Senator says trip to El Salvador was to support Kilmar Ábrego García's due process
Senator Chris Van Hollen, who travelled to El Salvador last week to meet Kilmar Ábrego García, the man at the center of a wrongful deportation dispute, said on Sunday that his trip was to support Ábrego García's right to due process because if that was denied then everyone's constitutional rights were threatened in the US.
The White House has claimed Ábrego García is a member of the MS-13 gang though he has not been charged with any gang-related crimes and the supreme court has ordered his return to the US be facilitated.
But in an interview with ABC's This Week, Van Hollen, a Maryland senator, stressed that the government had presented no evidence linking Ábrego García to MS-13 in federal court. 'Mr President,' the senator said, 'take your facts to court, don't put everything out on social media.'
Related: Kilmar Ábrego García 'traumatized' by threats in prison, Maryland senator says
Speaking on CNN's State of the Union, Van Hollen contested Trump's 'argument that you can't fight gang violence and uphold people's constitutional rights at the same time. That's a very dangerous view. If we deny the constitutional rights of this one man, it threatens the constitutional rights of everyone in America.'
Van Hollen, who returned to the US on Friday after meeting with Ábrego García, has accused administration officials of lying about Ábrego García's case in an attempt to distract from questions about whether his rights were violated when he was deported to El Salvador last month.
'I'm for whatever gives him his due process rights,' Van Hollen told the outlet. 'An immigration judge in 2019 said he should not be deported to El Salvador because that would put his life at risk from gang members like MS-13.
'The Trump administration did not appeal that immigration judge's order to keep him in the United States. He is here legally now, has a work permit, is a sheet metal worker, has a family, and three kids,' he said.
'I am fine with whatever result happens as long as he is given his due process rights under the constitution,' Van Hollen added. The administration has said Ábrego García's deportation was an 'administrative error' and the supreme court has ordered that the government 'facilitate' his return, setting up a contentious debate of what that means in practical terms.
As Van Hollen made the rounds of political shows on Sunday, he expanded on the theme of a constitutional crisis. On NBC's Meet the Press he was asked if the US was in constitutional crisis with the Trump administration.
'Oh, yes, we are. They are very much flouting the courts as we speak. As the courts have said, facilitating his return means something more than doing nothing, and they are doing nothing. Yes, they're absolutely in violation of the court's orders as we speak,' he said.
'My whole point here is that if you deprive one man of his constitutional rights, you threaten the constitutional rights of everybody,' Van Hollen said later to the Fox News Sunday host Shannon Bream. 'I would hope that all of us would understand that principle – you're a lawyer. I'm not vouching for the individual, I'm vouching for his rights.'
On ABC's This Week, Van Hollen was asked if he had walked into a trap when García was brought to his hotel for an hour-long meeting and the pair were pictured with margaritas. The senator said the drinks were placed there by a government official for the photos, and not touched, and added that the trip wasn't a trap because his purpose had been to meet with García so he could 'tell his wife and family he was OK'.
'That was my goal. And I achieved that goal,' he said.
But he added that 'the Salvadorian authorities tried to deceive people. They tried to make it look like he was in paradise. They actually wanted to have the meeting by the hotel pool originally.'
The senator also accused Tom Homan, Trump's 'border czar', of 'lying through his teeth' about Ábrego García, and strongly rejected comments by Gavin Newsom, the California governor seen as a potential candidate for the Democratic presidential nomination in 2028, who said that it was politically dangerous for Democrats to defend the wrongly deported man.
'I think what Americans are tired of, is people who want to put their finger to the wind to see what's going on,' the senator said. 'I would say that anyone that's not prepared to defend the constitutional rights of one man, when they threaten the constitutional rights of all, doesn't deserve to lead.'
After the meeting, President Nayib Bukele posted the image on X, writing that García 'miraculously risen from the 'death camps' & 'torture', now sipping margaritas with Senator Van Hollen in the tropical paradise of El Salvador!'
Van Hollen said the venue for the meeting and the subsequent picture 'just goes to show the lengths that Bukele and Trump will go to try to deceive people about what this case is all about'.
On Friday, the White House mocked Van Hollen by annotating a headline about his Thursday meeting with García. 'Fixed it for you, New York Times,' the White House X account shared. 'Oh, and by the way, Chris Van Hollen – he's NOT coming back.'
The annotated headline changes 'Senator Meets With Wrongly Deported Maryland Man in El Salvador' included crossing out 'Wrongly' in red ink and replacing the words 'Maryland Man' with 'MS-13 Illegal Alien'. They also added 'Who's Never Coming Back.'
Related: US supreme court orders temporary halt to deportations of Venezuelan men
But Ábrego García's deportation was also facing opposition from Republicans. On Sunday, the Louisiana senator John Kennedy was asked on Meet The Press if Ábrego García should be returned to the US.
Kennedy said that Van Hollen's trip to El Salvador and calls for Ábrego García to be returned to the US were 'utterly and gloriously wrong' and said that 'most of this gauzy rhetoric is just rage bait. Unless you're next-level obtuse, you know that Mr García is never coming back to the United States, ever.'
But Kennedy conceded that Ábrego García's deportation 'was a screw-up', adding that 'the administration won't admit it, but this was a screw-up. Mr García was not supposed to be sent to El Salvador. He was sent to El Salvador.' But he said Democrats' response was typical.
'The Democrats say, 'Look, you know, we told you, Trump is a threat to democracy.' This is going to happen every other Thursday afternoon. I don't see any pattern here. I mean, you know, some day pigs may fly, but I doubt it,'' he added.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


