Our favorite Bluetooth tracker for Android is on sale for 42 percent off
The Chipolo One is our pick as the best bluetooth tracker for 2025. This model is available only for Android users and works with Google's Find My Device network. The tracker's battery life should last for a year and is water-resistant. Plus, it rings really loud, so you don't have to worry about hearing it over a little noise. Unlike Apple's AirTag, it also offers a hole for easily attaching it to your keys.
The Chipolo Card Point is also on sale, dropping to $24 from $35 — a 31 percent discount. It's a great bluetooth tracker for flat items like your wallet, passport holder or a purse. It also works with Google's Find My Device network and has the same perks like water-resistance and a helpfully loud ring.
Follow @EngadgetDeals on X for the latest tech deals and buying advice.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Tom's Guide
3 minutes ago
- Tom's Guide
Huge Bose audio sale knocks up to 35% — shop my 7 favorite headphone and speaker deals
Bose is an audio brand that makes some of the best headphones and best Bluetooth speakers on the market. But it's no secret that these high-end audio devices can cost a pretty penny. However, thanks to Amazon's latest sale, you can save up to 35% right now. Whether you're looking for noise-cancelling headphones for back to school season or you're heading to the pool and need a Bluetooth speaker to blast your summer tunes, there's plenty of affordable Bose deals to be had. I personally recommend the Bose SoundLink Flex (Gen 2) for just $129. And when it comes to headphones, you can't go wrong with the Bose QuietComfort Headphones for $229 — a whopping $120 off. We don't know how long these Bose deals will last so we recommend you start shopping ASAP. Keep scrolling to check out the rest of my favorite picks from the sale. The Bose SoundLink (2nd gen) is a compact and powerful Bluetooth speaker with a durable design. This 1.2-pound speaker is water and dust proof and delivered great sound quality in our SoundLink Flex gen 2 review. With 12 hours of battery life and $20 off, you have yourself a great deal. If you want to enhance your TV sound without having speakers spread all over your room, the Bose TV speaker is what you want. It's small but still offers the sound Bose is known for. It's also discounted by $80 right now, which makes it a great deal. While Bose has plenty of other more expensive soundbars to choose from, this one for $199 is as budget-friendly as it gets. The Bose QuietComfort Earbuds (2024) are a fantastic pair of noise-canceling earbuds that don't break the bank. Bose reigns supreme in terms of sound quality and active noise cancellation, and that's very much the case with these mid-range earbuds too. You're getting best-in-class sound quality and ANC — all for just $169. The Bose Ultra Open have perfected the open earbud formula. They have a comfortable, non-invasive fit, solid battery life, and they sound better than you might expect from open buds. They got 4 stars in our Bose Ultra Open Earbuds review, where we loved their simple controls and surprising lack of sound leakage. In our Bose QuietComfort Headphones review, we said these are "excellent always-on noise-cancelers with enhanced sound and battery life." They're missing spatial audio mode and touch controls, but for $120 less, these are nearly perfect. The Bose QuietComfort Earbuds 2 take active noise cancellation to the next level. In our Bose QuietComfort Earbuds 2 review, we said these buds are a remarkable follow-up to their predecessors delivering better sound, call quality and unrivaled active noise canceling. Sound balance and noise neutralization work extremely well and the battery life is up to 6 hours, with an extra 24 hours via the charging case. With big sound and a fashionable look, the SoundLink Max is a great portable companion for taking on the go. 20 hours of battery life is a big bonus as well, giving you plenty of listening time.
Forbes
4 minutes ago
- Forbes
Quality Clicks: Google Rebuts Its Critics Sans Data
Amid evidence of an online catastrophe for publishers both large and small, Google is officially challenging the narrative that its AI Overviews tool is leading people to click into search engine results pages less frequently. The rebuttal comes through a now-prominent blog post by Google VP and Head of Search Liz Reid, who is contending that regardless of the numbers, the addition of the AI blurb at the top of a search is leading to more 'quality clicks.' 'Overall, total organic click volume from Google Search to websites has been relatively stable year-over-year,' Reid wrote Aug. 6. 'Additionally, average click quality has increased and we're actually sending slightly more quality clicks to websites than a year ago (by quality clicks, we mean those where users don't quickly click back — typically a signal that a user is interested in the website).' Quality Time with Google So the idea is that users will drill down deeper into things, spurred on by the introduction made by the AI tool. But this misses the point: it's the loss of aggregate traffic that hurts publishers and those trying to garner attention online, and since Google has had a practical monopoly on search for, well, decades, the impact of fewer clicks is big. But rather than leave it there, Reid added: 'This data is in contrast to third-party reports that inaccurately suggest dramatic declines in aggregate traffic — often based on flawed methodologies, isolated examples, or traffic changes that occurred prior to the roll out of AI features in Search.' The reader can assume that 'this data' refers to the first line, the organic click volume remaining 'relatively stable year-to-year' and not to the rest of it. However, outside parties are specifically taking aim at the former claim, noting that Google does not provide data to counter studies like those by Pew that definitely show lower levels of click-through traffic. With Their Own Eyes In addition to Pew's research, critics of the Google response point to their own evidence. 'Do the hundreds of thousands of Google Search Console [GSC] screenshots showing impressions remaining flat (or increasing) this year, while clicks dramatically decline – since AI Overviews were rolled out more broadly – count as 'flawed methodologies' or 'isolated examples'?' writes Amsive Vice President of SEO Strategy & Research Lily Ray. 'Thousands of us are seeing it… but it must just be some big coincidence?' 