
Genetic cholesterol eliminated by new drug, reducing heart attack risk, study finds
Many Americans are unaware that elevated levels of this particle — known as lipoprotein(a) or Lp(a) — are circulating in their blood.
Elevated Lp(a) cannot be modified with lifestyle changes, and has been called "one of the last untreatable frontiers of cardiovascular risk" by Cleveland Clinic, who led the study.
This new research confirmed earlier findings showing that the experimental drug — lepodisiran, made by Eli Lilly, who funded the study — can "silence" the main gene responsible for synthesizing Lp(a).
(Other experimental gene therapies with a similar mechanism of action are also in development, according to Cleveland Clinic.)
The findings were published in The New England Journal of Medicine and were also presented at the annual meeting of the American College of Cardiology on March 30.
Lipoprotein(a) levels are elevated in approximately 20-25% of people worldwide, according to the American Heart Association.
This equates to approximately 64 million people in the U.S. and 1.4 billion people globally.
Lp(a) shares similarities with another lipoprotein that doctors target to reduce the risk of heart disease, known as low-density lipoprotein (LDL) – often referred to as "bad cholesterol."
But lipoprotein(a) is more prone to plaque buildup and clots in the arteries than LDL, according to lead author Steven Nissen, M.D., chief academic officer of the Heart, Vascular & Thoracic Institute at Cleveland Clinic.
"Lipoprotein(a) is an independent risk factor for heart disease that is largely determined by genetics — that is, it is inherited," added Dr. Deepak L. Bhatt, director of Mount Sinai Fuster Heart Hospital and a professor of cardiovascular medicine at Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai in New York, told Fox News Digital. (He was not part of the study.)
Lp(a) is primarily determined by differences in one gene, while LDL cholesterol levels are influenced by multiple genes.
"That's a very big difference, and LDL has a much larger environmental component," Nissen noted.
"Lp(a) is an independent risk factor for heart disease that is largely determined by genetics."
Diet, exercise and weight loss can help decrease LDL levels, but they do not have an impact on Lp(a) levels, experts say.
And unlike LDL, which can be reduced with medications like statins, there are currently no approved drug treatments that lower Lp(a).
"There is no approved pharmacotherapy for lipoprotein(a) by regulatory authorities in any country in the world," Nissen confirmed.
The researchers performed a clinical trial of 320 individuals from Argentina, China, Denmark, Germany, Japan, Mexico, the Netherlands, Romania, Spain and the U.S. from Nov. 11, 2022, to April 17, 2023.
The participants were randomly assigned to receive either a placebo or one or two subcutaneous injections of lepodisiran.
The normal level of Lp(a) is less than 75 nanomoles per liter and the average level for people in the trial was about 250 nanomoles per liter, Nissen told Fox News Digital.
"They were very high — more than three times the upper limit of normal," he added.
After one injection of the highest dose, participants showed a nearly 100% reduction in levels of lipoprotein(a) at six months.
Those who received a second dose at six months maintained an almost 100% reduction at the one-year mark.
In other words, the therapy removed virtually all lipoprotein(a) from the blood, according to Nissen.
Cardiologists say these findings may ultimately help treat millions of Americans who have elevated levels of Lp(a).
"The results are very impressive," Bhatt said.
The researchers noted that there were no major safety concerns, but 12% of participants reported mild reactions at the injection site.
The study had only a few Black participants — a population that needs more research, as they are more likely to have elevated lipoprotein(a) concentrations than White persons, according to previous studies.
(To address this concern, the researchers are enrolling many more Black patients in their larger phase 3 clinical trial.)
Another limitation was that only two doses of lepodisiran were administered in the trial, so the effect of more doses is not known.
The study also did not show that reducing Lp(a) levels also reduces the risk of heart attacks and strokes, outside experts noted.
"A phase 3 trial testing the clinical impact of this drug is needed to see if the large reduction of Lp(a) translates into lower rates of heart attack," Bhatt said.
Nissen confirmed that the phase 3 trial to address this question is already underway.
"Whatever your level is when you're 24 years old is the level when you're 64 years old – it doesn't change, because it's genetic."
The European Society of Cardiology and the National Lipid Association in the U.S. both recommend that all adults check their Lp(a) levels.
"I have been checking Lp(a) levels in all patients for many years," Bhatt said.
But unlike traditional cholesterol, which doctors typically monitor over time, Nissen pointed out that lipoprotein(a) only needs to be checked once in a lifetime.
For more Health articles, visit www.foxnews.com/health
"Whatever your level is when you're 24 years old is the level when you're 64 years old – it doesn't change, because it's genetic," he said.
"So you only need to get it once, and if you get it early in life, then you know you're at risk, and you can live your life accordingly."
