Malema: Legalise prostitution and empower women to fight poverty in SA
Image: IOL
Economic Freedom Fighters (EFF) leader Julius Malema said the South African government must legalise prostitution, arguing that sex workers deserve protection, dignity, and workers' rights.
Speaking at the EFF Women's Day rally in Secunda, Mpumalanga, at the weekend, Malema said police abuse and discrimination against sex workers must come to an end.
'We are saying to the South African government, you must legalise prostitution. No one is going to be raped by police in the name of being a prostitute. And when she goes to open a case, they can't open a case because they say this is a prostitute.
''Prostitution is the oldest profession in the whole world. You may be a Christian; whether you like it or not, prostitution is a job, and there are people who work in it. Respect those people, they too must have protection and workers' rights,' he said.
Malema stressed that women must be protected 'in every space we occupy,' adding that sexual violence happens in all sectors of society.
'Women get raped at church, women get raped at school, women get raped at workplaces, get raped at social places, and they do not rape themselves. They are raped by men. Men have to stand up. And by standing up, you don't have to do anything. Just stop raping women. Rape will stop in South Africa,' he said.
He also condemned men who target vulnerable women. 'We don't want men who are cowards, who are scared of people their age, who are scared of people of their same gender, and they go and exercise their power over the powerless women.
''No man should lay a hand on a woman. We must protect them. We must respect them. We must provide for them. And any man who doesn't give women money is an irresponsible man. Women have to receive money. Especially black women.'
Malema said black women deserve special consideration because they endure triple oppression, for their race, gender, and class.
'Why should black women receive money? They were oppressed three times more than us as men. And therefore, for triple oppression, we have a duty to compensate them. Because they've gone through pain, they still go through pain.
''They go through pain because they are black. They go through pain because they are women. They go through pain because they are working class. When you see a black woman, you must know this woman is carrying huge burdens on her shoulder and give her the necessary support,' he told supporters.
Video Player is loading.
Play Video
Play
Unmute
Current Time
0:00
/
Duration
-:-
Loaded :
0%
Stream Type LIVE
Seek to live, currently behind live
LIVE
Remaining Time
-
0:00
This is a modal window.
Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window.
Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan
Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan
Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan
Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque
Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps
Reset
restore all settings to the default values Done
Close Modal Dialog
End of dialog window.
Advertisement
Next
Stay
Close ✕
He also called for urgent action to tackle unemployment among women, saying they are disproportionately affected compared to men.
'We cannot continue to have a situation where the women who are unemployed are more than men. In South Africa, women are more unemployed than men. We have to change those patterns. Why? Because when you give women jobs, when you give women opportunities, you are guaranteed that they will take care of the poor and the children in our townships and rural areas. But when you give men, some of them are using these resources in an irresponsible way,' Malema said.
'At the centre of defeating poverty should be women empowerment. You empower women, you fight poverty. You empower women, you fight inequality. And therefore, everywhere else where we see a woman employed, we must be very happy that at least more than 10 people are going to be looked after from where she comes from,' he said.
hope.ntanzi@io.co.za Get your news on the go, click here to join the IOL News WhatsApp channel.
IOL Politics
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The South African
11 hours ago
- The South African
I want a three-way with Putin and Zelensky, says Trump on pending meeting
US President Donald Trump said Wednesday he was planning a second meeting with Russian counterpart Vladimir Putin soon after Friday's Alaska summit – this time with Ukraine leader Volodymyr Zelensky included. Trump is due to sit down with Putin in Anchorage on Friday, the first meeting between the Russian leader and a sitting US president since 2021. 'If the first one goes okay, we'll have a quick second one,' he told reporters. 'I would like to do it almost immediately, and we'll have a quick second meeting between president Putin and president Zelensky and myself, if they'd like to have me there.' The high-stakes talks come with Trump seeking to broker an end to Russia's nearly three-and-a-half year war in Ukraine, and Zelensky and his European allies have urged the Republican to push for a ceasefire. A stepped-up Russian offensive, and the fact Zelensky has not been invited to the Anchorage meeting Friday, have heightened fears that Trump and Putin could strike a deal that forces painful concessions on Ukraine. Trump said Russia would face 'very severe consequences' if Putin did not agree to end the war after Friday's meeting, without elaborating. The US leader promised dozens of times during his 2024 election campaign to end the war on his first day in office but has made scant progress towards brokering a peace deal. He threatened 'secondary sanctions' on Russia's trading partners over its invasion of Ukraine but his deadline for action came and went last week with no action announced. Trump told reporters he'd had a 'very good call' with European leaders including Zelensky as he took questions from reporters at an arts event at Washington's Kennedy Center. 'I would rate it at 10. You know – very, very friendly,' he said. Let us know by leaving a comment below, or send a WhatsApp to 060 011 021 1. Subscribe to The South African website's newsletters and follow us on WhatsApp, Facebook, X and Bluesky for the latest news. © Agence France-Presse
