Demand not tenable: EC rejects Congress' plea for machine-readable Maharashtra voters' list
NEW DELHI: A day after the Congress urged the Election Commission to provide machine-readable digital copy of the Maharashtra voters' list, EC sources on Thursday said the demand is "not tenable" under the prevailing legal framework, asserting that a similar plea of the party was junked by the Supreme Court in 2019.
The EC sources said while Congress leader Rahul Gandhi has been demanding for machine-readable, digital copy of the electoral roll for the last seven months, such demand by the Congress is "not new".
"Rather, it forms part of a strategy by the political party for well over eight years, a fact that appears to have been selectively obscured in the present representation," an EC source pointed out.
The EC sources said the demand reiterated by Gandhi, albeit consistent with the position historically maintained by the Congress, is "not tenable within the contours of the prevailing legal framework".
They pointed out that the issue was already agitated by the Congress before the Supreme Court in a writ petition in 2018 filed by Kamal Nath, the then president of the Madhya Pradesh Congress Committee.
"It appears that Gandhi, the Leader of Opposition in the Lok Sabha, may not have been appropriately apprised of the finality with which the matter stands concluded in judicial record," they said.
Referring to the Supreme Court's verdict in Kamal Nath vs Election Commission of India, (2019), the sources said that top court had observed that it found force in the submission of EC.
Clause 11.2.2.2 of the Election Manual uses the expression "text mode".
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Hans India
32 minutes ago
- Hans India
Oops! BJP scores self-goal in online poll
New Delhi: Is the world-famous IT cell of India's ruling party slipping up? Over 70 per cent respondents to an online poll run by the BJP on its official X (Twitter before Elon Musk took over) handle feel the Congress, if it returns to power, will not reimpose Emergency. The BJP's X handle, @BJP4India, started the poll at 6.53pm on Wednesday, June 25, which marked the anniversary of the Emergency imposed by then prime minister Indira Gandhi on the midnight of June 25, half a century ago. Till 12.30pm on Thursday, the poll had received 23,756 votes. An overwhelming majority – 70.9 per cent – did not believe the Congress would bring back Emergency if it returned to power; 29.1 per cent did. The Emergency has been a pet issue of the BJP to remind Indians of the suspension of fundamental rights 50 years ago. The Congress has tried to push back on the narrative.
The Print
37 minutes ago
- The Print
Congress, TMC oppose EC's ‘special intensive revision' of electoral rolls in poll-bound Bihar
In a statement, the Congress's Empowered Action Group of Leaders and Experts—formed by the party in February to 'monitor the conduct of free and fair elections by the Election Commission of India'—said the proposed revision was a 'devious and dubious idea in the disguise of a solution'. While the Congress stated that there are enough reasons to be suspicious of the EC's plan, West Bengal Chief Minister and Trinamool supremo Mamata Banerjee called it 'dangerous' and 'alarming for democracy'. New Delhi: The Congress party and Trinamool Congress (TMC) Thursday opposed the Election Commission's special intensive revision (SIR) of the electoral roll in poll-bound Bihar, questioning the intent behind the exercise announced on 24 June. 'Lakhs of Union and state government officials will now control and dictate who has correct documents and who doesn't, who gets to vote in the upcoming Bihar elections etc. This carries a huge risk of willful exclusion of voters using the power of the state machinery,' stated the Congress. Both the parties objected to the documentation process that people will have to go through to prove their eligibility to vote. According to the EC's plan, those born between 1 July, 1987, and 2 December, 2004, will have to provide documents establishing the date of birth and/or place of birth of father or mother. Those born after 2 December, 2004, will have to establish the same for both parents. It will not be required for those born before 1 July, 1987. The EC cited factors such as rapid urbanisation, frequent migration, inclusion of names of foreign illegal immigrants as the reason behind its move. The Congress said the announcement itself was an 'admission' that 'all is not well' with India's electoral rolls, an issue which it has been raising aggressively since its defeat in the Maharashtra assembly polls. However, the cure devised by the EC was worse than the disease, according to the party. 'The EC had mooted a proposal on 8 March, 2025, for electoral roll cleaning using Aadhaar, which while not perfect, is a more viable alternative solution than an SIR in Bihar. Why did the EC abandon that to suddenly announce an SIR 3 months after the Aadhaar proposal? 'Given the EC's dogged resistance to the Congress party's long pending demand for Maharashtra electoral rolls and its dubious actions in the past, there is enough reason to be suspect about EC's plans for an SIR in Bihar just a few months before an election. The Congress party firmly opposes the SIR,' it said. Interacting with reporters in Digha in West Bengal, Banerjee said the EC cannot undertake such an exercise without consulting the recognised state and national parties. She suggested that it could be an attempt to revive plans for the creation of a National Register of Citizens (NRC). 'How will poor people get documents? Are they doing this to establish the NRC? What is their intention? Please clarify. What is happening in this country? You are targeting people born between 1987 and 2004, which means those aged between 21 and 37-38. Will everyone have their parents' birth certificates? Nowadays, people have birth certificates, but that was not the case before,' she said. 'Modiji is the prime minister, I respect the chair. But the ECI is linked to (Home Minister) Amit Shah. He is running the country. But they cannot do anything. I am here to expose their plan. This is serious and we have to counter it. Through the media, I want to make people alert. I will request the other Opposition-ruled States to bowl, while we have already started batting,' Banerjee said. (Edited by Zinnia Ray Chaudhuri) Also read: Kharge's 'Modi first' swipe at Tharoor. Congress MP responds 'wings are your, sky belongs to no one'
Indian Express
an hour ago
- Indian Express
Brazil's Supreme Court clears way to hold social media companies liable for user content
Brazil's Supreme Court agreed on Thursday on details of a decision to hold social media companies liable for what their users post, clearing the way for it go into effect within weeks. The 8-3 vote in Brazil's top court orders tech giants like Google, Meta and TikTok to actively monitor content that involves hate speech, racism and incitation to violence and act to remove it. The case has unsettled the relationship between the South American nation and the US government. Critics have expressed concern that the move could threaten free speech if platforms preemptively remove content that could be problematic. After Thursday's ruling is published by the court, people will be able to sue social media companies for hosting illegal content if they refuse to remove it after a victim brings it to their attention. The court didn't set out firm rules on what content is illegal, leaving it to be decided on a case-by-case basis. The ruling strengthens a law that requires companies to remove content only after court orders, which were often ignored. It's the product of two cases accepted by the court last year in which social media companies were accused of failed to act against users promoting fraud, child pornography and violence. A majority of the 11 justices voted to approve the change two weeks ago, but it took until today to reach consensus on how to implement it. The justices also agreed that social media companies will not be liable if they can show they took steps to remove illegal content in a timely fashion. Google said in a statement that is analyzing the court's decision. 'We remain open for dialogue,' the company said. Brazil's top court came to the decision after US Secretary of State Marco Rubio warned of possible visa restrictions against foreign officials involved in censoring American citizens. Thursday's ruling brings Brazil's approach to big tech closer to the European Union's approach, which has sought to rein in the power of social media companies and other digital platforms.
