
Silencing RFA Uyghur Echoes Past Mistakes
In 1979, the United States shut down Uyghur-language radio broadcasts to appease the Chinese government ahead of Deng Xiaoping's visit to Washington. Forty-five years later, Uyghur voices are being silenced once again, this time in the name of budget cuts. In March, the Trump administration eliminated Radio Free Asia's Uyghur Service, the only source of uncensored Uyghur-language news in the world. Whether for diplomatic gain or domestic political theater, the result is the same: the silencing of our voices and the empowerment of Chinese state propaganda. The U.S. must not repeat this mistake.
RFA Uyghur was the first outlet to confirm mass deaths in Chinese internment camps in 2017. When international journalists were blocked from reporting in our homeland, RFA Uyghur revealed that internment camps were still operating despite government claims to the contrary. Its closure is not just a blow to press freedom; it is the silencing of an entire people amid an ongoing genocide.
Starting in the late 1960s, the Uyghur-language service of Radio Free Europe/Radio Liberty (RFE/RL) broadcasted 15 minutes a day into Central Asia and East Turkistan. The programming — uncensored news, history, culture, and politics — was a lifeline for Uyghurs desperate for truthful reporting.
Just before Chinese leader Deng Xiaoping's historic visit to Washington in 1979, RFE/RL's Uyghur language service was abruptly closed. U.S. officials, eager to strengthen ties with China to counter the Soviet Union, proactively shut down Uyghur language programming to win favor with the Chinese government ahead of the important meeting. Just 15 minutes of independent Uyghur journalism was important enough to be factored into high-level diplomatic calculations.
Later, we were told that the directive came from President Jimmy Carter's national security advisor, Zbigniew Brzezinski, a staunch anti-Soviet who viewed China as a key partner against Moscow. Erkin Alptekin, a senior staff member at RFE/RL's Uyghur service, wrote in a letter to The Washington Post that the U.S. government was 'trying to eradicate a presumed source of embarrassment to blossoming U.S.-Chinese relations.' In other words, Uyghurs were collateral damage in a global chess game.
Under the leadership of Alptekin, Uyghurs advocated strongly to try to save RFE/RL's Uyghur service. Some in Congress listened and tried to right the wrong. In 1979, Rep. John M. Murphy introduced H.Con.Res.132, urging RFE/RL to resume Uyghur-language programming. The resolution did not pass, but it gave us a spark of momentum to keep fighting for independent Uyghur journalism.
When I was hired as a journalist at RFE/RL in 1988, there was no Uyghur language programming; instead, I worked for RFE/RL's Tajik Service. Even so, the 1979 resolution inspired us to keep advocating for Uyghur language programming. We finally succeeded in 1998, when Radio Free Asia's Uyghur Service was founded. I'll never forget the first broadcast, when independent reporting in our language finally reached our homeland for the first time in nearly 20 years.
Now, history is repeating itself.
With the elimination of RFA's Uyghur Service, the Chinese government faces one less challenge to its disinformation campaigns. CCP-run newspapers openly celebrated the closure of RFA and VOA. Since March, Chinese state media have added 16 new Uyghur-language radio frequencies, flooding the airwaves with propaganda. Abroad, Beijing's influence expands through tourism-promotion, all-expense-paid tours for foreign vloggers, censorship on Beijing-controlled applications like TikTok, and transnational repression campaigns that go unchecked.
We must learn from history instead of repeating our past mistakes. China is far more powerful now than it was when Uyghur language programming was first shut down in 1979. Allowing CCP propaganda to go unchallenged is even more dangerous this time. When the first Uyghur service was cut, China was opening its doors to the West, and allowing Uyghurs slightly more freedom. But now, China is waging a brutal genocide against our people. Uncensored Uyghur journalism is more important than ever before.
Sacrificing RFA Uyghur Service at such a desperate time for our people creates a perception that the U.S. only supports fundamental freedom when convenient.
Forty-five years ago, the U.S. silenced Uyghur voices in the name of diplomacy. Today, they are being silenced in the name of austerity. Either way, the result is the same: empowering the Chinese government's repression and abandoning a people struggling to survive genocide.
The United States must reverse this dangerous decision and restore Radio Free Asia's Uyghur Service. The cost is modest. The stakes could not be higher.
