logo
2026 World Cup Cities Face Fan Concerns Over U.S. Policies

2026 World Cup Cities Face Fan Concerns Over U.S. Policies

The Suna day ago

U.S. CITIES hosting next year's FIFA World Cup faced questions on Wednesday about how to reassure international fans concerned by President Donald Trump's immigration crackdown and travel ban as the year-to-go countdown began.
The United States, along with Canada and Mexico, is set to co-host the finals, which will feature 48 teams and a record 104 matches in a tournament that FIFA boss Gianni Infantino said would usher in a new generation of soccer fans.
Celebrities and soccer stars were due to walk the red carpet at the Fox Studio Lot in Los Angeles - one of the host cities - for the year-to-go event there, a day after President Trump deployed Marines and the National Guard to quell protests.
California Governor Gavin Newsom described the deployment as an 'unmistakable step toward authoritarianism,' while Trump officials defended it and branded the protests as lawless, blaming local and state Democrats for permitting upheaval.
Los Angeles is one of several host cities marking the year-to-go occasion.
New York-New Jersey held a waterside party on Wednesday, where local officials and fans celebrated against the backdrop of Ellis Island.
Asked about comments Vice President JD Vance made last month warning World Cup travellers not to overstay their welcome, New York-New Jersey host Committee CEO Alex Lasry said: 'Our goal is to make sure everyone who comes to New York-New Jersey has an incredible time.'
'Something that you have to kind of know, when you're putting on mega sporting events ... is the world is still going on. The world doesn't stop for these sporting events,' said Lasry.
'And you kind of have to go with the flow and make sure that you're able to adapt.'
Minky Worden, director of global initiatives at Human Rights Watch, said FIFA needed to work with the U.S. government to ensure the rights of competitors, support staff, fans and media were protected regardless of their identities or views.
'FIFA should publicly acknowledge the threat US immigration and other anti-human rights policies pose to the tournament's integrity ... (and) should establish clear benchmarks and timelines for the US policy changes needed to ensure respect for immigrants' rights during the 2026 World Cup and beyond,' she said.
U.S. Democratic leaders raised concerns over a national crisis on Tuesday as Trump moved U.S. Marines into Los Angeles to tackle civilian protests over his immigration policies.
'There are certainly things that are happening at the national level, the international level, there are going to be geopolitical issues that we don't even know right now that are going to affect the tournament,' Meg Kane, a host city executive for Philadelphia told reporters at a Paley Center event on Monday.
'So we recognise that we're planning within uncertainty.'
FIFA did not immediately respond to a request for comment.
Infantino confident
FIFA President Gianni Infantino said last month after meeting Trump that he was confident the world would be welcomed in for the 2026 World Cup and this year's Club World Cup, which runs from June 14 to July 13.
But the task of reassuring international fans was complicated by a travel ban that went into effect on Monday, cracking down on what Trump called 'foreign terrorists'.
Of the 12 countries facing travel bans, Iran is the only one that has qualified for the 2026 tournament so far. Tehran said on Saturday that the ban showed 'deep hostility' toward Iranians and Muslims.
European fans, supporter groups and former players contacted by Reuters said it was too early for anyone to be thinking about revising schedules or reevaluating plans for attending the World Cup.
Alina Hudak, the Miami host committee president and CEO, told Reuters she had been in touch with the local consular corps to address their concerns and to offer support.
'My responsibility is to make sure that we're ready, that we're safe, that we're coordinating logistically with all of our law enforcement agencies, that we've done everything we can to ensure that our mass transit system is ready and can handle the volume,' said Hudak.
'And so for me, you know, what's happening outside of that is something that we're monitoring, but not something that, quite frankly, I have an impact (on).' (Reporting by Amy Tennery in New York, additional reporting by Andrew Hoffstetter in Jersey City and Lori Ewing in Manchester; Editing by Toby Davis and Philippa Fletcher)

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Israel launches 'preemptive' strikes on Iran, expects retaliatory action
Israel launches 'preemptive' strikes on Iran, expects retaliatory action

