Over Half of Americans Don't Trust Trump on Ukraine, Russia War: Poll
Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content.
Over half of U.S. adults are not confident that President Donald Trump can make "wise decisions" when it comes to the Ukraine and Russia war, a new survey from the Pew Research Center shows on Thursday.
Newsweek reached out to the White House via email for additional comment.
Why It Matters
The poll's findings frame public expectations ahead of a high-profile bilateral meeting on Friday between Trump and Russian President Vladimir Putin, aimed at discussing a potential ceasefire in Ukraine and broader U.S.-Russia issues, including Arctic cooperation.
What To Know
The Pew Research Center survey found 59 percent of U.S. adults were either "not too confident" or "not at all confident" that President Trump could make wise decisions about the Russia-Ukraine war; 40 percent expressed at least some confidence. The poll interviewed 3,554 U.S. adults between August 4 and August 10 with a margin of error of 1.8 percent.
The survey also shows key partisan differences: a substantial majority of Democrats say that the U.S. has a responsibility to help Ukraine, with 66 percent, compared to 35 percent of Republicans. This number is up from 23 percent in a March survey, however.
The public also expressed views on U.S. assistance: Pew found 29 percent said the U.S. was not providing enough support to Ukraine, and 18 percent said it was providing too much, while 50 percent of Americans said the U.S. had a responsibility to help Ukraine defend itself, and 47 percent said it did not.
President Donald Trump and Ukraine's President Volodymyr Zelenskyy can be seen meeting in the Oval Office of the White House in Washington, D.C., February 28, 2025. (Photo by SAUL LOEB / AFP) (Photo by SAUL...
President Donald Trump and Ukraine's President Volodymyr Zelenskyy can be seen meeting in the Oval Office of the White House in Washington, D.C., February 28, 2025. (Photo by SAUL LOEB / AFP) (Photo by SAUL LOEB/AFP via Getty Images) More
What People Are Saying
Democratic Representative Jason Crow of Colorado on X this week: "Everyone wants Russia to stop its aggression & for an end to the war in Ukraine. But Trump keeps handing Vladimir Putin victories. Meeting in the U.S., without Ukraine at the table, is exactly what a dictator like Putin wants."
Trump on Truth Social on Wednesday: "Very unfair media is at work on my meeting with Putin. Constantly quoting fired losers and really dumb people like John Bolton, who just said that, even though the meeting is on American soil, 'Putin has already won.' What's that all about? We are winning on EVERYTHING. The Fake News is working overtime (No tax on overtime!)."
The president continued: "If I got Moscow and Leningrad free, as part of the deal with Russia, the Fake News would say that I made a bad deal! But now they've been caught. Look at all of the real news that's coming out about their CORRUPTION. They are sick and dishonest people, who probably hate our Country. But it doesn't matter because we are winning on everything!!! MAGA"
What Happens Next
Trump and Putin are scheduled to meet on Friday at Joint Base Elmendorf-Richardson in Anchorage.
Observers said the outcome could influence U.S. relationships with allies, Kyiv's negotiating position and congressional appetite for future assistance to Ukraine.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
10 minutes ago
- Yahoo
California pushes left, Texas to the right, with US House control and Trump agenda in play
LOS ANGELES (AP) — A political standoff in Texas over proposed House maps that could hand Republicans five new seats is poised to enter a new phase Friday, while heavily Democratic California plans to release its own new maps intended to erase all but a sprinkle of the state's GOP House districts in the fight over control of Congress. The hectic maneuvering in the nation's two most populous states underscored the stakes for both parties in the narrowly divided House that could determine the fate of President Donald Trump's agenda in the second half of his term. On Thursday, Texas Democrats moved closer to ending a nearly two-week walkout that has blocked the GOP's redrawing of U.S. House maps before the 2026 election. The Democrats announced they will return to the state provided that Texas Republicans end a special session and California releases its own redrawn map proposal, both of which were expected to happen Friday. However, Texas Republican Gov. Greg Abbott is expected to call another special session to push through new maps. Democratic lawmakers vowed to take the fight to the courts. In California, Gov. Gavin Newsom said his state will hold a Nov. 4 special election to seek approval of redrawn districts intended to give Democrats five more U.S. House seats, in a counterpunch to undercut any gains in Texas. 'We can't stand back and watch this democracy disappear district by district all across the country,' Newsom said at what amounted to a campaign kickoff rally for the as-yet unreleased maps that Democrats have been shaping behind closed doors. 