
Donald Trump not seeking ceasefire but wants ‘a real end' to Iran's nuclear programme
Donald Trump has said he is not seeking a ceasefire in Israel's war on Iran but instead wants to see 'a real end' to Iran's nuclear programme, with Tehran abandoning it 'entirely'.
The US president predicted Israel would not let up in its bombing campaign and suggested a decisive moment in that campaign was imminent, though he made clear he expected Israel to destroy Iran's nuclear facilities without US help.
'You're going to find out over the next two days … Nobody's slowed up so far,' he told CBS News, after abruptly abandonning a G7 summit in the Canadian Rockies, saying he was returning to the White House to deal with the conflict.
Speaking to reporters on the way back to Washington, Trump said he was seeking 'an end, a real end, not a ceasefire'.
That would involve a 'complete give-up' by Iran, he said. Trump's negotiating position before the Israeli attack was that Iran should stop uranium enrichment entirely, and he blamed Tehran for not accepting that proposal.
Trump also stressed that any Iranian attack on Americans or US bases, something that Iran has threatened, would be met with overwhelming force, saying 'we'll come down so hard, it'd be gloves off.'
Iran's foreign minister, Abbas Araghchi, said Iran was open to resuming talks with the US about its nuclear programme. 'If President Trump is genuine about diplomacy and interested in stopping this war, next steps are consequential,' Araghchi said in a statement.
Asked whether he would dispatch envoy Steve Witkoff or the vice-president, JD Vance, for direct talks with Iran, Trump was noncommittal, however, saying it would depend 'on what happens when I get back'. He later said: 'I'm not too much in the mood to negotiate.'
Benjamin Netanyahu was also dismissive of the idea of diplomacy.
'Of course they want to stop. They want to stop, and to keep producing the tools of death. We gave that a chance,' the Israeli prime minister said, laying out a new, expanded set of war aims. 'We want three central results: eliminating the nuclear programme, eliminating the ability to produce ballistic missiles and eliminating the axis of terror. We will obviously do what we must to achieve these objectives, and we have been coordinating well with the United States.'
On his Truth Social online platform overnight, Trump was even more threatening than the Israelis, declaring: 'Everyone should immediately evacuate Tehran!', after an Israeli evacuation order to part of northern Tehran affecting a third of a million people, warning of the imminent bombing of the district.
The Israeli online order was modelled on those routinely issued to Palestinians in Gaza, where bombing by the Israel Defense Forces (IDF) has flattened entire residential neighbourhoods over the course of a 20-month conflict.
The Israeli ultimatum on Monday said the bombing of Tehran would be aimed at 'military infrastructure', but one of the targets hit was a state television station, killing three staff and ending live broadcasts. Israel has also been bombing Iran's oil and gas installations, and Iran has retaliated with strikes on Haifa, damaging a power station and a refinery in the Mediterranean port.
Israeli airstrikes killed at least 24 Iranians across the country on Tuesday morning, bringing the toll since Friday's surprise attack to at least 224 people dead and more than 1,400 injured, its health ministry said. The scale of destruction and the threats from the IDF and Trump triggered an exodus of Tehranis jamming the roads out of the capital overnight.
In Israel, the death toll by Tuesday morning was 24, with about 600 injured. Iran fired a total of 20 to 30 missiles on Tuesday morning, according to the IDF, lightly wounding five people, marking a significant drop in the tempo of its attack compared with the previous few days.
The IDF said Iran has used 370 missiles in eight salvos out of a US-estimated arsenal of 3,000 ballistic missiles. The IDF further claims to have destroyed 200 of Iran's missile launchers, half the total, and to be hunting the remainder, continually constricting Tehran's ability to retaliate.
Sign up to First Thing
Our US morning briefing breaks down the key stories of the day, telling you what's happening and why it matters
after newsletter promotion
Israel has also struck a severe blow to Iran's chain of command, killing at least 11 top generals, and in some cases, their replacements. On Tuesday, the IDF said it had killed the acting armed forces commander, Maj Gen Ali Shadmani, who had been in the post just four days, after his predecessor was targeted in the first wave of strikes on Friday morning.
