Dickie Bird on slow over-rates during IND vs ENG: Umpires should not tolerate stoppages in play
Several former cricketers, including former England captain Michael Atherton, have criticised the umpires for losing their grip on the game.
India captain Shubman Gill and England opener Zak Crawley were involved in a heated exchange in the third Test at Lord's. Ravindra Jadeja also drew flak for allegedly ignoring the umpire's message to get on with the game when he was having a drink between overs.
Legendary umpire Dickie Bird now weighed in on the topic, stating that it's important for the umpires to be assertive and ensure that they have the last word on the field.
'Now, I see they are changing the ball every now and then, and that automatically slows down the game, but the umpires should make sure that they don't allow unnecessary breaks as it kills the buzz.'Dickie Bird
'The spectators pay a lot of money to watch Test matches nowadays. Too many stoppages is not a good advertisement for Test cricket. That's where the umpires need to be strong and tell the players such stoppages won't be tolerated,' Bird told Sportstar.
The 92-year-old, who has followed the series closely, felt the on-field umpires could have been more stern with the frequent requests for ball changes. At a time when technology - Decision Review System - has diminished the authority of the umpires slightly, it is important for them to ensure that they are taken seriously.
'Now, I see they are changing the ball every now and then, and that automatically slows down the game, but the umpires should make sure that they don't allow unnecessary breaks as it kills the buzz,' he said.
'In my time, I would jokingly tell the players, 'come on, lads, get on with the game, let's not kill [the charm of] the game.' We would have a good laugh and I ensured that we were back in action as quickly as possible,' Bird, who officiated in 66 Tests and 69 ODIs, said.
Ajit Wadekar, coach of the Indian cricket team, and umpire Dickie Bird (R) snapped at Harare Sports Club before the start of the cricket Test match between India and Zimbabwe in 1992. | Photo Credit: V.V. Krishnan/The Hindu
Belonging to an era where many greats played the sport, a nostalgic Bird revealed that dealing with the biggest names of the sport wasn't a challenge. 'My era also had some great characters like Merv Hughes, Sachin Tendulkar and several others, who were stars. We had the best years, but we still got going without (much trouble),' he added.
In a five-day Test, 90 overs are scheduled for each day. As per the rules, to prevent teams tactically wasting time to ensure a draw, all of the overs must be bowled on the fifth day, weather permitting. The ICC has also introduced penalties for slow over-rates. England was docked two points in the World Test Championship and fined 10 per cent of its match fee for a slow over-rate at Lord's.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
India.com
27 minutes ago
- India.com
How Much Money Did Divya Deshmukh Win At The FIDE Women's World Cup 2025?
photoDetails english 2938299 At just 19, Divya Deshmukh made history by winning the 2025 FIDE Women's World Cup, defeating veteran Grandmaster Koneru Humpy in a thrilling final. With this victory, she earned $50,000 in prize money and became the fourth Indian woman to achieve the prestigious Grandmaster title. However, the stark pay disparity between the men's and women's chess tournaments drew sharp focus—Divya's prize was less than half of what the Open category champion receives. Her triumph has reignited discussions on gender pay inequality in chess and spotlighted India's growing dominance in global women's chess. Learn more about Divya's remarkable journey and earnings. Updated:Jul 29, 2025, 08:26 AM IST 1. Divya Deshmukh Won $50,000 for Her Historic Triumph 1 / 13 By winning the 2025 FIDE Women's World Cup, 19-year-old Divya Deshmukh earned a top prize of $50,000 (approx. ₹41.6 lakh) — the highest payout in the women's tournament. 2. Koneru Humpy Took Home $35,000 as Runner-Up 2 / 13 Veteran grandmaster Koneru Humpy, who finished second, received $35,000 (approx. ₹29.1 lakh) — showcasing a steep drop from the winner's purse but still a significant reward. 