logo
Plurality of Americans hate the Republican ‘Big Beautiful bill' – but Congress is working to approve it anyway

Plurality of Americans hate the Republican ‘Big Beautiful bill' – but Congress is working to approve it anyway

Independent5 hours ago

A plurality of Americans oppose President Donald Trump's spending legislation, known as the One Big Beautiful Bill Act, according to a poll conducted by The Washington Post and Ipsos.
The survey found that Americans have mixed feelings about specific provisions in the bill, which proposes changes in tax, spending, and Medicaid policies, and are concerned about its impact on the national debt. This comes as Senate Republicans rush to pass the legislation.
Forty-two percent of Americans oppose legislation. The bill passed the House last month in a close vote. Only 23 percent of Americans back the bill, and 34 percent say they have no opinion.
Among Republicans, 49 percent support the legislation and 13 percent oppose it. Thirty-eight percent say they have no opinion.
About three-quarters of Democrats are against the bill, while 40 percent of independents oppose it and 17 percent are supportive. About four in 10 independents say they have no opinion.
Senate Republicans have attempted to push what they claim are the economic benefits of the bill and to pass it before Trump's July 4 deadline.
However, most people haven't heard much about the legislation, and among those who are aware of it, it's disliked. Among those who have learned a great deal or a good amount about the bill, 64 percent oppose and 33 percent support it. Almost half strongly oppose it.
Opinions on particular issues included in the legislation vary widely. The bill includes tax cuts, a boost in border security spending, and cuts to social safety net programs, including Medicaid. It also rolls back spending on efforts to fight the climate crisis.
Seventy-two percent of Americans back upping the child tax credit from 2,000 to 2,500, while 65 percent support removing taxes on tips. However, 66 percent of Americans reject cutting federal spending on food assistance to low-income households, while 23 percent support the measure. Sixty-one percent oppose spending $45 billion on detention centers for migrants, while 24 percent back it.
As many as 51 percent reject the idea of ending tax breaks for producing solar, wind, and geothermal energy. Thirty-one percent support the measure.
Meanwhile, 52 percent oppose spending about $50 billion to finish a wall on the southern border. Thirty-six percent back the effort.
The proposed cuts to social safety net programs in the package passed by the House are among the most divisive issues raised by the bill. The Republican package outlines major cuts to Medicaid, the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program, and other initiatives.
Fifty-two percent support requiring low-income adults without families to prove they're either working or are disabled to get health insurance via Medicaid. Thirty-three percent oppose the measure.
At the same time, 44 percent say it's unacceptable for roughly eight million people to lose health insurance because of the requirements, in addition to recurring eligibility verifications and restrictions at the state level. Thirty-two percent said it was acceptable for people to go without insurance. Without the specification of new requirements, 63 percent say it's unacceptable for 8 million people to lose insurance.
Seventy-one percent support the idea of extending tax cuts for those making less than $100,000, while 53 percent say the same for those making between $100,000 and $200,000. However, only 29 percent support extending the cuts for those making more than $400,000, and 30 percent say the same about corporations.
Almost seven in 10 Americans support the idea of raising taxes on individuals earning more than $2.5 million. The idea was raised by Trump last month, but House Republicans chose not to include it in the legislation.
The legislation is set to add $3 trillion to the national debt over the next decade, according to the nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office. Sixty-three percent of Americans believe such an increase is unacceptable, according to the poll.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Senate Republicans circle wagons as Trump beats war drum on Iran: ‘They've all had their spines removed'
Senate Republicans circle wagons as Trump beats war drum on Iran: ‘They've all had their spines removed'

The Independent

time14 minutes ago

  • The Independent

Senate Republicans circle wagons as Trump beats war drum on Iran: ‘They've all had their spines removed'