The Citizen
11 hours ago
- The Citizen
Zulaikha Patel: Former Pretoria Girls High pupil who protested against discriminatory hair policies joins Newzroom Afrika
Zulaikha Patel came to public prominence as part of the silent march at Pretoria High School for Girls against discriminatory hair policies. The month of August is a significant one for women in South Africa, owing to the 1956 Women's March, which saw more than 20 000 women head to the Union Buildings in Pretoria to protest against the apartheid government's extension of pass laws to women. That march birthed what today is celebrated as Women's Day. However, for Zulaikha Patel, who came to public prominence as part of the silent march at Pretoria High School for Girls against discriminatory hair policies at the institution in 2016, the month of August has a deeper meaning. 'My activism has thrust me into the public domain from a tender young age, and ultimately I spent all my teenage years growing up directly in the public eye, which at times became difficult as I had to grow up much quicker than my years in order to navigate public commentary and critique,' Patel tells The Citizen. Patel was 13 when she protested in high school; she is 23 now. ALSO READ: WATCH: Aldrin Sampear bows out of Newzroom Afrika Patel in August It was in August that the silent march at her former high school took place, and yesterday, Patel was announced as one of the new faces on Newzroom Afrika. 'I find this quite ironic that two significant moments in my life both took place in the month of August,' she said. She says as a woman in South Africa, she holds the month close to her heart because of the selfless acts of 1956 by the likes of Lilian Ngoyi and Helen Joseph, among the slew of female activists. Patel says the 1956 march continues to remain a 'source of inspiration for me on the power that women's voices hold and a source of inspiration to continue advocating for justice and human rights.' ALSO READ: Newzroom Afrika attracts heavies in new staff line-up Patel on joining Newzroom Newzroom Afrika shuffled its programming as a way of refreshing the channel, and Patel's face will be one of the new ones on screen. Patel will contribute to the AM Report and is part of the team that Iman Rappetti and Arabile Gumede spearhead with Vaylen Kirtley on the sports desk. 'With August marking the ushering of spring, which is symbolic of new beginnings, my new role with Newzroom Afrika marks a new chapter in my life, and this chapter of my activism is called 'giving the citizens the mic to define the country through their voices',' she said. She says her contribution to the AM Report will be bringing a new segment that focuses on the voices of the citizens of the country on various socio-economic challenges that the nation faces. She doesn't describe her move into journalism as being bitten by the journalism bug but rather the ''storytelling bug', which bit me a while ago when I began writing books,' she says. 'A huge part of my activism has been to empower people to use their own voices to change the world and their circumstances. The world is changed by ordinary people that have the audacity to use their voices for change.' She shares that this value is one that she's carrying with her into her new role at Newzroom, to focus on handing the mic to citizens to define and shape the country through their voice and lens. ALSO READ: Refilwe Modiselle gently tackles misconceptions and myths about albinism with her children's book Patel, the author In 2021, Patel debuted her children's book, My Coily Crowny Hair, a book encouraging young black girls to embrace their natural hair in a world where African hair is seen as uncouth. 'The book was received incredibly well, as African children with Afro hair and dreadlocks felt empowered, seeing African identity positively represented,' shared Patel. 'I strongly believe that seeing yourself represented in the pages of books empowers one's existence.' The success of My Coily Crowny Hair birthed a second book, Brave Like Me, that was published earlier this year. 'Brave Like Me is published in five languages: English, Afrikaans, isiZulu, isiNdebele and isiXhosa,' says Patel about the book that empowers children to use their voices to change the world. NOW READ: Radio 2000 broadcaster Ntombi Meso mends childhood traumas through her children's book
The Citizen
13 hours ago
- The Citizen
Zuma and MK party file urgent court bid to challenge Ramaphosa's Mchunu decision
The application by Zuma and the MK party comes after their recent loss in the Constitutional Court. Former president Jacob Zuma and the MK party have not given up the fight and have lodged an urgent application against President Cyril Ramaphosa in the High Court in Pretoria. The application by Zuma and the MK party comes after their recent loss in the Constitutional Court. What Zuma wants In the notice of motion, Zuma and his party want the high court to declare Ramaphosa's decision to place Minister of Police Senzo Mchunu on special leave. They also want the appointment of Wits law Professor Feroz Cachalia as acting police minister and the establishment of a commission of inquiry to be declared invalid, null and void and unconstitutional and set aside. ConCourt ruling The ConCourt on 31 July 2025 ruled that the application does not engage the court's jurisdiction and refused direct access to the MK party and Zuma in its matter against Ramaphosa. Ramaphosa's lawyer Kate Hofmeyr argued that cases that can exclusively be decided by the Constitutional Court are very limited. 'This matter does not fall within this court's exclusive jurisdiction. Very few matters do, and this is not one of them. 