
Analysis: Trump's new warnings about mail-in voting are the most sinister yet
Congressional news
January 6th
Election securityFacebookTweetLink
Follow
President Donald Trump has often shown how far he'll go to try to flout the will of voters. That's what makes his new renewed obsession with mail-in ballots so sinister.
Trump falsely claimed in a Truth Social post Monday that voting by mail is a 'scam' that allows Democrats to cheat. He promised an executive order to also target another safe election tool — voting machines — and inaccurately claimed he had the authority to dictate how elections are run before the 2026 midterms.
Incredibly, he appears to have been partly acting on the advice of Russian President Vladimir Putin, an authoritarian who destroyed Russia's post-Soviet Union democracy and who interfered in the 2016 election that Trump won.
Trump's fixation on mail-in voting is not new. His suspicion was sent into overdrive after he lost the presidency in 2020 in an election that saw an expansion of mail-in ballots to help keep voters safe during the Covid-19 pandemic.
The president sensed the danger to his hopes of a consecutive second term from a high turnout as early as the second quarter of 2020. He falsely claimed in interviews and on social media that foreign states could interfere in mail-in voting and that postal balloting would allow fraud. In June of that year, he predicted the 'Election disaster of our time' and a 'RIGGED ELECTION' on Twitter.
At the time, his warnings were seen as an odd quirk and were not supported by many senior Republicans. They also frustrated GOP strategists who were urging their voters to use mail-in ballots during the health emergency, especially since Democratic voters were traditionally more likely to use postal voting.
But in retrospect, and following the experience of Trump's refusal to accept the result of the 2020 election, his comments look more alarming: They heralded a historic attempt to overturn the result of a free and fair presidential election.
And they mean his newest remarks on the topic should be taken seriously. Taken together with more recent attempts to sway future elections, they raise alarm bells about the midterms and the next presidential election. Since Trump lacks the Constitutional power to dictate election rules in the states, he may also be laying the groundwork to claim a Republican loss in the midterm elections — often a rite of passage for incumbent presidents — is illegitimate.
Since returning to power, Trump has escalated his attempts to use executive power and the visibility of his office to tilt the midterms toward Republicans and to undermine democracy more generally.
Trump ordered Texas Republicans to initiate an unprecedented midterm redistricting drive to net five new GOP seats by 2026, which could be critical given the current tiny Republican House majority. The move set off a similar move by Gov. Gavin Newsom to draw new Democratic seats in California, which may trigger a nationwide partisan redistricting wave that could further damage democracy.
The president has also rewarded those who did his dirty work in attacking elections, granting hundreds of pardons and commutations to supporters who were convicted and jailed for the assault on the US Capitol on January 6, 2021, an attempt to overturn President Joe Biden's election win the previous November.
Trump's supporters have shown a similar disregard for the right of voters in each state to choose their leaders, even those who fiercely resisted federal power in previous capacities.
In June, Homeland Security Secretary and former South Dakota Gov. Kristi Noem explained the deployment of National Guard troops and active-duty US Marines to Los Angeles amid protests against Trump's immigration policies. She said they planned to stay to 'liberate this city from the socialist and burdensome leadership' of its elected Democratic representatives. In the event, the soldiers did nothing of the sort and mostly just guarded federal properties, but the deployments and her rhetoric were in keeping with Trump's authoritarian turn.
More recently, Trump has sent military reservists and federal agents into the streets of Washington, DC, as part of an anti-crime crackdown. He's now importing National Guard members from Republican states in a show of force over a city that has repeatedly and overwhelmingly voted to reject him in national elections. There are concerns this could be a template he will later apply to Democratic cities in the states.
With all this in mind, the possibility of an attempt by Trump to block or delegitimize the rights of states — including those that return mostly Democratic delegations — to run their own elections must be taken seriously.
Trump vented about mail-in voting during an Oval Office appearance with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky on Monday. 'Mail-in ballots are corrupt. Mail-in ballots, you can never have a real democracy with mail-in ballots,' the president said, firing off a torrent of falsehoods about voter fraud.
His latest tirade against mail-in voting may have been sown by Putin, an enemy of the United States, during their summit meeting in Alaska last week.
