Is This a ‘Negative World' for Christians?
Poverty Kills
Where Are Our Ex-Presidents?
Women Traveling Alone
To the Editor:
Re 'He Coined a Term for the Way Many Christians Feel' (news article, March 11):
In Ruth Graham's profile of the influential Christian author Aaron Renn, I recognized my own relationship with conservative Christianity in the model Mr. Renn proposes — a present-day 'negative world,' in which being Christian no longer offers social privilege.
But Mr. Renn's framework works only for white Christians. Black Christians could never be described as enjoying a 'positive world' in the 1960s. Perhaps this explains the conservative, often Christian, crusade to erase the history and accomplishments of people of color from schools and libraries.
Mr. Renn suggests that the example of the Rev. Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. doesn't disrupt his model because Dr. King's persecution was about race, not Christianity. Absolutely wrong. Dr. King was persecuted by white Christians for his Christian values: equality, economic justice, peace, safety and access to the vote. Dr. King dreamed that everyone might love their neighbors as themselves.
I left this religion of love years ago, heartbroken. True faith should never be entwined with white supremacy, misogyny or animus toward any group or individual in need. Today's 'negative world' has been crafted by religious people unwilling to love their neighbors.
Surely, Jesus weeps.
C. Sullivan
Colorado Springs
To the Editor:
What a disappointment to read the long profile of Aaron Renn and see 'traditional Christian moral views' defined almost entirely through the narrow lens of sexuality and gender. For those familiar with Scripture, it's clear that Jesus focused on generosity, healing, loving one's neighbor and welcoming the stranger, while the Ten Commandments are famously opposed to killing and lying.
By cutting international aid, our current evangelical-endorsed administration is killing others in great numbers, and it tells lies as often as the president requires it. Ideologues of Mr. Renn's persuasion might imagine less 'hostility' being directed toward them if they would focus on these kinds of very public and devastating sins instead of demonizing people's personal lives and fabricating theologies to justify the comforts of white patriarchy.
Thank you for your patience while we verify access. If you are in Reader mode please exit and log into your Times account, or subscribe for all of The Times.
Thank you for your patience while we verify access.
Already a subscriber? Log in.
Want all of The Times? Subscribe.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Boston Globe
15 minutes ago
- Boston Globe
Boston Consulting Group quits Gaza humanitarian aid effort amid criticism
'They are actually making the wheels turn,' said one of the people of BCG's involvement. Advertisement A spokesperson for BCG stated that the firm had provided 'pro bono' support to the humanitarian operation and will not get paid for any of the work it has done on behalf of the foundation. Another person familiar with its operations contradicted the firm's account, saying that BCG had presented monthly invoices of more than $1 million. Advertisement The foundation said in an email early Tuesday that it had distributed more than 7 million meals during its first eight days of operations. 'It proves our model is functional and is an effective means to deliver lifesaving assistance to the Gazan people under emergency conditions,' wrote John Acree, named last week as the GHF's interim director. Later Tuesday, the foundation announced a new executive director, Johnnie Moore, a Christian evangelical leader and public relations executive who is close to the Trump administration and was twice appointed during President Donald Trump's first term as a member of the US Commission on International Religious Freedom. Since the war in Gaza began following the Hamas-led attack on Israel on Oct. 7, 2023 - which killed about 1,200 people and saw around 250 taken hostage - deliveries of lifesaving humanitarian assistance have been sporadic and woefully inadequate for the enclave's more than 2 million inhabitants. Israel, which has tightly controlled humanitarian access through its border crossings, has charged - without evidence - that much of the distribution by the U.N. and other aid organizations in the past has been seized by Hamas. The architects of the GHF plan, including the Israeli government, private entrepreneurs, consultants and some humanitarian actors, have said that the new aid mechanism was designed to protect against looting and seizures by the militant group. Armed US contractors have been hired to secure the aid convoys and oversee the distribution hubs. The start of distribution followed an 11-week blockade, during which Israel prohibited any aid from entering Gaza. The government of Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has announced plans to relocate virtually all of Gaza's population to the southern part of the 141-square-mile enclave as it launches a new offensive in the north to eliminate Hamas's remaining fighters. So far, more than 54,000 Palestinians have been killed by Israeli attacks in the 19-month war, according to the Gaza Health Ministry, which does not distinguish between civilian and combatants. Advertisement Three out of four distribution hubs are now operating in the south, usually only for several hours in the morning until the day's packaged food deliveries have been exhausted. No violent incidents have been reported inside the distribution hubs themselves, although Gazan health workers have reported dozens of people shot nearby. On Tuesday, a spokesperson for the Israel Defense Forces said that they were investigating an incident resulting in casualties, in which Israeli troops fired on 'several suspects … deviating from the designated access routes' to the distribution sites. Gaza's Health Ministry and the International Committee of the Red Cross said that 27 people were killed and dozens more injured near an aid distribution site in southern Gaza. Previously, IDF spokesmen have said soldiers fired above the heads of crowds to disperse them but denied shooting directly at civilians, and they charged that reports of dead and