and incitement to hatred have no place in our society."
A spokesperson for the United Against Racism campaign group said the display is particularly concerning following the racist rioting in Ballymena and elsewhere across Northern Ireland last month, which forced more than a dozen foreign national families from their homes.
"In a context of widespread violence against migrants and their homes, the burning of effigies is a precursor to the burning of people,' the spokesperson said.
'Given recent events in Ballymena, and our own recent history, we must be alive to the real dangers that such acts carry.
"This is an absolutely shocking attempt to intimidate people who are fleeing war, poverty and persecution. It deserves unreserved and unequivocal condemnation, and United Against Racism calls on political representatives to show leadership to ensure the effigy is removed.'
SDLP leader Claire Hanna called for leadership over bonfires, referencing the Moygashel pyre and a bonfire in south Belfast that has sparked fears over nearby asbestos and the potential to cause power outages at hospitals.
Ms Hanna said her party 'supports the right of people to mark traditions in a safe and respectful way', but that 'cannot mean turning a blind eye to very real and serious concerns around public safety and community cohesion'.
'There is nothing cultural or traditional about exposing people to asbestos, endangering critical infrastructure or fuelling racial hatred through effigies demonising immigrants,' she said.
The Belfast South and Mid Down MP said progress in managing bonfires in recent years is being 'undermined by a lack of leadership and by a small number of self-appointed figures who seek to drag communities backwards and who seem to thrive on confrontation and media engagement.'
Sinn Fein MLA Colm Gildernew also voiced his concerns.
'This is an absolutely disgusting act, fuelled by sickening racist and far-right attitudes,' he said.
'This is a clear incitement to hatred and must be removed immediately.
'Those who come to our island to make it their home are not the enemy. They are our friends, our neighbours, and are welcomed, cherished and valued by the vast majority of people here.
'Political leaders in this area must step up, call for the removal of these offensive materials and make it clear they do not support such vile, deplorable views.'
Alliance Party councillor for the area, Eddie Roofe, also called for the display to be taken down.
'The placing of this racist model on top of the bonfire is despicable and must be removed immediately,' he said.
'It is nothing but a blatant act of racism and hatred, and cannot be excused as a celebration of culture.
'Those responsible only seek to incite fear and spread far-right beliefs and do not represent the community as a whole.
'Every year, we see incidents of hate and intimidation associated with bonfires, and this behaviour is entirely unacceptable. While Alliance supports everyone's right to celebrate their culture and traditions, these celebrations must be conducted safely and respectfully.
'They should never come at the expense of another person.
'I urge everyone to speak out against these actions, and I hope to see these inappropriate displays taken down as soon as possible. If we are to move forward as a society, we must all begin to show respect for one another.'
The depiction of migrants in a boat on top of the pyre follows successive nights of racist violence across Northern Ireland last month, which saw dozens of homes attacked and more than 60 PSNI officers injured.
Due to the violence, the Northern Ireland Housing Executive had to provide emergency accommodation to 18 families.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Spectator
14 hours ago
- Spectator
The Church of England must stop feeling guilty about the Reformation
Thomas More has a richly ambiguous place in our religious and political history. Like a brave hero of conscience, he defied the will of a tyrant, even unto death. A herald of modern liberty, then? Not quite. Before he found himself on the wrong end of the axe, as Lord Chancellor he calmly sent many dissidents to their death. His cause was not modern liberty, but the defence of the old version of authoritarian order. The Catholic Church calls him a saint. He is back in the news because a church in Canterbury has said it wants to exhume his remains, which the Catholic faithful are obviously keen to venerate. The surprising thing is that this church, St Dunstan's, is Anglican. As a few GCSE students still know, the Church of England was launched by the very tyrant who ordered More's death, Henry VIII. Some well-meaning types will see it as a lovely sign of harmony between the old rival traditions, that an Anglican church wants to maximise the veneration of this Catholic martyr. I don't. To me it is a sign that the Church of England lacks self-confidence. It is inclined to apologise for its birth. It is hypocritical to honour a man who wanted to strangle the CofE in its cradle. Yes, there was a bloody side to the birth of our national Church. Revolutions are bloody. You can't make a holy omelette without breaking holy eggs. Maybe it could all have happened in a slightly nicer way, but it is good that it happened. The English Reformation was a good thing. More was on the wrong side of history. You might be neither Catholic nor Protestant, and feel you have no dog in this fight. But, if you care about the tradition of British liberty, you have a puppy in this fight. For that tradition was born here, in the rather brutal national take-over of the Church. Paradoxically, the Tudor tyranny paved the way for the first major liberal state. It was the Reformation that led to a break with the medieval unity of religion and politics, which was basically a form of theocracy. It used to be part of British identity, to have some awareness of this. The Church of England should try to rekindle that awareness. Instead it is crippled with guilt about its origins. This guilt explains its current failure to sort out its divisions. In a story that is seemingly unrelated to the remains of Thomas More, the bishop of Fulham was cross with a community choir that was borrowing his church this week. He came down in his dressing gown and told them to can it. The real significance of this story is an omission in the Times report of what happened. It tells us at the end that this bishop, called Jonathan Baker, 'is responsible for episcopal oversight in the dioceses of London, Southwark and Rochester.' It sounds as if he is therefore the chief bishop of these places, which puts him on a par with the archbishops of Canterbury and York. In reality, he is responsible for the episcopal oversight of parishes in these dioceses that reject the ordination of women. The Church of England is divided, with a sub-group of bishops running a church-within-the-Church. These traditionalist bishops effectively reject the spiritual leadership of the archbishops, often declining to receive communion from them. What's the link with the More story? The Church allowed this division to emerge due its guilt at the Reformation. A Church shouldn't impose unity and force tender consciences, so let's allow the traditionalists to have their own bishops. It was a weak-minded decision, which has opened the door to opponents of homosexuality now demanding their own bishops too. The Church is disintegrating because of its victor's guilt at the excesses of Tudor times. Let it rediscover some pride in its remarkable, if a little brutal, history. And let St Dunstan's donate the remains of More to the local Catholic church.