CNN
11 minutes ago
- CNN
Trump lays into Musk, suggesting he has ‘Trump derangement syndrome'
President Donald Trump appeared to confirm the deterioration of his relationship with Elon Musk, saying he was 'very disappointed' in the tech billionaire after Musk repeatedly blasted the president's sweeping domestic agenda bill in recent days. 'Elon and I had a great relationship. I don't know if we will anymore,' Trump told reporters in the Oval Office less than one week after the two exchanged effusive praise on Musk's last day as a special government employee. Since then, Musk has strongly criticized what Trump calls his 'Big, Beautiful Bill' that has passed the House and faces an uncertain path forward in the Senate. On Tuesday, Musk called the bill a 'disgusting abomination.' Trump and Musk have not spoken since Musk lashed out at the legislation, a source familiar with the dynamic told CNN. 'He knew every aspect of this bill. He knew it better than almost anybody, and he never had a problem until right after he left,' Trump said, adding that while Musk has not yet personally attacked him, the president expected that could be next. Trump repeatedly claimed that Musk's concerns with the bill were centered on the repeal of electric vehicle subsidies that benefitted Tesla. Musk has admitted his company has struggled in the wake of his political involvement. Musk didn't wait to respond, posting his reactions in real time on his social media platform X. 'Without me, Trump would have lost the election, Dems would control the House and the Republicans would be 51-49 in the Senate,' Musk said. He added: 'Such ingratitude.' Musk denied Trump's claim that the Tesla CEO knew the inner workings of the bill ahead of time, and countered that the elimination of EV tax incentives has nothing to do with his opposition to the massive domestic policy bill. 'Whatever. Keep the EV/solar incentive cuts in the bill, even though no oil & gas subsidies are touched (very unfair!!), but ditch the MOUNTAIN of DISGUSTING PORK in the bill' Musk in a separate post. 'In the entire history of civilization, there has never been legislation that both big and beautiful. Everyone knows this! Either you get a big and ugly bill or a slim and beautiful bill. Slim and beautiful is the way.' One Republican strategist who has worked closely with the tech billionaire downplayed the idea that Musk's opposition is only about the EV subsidies, telling CNN that Musk was genuinely troubled by projections of how much the bill would add to the deficit – the reasoning Musk has publicly cited on multiple occasions. The nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office has estimated that the legislation passed by the House would increase the deficit by $2.4 trillion. During Thursday's Oval Office appearance alongside German Chancellor Friedrich Merz, Trump reminisced about his campaign bromance with Musk, who contributed at least a quarter-billion dollars to efforts supporting Trump's 2024 presidential bid and once called himself Trump's 'first buddy.' 'Elon endorsed me very strongly. He actually went up and campaigned for me. I think I would have won – Susie would say I would have won Pennsylvania easily anyway,' Trump said, referring to his chief of staff Susie Wiles, appearing to hint at tensions between Wiles and Musk. Trump appeared to moderate his tone at times, saying he 'always liked Elon' – before implicitly accusing him of so-called 'Trump Derangement Syndrome.' 'He's not the first – people leave my administration, and they love us, and then at some point they miss it so badly, and some of them embrace it, and some of them actually become hostile. I don't know what it is. It's sort of 'Trump derangement syndrome,' I guess they call it, but we have it with others too,' he said. 'They leave, and they wake up in the morning, and the glamour is gone,' he continued. 'The whole world is different, and they become hostile. I don't know what it is.' Kristen Holmes contributed to this report.


Bloomberg
12 minutes ago
- Bloomberg
Trump Faces New Lawsuit Over Migrants Sent to Salvadoran Prison
The Trump administration is facing a new legal challenge to its arrangement with El Salvador to send migrants — and potentially US citizens — to a mega-prison infamous for its dangerous and unsanitary conditions. The case, filed in federal court in Washington, is the first to directly target the State Department's agreement to pay millions of dollars to house people arrested in the United States in El Salvador's prison system, including the Centro de Confinamiento del Terrorismo, known as CECOT.


Washington Post
13 minutes ago
- Washington Post
Trump says latest travel ban ‘can't come soon enough'
Politics Trump says latest travel ban 'can't come soon enough' June 5, 2025 | 5:20 PM GMT President Donald Trump's new restrictions on the entry of travelers to the U.S. from more than a dozen countries does not include Egypt. In an earlier video announcing the ban, Trump referred to the recent attack that injured a dozen demonstrators in Boulder, Colo. Authorities said the attack was done by an Egyptian immigrant who arrived on a visa.