wounded were Hamas disinformation. The IDF has distributed its own videos that it says show Hamas militants shooting at civilians. In a statement Tuesday, the GHF said that 'while the aid distribution was conducted safely and without incident at our site today,' it was aware of the IDF investigation. The incident, the statement said, occurred in 'an area well beyond our secure distribution site and operations area. We recognize the difficult nature of the situation and advise all civilians to remain in the safe corridor when traveling to our … sites.' Advertisement The U.N. and other aid professionals, as well as some foreign aid donors, have long expressed concerns about the viability, morality and safety of the GHF's model, which confines food distribution to limited sites in the south and leaves Israel in control of how much aid enters the enclave. Nearly all major humanitarian organizations have refused to participate on the grounds that it violates their rules of neutrality and appears designed to further Israel's war aims. Even some senior Israeli defense officials have questioned the GHF model, anticipating that long lines could lead to stampedes, according to internal documents obtained by The Washington Post. Calling the overall situation a 'tragedy,' the World Food Program's executive director, Cindy McCain, told ABC News on Sunday: 'What we need right now is an immediate ceasefire, complete, unfettered access, along with the safe … roads, every gate open, to feed people and stop this catastrophe from happening.' Although Israel has allowed a limited number of U.N. aid convoys to enter Israel in the past week, the World Food Program has reported that desperate Gazans have stopped and looted them before they could reach WFP distribution points. 'Whether we like it or not, Israel is calling the shots in Gaza right now. We can either posture and be outraged, or accept it: Aid will never be provided in a neutral manner because of the heavy hand of the Israelis,' said one aid professional who was approached to assume a leading role in the GHF but ultimately declined to join the foundation. Advertisement
New York Times
20 minutes ago
- New York Times
Troop Casualties in Ukraine War Near 1.4 Million, Study Finds
Nearly one million Russian troops have been killed or wounded in the country's war against Ukraine, according to a new study, a staggering toll as Russia's three-year assault on its neighbor grinds on. The study, published on Tuesday by the Center for Strategic and International Studies in Washington, said that close to 400,000 Ukrainian troops have also been killed or wounded since the war began. That would put the overall casualty figure, for Russian and Ukrainian troops combined, at almost 1.4 million. Officials cautioned that casualty figures were difficult to estimate because Moscow is believed to routinely undercount its war dead and injured, and Kyiv does not disclose official figures. The study published on Tuesday relied on casualty figures compiled by American and British government estimates. The figures present an overall accounting of Russia's slow progress in Ukraine, with Russia proceeding in some places at around 165 feet a day, slower than even the bogged-down and costly Somme advance of British and French troops in World War I. Since January 2024, Russia has seized less than 1 percent of Ukrainian territory, according to CSIS, even as it continues to advance in the country. Overall, Russia occupies about 20 percent of Ukraine. 'Russia's military campaign in Ukraine is on pace to be among the slowest offensive campaigns in modern warfare,' said Seth G. Jones, one of the authors of the study. 'They have suffered upwards of one million casualties; they have taken a tiny amount of territory; and they have lost massive amounts of equipment.' The center put the number of Russian troop deaths at close to 250,000 since President Vladimir V. Putin ordered the invasion in February 2022. 'No Soviet or Russian war since World War II has even come close to Ukraine in terms of fatality rate,' the study said. Want all of The Times? Subscribe.
New York Times
20 minutes ago
- New York Times
Is There a Pattern in Ukraine's and Russia's Big Attacks and Talks?
It is said that the night is darkest just before dawn, and if that holds for warfare, then the brutal slugfest that preceded the second round of direct talks between Ukraine and Russia was about as dark as it gets. And about as audacious a success for Ukraine as it's had in this war. There's always an element of wishful thinking in trying to find a glimmer of hope in something as terrible and intractable as the Ukraine war. But let's try. The first round of talks in Istanbul in mid-May was preceded by a furious round of posturing and confusion, much of it apparently intended by each side to persuade President Trump that it was the other that was blocking his push for peace. The talks produced only a prisoner exchange and frustration in the White House but also plans to meet again. Then before Monday's second round, Russia unleashed one of the biggest drone and missile attacks on Kyiv to date and opened a front in northeastern Ukraine. But it was the Ukrainian feat that garnered all the attention. In an extraordinary operation code-named Spider's Web, Ukraine launched 117 drones from deep inside Russia and knocked out a whole bunch of strategic bombers, the kind Russia has used to fire cruise missiles at Ukraine. The ingenuity and audacity of the operation were jaw-dropping. Over 18 months, dozens of the small quadcopters armed with explosives had been smuggled into Russia and then transported to far-flung bases by Russian drivers who thought they were carrying prefabricated cottages. The boxes were remotely opened, and the drones flew to the nearby air bases. Ukraine claimed 41 warplanes were hit and at least 13 destroyed; Moscow said only that some planes were damaged. The question is whether the exchange of blows and the demonstration of Ukraine's resourcefulness can help end the conflict. Military wisdom holds that combatants come to the negotiating table when they've concluded there's nothing more to gain on the battlefield, but Russia's Vladimir Putin, the aggressor, shows no sign of seeing things that way. Want all of The Times? Subscribe.