Senate Republicans are largely standing with President Donald Trump as he escalates U.S. involvement in Israel's war with Iran. On Tuesday, the president demanded that Iran lay down its weapons in an 'UNCONDITIONAL SURRENDER ' and said that he knew exactly where Iran's Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei was hiding. Trump insisted that Iran was 'very close' to a working nuclear weapon. He also disregarded testimony from his own Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard, who said in March that Iran was not working toward building a nuclear weapon. Sen. Ted Cruz (R-Texas), a member of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, told reporters that Trump would have constitutional authority to bomb Fordow, which is located deep inside a mountain near the city of Qom. 'Under Article II of the Constitution, the president is the commander in chief, and he has the authority and responsibility to keep Americans safe and defend American servicemen and women,' Cruz said. 'Congress has the authority to declare war, and war is considered sustained and longstanding hostilities,' he maintained. 'A single bombing run, historically, has not been understood to require congressional authorization to engage in sustained hostility, to engage in continued warfare, does require congressional coming to the floor.' Other Republicans echoed Cruz's words on Iran. While Republicans in the House like Rep. Thomas Massie of Kentucky and MAGA hardliner Marjorie Taylor Greene of Georgia have criticized the idea of U.S. involvement in Israel's war with Iran, the Senate still has plenty of majority members who have a more traditionally Republican interventionist foreign policy. 'I think he's doing quite well actually,' Sen. Joni Ernst of Iowa, a member of the Armed Services Committee, told The Independent. 'He's been very well measured in allowing Israel to do what they think they need.' Ernst said if necessary, Trump would consult Congress. 'I think we'll need to understand the situation and get briefings on it, and then we'll take measure as necessary,' she said. Republicans in the Senate have historically been uneasy with Trump's plans to negotiate with Iran. In March, 51 Republican Senators sent a letter to the Trump administration regarding its negotiations with Iran. During Trump's first administration, he withdrew with the Iran nuclear agreement brokered by former president Barack Obama. Trump also put in place sanctions. But in the second administration, he dispatched his envoy to the Middle East Steve Witkoff to negotiate with Iran in Oman while maintaining hawkish rhetoric on Iran. But on Thursday, Israel began its strikes on Iran, which led to Iran responding in kind. Trump called for a deal between Israel and Iran, but has also signaled support for Israel, which many Republicans in the Senate welcomed. 'Right now, we should defend Israel against any counter attacks, and then I'll leave it to the administration to mount about a plan that comports with what we want to do here in Congress,' Sen. Thom Tillis of North Carolina, a hawk on Iran, told The Independent. But support is not unanimous even among Republicans. Sen. Rand Paul, the sole Republican who did not sign the letter, told The Independent that he would have more to say about war with Iran. But he did have concerns. 'It's always been my belief that you don't go to war without the approval of Congress, and bombing another country is obviously war,' the libertarian said. Only a handful of Democrats in the Senate, meanwhile, have voiced their full-fledged opposition to war with Iran. Sen. Tim Kaine of Virginia introduced a war powers resolution. Sen. Bernie Sanders, an independent and socialist from Vermont who caucuses with the minority party, also introduced a resolution with other Democrats. 'We should not stand by why Donald Trump tries to drag America to another endless war in the Middle East,' Sen. Elizabeth Warren, a member of the Armed Services Committee, who joined the resolution, told The Independent. 'There's evidently a serious medical problem with the Senate Republicans,' the Massachusetts senator said. 'They've all had their spines removed,' said Warren. 'None of them seem capable of standing up to Donald Trump, which means they cannot fulfill their oaths to the Constitution of the United States.' But many Republicans will likely continue to support Trump's efforts on Iran. Sen. Kevin Cramer of North Dakota showed up to the Senate wearing a lapel pin shaped like a fighter plane with Israel's flag on it.

Trump U-turn on deporting farm workers came after fury from Noem and Miller, report claims
Trump U-turn on deporting farm workers came after fury from Noem and Miller, report claims

The Independent

time15 minutes ago

  • The Independent

Trump U-turn on deporting farm workers came after fury from Noem and Miller, report claims

