Justice Varma cash row: Supreme Court dismisses judge's plea challenging in-house probe
A bench of Justices Dipankar Datta and A G Masih, which heard Justice Yashwant Varma's petition, said the writ petition should not have been entertained amid his conduct, which did not inspire confidence, and framed a few other questions and answered them regarding the constitutional issues raised by him.
On the question whether the procedure has legal sanction, the bench answered this in the affirmative. 'We have said that the procedure does have legal sanction,' Justice Datta said, reading out the operative parts of the judgment.
The bench held that the then Chief Justice of India Sanjiv Khanna, and the committee set up by him 'have scrupulously followed the procedure except one that is the uploading of the video footage and the photographs' of the alleged burnt cash.
The bench said, 'We have said that it was not required under the procedure to do so, but having said so, we have also held that nothing turns on it because at the opportune moment you did not question it, and there is also no relief claimed in the writ petition insofar as uploading is concerned.'
On the procedure requiring CJI to forward the report of the committee to the President and the Prime Minister, the SC held that 'it is not unconstitutional.'
The bench also went into the question whether an inquiry and the consequent report in terms of the procedure, which could be unfavourable to the judge under probe, is a parallel and extra-constitutional mechanism. 'We have also held that it is not a parallel and extra-constitutional mechanism,' said the bench.
On whether paragraph 5b of the procedure falls foul of Article 125 read with Article 217 and 218 of the Constitution or abrogates any fundamental right of a judge of a high court, the bench said, 'The answer is in the negative.'
Justice Varma, who was a judge of the Delhi HC, is facing an impeachment motion following a probe into allegations of cash being found at his official residence. He moved the Supreme Court on July 18, challenging the in-house inquiry mechanism, which indicted him, calling it a 'parallel, extra-constitutional mechanism'.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Hindustan Times
37 minutes ago
- Hindustan Times
‘Time to save democracy': Kharge says ECI acts as ‘representative of the ruling party', backs Rahul's voter fraud claims
Congress president Mallikarjun Kharge on Thursday launched a scathing attack on the Election Commission of India (ECI), accusing it of acting like a 'representative of the ruling party' and allegedly failing in its constitutional duty to conduct free and fair elections. Congress chief Mallikarjun Kharge alleges 'Vote Chori' is being carried out strategically across several constituencies.(Sansad TV File) 'There was a time when the Election Commission of India was praised across the world. Many countries took training from our Election Commission to conduct fair elections. When any political party raised questions, the Commission would respond or clarify within constitutional limits,' Kharge said in a post on X, originally written in Hindi. 'Today, when someone questions the ECI, instead of responding, it acts like a representative of the ruling party, leveling counter-allegations and making baseless statements without considering the demands of opposition parties,' he alleged. Referring to Congress MP Rahul Gandhi's remarks on alleged electoral irregularities, Kharge said, 'Today, Mr. Rahul Gandhi, after thorough investigation, cited examples from Karnataka's Mahadevapura Assembly Segment, explaining how the Election Commission allowed gross rigging in a single election, shredding its constitutional duties, with 1,00,250 votes stolen.' Kharge claimed that such irregularities were not isolated incidents. 'This #VoteChori is happening strategically across many seats in the country,' he added. Announcing the party's next move, he said, 'The Congress Party will raise public awareness about this. Tomorrow, we will begin from Freedom Park in Bengaluru, Karnataka.' 'The time has come to save democracy and the Constitution, to save the country!' the Congress chief added in the post. Addressing reporters at the AICC headquarters in New Delhi, claimed that the Maharashtra election results confirmed the Congress party's suspicion that the polls had been manipulated. 'Not giving machine-readable voter list convinced us that the Election Commission (EC) colluded with BJP to 'steal' elections in Maharashtra,' alleged the Leader of Opposition in the Lok Sabha. He further said, 'They said we are going to destroy the CCTV footage. This was surprising to us because there was a question in Maharashtra about a massive voting after 5.30 pm for the numbers to add up. Our people knew that in the polling booths, no such thing happened. There was no massive voting after 5.30 pm.' 'These two things made us believe with reasonable certainty that the Election Commission of India was colluding with the BJP to steal elections,' Gandhi added.