STV News
a day ago
- STV News
Swinney brands Gaza crisis ‘genocide' after Fringe show disrupted
Scottish First Minister John Swinney has described the ongoing crisis in Gaza as a 'genocide' after a Fringe show he appeared at was repeatedly disrupted by pro-Palestinian protesters. Police were called to the Stand Comedy Club in Edinburgh after the First Minister was interrupted seven times by six different groups of protesters during a conversation with comedian Susan Morrison. The protesters urged the First Minister to describe the crisis as a genocide and stop state funding for arms companies. Speaking to journalists after the event, the First Minister said: 'It's quite clear that there is a genocide in Palestine – it can't be disputed. 'I have seen reports of terrible atrocities which have the character of being genocide. PA Media First Minister John Swinney appeared on stage with comedian Susan Morrison 'I've expressed that and obviously it's not reached all those individuals, but that's my feeling.' The Scottish Government has also been criticised for – while not funding directly the manufacturing of munitions – providing money for apprenticeships at firms which build weapons. But the First Minister said the Government's commercial arm, Scottish Enterprise, has the 'strictest assessments imaginable about the purpose and the use of public expenditure in companies that may be related to defence industries'. Pushed on providing money for staff who could potentially build munitions, the First Minister added: 'We're trying to enable companies to diversify their activities, that's the purpose. 'That's why the due diligence checks are applied and they are applied unreservedly.' Throughout the show, groups of attendees stood up, holding signs which spelt the word 'genocide', and heckled the First Minister. PA Media Police were called in to remove pro-Palestinian protesters from the event As the event continued, the interruptions became more forceful, before two groups stood at the same time, angrily shouting at the First Minister and chanting slogans such as 'call it genocide'. Members of his security team stood in front of the stage, stopping protesters from approaching the First Minister, before three uniformed police officers arrived at the venue to usher the protesters out. During the tense exchange, which lasted several minutes, a number of the crowd – who were not protesting – appeared to be in tears. A final disruption came from one woman in the crowd, who asked the First Minister why he had not responded to her letter about heavy metal band Disturbed playing at the Hydro in Glasgow. The band's lead singer, David Draiman, has been criticised after being pictured signing an Israeli bomb. The woman asked the First Minister why he did not speak out on Disturbed playing at the city's biggest venue, when he said it would be inappropriate for Irish band Kneecap to play the TRNSMT festival after comments members of the band had made about Tory MPs. The First Minister said his comments on Kneecap had come due to questions from the media and he 'didn't particularly' want to speak about the band earlier this year, adding that he did not want to choose what art people do and do not consume. The woman became increasingly angry with the First Minister's response and was eventually dragged from the venue by a police officer, whom she branded a 'thug'. Get all the latest news from around the country Follow STV News Scan the QR code on your mobile device for all the latest news from around the country


North Wales Chronicle
a day ago
- North Wales Chronicle
Swinney brands Gaza crisis ‘genocide' after Fringe show disrupted
Police were called to the Stand Comedy Club in Edinburgh after the First Minister was interrupted seven times by six different groups of protesters during a conversation with comedian Susan Morrison. The protesters urged the First Minister to describe the crisis as a genocide and stop state funding for arms companies. Speaking to journalists after the event, the First Minister said: 'It's quite clear that there is a genocide in Palestine – it can't be disputed. 'I have seen reports of terrible atrocities which have the character of being genocide. 'I've expressed that and obviously it's not reached all those individuals, but that's my feeling.' The Scottish Government has also been criticised for – while not funding directly the manufacturing of munitions – providing money for apprenticeships at firms which build weapons. But the First Minister said the Government's commercial arm Scottish Enterprise has the 'strictest assessments imaginable about the purpose and the use of public expenditure in companies who may be related to defence industries'. Pushed on providing money for staff who could potentially build munitions, the First Minister added: 'We're trying to enable companies to diversify their activities, that's the purpose. 'That's why the due diligence checks are applied and they are applied unreservedly.' Throughout the show, groups of attendees stood up, holding signs which spelled the word 'genocide', and heckled the First Minister. As the event continued, the interruptions became more forceful, before two groups stood at the same time, angrily shouting at the First Minister and chanting slogans such as 'call it genocide'. Members of his security team stood in front of the stage, stopping protesters from approaching the First Minister, before three uniformed police officers arrived at the venue to usher the protesters out. I still remember the bus ride to my first Edinburgh Festival show as a teenager, with my late mother – not knowing it would spark a lifelong love of culture. As the Festival season starts, I want every community in Scotland to have that same access to a booming cultural scene. — John Swinney (@JohnSwinney) August 2, 2025 During the tense exchange, which lasted several minutes, a number of the crowd – who were not protesting – appeared to be in tears. A final disruption came from one woman in the crowd, who asked the First Minister why he had not responded to her letter about heavy metal band Disturbed playing at the Hydro in Glasgow. The band's lead singer David Draiman has been criticised after being pictured signing an Israeli bomb. The woman asked the First Minister why he did not speak out on Disturbed playing at the city's biggest venue, when he said it would be inappropriate for Irish band Kneecap to play the TRNSMT festival after comments members of the band had made about Tory MPs. The First Minister said his comments on Kneecap had come due to questions from the media and he 'didn't particularly' want to speak about the band earlier this year, adding that he did not want to choose what art people do and do not consume. The woman became increasingly angry with the First Minister's response and was eventually dragged from the venue by a police officer, whom she branded a 'thug'.