Legislation to implement Three Waters replacement passes third reading
Photo:
123RF
The government's final piece of legislation to
implement 'Local Water Done Well'
, replacing Labour's Three Waters, has passed its third reading.
National MP Ryan Hamilton hailed the legislation, and said "hello localism, and choice" while Te Pāti Māori MP Mariameno Kapa-Kingi called it "an atrocious piece of work."
The government has said the Local Government (Water Services) Bill and the Local Government (Water Services) (Repeals and Amendments) Bill provide a "flexible" framework for local councils to address challenges related to drinking-water, waste-water, and stormwater services.
NZ First's Casey Costello led the debate, calling it the government's "urgently required" plan to "address challenges with New Zealand's water services."
"Simply put, chronic underinvestment and the lack of sustainable management of local government water services has come home to roost."
Costello said councils would be able to choose the best structure for "financially sustainable water services that meet regulatory requirements and local needs."
NZ First's Casey Costello led the debate. (File photo)
Photo:
VNP / Louis Collins
"I want to keep repeating that Local Water Done Well will maintain local ownership, choice, and decision-making.
"That gives councils the best shot at identifying their most pressing problems and the right approach to solving them."
National MP Ryan Hamilton hailed the passing of the government's Three Waters replacement.
"Goodbye Three Waters, hello Local Water Done Well. Goodbye co-governance, hello locally chosen and designed options.
"Hello localism and choice."
NZ First's Jamie Arbuckle highlighted the removal of "co-governance" in the legislation.
"Isn't it great to get rid of co-governance from this piece of legislation? Get rid of it! We are about New Zealanders. We are about Kiwis."
But the opposition slammed the legislation, with Labour's Megan Woods saying it "shifts the financial risk" to councils and ratepayers.
Labour's Megan Woods slammed the legislation. (File photo)
Photo:
RNZ / Samuel Rillstone
She criticised the government's response to Three Waters, and said it had got rid of the economies of scale and "the money that could have been saved", allowing for a "proliferation" of water service entities.
"What the government said was 'oh no there's two few entities, there's not enough room for local decision making under the previous government plans'."
But she said the changes had led to an average increase in water charges for households.
Tangi Utikere, Labour's spokesperson for local government, echoed her, and said there was no adequate financial support to those councils for the changes the government was seeking to implement.
Te Pāti Māori's Mariameno Kapa-Kingi criticised the government for "ignoring the role of Māori in the delivery of water services."
"Removing these provisions is not progress, it is reform, it is regression and it is deeply and only racist."
She said the bill in its thinking and design ignored and dismissed how "tangata tiriti get to live here", referencing Te Tiriti o Waitangi.
She implored the government to "get the education" and concluded by saying "what an atrocious piece of work."
Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero
,
a daily newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
RNZ News
23 minutes ago
- RNZ News
Leadership rumour laughed off as Willis and Sepuloni clash
Minister of Finance Nicola Willis. Photo: RNZ / Samuel Rillstone You can listen live to RNZ's political panel on Morning Report at 8am every Wednesday. Analysis - Finance Minister Nicola Willis' seven interruptions in 30 seconds is a targeted attack on Labour's rumoured capital gains tax policy reminiscent of Sir John Key's "show me the money" moment. But the strategy this early is not the slam dunk Key's jibe - less than a month before the 2011 election - was hailed as by columnists. Speaking on Morning Report' s political panel, opposite Labour's deputy Carmel Sepuloni, Willis interrupted her opponent to ask - six times - how Labour would pay for its promises, with a distinct seventh interruption half way through for good measure. Labour's promises at this point are, however, only promises to reveal policy at some point including a tax policy before the end of the year, which could explain how other promises would be paid for. This takes some sting out of the Finance Minister's criticism, but also leaves Labour without an effective way to combat it. The panel started with host Ingrid Hipkiss asking about Willis' recent trip to London. "If we're really quiet, Carmel, do you think we'll be able to hear the gentle whispers coming that we may be speaking with New Zealand's next prime minister?" she said, referring to a social media post by a former gossip columnist Willis had laughed off the previous day as coming from "an exuberant fan". Sepuloni was quick to emphasise the rumour of division, saying "the conversations around rolling the leadership really ramped up" during the London trip