The Irish Times view on Elon Musk's departure: a myth punctured
Future historians of the United States will no doubt be fascinated by the 130-day period in which the richest man in the world was permitted to take a chainsaw to the institutions and agencies of the federal government. Much remains to be discovered about what really transpired under the auspices of Elon Musk's Department of Government Efficiency (Doge),but there is good reason to believe that most of it was calamitous..
We do have a sense of whether or not Musk succeeded in his stated aim of cutting $2 trillion from the federal budget. He later described that figure as a 'best-case outcome,' suggesting that achieving $1 trillion in cuts would be a more realistic and still significant goal. By April 2025, the department claimed to have saved approximately $160 billion, a figure that was met with scepticism and scrutiny regarding its accuracy and the methods used to calculate it. In fact, many agencies actually incurred new costs due to the chaos left in Doge's wake, from severance payouts to emergency re-hires and legal settlements.Even if the figure of $160 billion were to be believed, it is dwarfed by the trillions of dollars of additional debt contained in Donald Trump's so-called 'big, beautiful bill', if it is approved by Congress.
Despite their protestations, it is clear that deficit reduction and elimination of waste were not the true purposes of Musk or Trump. This was a massive exercise in vindictiveness and vandalism against the very idea of public service. It was therefore both highly ideological and intensely narcissistic.
Musk arrived in Washington promising to apply Silicon Valley principles to the sprawling machinery of American government. What unfolded was something altogether cruder. Mass layoffs were announced via social media before the agencies affected were informed. But far worse was the damage inflicted on international aid and humanitarian relief programmes. USAID, once a cornerstone of American soft power, was left scrambling to maintain basic operations in famine zones.The human toll was stark: disrupted refugee resettlements, delayed disaster responses and stalled global vaccination campaigns.
READ MORE
Musk, predictably, blamed 'deep state resistance' and entrenched bureaucracy for his failures. But his refusal to engage with the reality of public service reveals the deeper flaw in his approach. Government is not a start-up. Its success is not measured in quarterly earnings or viral acclaim.
Musk's brief, brash time at Doge offers a lesson in the costs of mistaking disruption for leadership. Efficiency, when pursued without empathy or accountability, becomes little more than cruelty in spreadsheet form. The damage may yet be repaired, but the myth of the benevolent tech disruptor has surely, at last, been punctured.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Irish Times
2 hours ago
- Irish Times
How a man described as ‘dumber than a sack of bricks' came to dominate global trade policy
Elon Musk called him 'a moron' and 'dumber than a sack of bricks' but he's probably the most consequential economist in the world right now. 75-year-old Peter Navarro is the intellectual driving force behind global tariffs and Donald Trump's attempt to rewire the global trading system. He wangled his way into Maga hearts with his 2011 book 'Death by China' (later a documentary) which paints China as the great Satan of world trade. In it, Navarro argues that Beijing engages in unfair trade practices, from intellectual property theft and currency manipulation to product dumping and abusive labour standards. READ MORE [ Donald Trump accuses China of violating US tariff truce Opens in new window ] And, more importantly, that the US worker is the chief fall guy. 'If the Chinese vampire can't suck the American blood, it's going to suck the UK blood and the EU blood,' he told the Daily Telegraph last month while accusing the UK of being a 'compliant servant of communist China'. The Massachusetts-born economist played a role in the first Trump administration but his push for a more aggressive stance on China was crowded out by free trade conservatives (the US did impose tariffs on Beijing but they were limited in scope). But Navarro is nothing but steadfast and he drinks the Maga Kool-Aid. He took part in the Rudy Giuliani-led campaign to have the 2020 US election result overturned and spent four months in prison last year for refusing to co-operate with the congressional inquiry into the January 6th attack on the US Capito l. His reward was to be appointed Trump's senior counsellor for trade and manufacturing and to have his tariff agenda elevated to the heart of US trade policy, the source of so much global turmoil at present. According to the New York Times and the Wall Street Journal, Navarro was the brains behind Trump's reciprocal tariff formula presented by the president on a cardboard chart in the White House Rose Garden. The formula, which has no precedent in economic theory, took the US goods trade deficit with a specific country, divided it by that country's exports to the US, turned it into a percentage and then cut it in half to produce the tariff rate. It generated weird outcomes. Madagascar, one of the poorest countries in the world, qualified for a punitive 47 per cent tariff on a modest $733 million of exports of vanilla, metals and clothing to the US. Navarro is spearheading this protectionist drive or at least providing an economic rationale for Trump's isolationist tendencies. His standing in academic circles took a hammering a few years back when it emerged that he had fabricated one of the people frequently quoted in his books. 'Ron Vara' is cited in several of Navarro's books mainly to make the case against China but Ron Vara was an anagram of Navarro, and was in fact Navarro citing himself. He defended the fabrication as a 'whimsical device' but it seems even his co-authors weren't in on the joke and publishing companies are now adding advisory notes to his books. Like many in the current Washington administration, Navarro was a fringe figure (he used to write get rich quick investment books) before being anointed by Trump. If his views on tariffs are in the minority, his representation of China as the chief villain of the global trading system has become more mainstream and resonates strongly with Trump's voter base. The US has lost close to 5 million manufacturing jobs since 2001, the year China joined the World Trade Organisation (WTO). The decline has been unprecedented by US standards and has created, or at least compounded, what's often referred to as a Rust Belt from the Midwest to the Great Lakes, an area that spans from western New York to Michigan and north Illinois and encompasses states like West Virginia, Ohio and Indiana. It was once the backbone of US industry, but it has now become synonymous with economic decline, population loss and urban decay. You could argue that the US backlash against globalisation and politics currently playing out in Washington is largely a product of Rust Belt economics. Navarro penned a chapter in Project 2025 (reputedly the ultraconservative blueprint for Trump's second term) called 'the case for fair trade' in which he makes the argument for action against what he describes as China's 'institutionalised aggression'. And why the US's big trade deficits (in goods) with other countries (Ireland is highlighted as having the seventh biggest) has been so damaging. 'These trade deficit statistics implicitly measure the large amounts of America's manufacturing and defense industrial base and supply chains that have been offshored to foreign lands,' he says. 'Such offshoring not only suppresses the real wages of American blue-collar workers and denies millions of Americans the opportunity to climb up the rungs of the ladder to the middle class, but also raises the spectre of a manufacturing and defense industrial base that, unlike our experience in World Wars I and II, will not be able to provide the weapons and material that would be needed should America enter another major world war or seek to assist a major ally like Europe, Japan, or Taiwan,' he says. The above passage encapsulates why many in the US see globalisation as a betrayal of the American dream and a fundamental attack on US hegemony.