3. Women's Winner Earns Less Than Half of Open Champion 3 / 13 Despite similar formats, the Open World Cup winner receives $110,000, while the Women's World Cup champion gets just $50,000 — highlighting a glaring gender-based pay gap. 4. Total Women's Prize Pool Was $691,250 4 / 13 The FIDE Women's World Cup 2025 had a total prize pool of $691,250, distributed across all rounds. This amount remains smaller compared to the Open section's multimillion-dollar pool. 5. D Gukesh Earned 22 Times More for Winning the World Championship 5 / 13 In contrast, D Gukesh earned ₹11.45 crore (approx. $1.37 million) for winning the 2024 FIDE World Championship — making Divya's $50,000 less than 4% of his prize. 6. FIDE's Structured Payout Rewards All Round Participants 6 / 13 Prize money is awarded progressively — starting from $3,750 for Round 1 and rising through each stage, ensuring every player in the knockout format is compensated for performance. 7. Prize Money Has Remained Stagnant Since 2021 7 / 13 While the 2025 Women's World Cup saw a minor increase in the total prize pool, the top prize of $50,000 remains unchanged since 2021 — raising concerns over FIDE's financial prioritization. 8. Women Can Compete in Open Events — But Few Do 8 / 13 Although female players can qualify for the Open World Cup, most opt for the women's section due to fewer slots and stiffer competition in the open category, affecting their earnings potential. 9. Equal Format, Unequal Pay: The Debate Grows Louder 9 / 13 Both men's and women's events follow the same format and time control, yet offer unequal rewards. This continues to fuel demands for equal prize money in global chess events. 10. Divya's Win Has Sparked National Discussion on Pay Parity 10 / 13 Divya Deshmukh's earnings and the visible gap with male counterparts have reignited the debate on gender equity in sports — making her victory both a personal and political milestone. 11 / 13 12 / 13 13 / 13
India Today
27 minutes ago
- India Today
Ravindra Jadeja earns overdue recognition as reliable Test batter in England
For much of his career, Ravindra Jadeja's batting has lived in the shadow of his bowling. The labels came easily: relentless left-arm spinner, electric fielder, the captain's go-to man. But over the last few weeks in England, Jadeja has stepped out of those brackets, not by reinventing himself, but by reaffirming what those in the dressing room always knew - that he is as much a batter as he is an unbeaten 107 in Manchester - a century that salvaged a draw for India in the fourth Test of the Anderson-Tendulkar Trophy - was not just a statistic. It was a moment of reckoning. The innings wasn't about flair or dominance; it was about control, clarity and a quiet defiance. While cricket debates swirl around "Bazball" and aggressive run-scoring, Jadeja has chosen to bat with discipline. To defend, to leave, to wait - and then to hundred, laced with 13 boundaries and a six, crowned a series that now reads: four fifties and a century in eight innings. Jadeja is averaging 113.50, and yet, there's been no grandstanding, no self-congratulation. That has never been his way. His tally of 454 runs is the fourth-highest in the series-more than Joe Root, more than any English batter. He has let his bat speak, and it has spoken volumes. SURVIVAL OF THE FIGHTER He came into this series as the oldest man in a squad that has already begun transitioning. Virat Kohli had stepped aside from Test cricket. Rohit Sharma and R Ashwin had also joined the bandwagon of retired Test cricketers. Some wondered if Jadeja too should make way. At 36, with battle-worn knees and an already decorated career, few would have questioned his Jadeja chose to stay. Not just to play, but to lead - not with slogans, but with every innings, he batted with the assurance of a man who knows both his game and the game itself. There was restraint. There was purpose. The wide drives stayed in the locker. The big shots came only in his arc - long-on to long-off - or when a bowler dropped was a brief lapse in Manchester, first ball, when he slashed at a wide delivery and was dropped by Joe Root at slip. That was it. After that, he barely gave England a LEGENDARY SOBERSThe numbers now place Jadeja in rare company. He has scored 1,041 runs in England while batting at No. 6 or lower - second only to the great Garry Sobers (1,097) among visiting players. Nine of those innings have ended in scores of 50 or more - again, a record he shares with also has 34 wickets in England, placing him in an elite bracket. Only Sobers (1,820 runs and 62 wickets) and Wilfred Rhodes (1,032 runs and 42 wickets in