'Iran is completely naked and we have full freedom of action. This is an unprecedented achievement,' an IDF general staff officer told the newspaper Yedioth Ahronoth.
If IDF claims of its dominance are borne out, it will leave Iran with few cards to play. The Iranian parliament has prepared a bill that would withdraw Iran from the 1968 nuclear non-proliferation treaty, so that it would no longer be legally bound to forgo nuclear weapons, but the government insists it remains opposed to all weapons of mass destruction.
State TV has also aired calls from hardline politicians suggesting that Iran block the strategic Strait of Hormuz, potentially stopping the passage of more than 17m barrels of oil a day, and producing a dramatic spike in world oil prices and global inflation.
Trump's abrupt departure from the G7 summit in Canada, coupled with the eastward deployment of significant numbers of US military aircraft, had provoked speculation that Trump was contemplating US participation in the offensive, contributing bombers and huge penetrating munitions that experts say are necessary to destroy deeply buried Iranian uranium enrichment plants.
When asked about US involvement, Trump responded that the Iranian nuclear programme 'is wiped out long before that'.
A White House spokesperson, Alex Pfeiffer, denied reports of US participation in Israeli offensive operations.
'American forces are maintaining their defensive posture, and that has not changed. We will defend American interests,' Pfeiffer wrote.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Independent
13 minutes ago
- The Independent
Trump's chilling warning to Iran: we won't kill Supreme Leader
Donald Trump has warned Iran to make a deal 'before there is nothing left' and issued a chilling threat: we know where the Supreme Leader is 'hiding' and we won't kill him – 'at least for now.' He demanded a "real end" to the bloody conflict with Israel, which is now entering its sixth day, and told Tehran there was still time to end the war if it delivered 'unconditional surrender.' After launching 'Operation Rising Lion' last week with an unprecedented attack on Iranian nuclear sites and top military figures, Israel claimed on Tuesday to have the Iranian military leadership 'on the run'. Warning that the the operation – which marks the largest attack on Iran since the 1980s – was 'not over yet', Israel said an overnight attack on Tehran's command centre killed Iran's new wartime chief of staff, Ali Shadmani – who had only been in the role for four days. As terrified Iranians fled Tehran and other areas being pounded by the Israeli air force, civilians told The Independent they were either trying to stockpile supplies and take cover without bomb shelters or sprint hundreds of kilometres to borders with countries like Armenia. Israel's ambassador to the US, Yechiel Leiter, insisted his country's strikes on Iran were 'the war to end wars' and 'engender peace in the Middle East', as he told Merit TV that Mr Trump was not putting pressure on Israel to halt its offensive. Referring to the pager attack on Hezbollah, the senior Israeli diplomat added: 'We've pulled off a number of surprises – when the dust settles – you're going to see some surprises on Thursday night and Friday, that will make the beeper operation almost seem simple.' After leaving the G7 summit in Canada early on Monday night 'because of what's going on in the Middle East', Mr Trump said his departure 'certainly has nothing to do with a cease fire' and was 'much bigger than that', adding: 'Stay tuned!' Asked by reporters alongside Sir Keir Starmer whether he supported regime change in Tehran, Mr Trump replied: 'I want to see no nuclear weapons in Iran, and we're well on our way to making sure that happens.' The US president later told CBS News that he wanted a 'real end' to the issue of Iran's nuclear programme, and predicted that Israel would not