Donald Trump 's rapid flip-flop on not deporting undocumented migrant farm and hotel workers came after the president was reportedly met with angry pushback from Stephen Miller and Kristi Noem. Trump briefly changed his mind on who ICE should kick out of the country after getting a phone call from Agriculture Secretary Brooke Rollins, according to Axios. Speaking at the White House on June 12, Trump said, "We can't take farmers and take all their people and send them back because they don't have maybe what they're supposed to have, maybe not.' Rollins reportedly went over Deputy Chief of Staff Stephen Miller and Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem to speak with the president. Axios reported the pair were angry over Rollins' actions. In response, Noem and Miller went to the president to change his mind. The policy was switched to meet their position and raids on those sectors resumed, reported CBS News. On Sunday, Trump also announced the administration would target U.S. metropolitan areas, particularly 'sanctuary cities.' "ICE Officers are herewith ordered, by notice of this TRUTH, to do all in their power to achieve the very important goal of delivering the single largest Mass Deportation Program in History,' the president wrote on the social media platform. Tricia McLaughlin, a spokesperson for the Department of Homeland Security, doubled down on the president's remarks, saying, 'There has not been a change in our posture.' Another senior administration official told Axios the president 'doesn't need to hear from Conrad Hilton to know about the hotel business,' he said. 'He has his own resort." Almost six months since Trump's inauguration, President Barack Obama still holds the record for deporting the most amount of migrants. His administration deported 438,421 people in 2013. To break Obama's record, Trump would need to double the current number of people his administration is deporting, but it's unclear if that could be done. Trump briefly changed his tune on deportations last week. At the end of April, the administration said it had deported about 139,000 migrants.

Senate passes landmark crypto regulation bill on a bipartisan vote, sending it to the House
Senate passes landmark crypto regulation bill on a bipartisan vote, sending it to the House

NBC News

time16 minutes ago

  • NBC News

Senate passes landmark crypto regulation bill on a bipartisan vote, sending it to the House

WASHINGTON — After weeks of stops and starts, Senate Republicans teamed up with a bloc of Democrats Tuesday to pass a landmark cryptocurrency bill that would establish the first regulatory framework for issuers of stablecoins. The vote on the GENIUS Act was 68-30. The vote marked the first time that the Senate has passed major legislation regulating digital assets. "With this bill, the United States is one step closer to becoming the global leader in crypto," Sen. Bill Hagerty, R-Tenn., the author of the GENIUS Act, said in a floor speech. "This bill will cement U.S. dollar dominance, it will protect customers, it will drive demand for U.S. treasuries." "Today will be remembered as an inflection point for innovation in the United States of America," Hagerty said. The GENIUS Act now heads to the Republican-led House, which has been working to pass its own bipartisan bill focused on creating a regulatory framework for digital assets. The Senate action comes as Washington continues to wrestle with how best to regulate the fast-growing cryptocurrency industry. Democrats have been divided over the issue, with some in the party pushing Congress to do more to rein in an industry they see as rife with conflicts of interests for President Donald Trump and his family. The Senate Banking Committee passed an earlier version of the GENIUS Act in April, with backing from five Democrats. But Minority Leader Chuck Schumer, D-N.Y., and the Democrats — along with two Republicans — blocked the bill from advancing on the floor in May as they demanded stronger national security and anti-money laundering provisions. A group of bipartisan negotiators — Hagerty and Sens. Cynthia Lummis, R-Wyo.; Mark Warner, D-Va.; Kirsten Gillibrand, D-N.Y.; Angela Alsobrooks, D-Md.; and Ruben Gallego, D-Ariz. — later struck a deal on changes to the bill that addressed key sticking points for Democrats. The changes called for consumer protection safeguards and limits on tech companies issuing stablecoins, digital tokens pegged to fiat currencies like the U.S. dollar, and would extend ethics standards to special government employees. The bipartisan deal unlocked support from a broader group of Democrats, and the legislation advanced on the floor after clearing the 60-vote threshold. 'I think because we worked so hard and so long with them that it got a few more of them to 'yes.' And so I think this is a real legislative victory,' Lummis told NBC News before the vote. 'They did get more of what they wanted. They should be voting yes, because they were extremely influential in shaping the legislation.' But other Democrats were frustrated that nothing in the revised legislation would explicitly prevent Trump and his family from continuing their crypto ventures. New financial disclosures reveal that Trump made one of his largest fortunes last year, $57.3 million, on his family's cryptocurrency company World Liberty Financial. "This is a bill that was written by the industry that will supercharge the profitability of Donald Trump's crypto corruption, while it undercuts consumer protection and weakens our national defense," Sen. Elizabeth Warren, D-Mass., the ranking member of the Senate Banking Committee, told NBC News. The legislation does include language that would 'prohibit any member of Congress or senior executive branch official from issuing a payment stablecoin product during their time in public service.' But Warren argued that the legislation isn't strong enough to prevent terrorists, drug traffickers and other criminals from using stablecoins for illicit purposes. The bill "is in a better place, but it's not in a good enough place," she said.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store