'We are not bystanders in this world. We can shape the future.' The two states have emerged as the center of a partisan turf war in the House that could spiral into other states — as well as the courts — in what amounts to a proxy war ahead of the 2026 elections. Fight has gone national Newsom's announcement Thursday marked the first time any state beyond Texas has officially waded into the mid-decade redistricting fight. The Texas plan was stalled when minority Democrats fled to Illinois, New York and Massachusetts on Aug. 3 to stop the Legislature from passing any bills. Elsewhere, leaders from red Florida to blue New York are threatening to write new maps. In Missouri, a document obtained by The Associated Press shows the state Senate received a $46,000 invoice to activate six redistricting software licenses and provide training for up to 10 staff members. Newsom encouraged other Democratic-led states to get involved. 'We need to stand up — not just California. Other blue states need to stand up,' Newsom said. House control could come down to a few seats in 2026 Republicans hold a 219-212 majority in the House, with four vacancies. New maps are typically drawn once a decade after the census is conducted. Many states, including Texas, give legislators the power to draw maps. California is among states that rely on an independent commission that is supposed to be nonpartisan. The California map would take effect only if a Republican state moves forward, and it would remain through the 2030 elections. After that, Democrats say they would return mapmaking power to the independent commission approved by voters more than a decade ago. Newsom goes to LA to launch campaign for new districts In Los Angeles, Newsom and other speakers veered from discussing the technical grist of reshaping districts — known as redistricting — and instead depicted the looming battle as a conflict with all things Trump, tying it explicitly to the fate of American democracy. An overarching theme was the willingness to stand up to Trump, a cheer-inducing line for Democrats as the party looks to regroup from its 2024 losses. 'Donald Trump, you have poked the bear, and we will punch back,' said Newsom, a possible 2028 presidential contender. Opposition to California plan begins to take shape Some people already have said they would sue to block the effort, and influential voices including former California Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger may campaign against it. 'Gavin Newsom's latest stunt has nothing to do with Californians and everything to do with consolidating radical Democrat power, silencing California voters, and propping up his pathetic 2028 presidential pipe dream,' National Republican Congressional Committee spokesperson Christian Martinez said in a statement. 'Newsom's made it clear: he'll shred California's Constitution and trample over democracy — running a cynical, self-serving playbook where Californians are an afterthought and power is the only priority.' California Democrats hold 43 of the state's 52 House seats, and the state has some of the most competitive House seats. In California, lawmakers must officially declare the special election, which they plan to do next week after voting on the new maps. Democrats hold supermajorities in both chambers — enough to act without any Republican votes — and Newsom said he is not worried about winning the required support from two-thirds of lawmakers to advance the maps. ___ Nguyễn reported from Sacramento, and Lathan from Austin, Texas. Associated Press writer David Lieb in Jefferson City, Missouri, contributed.
Boston Globe
11 minutes ago
- Boston Globe
Harvard tries to eliminate discrimination protections for campus unions
A university spokesperson referred to a statement it released in June that said, 'Our proposal is aligned with the University's position that the Non-Discrimination, Anti-Bullying, and Title IX policies are the appropriate processes for these concerns.' The spokesperson declined to comment further on Thursday. Get Starting Point A guide through the most important stories of the morning, delivered Monday through Friday. Enter Email Sign Up But union officials say Harvard's resistance is a troubling sign that the school is deferring to the Trump administration's vision for higher education before any legal settlements or deals are made. A potential deal with the White House, they say, may force Harvard to alter its discrimination protections without consulting the union, a move that could hurt its members. Advertisement Since January, the federal government has taken aim at all kinds of provisions that mention race, gender, and 'illegal DEI' on college campuses. 'The Harvard administration is using these attacks on higher education to justify further exploitation by not supporting workers and taking away basic protections,' said Adam Sychla, a bargaining committee member for the Harvard Academic Workers Union. 'While we support Harvard standing up to the Trump administration, it's stolen valor to do so while exploiting its workers.' Advertisement Since Inauguration Day, the Trump administration has viewed Harvard, the nation's wealthiest and most prestigious university, as instrumental in its goals of remaking higher education. After the university rejected government demands that it overhaul admissions, hiring, and governance in April, federal officials canceled nearly $3 billion in research funding; moved to ban the university from hosting international students; and But to critics, Harvard's proposals on discrimination policies this year are yet another example of how the university is 'If the basement of our protections start to erode, like what we see happening here, it erodes what unions are then feeling like they can demand,' said Shannon Gleeson, a Cornell University professor and expert in workplace protections. 