be slowing its attacks on Iran, claiming: 'You're going to find out over the next two days. You're going to find out.' Mr Trump later boasted that 'we know exactly where the so-called 'supreme leader' is hiding', adding: 'He is an easy target, but is safe there – we are not going to take him out (kill!), at least not for now. But we don't want missiles shot at civilians, or American soldiers. Our patience is wearing thin.' But speaking at the G7 on Tuesday, Sir Keir insisted that Mr Trump was not planning to attack Iran, telling reporters: 'There is nothing the president said that suggests he's about to get involved in this conflict. On the contrary, the G7 statement was about de-escalation. 'I think what he said was he wanted to go beyond a ceasefire effectively and end the conflict. And I think he's right about that. I mean, a ceasefire is always a means to an end.' The conflict continued to rage on Tuesday, with an Israeli military official telling reporters that that, overnight alone, Israel struck 'dozens' of military assets, including a Tehran command centre 'responsible for managing combat operations' and components connected to the Iranian nuclear programme. He claimed that Israeli forces have taken out 'more than a third of Iran's missile launchers' in a wave of strikes which continued over western Iran on Tuesday. Iran, meanwhile, has likely fired more than 1,000 projectiles at Israel, including 400 ballistic missiles and dozens of drones, the official added. Around 35 of those missiles have penetrated Israel's defensive shield and made impact, Israeli officials say. Iran's Revolutionary Guards claimed to have hit Israel's military intelligence directorate and spy agency Mossad's operational centre early on Tuesday. There was no Israeli confirmation of such attacks. Iranian officials have reported 224 deaths, mostly civilians, while Israel said 24 civilians had been killed, although rights groups say the toll in Iran is likely to be significantly higher. 'At one point every thirty minutes or so there were explosions,' said one man in the Iranian capital who asked not one identified for fear of backlash from the Iranian authorities for speaking to Western media. 'We were terrified,' he added, saying that civilians felt that if Iran hadn't retaliated with attacks on Israel 'Israel would have destroyed us now'. He continued: 'We haven't left our homes, in my area alone at least 10 civilians have been killed.' Other families were taking the long road from places like Tehran to Armenia, and evacuating by land. One of Israel's main targets has been Iran's nuclear facilities — with Israeli officials saying they have pounded the sprawling nuclear sites of Natanz and Isfahan, as well as the Organisation of Defensive Innovation and Research in Tehran (SPND), and had killed at least 10 scientists so essential to the nuclear programme 'it will be very hard advancing it without their knowledge.' When asked if Israel had the sufficient capability to eliminate Iran's capacity to produce nuclear weapons – and whether it would be able to target underground facilities in places like the Natanz nuclear facility without US assistance – the military official added: 'We have a few surprises up our sleeve.' He said Israel was still assessing the damage to the Natanz facility 'but our initial understanding is that the strikes were successful, at least to some degree.' The UN nuclear watchdog said on Tuesday there were indications of direct impacts on the underground enrichment halls at the Natanz facility, but that there was no change to report at the Fordow and Isfahan sites. Iran has insisted that its nuclear programme is merely for civilian purposes. Israel claims it acted on intelligence suggesting Iran was 'approaching the point of no return' in creating a nuclear weapon, although anonymous US officials have suggested this does not chime with Washington's assessments.