Hindustan Times
39 minutes ago
- Hindustan Times
SC relists case in which it barred HC judge from hearing criminal cases
New Delhi, Days after the Supreme Court pulled up an Allahabad High Court judge for allowing criminal proceedings in a civil dispute case, the Supreme Court relisted the matter for August 8. SC relists case in which it barred HC judge from hearing criminal cases In an unprecedented order, a bench of Justices J B Pardiwala and R Mahadevan on August 4 stripped criminal matters of the roster of a Allahabad High Court judge "till he demits office" after he "erroneously" upheld summons of criminal nature in a civil dispute. According to the top court's causelist, the matter would be heard by the same bench. According to sources, senior judges in the apex court have taken strong exception to the bench's order and even Chief Justice of India B R Gavai was consulted in the matter. The high court judge had refused to quash a magistrate's summoning order against a company which was accused of not paying the balance monetary sum in a business transaction of civil nature. Justices Pardiwala and Mahadevan on August 4 directed removal of criminal matters from the high court judge's roster till his retirement while tasking him to sit with a senior judge in a division bench. The high court judge's order said asking the complainant to pursue civil remedy for recovering the amount was unreasonable being time intensive. Calling the order passed by the high court judge "erroneous", the top court said the judge went ahead to the extent of saying that the complainant should be permitted to institute criminal proceedings for the purpose of recovery of the balance amount. The top court said the high court order was one of the "worst and most erroneous" orders that it came across in their respective tenures as judges of the top court. "The judge concerned has not only cut a sorry figure for himself but has made a mockery of justice. We are at our wits' end to understand what is wrong with the Indian Judiciary at the level of High Court. At times we are left wondering whether such orders are passed on some extraneous considerations or it is sheer ignorance of law. Whatever it be, passing of such absurd and erroneous orders is something unpardonable," the bench said. The top court was hearing a challenge to high court's order which dismissed an application filed by one M/S Shikhar Chemicals seeking to quash summoning order in a case of commercial transaction. In this case, the complainant delivered goods in the form of thread to Shikhar Chemicals worth ₹52.34 lakh of which an amount of ₹47.75 lakh came to be paid, however, the balance amount has not been paid, till date. Lalita Textiles filed a criminal complaint for the recovery of the balance amount. Thereafter, the complainant's statement was recorded and a magisterial court issued summons against the applicant. The company moved the high court against the order, contending the dispute was purely civil in nature. The high court, however, rejected the plea of the applicant. On August 4, the top court observed it was expected of the high court to know the well-settled position of law that in cases of civil disputes a complainant cannot be permitted to resort to criminal proceedings as the same would amount to abuse of process of law. Terming the high court's take on the issue as "shocking", the bench said, "It is an extremely sad day for one and all to read the observations contained in para 12 of the impugned order." The order continued, "It was expected of the high court to understand the nature of the allegations levelled in the complaint. In substance the high court has said in so many words that the criminal proceedings instituted by the complainant in a case of pure civil dispute is justified because it may take considerable time for the complainant to recover the balance amount by preferring a civil suit." The bench said in such circumstances it was left with no other option but to set aside the high court order even without issuing notice to the respondents. "We request the the Chief Justice of the High Court of Allahabad to assign this matter to any other Judge of the High Court as he may deem fit. The Chief Justice of High Court shall immediately withdraw the present criminal determination from the concerned Judge. The Chief Justice shall make the concerned judge sit in a Division Bench with a seasoned senior judge of the High Court ," the top court said. This article was generated from an automated news agency feed without modifications to text.
India Today
42 minutes ago
- India Today
Poll body issues notice for Vice President's election after Jagdeep Dhankar quits
The Election Commission of India has issued a notice regarding the elections that will take place to appoint the new Vice President of India on September 9. The latest notice details the specific dates for filing the nomination papers and candidature to the notice, the nomination papers are to be filed on the first floor of Parliament no later than August 21, 2025. Additionally, a deposit of rupees 15,000 will also need to be submitted to the Reserve Bank of India (RBI) or to a Government notice also mentions additional documents needed, along with the nomination papers like the receipt of making the said deposit. Furthermore, the date and time assigned for the scrutiny of the nomination papers is at 11 a.m. on August 22. The notice also confirmed the timing of the vice-presidential polls: between 10 a.m. to 5 comes after the abrupt resignation of the former Vice President Jagdeep Dhankar on July 22."To prioritise health care and abide by medical advice, I hereby resign as the Vice President of India, effective immediately, in accordance with Article 67(a) of the Constitution," Dhankhar wrote in a letter addressed to President Droupadi his resignation, the Ministry of Home Affairs confirmed the vacancy through a notification issued on July 22, planned election to fill the vacancy is in accordance with what the Constitution of India dictates in the case of a sudden vacancy of the vice-presidential Article 66 of the Indian Constitution will be implemented, allowing a secret ballot exclusively participated in by members of Rajya Sabha and Lok Sabha.- EndsMust Watch IN THIS STORY#Parliament
