TTrump's new executive policing order sparks debate over effectiveness
US President Donald Trump signs an executive order in the Oval Office of the White House, in Washington, U.S., January 23, 2025. PHOTO:REUTERS
Listen to article
President Donald Trump's newly signed executive order on policing has sparked mixed reactions across the law enforcement community and from experts.
The order promises expanded legal protection for officers, additional training, and more access to military-grade equipment, among other measures, but its practical implications remain unclear.
The key provision of the order directs Attorney General Pam Bondi to provide free private legal services to police officers facing civil rights lawsuits.
Critics question the necessity of this move, pointing out that police officers are already covered by union-provided legal services.
Criminology experts, including Thomas Nolan from Boston University, argue that the order may be a symbolic gesture to address law enforcement concerns without bringing substantial change.
Additionally, the order calls for increased training and higher pay for officers, but experts note that salary changes typically come through collective bargaining rather than federal intervention.
The order also pushes for tougher penalties for crimes against officers, a move supported by police unions but criticized by those who argue that existing state laws already address this issue.
Trump's proposal also includes increased investment in prison security and the capacity of US correctional facilities.
However, critics highlight that similar initiatives were already part of previous administrations, such as the 1994 Crime Bill.
The effectiveness of Trump's order remains uncertain, with experts divided on whether it will result in meaningful reform or if it is merely a political gesture aimed at securing the support of law enforcement groups.
The order is part of Trump's broader effort to strengthen law enforcement and demonstrate support for police unions, who were key backers during his 2024 campaign.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Business Recorder
2 hours ago
- Business Recorder
Russian drone attack kills five, injures 24, Ukraine officials say
KHARKIV: A Russian drone attack killed the family of the local fire chief in Ukraine's northern town of Pryluky in Chernihiv region, Ukraine's interior minister said on Thursday. Minister Ihor Klymenko said the attack killed the fire chief's wife, daughter and one-year-old grandson. 'On this terrible night, the rescuer was on site with the fire and rescue team to deal with the aftermath of the enemy strikes,' he wrote on Telegram, expressing his condolences. The family was among five people killed when Russia launched six drones to attack the town overnight, regional governor Viacheslav Chaus said. Six more people were hospitalised, he added. Ukraine's northern and eastern regions have been a frequent target of Russian drones and missiles in the more than three-year-old war. Another Russian drone attack on Ukraine's northeastern city of Kharkiv injured 18 people, including four children, Klymenko said. Kharkiv Mayor Ihor Terekhov said the overnight strikes damaged seven apartment buildings, with direct hits on two. Ukraine strikes grounded Russian bombers in major drone assault 'It flew into our neighbours' apartment next door, and my child and I managed to run out into the hallway,' resident Anastasiia Meleshchenko told Reuters at the scene, adding that the ceiling began to crumble after a blast. 'Yesterday, workers had just finished repair work in my apartment after the previous attack,' she said. Outside, wrecked cars were on the street and emergency services workers were inspecting the damage. There was no immediate comment from Russia.
Express Tribune
2 hours ago
- Express Tribune
Trump halts entry of foreign students enrolled at Harvard
Listen to article US President Donald Trump on Wednesday announced an immediate ban on visas for foreign students enrolled to begin studies at Harvard University, intensifying a long-standing clash with academic institutions. In a proclamation released late in the day, Trump said the measure targets those seeking entry to the United States "solely or principally" to attend courses or exchange programmes run by Harvard. The decision applies to all new entrants via the Student and Exchange Visitor Program (SEVP) and places current visa-holders under review. "The entry of such aliens presents an unacceptable risk to our Nation's security," Trump said in the statement. The White House accused Harvard of repeatedly withholding information on criminal activity involving foreign students and resisting federal oversight of its programmes. Harvard, a frequent target of Trump's rhetoric, has openly defied the administration's efforts to impose stricter controls on academic operations, including recruitment and research. Trump's order also warned that existing international students could face revocation of their visas if concerns arise during the review process. The move is likely to strain further relations between the government and US universities, many of which depend on international enrollment. Harvard officials have yet to respond publicly to the directive. Trump also accused Harvard and its affiliated campus groups of limiting opportunities for American citizens, claiming the university continued to deny "hardworking Americans" fair access. The proclamation stated it was not in the country's interest to "exacerbate" what it described as Harvard's discriminatory practices against certain races, nationalities, or religious backgrounds by allowing large numbers of international students. The Trump administration has taken a hard line on foreign students, with Secretary of State Marco Rubio recently pledging to step up efforts to revoke visas for Chinese nationals. Just last week, as students marked graduation ceremonies, a federal judge extended a temporary injunction blocking Trump's attempt to halt international student enrollment at Harvard.