last week, Labour Party Deputy Leader Carmel Sepuloni and Labour Leader Chris Hipkins. Photo: RNZ / Angus Dreaver Willis again laughed the suggestion off, saying a leadership spill was "not on the cards" and suggesting that while plenty were quick to criticise, "every now and then, there's a fan who's just as exuberant in the other direction, and that's all there is to it". She said the trip had been "fantastic" and allowed her to speak lenders the government was borrowing from, and "they can see that we're a sensible government, doing the right things to manage the public finances, they back our plan". Sepuloni said Willis needed to recognise "much of that debt has actually been built up under her watch". "They decided to give out tax cuts that they were told were unaffordable and give tax breaks to places like landlords, 2.9 billion to landlords, tax breaks to the tobacco industry. I think New Zealanders are questioning the priorities of this government." Hipkiss asked Sepuloni the inevitable question about what Labour would do, leading to the following exchange with Sepuloni talking over Willis' interjections: Sepuloni: Our priority would certainly be on what I've mentioned already. We need support Willis : How would you pay for it? Is the question. Sepuloni : need suport for New Zealanders to get into work.... Willis : How would you pay for it? Sepuloni : Well, we certainly wouldn't be giving tax breaks.... Willis : How would you pay for it? Sepuloni : ... value of 2.9b ... Willis : so you wouldn't give tax relief to people struggling. Sepuloni : to landlords, our focus would be on work ... Willis : how would you pay for it Sepuloni : ... and jobs. We wouldn't have been pausing and ... Willis : How would you pay for it? Sepuloni : ... and ending up with 18,000 fewer jobs in the ... Willis : How are you going to pay for it? Sepuloni : ....construction industry. It's about choices Nicola, and your government have made choices that are completely out of step with what New Zealanders want. Willis : Okay so she gave a long answer, and this is exactly Labor's problem. They want to promise everyone everything, and they will not front up with how they want to pay for it, because the way they want to pay for it is putting new taxes on an economy that is already struggling. The discussion soon veered back to the coalition's approach, with Willis again highlighting the crackdown on local councils' spending and the government's "concerns" about keeping food prices under control. "The last government attempted some reforms in that area. It's pretty clear they're not delivering enough. So we are working hard on what the next steps are," she said. Sepuloni came in with an interjection of her own - Labour's frequent refrain that the government has been unable to find a single family receiving the maximum $250 a fortnight from the FamilyBoost scheme. Willis had to rework the scheme after it was revealed to be less effective than expected . "This was a government that promised thousands of families $250 extra a fortnight through their FamilyBoost scheme and now they can't identify one family who have received it," Sepuloni said. "I am just going to correct a factual error there," Willis said, "because there are more than 60,000 families that have received a cheque - money into their bank account." "Everyone who has applied has received their full entitlement, and actually now there's a human reality to that I saw at Parliament a couple of weeks ago, an Uber driver, he stopped me, he said 'I want a photo with you, because that family boost money has made such a difference to my family'." It was unclear what "error" Willis was referring to: many families are receiving some funding but no evidence has been forthcoming of any families being eligible for the maximum amount under National's tax policy from the last election. "I'm glad you had another exuberant fan," Hipkiss observed, "let's move on to teachers and correcting factual errors". Public Service Minister Judith Collins corrected herself on Tuesday after claiming last week striking teachers were earning an annual salary of "about $140,000", far more than what most would earn . "It's actually really disappointing that we've got a government who have been pointing the finger at our teachers and blaming them for going on strike when actually this is off the back of them having their pay equity claims pulled, and now what we're seeing is that they've been offered a 1 percent [annual] increase," Sepuloni said. "We're just saying 'look (secondary teachers' union) PPTA, represent your workforce fairly, come and do your job which is negotiate with us, let's strike a deal," Willis replied. "We value teachers very, very much. They are going to be the key to us lifting educational achievement in our schools. They're going to be the key to getting a replacement to NCEA working and we want to negotiate with them to get a fair deal." Collins last week billed the strikes - taking place today - as a "political stunt". On Tuesday she said it was a case of mixing her messages up a bit.