Let us not make the same mistake twice.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

2 hours ago
80 Years On: State Policy Victimized Manchuria Pioneers
Nagano, Aug. 19 (Jiji Press)--Hiroyoshi Takizawa, who moved to Manchuria, in today's northeastern China, at the age of 8 as part of a pioneer group, was forced to flee for about three weeks, after the former Soviet Union's invasion. Along the way, he endured the harrowing ordeal of his father fatally shooting his younger brother and sister as part of a group suicide. "We were victims of national policy. Such a tragedy must never be repeated," says Takizawa, now a 91-year-old resident of the city of Nagano. In March 1943, spurred by his father's ambition to "make it big in Manchuria," Takizawa's family left their home in what is now the village of Kijimadaira in Nagano Prefecture and relocated to eastern Manchuria. They joined the Koshago pioneer group, formed largely in their home region, and the seven-member household--Takizawa, his parents, two elder brothers, a younger sister and a younger brother--settled there. After their arrival, a baby sister was born. For a time, life was comfortable. That changed on Aug. 9, 1945, when the Soviet Union invaded Manchuria, in violation of its neutrality pact with Japan. The Imperial Japanese Army's Kwantung forces, which were expected to defend the area, had apparently already withdrawn, leaving civilians including the Takizawas to flee without a clear destination. In the face of repeated attacks, the Koshago pioneer group continued southward. On Aug. 24, 1945, nine days after Emperor Hirohito's radio broadcast announcing Japan's surrender, the group, fearing a Soviet assault, chose mass suicide. [Copyright The Jiji Press, Ltd.]


The Mainichi
3 hours ago
- The Mainichi
India's Modi to meet China's top diplomat as Asian powers rebuild ties
NEW DELHI (AP) -- Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi will meet with China's top diplomat on Tuesday in a sign of easing tensions between the nuclear-armed neighbors after a yearslong standoff between the Asian powers. Chinese Foreign Minister Wang Yi, who arrived in India on Monday, is scheduled to hold talks with Modi and other leaders about the disputed border in the Himalayan mountains. Reducing the number of troops on the border and possibly resuming trade in the contested region are expected to be on the agenda. The rebuilding of ties coincides with friction between New Delhi and Washington after U.S. President Donald Trump imposed steep tariffs on India, a longtime ally seen as a counterbalance against China's influence in Asia. India is part of the Quad security alliance with the U.S., along with Australia and Japan. 'Compromise at the highest political level' India and China's decades-old border dispute worsened in 2020 after a deadly clash between their troops in the Ladakh region. The chill in relations affected trade, diplomacy and air travel as both sides deployed tens of thousands of security forces in border areas. Some progress has been made since then. Last year, India and China agreed to a pact on border patrols and withdrew additional forces along some border areas. Both countries continue to fortify their border by building roads and rail networks. In recent months, the countries have increased official visits and discussed easing some trade restrictions, movement of citizens and visas for businesspeople. In June, Beijing allowed pilgrims from India to visit holy sites in Tibet. Both sides are working to restore direct flights. Last week, the spokesman for India's foreign ministry, Randhir Jaiswal, said India and China were in discussions to restart trade through three points along their 3,488-kilometer (2,167-mile) border. Manoj Joshi, a fellow at the Observer Research Foundation, a New Delhi-based think tank, said relations are still at an uneasy level of normalization. "Settling the boundary issue between the two countries requires political compromise at the highest political level," said Joshi, who also served as a member of the advisory board for India's National Security Council. He asserted that the countries are "still talking past each other when it comes to the border dispute and issues surrounding it." Ahead of his meeting with Modi, Wang met India's National Security Adviser Ajit Doval and discussed the way forward to bolster the relationship. "The setbacks we experienced in the past few years were not in the interest of the people of our two countries. We are heartened to see the stability that is now restored in the borders," Wang said. On Monday, China's Foreign Ministry spokesperson Mao Ning said Beijing is willing to take Wang's India visit as an opportunity to work with the Indian side to "properly handle differences and promote the sustained, sound and stable development of China-India relations." Mao said Wang's meeting with Modi's national security adviser will "continue in-depth communication to jointly safeguard peace and tranquility in the border areas." Modi plans to visit China soon The thaw between Beijing and New Delhi began last October when Modi and Chinese President Xi Jinping met at a summit of emerging economies in Russia. It was the first time the