Express Tribune
3 hours ago
- Express Tribune
Trump imposes new US travel ban on 12 nations
Afghan refugees queue outside a distribution and donation center at Liberty Village on Joint Base McGuire-Dix-Lakehurst in New Jersey, U.S., December 2, 2021. REUTERS/Barbara Davidson/Pool/File photo Listen to article US President Donald Trump signed a proclamation on Wednesday banning the nationals of 12 countries from entering the United States, saying the move was needed to protect against "foreign terrorists" and other security threats. The directive is part of an immigration crackdown Trump launched this year at the start of his second term, which has also included the deportation to El Salvador of hundreds of Venezuelans suspected of being gang members and efforts to deny enrollments of some foreign students and deport others. The countries affected by the latest travel ban are Afghanistan, Myanmar, Chad, Congo, Equatorial Guinea, Eritrea, Haiti, Iran, Libya, Somalia, Sudan and Yemen. The entry of people from seven other countries: Burundi, Cuba, Laos, Sierra Leone, Togo, Turkmenistan and Venezuela, will be partially restricted. "We will not allow people to enter our country who wish to do us harm," Trump said in a video posted on X. He said the list could be revised and new countries could be added. "We cannot have open migration from any country where we cannot safely and reliably vet and screen... That is why today I am signing a new executive order placing travel restrictions on countries including Yemen, Somalia, Haiti, Libya, and numerous others." –President Trump — The White House (@WhiteHouse) June 4, 2025 The proclamation is effective on June 9, 2025 at 12:01 am EDT (0401 GMT). Who does it apply to? The proclamation states that the full and partial travel bans apply to foreign nationals of the designated countries who: - are outside the United States on June 9, and - do not have a valid visa on June 9 The proclamation also states: No immigrant or non-immigrant visa issued before June 9 "shall be revoked pursuant to this proclamation." Are there any exceptions to the trave bans? Exceptions to the travel ban include: - Any lawful permanent resident of the United States - Dual nationals - Diplomats traveling on valid non-immigrant visas - Athletes or members of an athletic team and immediate relatives, traveling for the World Cup, Olympics, or other major sporting event - Immediate family immigrant visas - Adoptions - Afghan Special Immigrant Visas - Special Immigrant Visas for United States government employees - Immigrant visas for ethnic and religious minorities facing persecution in Iran During his first term in office, Trump announced a ban on travelers from seven Muslim-majority nations, a policy that went through several iterations before it was upheld by the Supreme Court in 2018. Former President Joe Biden, a Democrat who succeeded Trump, repealed that ban on nationals from Iran, Libya, Somalia, Syria and Yemen in 2021, calling it "a stain on our national conscience." Trump said the countries subject to the most severe restrictions were determined to harbor a "large-scale presence of terrorists," fail to cooperate on visa security and have an inability to verify travelers' identities, inadequate record-keeping of criminal histories and high rates of visa overstays in the United States. "We cannot have open migration from any country where we cannot safely and reliably vet and screen those who seek to enter the United States," Trump said. He cited Sunday's incident in Boulder, Colorado in which an Egyptian national, Mohamed Sabry Soliman, has been charged in the attack. Federal officials said Soliman had overstayed his tourist visa and had an expired work permit - although Egypt is not on the list of countries facing travel limits. Somalia immediately pledged to work with the US to address security issues. "Somalia values its longstanding relationship with the United States and stands ready to engage in dialogue to address the concerns raised," Dahir Hassan Abdi, the Somali ambassador to the United States, said in a statement. Venezuelan Interior Minister Diosdado Cabello, a close ally of President Nicolas Maduro, responded on Wednesday evening by describing the US government as fascist and warning Venezuelans of being in the US. "The truth is being in the United States is a big risk for anybody, not just for Venezuelans ... They persecute our countrymen, our people for no reason." A spokesperson for the Taliban-led Afghan foreign ministry did not immediately respond to a request for comment. Pakistan's foreign ministry did not immediately reply to a request for comment on how it would handle the thousands of Afghans waiting in Islamabad who had been in the pipeline for US resettlement. Calls early on Thursday to the spokesperson of Myanmar's military government were not answered. The foreign ministry of Laos did not immediately respond to a request for comment. Trump campaigned on a tough border strategy and previewed his plan in an October 2023 speech, pledging to restrict people from Gaza, Libya, Somalia, Syria, Yemen and "anywhere else that threatens our security." Trump issued an executive order on January 20 requiring intensified security vetting of any foreigners seeking admission to the US to detect national security threats. That order directed several cabinet members to submit a list of countries from which travel should be partly or fully suspended because their "vetting and screening information is so deficient."
