Supreme Court Rejects Mexico's Lawsuit Against US Gunmakers
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources.
Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content.
The U.S. Supreme Court has unanimously rejected a high-profile, multibillion dollar lawsuit filed by the Mexican government that sought to hold American gun manufacturers legally accountable for the rampant cartel violence south of the border.
In a decision authored by Justice Elena Kagan, the Court ruled that Mexico's claims were barred by the Protection of Lawful Commerce in Arms Act (PLCAA)—a 2005 federal statute that largely shields gunmakers and sellers from liability when crimes are committed with their products.
This is a breaking news story—more to follow.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
USA Today
20 minutes ago
- USA Today
Supreme Court rejects GOP challenge to Pennsylvania ruling about provisional ballots
Supreme Court rejects GOP challenge to Pennsylvania ruling about provisional ballots Show Caption Hide Caption Supreme Court hears arguments on judges' block on Trump birthright EO The justices heard arguments on whether its ok for judges to universally block President Donald Trump's birthright citizenship executive order. WASHINGTON − The Supreme Court on June 6 rejected a Republican challenge to a Pennsylvania court's ruling on provisional ballots, a case that could have restricted how much leeway state courts have to interpret federal election rules. During the 2024 election, the Pennsylvania Supreme Court said voters should be able to cast provisional ballots if they failed to encase an absentee ballot in the required secrecy sleeve. State and national Republicans argued that would give voters an 'unauthorized do-over' for 'naked ballots' or for other mistakes on mail-in votes. And they said the Pennsylvania Supreme Court's decision usurped the power the Constitution gives state legislatures to set federal election rules. In November, the U.S. Supreme Court declined the GOP's emergency request to intervene as ballots were being cast. The Republican National Committee said the justices should decide the issue now because they can do so without worrying whether their decision would affect an ongoing election. Related: Supreme Court to decide if challenge to Illinois' grace period for mail-in ballots can proceed Pennsylvania Democrats countered that the 2024 ruling by the state supreme court was consistent with the text of state election law and with the intent of the legislators who set the rules. There's no good reason, Democrats said, for the Supreme Court to review what was a routine interpretation of a state law. Getting involved would invite appeals in 'any and every state-law election case," lawyers for the Pennsylvania Democratic Party told the justices. 'That is not a regime the Court should foster,' they wrote. The case is the second about election law the court agreed to hear next term. They will also decide whether a GOP congressman can challenge Illinois' decision to count mail-in ballots that are cast, but not received, before the end of Election Day.
Yahoo
26 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Kilmar Abrego Garcia returns to US to face criminal charges
NASHVILLE, Tenn. (WKRN) — Kilmar Abrego Garcia, a Maryland man who was mistakenly deported to El Salvador, has landed in the United States to face criminal charges, according to U.S. Attorney General Pam Bondi. An indictment, which was recently filed in the U.S. District Court Middle District of Tennessee, reports that Abrego Garcia, 29, conspired to bring undocumented migrants to the United States from around 2016 to 2025. Body cam footage released from 2022 THP traffic stop of Maryland man deported to El Salvador Abrego Garcia and co-conspirators reportedly collected financial payments for illegal transportation and knowingly transferred the money between one another. The indictment alleges that the 29-year-old used his status in MS-13 to further his criminal activity. According to the court filing, Abrego Garcia also participated in varying transportation routes within the United States. Co-conspirators also alleged that Abrego Garcia trafficked narcotics, abused women and had been associated with child sexual abuse, Bondi said. garcia indictmentDownload On May 2, the Tennessee Highway Patrol released video of traffic stop dated Nov. 30, 2022, which involved Abrego Garcia in Cookeville. The 29-year-old was reportedly pulled over for speeding in a vehicle with eight passengers and told state troopers they'd been working in Missouri. As seen on video, THP troopers could be heard discussing among themselves their suspicions of human trafficking since the group was traveling without luggage. However, the 29-year-old was not charged with a crime that day. When asked about what's changed since the Department of Homeland Security declined to charge Abrego Garcia, Bondi told reporters that it's due to Trump's presidency. 'Thanks to the bright light that has been shined on Abrego Garcia, this investigation continued with actually amazing police work and we were able to track this case and stop this international smuggling ring from continuing,' Bondi said, citing 'recently found facts.' The indictment alleges that over the past nine years, Abrego Garcia transported undocumented migrants and children on approximately more than 100 trips between Texas to Maryland and other states. Bondi claimed that this was his 'full-time job' and that he was associated with a larger 'smuggling' group. 'The defendant traded the innocence of children for profit,' Bondi said. ⏩ Abrego Garcia has since been charged with 'conspiracy to transport illegal aliens and unlawful transportation of undocumented aliens.' An arrest warrant, which was signed in Nashville and obtained by News 2, states that Abrego Garcia was to be arrested and brought before United States magistrate judge. Bondi said in a Friday press conference that the U.S. had presented El Salvador with an arrest warrant and they agreed to return him to the U.S. 'This is what American justice looks like,' Bondi said. Bondi added that upon completion of his sentence, officials anticipate that he will be returned to El Salvador. The moves come more than two months after the Trump administration acknowledged in court filings that Abrego Garcia's deportation was due to an 'administrative error.' No additional details were immediately released. The Tennessee Attorney General declined to comment on the matter. 📲 Download the News 2 app to stay updated on the go.📧 Sign up for WKRN email alerts to have breaking news sent to your inbox.💻 for Nashville, TN and all of Middle Tennessee. This is a developing story. WKRN News 2 will continue to update this article as new information becomes available. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Yahoo