RNZ News
23 minutes ago
- RNZ News
Police receive 1000 submissions over Canterbury changes
Superintendent Tony Hill Photo: RNZ / Nathan Mckinnon Police have received around one thousand submissions, including petitions, on a controversial proposal to restructure Canterbury staffing . The changes could see some roles disestablished to focus on road policing and 24/7 hubs created in Rangiora and Rolleston. Federated Farmers has expressed its outrage, organising two public meetings in North Canterbury and Selwyn. Police are now working their way through the feedback, which includes 200 staff submissions and 800 from the public or external parties. District commander superintendent Tony Hill says the feedback shows police need to take more time examining some aspects of the proposal. Earlier, Hill said the proposal was designed to focus on core police services and meeting demand now and in future. He accused Federated Farmers of scaremongering over the proposal , which was a "refocusing" rather than a reduction in sworn officers. Some roles would be disestablished, but those officers would be encouraged to apply for other roles, he said. However, hundreds of North Canterbury residents turned out to a fiery meeting in Culverden , angry about the proposal to remove the town's two police officers. Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero , a daily newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.
RNZ News
an hour ago
- RNZ News
Invercargill mayoral candidates pitch back to basics approach ahead of election
Invercargill will soon have a new mayor. Photo: RNZ / Nate McKinnon Invercargill's mayoral candidates are pitching a back to basics approach ahead of this year's election. For the first time since the 1990s an incumbent was not standing for reelection, and instead ratepayers have eight candidates to chose from, including sitting councillors and fresh faces. The Southland Business Chamber hosted a lively debate in Invercargill on Tuesday night to help community members decide who they want to lead the city. With the rubber chicken of shame for those who overran their time and some favourite pie chat, the debate had a healthy mix of tough questions and meaty answers. Candidates tackled questions covering council amalgamation, water reforms, rates caps and project spending. Sitting councillor Alex Crackett said she wanted the basics done right to keep costs down. "I've heard from pensioners who are having to choose between buying a loaf of bread or paying for their rates. This is not the Invercargill that we should accept," she said. "We need steady, experienced hands on the basics - the roads, water, waste, because our strong foundations give us room to dream bigger." Current deputy mayor Tom Campbell backed the investments and projects that helped to revitalise the city, but said they did inevitably feed into rates. Now his priorities were affordability of rates and finding efficiencies in the council. "The new building phase has to be over. There are infrastructure projects to do, but that has to be it for capital works funded by ratepayers," he said. Current mayor Nobby Clark has opted to stand down, watching from the audience instead on the stage last night. The mayor's brother, Andrew Clark, copped flak for standing for the top job in both Tasman - where he currently lives - and the southern city. He was after responsible, disciplined spending. "Without hesitation as your new mayor, I would find an alternative water supply as a priority for Invercargill," he said. "You are completely solely dependent on the river. In the event of an earthquake or severe drought, there would be real problems in the community." Sitting councillor Ian Pottinger said he wanted to help the city's citizens and has an open door policy. The council's two mana whenua representatives can only vote on committees before votes go to the council, but he would like to see some changes. "I would give each committee delegated authority that made the decision, it stands, and then their vote has purpose," he said. "I do like the way it is now with both the reps. I think it works great." Sitting councillor Ria Bond also wanted to focus on the essentials and cutting back costs that were not core council business. "I know the frustration when councils choose vanity projects or short term wins that leave ratepayers paying the price for decades," she said. "As mayor, my focus will be clear and it will be disciplined." Tom Morton was not onboard with amalgamating councils, and said he had gone door to door to speak with people "Speaking to urban people, not rural people because we're in an urban environment and urban people have different needs to the rural people," he said. "Just to save money is not a good reason. We need to keep Invercargill for Invercargill and worry about what's happening in Invercargill." Stevey Chernishov, who used part of his introduction to spruik his men's conference, said the city was spending too much on businesses from outside the region and he wanted money to circulate around the district. "If you want a personality for Invercargill city, if you want somebody who's going to smile and challenge the system that's currently in place, I'm here to tell you that what we need to do is build a localised and enterprising southern New Zealand," he said. Gordon McCrone, whose party website has content described as disturbing and dangerous , was barred from the debate. The website has since been taken down. Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero , a daily newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.