'Any allegation that the power was exercised unlawfully falls under our constitutional scheme to the High Court and the Supreme Court of Appeal (SCA) to consider first. Additionally, there is no pressing need for this court, on 10 days' notice, to decide the issues in this matter as a court of first and last instance,' Hofmeyr said. This basically means that Zuma and the MK party had to approach the high court first, which they have now done. ALSO READ: Zuma and MK party case should've started in High Court, ConCourt hears [VIDEOS] The court ruling was handed down two hours after it hosted a special ceremonial sitting for retiring Acting Deputy Chief Justice Mbuyiseli Madlanga, whom Ramaphosa appointed to chair a commission to probe explosive allegations by KwaZulu-Natal (KZN) top cop Lieutenant-General Nhlanhla Mkhwanzi of criminal infiltration in the South African justice system. Constitutional matter In his founding affidavit to the high court, Zuma said he is bringing the application in his personal capacity, but because the application is urgent and in the 'interest of justice' he is also deposing the papers on behalf of the MK party. 'The twin purposes of this application are to re-assert the merits of the application which were left unadjudicated by the Constitutional Court on account of its findings on exclusive jurisdiction and direct access; and to raise new grounds of illegality and irrationality based on events which arose post the 30 July 2025 hearing in the Constitutional Court,' Zuma argues. Zuma said that the present application is indisputably a constitutional matter. Section 169(1)(a) of the Constitution provides that the High Court of South Africa may decide any constitutional matter except a matter that the Constitutional Court has agreed to hear by way of direct access or is assigned by legislation to another court of a status similar to the High Court. 'This is such a matter because the Constitutional Court, rightly or in my view wrongly, declined to grant direct access. That decision must be respected as a fact until or unless it is set aside,' Zuma said. ALSO READ: Zuma and MK party accuse ConCourt of ignoring 'most serious' violations by Ramaphosa Urgency In his papers, Zuma argues that in his Constitutional Court application, Ramaphosa did not contest the urgency, exclusive jurisdiction, and/or direct access. 'The president sought and was allowed to opportunistically hide behind those technicalities to escape much-needed judicial accountability for the unjustifiable multiple breaches of the rule of law. There are no more hiding places. 'The serious and unprecedented revelations of alleged criminality made by Lieutenant-General Mkhwanazi, as another highly qualified whistleblower, in the tradition of former Intelligence Chief Arthur Fraser, can no longer be ignored or swept under the carpet at the request of the president,' Zuma argued. Zuma explains that the urgency of the application is 'clearly not self-created, and it can never be reasonably asserted that relief may be obtained in due course.' 'The impugned commission has already commenced and continues to operate at huge cost to the taxpayer. In the (unlikely) event of its delivering a final report in six months' time, the matter would still not have been heard in due course.' Cachalia Zuma also argues that Cachalia has since assumed office and will be 'making decisions which affect the security of the people of South Africa' while Mchunu 'who has been illegally placed on leave of absence by the president continues to earn a salary and enjoy other expensive privileges such as bodyguards, drivers, free ministerial accommodation, air travel domestic workers and the like.' 'It is trite that the matter involves very serious and unprecedented allegations of executive and judicial capture which, if true, constitute a threat to the very democracy prevailing in South Africa. 'It is impossible to imagine a greater catastrophe than that which would transpire if the allegations are true and the matter is not heard as one of the utmost urgency. In relation to the question of urgency, the merits must be regarded as true and proven,' Zuma argues. Senzo Mchunu Zuma also argues that there is 'no express legal provision which empowers Ramaphosa to place a minister on leave of absence. 'The respondents can therefore only rely on an implied power which is said to flow from the power to dismiss. 'It will be argued that the decision does not pass the reasonable necessity test because the power to dismiss in section 91(2) must not be confused with the power to dismiss an employee,' he said. 'Financial benefit' Zuma said the appointment of Cachalia is 'totally incoherent' and false explanations given by Ramaphosa in 'respect of this decision owe to the fact that it is rooted in improper motives and bad faith'. 'Its purpose if to grant undue financial benefits to Minister Mchunu at the expense of the taxpayer and to shield him from accountability and well-deserved dismissal or removal from the Cabinet. 'In explaining this appointment, the president has performed both somersaults and backflips in a series of incompatible volte face manoeuvres, all pointing to sheer irrationality,' Zuma argued. In his papers, Zuma argued that following the swearing in of the acting police minister, both Ramaphosa and Cachalia gave media interviews, with differing accounts of his official title and status. Questions to Ramaphosa Zuma's attorneys sent a letter to Ramaphosa on 4 August 2025, posing 15 unanswered questions regarding his actions and justifications. Zuma said Ramaphosa's response was 'inadequate'. 'Given the public importance of the issues and the imminence of the 1 August date for the assumption of office by Professor Cachalia, the matter cries out for direct access.' ALSO READ: Zuma demands Ramaphosa resign by Friday, or else… Madlanga Commission Zuma also argues that there is no legal provision which is capable of endowing the president with the power to confer upon the Madlanga Commission the powers which are reserved to the Judicial Service and/or Magistrates' Commissions, to investigate allegations of misconduct on the part of members of the judiciary. 'There are specific and well-accepted policy reasons why such powers are exclusively reserved for the bodies referred to above. These include the preservation of the independence, dignity and effectiveness of the judiciary.' The matter is expected to heard on 26 August 2025. ALSO READ: Madlanga inquiry: How much probe into Mkhwanazi's allegations will cost