Australia) have managed the feat of 1,000 runs and 30+ wickets in a single overseas a player often remembered for his sword celebrations and whip-smart fielding, Jadeja's real legacy may be one of grit and consistency - the attributes that rarely trend, but always Lord's, chasing 193, India were staring at defeat at 112 for 8. With the top order swept away by Archer and Stokes, Jadeja held firm. His 72, built in the company of Jasprit Bumrah and Mohammed Siraj, took India to within 23 runs of an improbable win. It wasn't to be, but the fight that knock, captain Shubman Gill called him "one of the most valuable players in India." That may sound obvious, but the tone carried weight. In a team where senior figures are slowly stepping away, Jadeja has become the reference point - not loud, not showy, but is often seen in long conversations with head coach Gautam Gambhir. There's no attempt to take charge, no performative leadership. But in a team still finding its identity, his is the example that 2.0 IN ENGLAND?With 3,824 Test runs and counting, Jadeja's batting record now stands taller than most top-order batters India have cycled through in recent years. His average, just shy of 38, reflects a player who has evolved without fuss. England, with its swing and seam and skies, has historically exposed Indian batters. Here, Jadeja has not just survived - he has isn't the story of a late bloomer. It's the story of a cricketer who was always more than what the scorecard showed, who waited for his due, and who didn't mind if it came late - as long as it came on his own may never be counted among the traditional greats. But in Manchester, in Lord's, and in dressing rooms where respect is measured in silence rather than sound, his name now means something is no longer the batter who chips in. He is the batter who holds firm. And in the land that once tested him the most, Ravindra Jadeja is finally being seen for everything he is - and always was.- EndsTune InTrending Reel
Time of India
30 minutes ago
- Time of India
'Most influential of the last decade': Former India head coach Ravi Shastri singles out former India captain
Former India Head Coach Ravi Shastri talks to then captain Virat Kohli during the 4th Test between India and England in 2021 in Ahmedabad (Photo by) Ravi Shastri , one of Indian cricket 's most prominent voices, has once again expressed his admiration for Virat Kohli , calling him the most influential player of the last decade. In a recent video posted on Stick to Cricket, the former India head coach was asked to name the best player of the modern era. Without hesitation, Shastri responded, "It's a young brigade at the moment, but the best player, the most influential player of the last decade – Virat Kohli. " Go Beyond The Boundary with our YouTube channel. SUBSCRIBE NOW! Shastri, who coached India during some of Kohli's most successful years as Test captain, has long been an open admirer of the 36-year-old. His latest praise adds to a string of accolades he has directed towards Kohli in recent years. During a quick-fire segment, Shastri was also asked to name a current bowler he'd least like to face. His answer: Jasprit Bumrah . He also cheekily addressed a question about whether he'd prefer hitting six sixes or winning a World Cup—reminding viewers that he had done both in his career, before picking the World Cup win as more special. Old Trafford cricket ground: A stadium tour of the iconic venue in Manchester Earlier, Shastri, in a discussion with cricketing greats like Phil Tufnell, Sir Alastair Cook, David Lloyd, and Michael Vaughan, while talking about the ongoing five-Test series in England, named his top five Indian cricketers of all time. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Why Seniors Are Snapping Up This TV Box, We Explain! Techno Mag Learn More Undo Shastri picked legends across eras, saying, '(Sunil) Gavaskar, Sachin (Tendulkar), Virat definitely. I'm looking at the most influential players of that era. MS (Dhoni) again. So these will be the five.' Poll Who do you think is the most influential Indian cricketer of the last decade? Virat Kohli MS Dhoni Rohit Sharma Jasprit Bumrah He later completed the list by adding Kapil Dev. Shastri's continued praise for Kohli underlines the lasting impact the batter has had on Indian cricket, both statistically and as a leader. Catch Rani Rampal's inspiring story on Game On, Episode 4. Watch Here!