'It sends a cultural message about what the approach is that our institutions are taking to address inequality and bide by a culture of nondiscrimination.' Advertisement Conservative critics say instead that it benefits students to be under a single nondiscrimination policy across campus. 'It's just good management that the same rules apply to all sectors of your institution,' said Peter Wood, president of the National Association of Scholars, a nonprofit that seeks to reform higher education. 'Exceptions can be made where they are truly warranted and should be noted as such, but not in a way that labor organizations can carve out their own special sweetheart deal.' Harvard's attempts to reverse the nondiscrimination policies started months ago, in February. In negotiations with the 3,400-member Academic Workers Union, Harvard declined to include contract language that explicitly protects people on the basis of religion or race, for example. Instead, it deferred to The same goes for the graduate student union, a unit that has between 3,000 and 5,500 research and teaching assistants during the academic year. Harvard proposed revoking a longstanding nondiscrimination clause in the union's third contract, immediately after negotiations began. It came as a shock to graduate workers, considering that the union's first two agreements — ratified after 2020 — prohibited discrimination explicitly. Harvard's proposals about nondiscrimination policies to both unions also include provisions that ban them from challenging outcomes of most discrimination complaints and forbid union representation for workers as those complaints are handled by the university. Denish Jaswal, a graduate union organizer and PhD candidate in philosophy, said Harvard's moves are a ploy to 'consolidate their power' and undermine workers. 'Their proposal not only rolls back rights we currently have, but more fundamentally, gives [Harvard] absolute power to determine these policies and modify them at will whenever they would like,' she said. 'A union contract is one of the only concrete backstops to ensure that workers have a true say in their working conditions.' Advertisement Should Harvard get its way, union workers would be subject to In January, for example, its Office for Community Conduct expanded the nondiscrimination policies to fulfill a key condition of its legal agreements with two Jewish advocacy groups. The updated version defined Islamophobia and antisemitism and listed 'advocating genocide' as a possible conduct violation, among other changes, Harvard president Alan Garber in April also It's similar to some nondiscrimination provisions in the deal the Trump administration forged with the Columbia University last month. The New England Higher Education Commission, the accreditor that oversees Harvard and clears its path to federal financial aid, is also Hiba Hafiz, a Boston College professor and labor law expert, said nondiscrimination clauses are 'standard fare' in union contracts and 'entirely consistent with existing protections workers are entitled to' under state and federal law. All active agreements between graduate student employee unions and private universities across the country include a nondiscrimination clause mentioning race and gender. Harvard's move now is 'certainly a novel betrayal that is unprecedented before the Trump administration's attacks on the institution,' Hafiz said. 'It appears that Harvard is willing to prioritize its anti-union principles over other principles it has held dear, and I find that aspect of its position against its graduate students both novel and deeply alarming.' Advertisement Now there are questions, too, about whether Harvard will exclude hundreds of people from union eligibility. The university is arguing that workers paid by a stipend, rather than an hourly wage or a salary, cannot be members of either the Harvard Academic Workers or Graduate Student Union. It could exclude 900 graduate workers from union membership. Harvard postdoctoral researchers — many of whom are 'stipendees' — also make up the majority of the academic workers union. Sudipta Saha, vice president of the graduate workers union, said the move to reclassify workers as nonunion employees comes just as federal labor law turns against unions in the second Trump term. And union officials fear that reclassifying workers could make it easier for Harvard to fire graduate research and teaching assistants as 'It's basically a union-busting tactic that is taking advantage of the fact that the normal recourse that we have through [federal regulators] is less available to us,' he said. Hilary Burns of the Globe staff contributed to this story. Diti Kohli can be reached at
Hamilton Spectator
12 minutes ago
- Hamilton Spectator
Trump and Putin to meet in Alaska for high-stakes summit on Russia-Ukraine war
FILE - U.S. President Donald Trump meets with Russian President Vladimir Putin at the G-20 Summit on July 7, 2017, in Hamburg, Germany. (AP Photo/Evan Vucci, File) EV flag wire: true flag sponsored: false article_type: : sWebsitePrimaryPublication : publications/hamilton_spectator bHasMigratedAvatar : false :