'You know, Vladimir Putin said something — one of the most interesting things. He said, 'Your election was rigged because you have mail-in voting.' He said, 'It's impossible to have mail-in voting and have honest elections,' Trump told Sean Hannity on Fox News immediately after the summit.
Trump said Putin told him that he won the 2020 by 'so much' and that there would have been no war in Ukraine had Trump held office in 2022. 'And he said, 'And you lost it because of mail-in voting.' … Vladimir Putin, smart guy, said you can't have an honest election with mail-in voting.'
It took only two days for Trump to launch an early-morning online tirade against mail-in voting and to initiate a new attempt to halt it in the United States.
Still, Trump's capacity to do more than try to discredit mail-in voting is questionable.
There is no official role for presidents in administering federal elections — a point driven home in several of the criminal indictments he faced for his role in seeking to overturn the 2020 election.
The Constitution states that 'the times, places and manner of holding elections for Senators and Representatives, shall be prescribed in each state by the legislature thereof.' It does allow Congress to at any time alter regulations on the times and manner of elections. This is one potential route for Republicans to change state election laws. But since they lack 60 votes in the Senate, they'd have to outlaw the filibuster to do so, an unlikely scenario since this could open the way to untamed Democratic power the next time their rivals control the chamber.
Still, White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt signaled Tuesday that Trump intended to go beyond an executive order.
'I'm sure there will be many discussions with our friends on Capitol Hill. And also our friends in state legislatures across the country, to ensure that we're protecting the integrity of the vote for the American people,' Leavitt said.
'I think Republicans generally, and the president generally, wants to make it easier for Americans to vote and harder for people to cheat in our elections,' she said — even though mail-in voting is one of the easiest ways to cast a ballot. 'And it's quite mind-boggling that the Democrat Party could stand in opposition to common sense.'
Multiple studies by academic institutions, think tanks and vote protection organizations have shown that mail-in voting is secure.
CNN's Daniel Dale produced a comprehensive new fact check debunking the president's claims that Democrats use mail-in voting to cheat and that the states 'must do' what the federal government and president tell them to do. The latter claim, incidentally, is a fundamental misunderstanding of the character of a federal republic.
Dale notes that in general in US elections, 'there has generally been a tiny quantity of ballot fraud representing a minuscule percentage of votes cast.'
Any attempt by Trump to change voting methods by executive fiat would immediately trigger court challenges. And it's not clear that Republican-led state legislatures would all fall into line, since Republicans have been catching up to Democrats in the share of early voting in person and by mail.
Democrats are already signaling they will resist the president's latest salvo against mail-in voting and as a rallying call.
Arizona's Secretary of State Adrian Fontes, a Democrat, pointed out on X Tuesday that more than 80% of the state's voters cast mail-in ballots and implied that previous warnings about Republican attempts to take over elections were coming true. 'I've been warning about this for years. The canary is dead,' he wrote.
And Katie Porter, a candidate for the Democratic gubernatorial nomination in California, is already fundraising off Trump's remarks. 'Donald Trump is trying to steal the 2026 midterm election in plain sight,' she wrote in a mailing Tuesday.
That may be getting ahead of where things currently are. But the warning signs are there, not least following Trump's joke during his meeting with Zelensky on Monday when his visitor said elections are suspended in Ukraine for the duration of the war — as the law stipulates.
'You say during the war, you can't have elections? So, let me just say, three-and-a-half years from now — so you mean if we happen to be in a war with somebody, no more elections? Oh, that's good,' Trump said.