Irish Examiner
3 hours ago
- Irish Examiner
EU prepared to retaliate to Trump's steel and aluminum tariff hikes
Europe is prepared to retaliate against US president Donald Trump's plan to double tariffs on imported steel and aluminum, the European Commission, raising the prospect of an escalating trade fight between two of the world's largest economic powers. Mr Trump's announcement on Friday that he would increase tariffs on imported steel and aluminum to 50% from 25%, intensifies his global trade war and came just hours after he accused China of violating an agreement with the U.S. to mutually roll back levies and trade restrictions for critical minerals. The European Commission said it "strongly" regrets Trump's plan to increase tariffs, adding it "undermines ongoing efforts to reach a negotiated solution." "This decision adds further uncertainty to the global economy and increases costs for consumers and businesses on both sides of the Atlantic," a European Commission spokesperson said, adding that "the (European Union) is prepared to impose countermeasures." The spokesperson noted that the European Union had paused its countermeasures to create space for continued negotiations. "The European Commission is currently finalising consultations on expanded countermeasures. If no mutually acceptable solution is reached, both existing and additional EU measures will automatically take effect on 14 July — or earlier, if circumstances require," the spokesperson added. Trump announced the higher tariffs just outside Pittsburgh, where he was talking up an agreement between Nippon Steel and US Steel. Trump said the $14.9bn (€13.1bn) deal, like the tariff increase, will help keep jobs for steel workers in the US. He later posted on social media that the increased tariff would also apply to aluminum products and that it would take effect on Wednesday. The planned move ratchets up pressure on global steel producers, and has sparked protests from trading partners around the world. Canada's Chamber of Commerce quickly denounced the tariff hike as "antithetical to North American economic security." "Unwinding the efficient, competitive and reliable cross-border supply chains like we have in steel and aluminum comes at a great cost to both countries," Candace Laing, president of the chamber, said in a statement. Canada's United Steelworkers union called the move a direct attack on Canadian industries and workers. Australia's centre-left government also condemned the tariff increase, with Australia's trade minister Don Farrell calling it "unjustified and not the act of a friend." The US is the world's largest steel importer, excluding the European Union, with a total of 26.2m tons of imported steel in 2024, according to the US Department of Commerce. As a result, the new tariffs will likely increase steel prices across the board, hitting industry and consumers alike. Steel and aluminum tariffs were among the earliest put into effect by Mr Trump when he returned to office in January. The tariffs of 25% on most steel and aluminum imported to the US went into effect in March, and he had briefly threatened a 50% levy on Canadian steel but ultimately backed off. Reuters
Irish Times
4 hours ago
- Irish Times
China accuses US secretary Pete Hegseth of ‘vilifying' remarks at defence forum
China has protested to the United States over 'vilifying' remarks made by secretary for defence Pete Hegseth , the ministry for foreign affairs said on Sunday, while accusing it of deliberately ignoring calls for peace from regional nations. China has objected to Mr Hegseth calling it a threat in the Indo-Pacific, the ministry added, describing his comments at the Shangri-La Dialogue in Singapore on Saturday as 'deplorable' and 'intended to sow division'. 'Hegseth deliberately ignored the call for peace and development by countries in the region, and instead touted the Cold War mentality for bloc confrontation, vilified China with defamatory allegations, and falsely called China a 'threat',' the ministry said on its website. 'The United States has deployed offensive weaponry in the South China Sea and kept stoking flames and creating tensions in the Asia-Pacific, which are turning the region into a powder keg,' the ministry said. READ MORE Mr Hegseth had called on allies in the Indo-Pacific region , including key security ally Australia , to spend more on defence after warning of the 'real and potentially imminent' threat from China. Asked about the call to boost defence spending, Australian prime minister Anthony Albanese said his government had pledged an extra 10 billion Australian dollars (€5.6 billion) to defence. 'What we'll do is we'll determine our defence policy,' Mr Albanese told reporters on Sunday, a transcript of his remarks showed. As part of Washington's long-standing defence ties with the Philippines, the US military this year deployed Typhon launchers that can fire missiles to hit targets in both China and Russia from the island of Luzon. China and the Philippines contest sovereignty over some islands and atolls in the South China Sea, with growing maritime run-ins between their coast guards as both vie to patrol the waters. The ministry also warned the US not to 'play with fire' on the Taiwan question. In his speech at Asia's premier forum for defence leaders, military officials and diplomats, Mr Hegseth said any attempt by China to conquer Taiwan 'would result in devastating consequences'. China has vowed to 'reunify' with the separately governed island, by force if necessary. Taiwan's government rejects Beijing's sovereignty claims, saying only the island's people can decide their future. – Reuters