The Independent
13 minutes ago
- The Independent
Plurality of Americans hate the Republican ‘Big Beautiful bill' – but Congress is working to approve it anyway
A plurality of Americans oppose President Donald Trump's spending legislation, known as the One Big Beautiful Bill Act, according to a poll conducted by The Washington Post and Ipsos. The survey found that Americans have mixed feelings about specific provisions in the bill, which proposes changes in tax, spending, and Medicaid policies, and are concerned about its impact on the national debt. This comes as Senate Republicans rush to pass the legislation. Forty-two percent of Americans oppose legislation. The bill passed the House last month in a close vote. Only 23 percent of Americans back the bill, and 34 percent say they have no opinion. Among Republicans, 49 percent support the legislation and 13 percent oppose it. Thirty-eight percent say they have no opinion. About three-quarters of Democrats are against the bill, while 40 percent of independents oppose it and 17 percent are supportive. About four in 10 independents say they have no opinion. Senate Republicans have attempted to push what they claim are the economic benefits of the bill and to pass it before Trump's July 4 deadline. However, most people haven't heard much about the legislation, and among those who are aware of it, it's disliked. Among those who have learned a great deal or a good amount about the bill, 64 percent oppose and 33 percent support it. Almost half strongly oppose it. Opinions on particular issues included in the legislation vary widely. The bill includes tax cuts, a boost in border security spending, and cuts to social safety net programs, including Medicaid. It also rolls back spending on efforts to fight the climate crisis. Seventy-two percent of Americans back upping the child tax credit from 2,000 to 2,500, while 65 percent support removing taxes on tips. However, 66 percent of Americans reject cutting federal spending on food assistance to low-income households, while 23 percent support the measure. Sixty-one percent oppose spending $45 billion on detention centers for migrants, while 24 percent back it. As many as 51 percent reject the idea of ending tax breaks for producing solar, wind, and geothermal energy. Thirty-one percent support the measure. Meanwhile, 52 percent oppose spending about $50 billion to finish a wall on the southern border. Thirty-six percent back the effort. The proposed cuts to social safety net programs in the package passed by the House are among the most divisive issues raised by the bill. The Republican package outlines major cuts to Medicaid, the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program, and other initiatives. Fifty-two percent support requiring low-income adults without families to prove they're either working or are disabled to get health insurance via Medicaid. Thirty-three percent oppose the measure. At the same time, 44 percent say it's unacceptable for roughly eight million people to lose health insurance because of the requirements, in addition to recurring eligibility verifications and restrictions at the state level. Thirty-two percent said it was acceptable for people to go without insurance. Without the specification of new requirements, 63 percent say it's unacceptable for 8 million people to lose insurance. Seventy-one percent support the idea of extending tax cuts for those making less than $100,000, while 53 percent say the same for those making between $100,000 and $200,000. However, only 29 percent support extending the cuts for those making more than $400,000, and 30 percent say the same about corporations. Almost seven in 10 Americans support the idea of raising taxes on individuals earning more than $2.5 million. The idea was raised by Trump last month, but House Republicans chose not to include it in the legislation. The legislation is set to add $3 trillion to the national debt over the next decade, according to the nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office. Sixty-three percent of Americans believe such an increase is unacceptable, according to the poll.


Reuters
15 minutes ago
- Reuters
Suspected Israeli hackers claim to destroy data at Iran's Bank Sepah
June 17 (Reuters) - An anti-Iranian government hacking group with potential ties to Israel and a track record of destructive cyberattacks on Iran claimed in social media posts on Tuesday that it had destroyed data at Iran's state-owned Bank Sepah. The group — known as Gonjeshke Darande, or 'Predatory Sparrow' — hacked the bank because they accused it of helping fund Iran's military, according to one of the messages posted online. The hack comes amid increasing hostilities between Israel and Iran, after Israel attacked multiple military and nuclear targets in Iran last week. Both sides have launched multiple missile attacks against each other in the days since. Reuters could not immediately verify the attack on Bank Sepah. The bank's website was offline on Tuesday and its London-based subsidiary, Bank Sepah International plc, did not immediately respond to an emailed request for comment. Customers were having problems accessing their accounts, according to Israeli media., opens new tab Gonjeshke Darande did not respond to multiple messages sent via social media. 'Disrupting the availability of this bank's funds, or triggering a broader collapse of trust in Iranian banks, could have major impacts there,' Rob Joyce, the former top cybersecurity official at the NSA, said in a post on X. In 2022, Gonjeshke Darande claimed responsibility for a cyberattack against an Iranian steel production facility. The sophisticated attack caused a large fire at the facility, resulting in tangible, offline damage. Such attacks are usually beyond the capabilities of activist hackers, security experts say, and would be more in line with the capabilities of a nation state. The group has also been publicly linked by cybersecurity researchers to a 2021 cyberattack that caused widespread outages at gas stations across Iran. Israel has never formally acknowledged that it is behind the group, although Israeli media has widely reported Gonjeshke Darande as 'Israel-linked'.