26 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Michigan Senate Democrats advance bump stock ban, ghost gun serialization bills from committee
Attendees cheer at a gun safety rally at the state Capitol Building on April 22, 2025 | Photo: Anna Liz Nichols Several firearm safety and control bills addressing a ban on bump stocks, serializing ghost guns and codifying the Michigan Capitol's concealed and open carry ban into law were advanced to the Michigan Senate on Thursday. The bills were moved forward by the Senate Judiciary Committee following additional testimony on the reintroduced package – but not before the panel heard emotional testimony from gun violence prevention and safety advocates and gun rights groups, the latter of whom opposed the bills. Senate Bill 224 would ban bump stocks, devices that let users essentially convert their semi-automatic weapons into rapid firing weapons. A bump stock was one of the primary tools used in the 2017 Las Vegas mass shooting, the deadliest in American history. The U.S. Supreme Court in 2024 struck down federal rules created after the shooting that defined a semi-automatic weapon equipped with a bump stock as an automatic weapon, which was already banned under law. SUBSCRIBE: GET THE MORNING HEADLINES DELIVERED TO YOUR INBOX The federal high court's decision, however, has not deterred Michigan Democrats from seeking ways to ban them at the state level. Michigan would join 17 others in adopting a similar policy. Sponsored by Sen. Dayna Polehanki (D-Livonia), Senate Bill 224 would add bump stocks to a list of disallowed firearms equipment in Michigan. 'Destructive weapons of war should never have a place in our communities, yet devices that allow individuals to convert a rifle into a functioning machine gun remain legal in our state,' Polehanki said. 'And let me be clear: these are not tools for sport or self-defense. Bump stocks are used to inflict maximum harm in seconds, and their continued availability puts every one of our communities at risk. That's unacceptable, and it's time for a change.' Senate Bills 331 and 332, both sponsored by Sen. Mallory McMorrow (D-Royal Oak), would prohibit the purchase, possession and distribution of firearms without valid serial numbers, which are commonly referred as ghost guns because they are untraceable in federal and state firearms registries. McMorrow's bill would make a first offense a misdemeanor with a penalty up to a $5,000 fine and one year in prison. Successive offenses would be considered felonies with up to five years in prison and a $10,000 fine. A member of McMorrow's staff delivered testimony on Thursday, but in a statement issued following the committee hearing, the senator said ghost guns were designed to deliberately evade accountability, requiring no background checks, no serial numbers and no way to trace them if used to commit a crime. 'As we see law enforcement officers recovering these untraceable firearms at an alarming rate, Michigan can't afford to wait,' McMorrow said. 'Just as rapidly as new weapon production methods emerge and evolve, so too must our laws and public safety efforts. Our communities deserve nothing less.' Polenaki also sponsored Senate Bills 225 and 226 along with Sen. Rosemary Bayer (D-West Bloomfield). The bills would make the Michigan Capitol Commission's open and concealed carry bans law, and would also apply to the Anderson House Office Building and the Binsfeld Senate Office Building. At least 26 other states have a similar ban in place to maintain the safety of their Capitol grounds. Bayer during testimony on Thursday recounted the fear she felt when armed protesters stormed Michigan's Capitol and remained in the Senate chamber's gallery, which several senators said made them feel intimidated as they voted on important legislation. 'Those types of threats and intimidation have no place in any work environment, especially not one where the work of the people is being done,' Bayer said. 'Every day, we have students and teachers, parents and public servants walk the halls of our Capitol. It's our responsibility to make sure they feel safe doing so, and this legislation will help ensure all people feel safe freely participating in our state's democracy.' Members of Moms Demand Action, Students Demand Action and various other gun safety groups, like Brady and Giffords, testified Thursday in support of the measures, hoping they would keep firearms out of the Capitol and keep ghost guns and bump stocks out of the hands of future mass shooters. Linda Danders with Moms Demand Action said from the very first time armed extremists showed up at the Capitol to intimidate lawmakers, her group knew there was a real and imminent threat to the safety of Michiganders and the state's democracy. 'That's why we've been urging Michigan lawmakers to prohibit guns in the Capitol,' Danders said. 'Thanks to the efforts of many in this room, open carry of firearms in the Capitol Building is now prohibited, but there is still a dangerous loophole left for individuals to carry concealed, loaded handguns into and on Capitol grounds, including in this building.' Tom Lambert, legislative director for Michigan Open Carry, said he was opposed to the package, calling it another episode in the continuing series of 'people who hate guns, don't know what they're talking about and they don't care,' referring to Senate Democrats' push for greater gun control. 'You have serious Second Amendment issues, you also have serious Fifth Amendment issues. Not only are you taking lawfully possessed property that people acquire lawfully and possess lawfully today and you're prohibiting it, you're in the alternative requiring them to deface these items that, again, lawfully, do not have a serial number on them,' Lambert said of the ghost guns bill. 'If you put one of these federally regulated serial numbers on them, you will decrease the value of those items, some of which are worth a significant amount, which constitutes a Fifth Amendment taking.' Lambert insinuated that could lead to legal consequences for the state that could cost a lot. 'I hope we put [that] in the budget to pay for all that stuff,' he said. In response to emotional testimony from a student, Sen. Sue Shink (D-Northland Township) said no young person should have to worry about the threat of gun violence. 'Quite frankly, at my age, it's not something I should have to worry about either,' Shink said. 'And I'll just tell you, and also so that the people who are from those gun organizations know that, yeah, it's scary to know that they're out there pushing violence and pushing fear on people who just want to live in peace, who just want to be left alone to pursue their life, liberty and happiness. It's bullshit. You shouldn't have to put up with it.'