'Gaslighting of the highest order,' adds Florentina Schinteie, SEO Strategist for In-House Teams and Former Head of SEO at DesignRush. The Re-Skilling of the Web Here's another bit from the above blog post: 'While overall traffic to sites is relatively stable, the web is vast, and user trends are shifting traffic to different sites, resulting in decreased traffic to some sites and increased traffic to others. People are increasingly seeking out and clicking on sites with forums, videos, podcasts, and posts where they can hear authentic voices and first-hand perspectives. People are also more likely to click into web content that helps them learn more — such as an in-depth review, an original post, a unique perspective or a thoughtful first-person analysis. Sites that meet these evolving user needs are benefiting from this shift and are generally seeing an increase in traffic.' This seems in some ways eerily similar to the arguments of big bosses bullish on AI in the job market. Old jobs, they admit, will go away, but new jobs, they contend, will also be created. So it's a wash. Well… Workers will have to re-skill, then – what does that look like? The burden, you'd assume, would be on the workers themselves, which is convenient for whoever's moving the goalposts. The same concept is in play here. Reid suggests it's on the publishers to quickly add content … forums? Podcasts? But all of that aside, that first claim of the 'stability' of traffic is under fire. It's not just Pew, either. 'Research by AI search and SEO platform Authoritas, submitted as part of a legal complaint to the UK's Competition and Markets Authority, found that when an AI Overview is present, publishers are seeing a drop of 47.5% in per-query clickthrough rate on desktop, and 37.7% on mobile,' wrote Charlotte Tobitt Aug. 7 at PressGazette. 'Similarweb data found that among the top 100 news and media websites globally, the average rate of zero-click searches has gone from 50.5% to 52.7% in the past year. Among a wider dataset, zero-click news searches were said to have increased from 56% when AI Overviews were first launched in the US in May 2024 to almost 69% in May this year.' Publishers also report huge losses in traffic. Covering this last week, I cited this article in Columbia Journalism Review, which lays out some of these claims. For those who are skeptical about Reid's post, as a stand-in for a larger Google response: it's the numbers. The claim just doesn't seem credible, and no one from Google is coming up with any real proof. Panda and Penguin Another way to view Google's side of the issue, represented by Reid's arguments, is that the addition of AI Overviews is just like former Google algorithm changes, like Panda in 2011, and Penguin in 2012. These shifts were done with the stated goal of meeting user needs and driving positive change. Advertisers had to scramble. Digital marketers had to adapt by crafting content and sites to attract the priorities of the 'new boss' of Google favor. Conceptually, the same is true here – but the shift is much bigger, and the paradigm changes a lot more. The result appears to be a showdown between Google (which, in classical Marxian parlance, owns the means of production) and publishers, who, absent some course correction, may be left out in the cold, with simple admonitions to get started podcasting.
NBC News
4 minutes ago
- NBC News
Musk threatens 'immediate' legal action against Apple over alleged antitrust violations
Elon Musk on Monday threatened Apple with legal action over alleged antitrust violations related to rankings of the Grok AI chatbot app, which is owned by his artificial intelligence startup xAI. 'Apple is behaving in a manner that makes it impossible for any AI company besides OpenAI to reach #1 in the App Store, which is an unequivocal antitrust violation. xAI will take immediate legal action,' Musk wrote in a post on his social media platform X. Apple declined to comment on Musk's threat. 'Why do you refuse to put either X or Grok in your 'Must Have' section when X is the #1 news app in the world and Grok is #5 among all apps? Are you playing politics?' Musk said in another post. Apple last year tied up with OpenAI to integrate its ChatGPT chatbot into iPhone, iPad, Mac laptop and desktop products. Musk at that time had said that 'If Apple integrates OpenAI at the OS level, then Apple devices will be banned at my companies. That is an unacceptable security violation.' Prior to his legal threats against Apple, Musk had celebrated Grok surpassing Google as the fifth top free app on the App Store. When contacted by CNBC, xAI did not immediately respond to a request for further information on a potential lawsuit. CNBC confirmed that ChatGPT was ranked No. 1 in the top free apps section of the American iOS store, and was the only AI chatbot in Apple's 'Must-Have Apps' section. The App Store also featured a link to download OpenAI's new flagship AI model, ChatGPT-5 at the top of its 'Apps' section. OpenAI on Thursday announced GPT-5, its latest and most advanced large-scale AI model, following xAI's release of its newest chatbot, Grok 4, last month. Musk has an ongoing feud with ChatGPT maker OpenAI, which he co-founded in 2015. The billionaire stepped down from its board in 2018, four years after saying that AI was 'potentially more dangerous than nukes.' He is now suing the Microsoft -backed startup, and its CEO Sam Altman, alleging they abandoned OpenAI's founding mission to develop artificial intelligence 'for the benefit of humanity broadly.' Robert Keele, who headed the legal department at xAI, announced last week that he had left the company to spend more time with his family. In his announcement, Keele also acknowledged 'daylight between our worldviews' with Musk. In response to Musk's antitrust threats against Apple, OpenAI CEO Sam Altman said in an X post: 'This is a remarkable claim given what I have heard alleged that Elon does to manipulate X to benefit himself and his own companies and harm his competitors and people he doesn't like.' This is not the first time Apple has been challenged on antitrust grounds. In a landmark case, the Department of Justice last year sued the company over charges of running an iPhone ecosystem monopoly. In June, a panel of judges also denied an emergency application from Apple to halt the changes to its App Store resulting from a ruling that the company could no longer charge a commission on payment links inside its apps, nor tell developers how the links should look.