leaders had spoken in person since 2019. Modi is set to meet Xi when he travels to China late this month -- his first visit in seven years -- to attend the summit of the Shanghai Cooperation Organization, a regional grouping formed by China, Russia and others to counter U.S. influence in Asia. Earlier this year, Xi called for India and China's relations to take the form of a "dragon-elephant tango" -- a dance between the emblematic animals of the countries. Last month, India's external affairs minister visited Beijing in his first trip to China since 2020. The US and Pakistan play roles in the thaw The renewed engagement comes as New Delhi's ties with Trump are fraying. Washington has imposed a 50% tariff on Indian goods, which includes a penalty of 25% for purchasing Russian crude oil. The tariffs take effect Aug. 27. India has shown no sign of backing down, instead signing more agreements with Russia to deepen economic cooperation. Trump's renewed engagement with India's arch rival, Pakistan, has also encouraged New Delhi's overtures to China, said Lt. Gen. D.S. Hooda, who led the Indian military's Northern Command from 2014 to 2016. In June, Trump hosted Pakistan's army chief for a White House lunch and later announced an energy deal with Islamabad to jointly develop the country's oil reserves. Both followed Trump's claims of brokering a ceasefire between India and Pakistan after the two sides traded military strikes in May. That clash saw Pakistan use Chinese-made military jets and missiles against India. "China is heavily invested in Pakistan and, practically speaking, you can't have any expectation that Beijing will hold back support to Islamabad," Hooda said. "But you can't have two hostile neighbors on your borders and simultaneously deal with them also."

Japan Times
3 hours ago
- Japan Times
Ishiba says Japan considering role in security guarantees for Ukraine
Prime Minister Shigeru Ishiba said Tuesday that Tokyo is considering playing a role in security guarantees being offered to Kyiv by a coalition of nations as peace talks with Russia to end its war in Ukraine gain steam. 'We'll watch the ongoing discussions closely, and while carefully considering what Japan can and should do — including various legal and capability aspects — we'll play an appropriate role,' Ishiba told reporters. Ishiba, who spoke hours after U.S. President Donald Trump, Ukrainian leader Volodymyr Zelenskyy and top European leaders met at the White House in Washington for peace talks, characterized the growing momentum as 'very meaningful.' But the prime minister, singling out Russia for killing civilians in Ukraine, also appeared to tamp down expectations of the type of quick peace deal being sought by Trump. 'Achieving a fair peace is an extremely difficult task that will take time,' Ishiba said. Earlier, NATO chief Mark Rutte said that the 'coalition of the willing,' which groups 30 nations backing Ukraine, had been working for months to craft a comprehensive package of security guarantees to deter Russian leader Vladimir Putin from an attempt to re-invade his neighbor under any hypothetical peace deal. 'Over the last couple of months ... a group of now 30 countries, including Japan and Australia, are working on this concept of security guarantees,' Rutte told Fox News on Monday after taking part in the talks in Washington. Japan joined the grouping in March. Tokyo has been watching the flurry of diplomacy nervously, with the precedent set by any hasty peace deal likely to have broad ramifications for Japan and Asia. Tokyo has been a strong proponent of maintaining the rules-based global order while condemning unilateral attempts to change the status quo by force — a stance widely seen as aimed at China, albeit obliquely. Russia's invasion of Ukraine has stoked concern in Japan that military powerhouse China — with its eye on democratic Taiwan — could take a page from Moscow's playbook and invade the island that it claims as its own. On Monday, Ishiba said that in addressing the war, leaders must "ensure that it does not undermine global security and the international order, including that of the Indo-Pacific region.' Japan in June last year became the first non-NATO country to ink a security accord with Ukraine, signing a 10-year deal that promised continued humanitarian and nonlethal aid, and bolstered support for the war-torn country's reconstruction. One of the biggest surprises to come out of Monday's meeting in Washington was Trump's pitch of a one-on-one summit between Zelenskyy and Putin that would be followed by a trilateral gathering involving all three. Although it remains unclear if those meetings will materialize, Zelenskyy also secured a key goal in winning Trump's commitment to the U.S. participating in security guarantees as part of any peace deal, while reserving discussion of territorial exchanges for any direct talks with Putin. Rutte said that while the grouping needed more time to discuss the details of the security guarantees, 'for Ukraine to consider what to do next when it comes to territory, it is important to also know what the situation will be with the security guarantees to prevent Vladimir Putin from ever trying again to invade parts of Ukraine.'