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Hill
24 minutes ago
- The Hill
RFK Jr. attacks pediatric group after vaccine recommendations
Hours after the American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) broke with Health and Human Services (HHS) Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr and recommended COVID-19 vaccines for all young children, he blasted the association as beholden to corporate interests. The AAP on Tuesday recommended all infants and children 6 months through 23 months get vaccinated against COVID-19 to help protect against serious illness. Kennedy responded in a post on social platform X, calling the group's recommendations 'corporate friendly' because AAP receives donations to its Friends of Children Fund from vaccine companies like Pfizer and Moderna, among others. The philanthropic fund backs projects supporting child health and equity. The health secretary said the organization should disclose 'its corporate entanglements … so that Americans may ask whether the AAP's recommendations reflect public health interest, or are, perhaps, just a pay-to-play scheme to promote commercial ambitions of AAP's Big Pharma benefactors.' Susan Kressly, AAP's president, in a statement said the group would welcome an opportunity to sit down with Kennedy to review the recommendations. 'This attack on the integrity of pediatricians is unfortunate, but it does not change the facts,' Kressly said. 'We are transparent about our funders, follow rigorous conflict-of-interest disclosures and maintain safeguards to ensure the integrity and independence of our guidance.' The AAP and HHS have been at odds for months, and tensions reached a head when Kennedy dismissed all the members of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's (CDC) Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP) and replaced them with his own handpicked representatives, including some outright vaccine skeptics. The AAP chose not to participate in the reconstituted panel's first meeting in June, calling it 'illegitimate.' Kennedy later excluded the fund along with other top medical organizations from working with the panel to research and help influence vaccination recommendations. Kennedy has long criticized the so-called medical establishment for conspiring to make Americans sick. His first ' Make America Healthy Again ' report accused doctors of being overly influenced by the pharmaceutical industry to overprescribe certain medications that don't treat the root causes of disease.


New York Post
24 minutes ago
- New York Post
This super trendy drink can mess with your body's iron levels — how to drink it safely
That sip might be doing a number on your bloodwork. Nutritionists are warning that a trendy drink hyped for its health perks could be throwing off your iron levels — raising your risk for anemia and leaving you feeling weak and worn out. But don't toss your cup just yet. With a few simple changes, experts say that you can still ride the wellness wave without the unpleasant side effects. Advertisement 3 Proponents of the drink predict it could become as ubiquitous as coffee as demand skyrockets. JCM – The buzzy beverage, matcha, is made from specially grown and processed green tea leaves, which are then ground into a fine powder and whisked with hot water. The result is a frothy, vibrant drink with an earthy kick that's been a staple in Japan for centuries. It's taken the west by storm in recent years, becoming such a viral sensation it's triggered a global shortage. Across the internet, matcha has become the morning drink of choice for influencers and wellness warriors who claim it's a healthier alternative to coffee. Advertisement They aren't totally wrong. 'Matcha contains an amino acid called l-theanine, which is known for its calming effects,' Sarah Martel, a registered dietitian, told the Toronto Star. 'This, in combination with matcha's natural caffeine content, provides a nice boost of energy, all without all the anxiety and jitters that come with coffee,' she added. Advertisement It's also packed with antioxidants like catechins, which may help fight cell damage, reduce inflammation and lower the risk of chronic diseases, including cancer. 3 Matcha is generally much more concentrated than regular green tea. Uuganbayar – Studies have shown matcha may support liver health, boost brain function, promote heart health and even help with weight loss. But it's not all green juice and glowing reviews. Lately, some users on social media have been raising red flags about its potential to affect your body's ability to absorb iron — and they aren't totally off base. Advertisement The mineral is a key component of hemoglobin, the protein in red blood cells that shuttles oxygen from your lungs throughout the body. Iron is also critical for brain development, hormone production and overall cell function. 'Matcha contains tannins that bond to non-heme iron, which is the form of iron found in plants, and can in turn block your body's ability to absorb the mineral,' Farzanah Nasser, a nutritionist, told Vogue. If left unchecked, this can lead to iron deficiency, which affects about 10 million people in the US — and may even progress to iron deficiency anemia, impacting some 5 million Americans. The condition develops when your body doesn't have enough healthy red blood cells. At first, it might fly under the radar. But as iron levels drop, symptoms can include extreme fatigue, pale skin, shortness of breath, headaches, dizziness, brittle nails and even strange cravings for ice, dirt or starch, 3 Iron deficiency anemia is a common condition, especially among women. dragonstock – But don't panic — there's a way to sip smart. Advertisement 'Drinking matcha with or immediately after meals will have a stronger inhibitory effect on iron absorption than drinking it between meals,' Kirbie Daily, assistant director of Olympic Nutrition at the University of Memphis, told 'I recommend giving yourself at least one to two hours in between your meals or iron supplementation, and having your matcha,' she advised. Experts also suggest pairing meals with vitamin C-rich foods — like citrus or bell peppers — to help boost iron absorption. Advertisement And when it comes to matcha, moderation is key. One cup a day is generally considered safe, even for those watching their iron. 'If someone is having a matcha a day, I'm not concerned,' Jessica Cording, a registered dietitian, told Well + Good. 'But it's probably not the best if you're drinking matcha around the clock and close to meals.'


New York Times
an hour ago
- New York Times
Fewer People Are Reading for Fun, Study Finds
Any reader knows the unique delight of settling down with a good book. But over the past two decades, there has been a steady decline in Americans who read for fun, according to a study published on Wednesday. Researchers from University College London and the University of Florida examined national data from 2003 to 2023 and found that the share of people who reported reading for pleasure on a given day fell to 16 percent in 2023 from a peak of 28 percent in 2004 — a drop of about 40 percent. It declined around 3 percent each year over those two decades. There is evidence that reading for pleasure has been declining since the 1940s, the researchers said, but they called the size of the latest decrease 'surprising,' given that the study defined reading broadly, encompassing books, magazines and newspapers in print, electronic or audio form. Many previous studies' results could be questioned because they didn't explicitly account for e-books and audiobooks, said Daisy Fancourt, a co-author of the study and a professor of psychobiology and epidemiology at University College London. The study did not answer the question of why Americans were reading less. But the authors suggested some possible explanations, including increased use of social media and other technology, or more time spent at work because of economic pressure. Further research would be needed to confirm those theories. The decline in reading could have implications for Americans' learning, relationships and overall well-being, the researchers said. Want all of The Times? Subscribe.