Coming from any other president, his quip might have been funnier.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

Yahoo
7 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Vance's trip for burgers crashes into Trump's D.C. takeover
A vice president, defense secretary and top White House aide walk into a burger joint. Let the chaos ensue. Vice President JD Vance, Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth and White House deputy chief of staff Stephen Miller on Wednesday paid an unannounced visit to the National Guard troops stationed at Union Station, the major regional train station in the nation's capital. From a second-floor Shake Shack, Vance thanked the soldiers for 'actually keeping this place safe.' 'You guys bust your ass all day. We give you hamburgers. Not a fair trade, but we're grateful for everything you guys do,' the vice president said. His staffers presented them with boxes of burgers. The remarks were hard to hear, however, because of what was happening down below. As three of the most powerful men in the world attempted to seize yet another media moment broadcasting the White House's crackdown on crime in Washington, protesters in the station drowned them out. Shouts of 'Free D.C.,' echoed throughout the historic train hall. The extraordinary scene was evocative of the greater tensions between Washington and the White House, as President Donald Trump exerts unprecedented control over the deep-blue city. Since the president launched a takeover of the Metropolitan Police Department, deployed federal law enforcement from agencies like ICE and the FBI and sent in National Guard troops nine days ago, the District has had little choice but to comply with a crackdown — based predominantly on the president's whims — while tackling the uncomfortable political realities of crime here. 'You hear these people out here screaming 'Free D.C.,' Vance said. 'Let's free D.C. from lawlessness. Let's free Washington, D.C., from one of the highest murder rates in the entire world. Let's free Washington, D.C., so that young families can walk around and feel safe and secure. That's what we're trying to free D.C. from.' Vance and Miller — who have both been publicly critical of diversity, equity and inclusion efforts and the broader racial justice movement — cast the protesters in racial terms, calling them out for being white and not having a true understanding of crime in the city. 'It's kind of bizarre that we have a bunch of old, primarily white people who are out there protesting the policies that keep people safe when they've never felt danger in their entire lives,' Vance said. Although troops and law enforcement have been highly visible in the city's tourist hotspots — which are generally high-traffic, low-crime areas — the White House says enforcement crackdowns are concentrated in Wards 7 and 8, which are majority-Black and have the highest crime rate in the city. POLITICO could not independently confirm the White House's analysis. 'We're going to ignore these stupid white hippies,' Miller said. 'They all need to go home and take a nap because they're all over 90 years old, and we're going to get back to business protecting the American people.' Miller called the protesters 'crazy communists' who 'have no connection to this city.' He promised to add 'thousands more resources to this city to get criminals and the gang members out of here.' Trump nine days ago invoked a provision of the Home Rule Act, the 1970s law that grants limited self-governance to the District, to demand the services of the Metropolitan Police Department to assist the federal government during 'special conditions of an emergency nature.' But Trump and his administration have cast his move in much more dire terms, suggesting it was a full-fledged federal takeover of the city's police. An attempt by the administration to name the head of the Drug Enforcement Administration the city's 'emergency police commissioner' prompted fury from city officials, a move the administration walked back last week in an agreement with D.C. at the urging of a federal judge. Trump only has the authority to take federal control of the MPD for 30 days without congressional approval, but has suggested he wants to circumvent that. Asked if the White House would try to extend the takeover beyond that timeline, Vance said: 'If the president of the United States thinks that he has to extend this order to ensure that people have access to public safety, then that's exactly what he'll do.' A supermajority of the city's residents oppose Trump controlling law enforcement in the city, according to a Washington Post-Schar School poll released Wednesday. But Vance said he was 'highly skeptical' of that poll. 'I don't know what poll you're talking about, maybe the same poll that said Kamala Harris would win the popular vote by 10 points,' he quipped. That response, too, is indicative of the broader White House playbook behind the crime crackdown: Lean on what people see and how they feel, and when the numbers don't align with the vibes, call the numbers into question. District police data, for example, has violent crime in Washington at a 30-year low. But the White House claims the MPD 'cooked the books' and the Justice Department is now probing whether those statistics were manipulated, multiple outlets reported Tuesday. Vance on Wednesday said 'crime statistics all over our country were massively underreported.' Asked what evidence he had that the MPD statistics had been manipulated, Vance said 'you just have to look around,' adding that statistics from the Justice Department and FBI 'back it up.' It was not clear what statistics he was referring to. Solve the daily Crossword