Borneo Post

time23 minutes ago

  • Borneo Post

Israel launches 'preemptive' strikes on Iran, expects retaliatory action

This handout photo released by Iran's Revolutionary Guard Corps official Sepah News Telegram channel on June 13, 2025 reportedly shows smoke billowing from a site targeted by an Israeli strike in the Iranian capital Tehran early in the morning. — Sepah News / AFP photo JERUSALEM (June 13): Israel carried out 'preemptive' strikes against Iran on Friday, targeting its nuclear plant and military sites, after US President Donald Trump warned of a possible 'massive conflict' in the region. Explosions were heard Friday morning in the Iranian capital, state TV reported, adding that Iran's air defence were at '100 per cent operational capacity'. Israel declared a state of emergency, with Defence Minister Israel Katz saying that retaliatory action from Tehran was possible following the operation. 'Following the State of Israel's preemptive strike against Iran, a missile and drone attack against the State of Israel and its civilian population is expected in the immediate future,' Katz said. Oil prices surged as much as 6 percent on the strikes, which came after Trump warned of a possible Iranian attack and said the US was drawing down staff in the region. 'I don't want to say imminent, but it looks like it's something that could very well happen,' Trump told reporters at the White House Thursday when asked if an Israeli attack loomed. Trump said he believed a 'pretty good' deal on Iran's nuclear programme was 'fairly close', but said that an Israeli attack on its arch foe could wreck the chances of an agreement. The US leader did not disclose the details of a conversation on Monday with Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, but said: 'I don't want them going in, because I think it would blow it.' Trump quickly added: 'Might help it actually, but it also could blow it.' A US official said there had been no US involvement in the Israeli strikes on Iran. — 'Extremist' — The United States on Wednesday said it was reducing embassy staff in Iraq — long a zone of proxy conflict with Iran. Israel, which counts on US military and diplomatic support, sees the cleric-run state in Tehran as an existential threat and hit Iranian air defences last year. Netanyahu has vowed less restraint since the unprecedented Oct 7, 2023 attack on Israel by Tehran-backed Hamas, which triggered the massive Israeli offensive in Gaza. The United States and other Western countries, along with Israel, have repeatedly accused Iran of seeking a nuclear weapon, which it has repeatedly denied. Israel again called for global action after the UN's International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) accused Iran on Wednesday of non-compliance with its obligations. The resolution could lay the groundwork for European countries to invoke a 'snapback' mechanism, which expires in October, that would reinstate UN sanctions eased under a 2015 nuclear deal negotiated by then US president Barack Obama. Trump pulled out of the deal in his first term and slapped Iran with sweeping sanctions. Iran's nuclear chief, Mohammad Eslami, slammed the resolution as 'extremist' and blamed Israeli influence. In response to the resolution, Iran said it would launch a new enrichment centre in a secure location. Iran would also replace 'all of these first-generation machines with sixth-generation advanced machines' at the Fordo uranium enrichment plant, said Behrouz Kamalvandi, spokesman of the Atomic Energy Organization of Iran. Iran currently enriches uranium to 60 per cent, far above the 3.67-per cent limit set in the 2015 deal and close, though still short, of the 90 per cent needed for a nuclear warhead. — AFP donald trump Israel Katz Mohammad Eslami

Judge orders Trump to return control of National Guard to California
Judge orders Trump to return control of National Guard to California

Borneo Post

time23 minutes ago

  • Borneo Post

Judge orders Trump to return control of National Guard to California

A man stands in front of a row of California National Guard members and waves a combination US and Mexican flag during ongoing protests in response to federal immigration operations outside the Federal Building in downtown Los Angeles, on June 12, 2025. — AFP photo LOS ANGELES (June 13): A judge has ordered Donald Trump to return control of the California National Guard to the state, saying the president's decision to deploy them to protest-hit Los Angeles over Governor Gavin Newsom's objections was 'illegal.' 'His actions were illegal … He must therefore return control of the California National Guard to the Governor of the State of California forthwith,' US District Judge Charles Breyer wrote of the president in the ruling, seen by AFP. However, he paused the order until 12pm local time (1900 GMT) Friday — and the White House almost immediately launched an appeal that could make it all the way to the Supreme Court. 'Donald Trump will be relieved of his command at noon tomorrow,' Newsom said in televised comments after the ruling was issued. 'He is not a monarch, he is not a king, and he should stop acting like one,' the 57-year-old Democrat said. Trump's decision to federalize the National Guard — a reserve force — and deploy them in California over the objection of the state governor was one not taken by a US president since 1965. The Republican has argued he did so because protests in Los Angeles against immigration raids ordered by his administration had gotten out of control, and the city was 'burning.' But Newsom and local law enforcement have stated repeatedly that there was no need for the deployment, and the protests have been mostly peaceful and contained to a few city blocks — albeit tarnished by some spectacular violence, including the torching of several cars. Critics have accused Trump — who also deployed 700 active Marines to the sprawling city — of exaggerating the crisis and exceeding his authority to conduct a power grab. Breyer's 36-page opinion said the violence fell 'far short' of the 'rebellion' Trump described to justify calling in the guardsmen. There was 'no evidence of organized, as apart from sporadic or impromptu, violence' during the protests, which first broke out in Los Angeles on Friday, he said. 'Nor is there evidence that any of the violent protesters were attempting to overthrow the government as a whole; the evidence is overwhelming that protesters gathered to protest a single issue — the immigration raids.' Breyer also wrote that he was 'troubled' by the implication that 'protest against the federal government, a core civil liberty protected by the First Amendment, can justify a finding of rebellion.' There was no immediate reaction from the White House to the ruling. — AFP california Charles Breyer donald trump Gavin Newsom US National Guard

Judge orders Trump to return control of National Guard to California: ruling
Judge orders Trump to return control of National Guard to California: ruling

The Sun

time37 minutes ago

  • The Sun

Judge orders Trump to return control of National Guard to California: ruling

Los Angeles, United States: A judge has ordered Donald Trump to return control of the California National Guard to the state, saying the president's decision to deploy them to protest-hit Los Angeles over Governor Gavin Newsom's objections was 'illegal.' 'His actions were illegal ... He must therefore return control of the California National Guard to the Governor of the State of California forthwith,' US District Judge Charles Breyer wrote of the president in the ruling, seen by AFP. However, he paused the order until 12 pm local time (1900 GMT) Friday -- and the White House almost immediately launched an appeal that could make it all the way to the Supreme Court. Trump's decision to federalize the National Guard -- a reserve force -- and deploy them in California over the objection of the state governor was one not taken by a US president since 1965. The Republican has argued he did so because protests in Los Angeles against immigration raids ordered by his administration had gotten out of control, and Los Angeles was 'burning.' But Newsom and local law enforcement have stated repeatedly that there was no need for the deployment, and the protests have been mostly peaceful and contained to a few city blocks -- albeit tarnished by some spectacular violence, including the torching of several cars. Critics have accused Trump -- who also deployed 700 active Marines to the sprawling city -- of exaggerating the crisis and exceeding his authority to conduct a power grab. Breyer's 36-page opinion said the violence fell 'far short' of the 'rebellion' Trump described to justify calling in the guardsmen.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store