Yahoo
7 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Fox News Host Has Lame Defense For Why Gavin Newsom's Tweets Are Bad, But Trump's Are Not
Fox Newshost Dana Perino attempted to defend her pearl-clutching towardCalifornia Gov. Gavin Newsom's trend oftrolling tweets on Tuesday's episode of'The Five.' But doing so required her to ignore the reason for the governor's recent mockery of Donald Trump's social media style and insisted Newsom is just being a copycat. Newsom has recently been mocking MAGA by mimicking the president's all-caps online posts, complete with insults and ludicrously narcissistic praise of himself. In the process, Trump lovers like Kid Rock have gotten themselves in a MAGA tizzy over the posts. On Monday, Perino suggested with a straight face that Newsom has 'to stop it with the Twitter thing,' claiming he was 'making a fool' of himself in the process. Many people on social media mocked Perino's complaints about Newsom's posts because many of them are direct copies of previous Trump posts. As a result, she faced accusations of hypocrisy and having a partisan double standard where mean tweets are concerned. Related: Newsom's Press Office responded with an all-caps post that began, 'DANA 'DING DONG' PERINO (NEVER HEARD OF HER UNTIL TODAY!) IS MELTING DOWN BECAUSE OF ME, GAVIN C. NEWSOM!' Perino attempted to defend her pearl-clutching by saying, 'We get the joke,' though her excuse required her to be humorless. Related: 'He was reading tweets that were written for him by people that he is heavily investing in to try to help him look more like Trump, I guess,' she said. 'I mean, I thought they hated Trump, but they're trying to be more like him and they have to pay people to do it.' She also insisted that the problem she had with Newsom's posts is that they weren't authentic. She added: 'You're trying to do somebody else who you say is Hitler, and you think that we don't get the joke. Oh, no, we get the joke. It's just not funny.' Perino's co-host, Jesse Watters, also seemed a bit miffed at Newsom for following the lead of the GOP's fearless leader. 'They claim conservatives don't get the joke, we do ― we just think you look like a tool,' he said without irony. Both Perino and Watters' lame defenses of their partisan double standards were mocked by others on social media. Related... Fox News' Dana Perino Called Out For Hypocrisy Over Gavin Newsom Posts Kid Rock Goes Into Meltdown Mode After Getting Punked By Gavin Newsom's X Account Gavin Newsom's Troll Job Of Trump Is Working Incredibly Well Poli Sci Experts Predict What Exactly Gavin Newsom's Mockery Of Trump Could Achieve
Yahoo
7 minutes ago
- Yahoo
One candidate drops from Lakeland's race for the Northeast District seat
Lakeland candidate Don Burns has withdrawn his candidacy for Lakeland's District B Northeast seat this November. Burns filed his candidacy forms with Lakeland City Clerk's Office on July 2. His campaign lasted less than 50 days. He is the face behind the "I Am Lakeland" video podcast, in which he interviews local entrepreneurs and residents about what is happening in the city. The city clerk's office confirmed Burns officially withdrew on Aug. 19, and his name will not be appearing on the ballot. "After I filled out the paperwork, I discussed things more with my wife and kids," Burns told The Ledger. "It's my kids' last two years of college. I'm still young, 56, and in two years I think I could be more qualified." In his first interview with The Ledger, Burns said he had originally intended to run for the Northeast District seat in 2028, when Commissioner Bill Read's term was scheduled to end. Read announced June 23 that he intends to step down as a city commissioner at the end of the year, effective Dec. 21, 2025 ― two years into his third term representing the city's Northeast District. This leaves Terry Coney, recent president of Lakeland's NAACP banch, as the sole candidate for the city's District B on Nov. 4 Election information Lakeland will have five seats up for grabs this coming November: Mayor At-Large At-Large Seat 1 District B Northeast District C Southwest District D Southeast To be eligible, individuals must: live within the city limits and the district, if applicable, for a year prior to running for office; be a registered voter and never have committed a felony. The city's elections are nonpartisan and candidates do not formally declare a party affiliation and may not take contributions from political parties. As of Aug. 20, there is one candidate for the city's District B Northeast seat after Burns' withdrawal and no one has filed to run At-Large Seat 2, currently held by Commissioner Stephanie Madden. Lakeland's qualifying week starts Sept. 15, with all paperwork being due to the City Clerk's Office by noon on Sept. 19. More information can be found on the city's website at This article originally appeared on The Ledger: Don Burns ends his campaign for Bill Read's open NE District seat Solve the daily Crossword