Hungary bans 'national security threat' Kneecap from performing at Sziget festival
Government spokesperson Zoltán Kovács explained in a post on the X platform that the the decision to ban Kneecap from entering the country and from participating in the Sziget Festival, was due to statements deemed anti-Semitic and glorifying Hamas and Hezbollah.
He later added that the immigration authorities had issued a formal decision to ban the band members from entering Hungary for three years, considering their presence a "serious threat to national security".The government had previously asked festival organisers to exclude the band from the event, which is one of Europe's biggest music festivals and attracts hundreds of thousands of music lovers to an island on the Danube every summer.
Pro-Palestinian protests
The Belfast-based band is known for its support of the Palestinian cause, which it openly expresses at its concerts.
One of its most controversial recent appearances came at Britain's Glastonbury Festival, when lead singer Liam O'Hannah, better known by his stage name Mo Chara, accused Israel of committing war crimes.
Last May, Mo Chara was charged with a terrorism-related offence in the UK for displaying a pro-Hezbollah flag. The artist denied the charge, and in previous statements, he emphasised that the band does not support either Hamas or Hezbollah, and that it "condemns all attacks on civilians, at all times".
The band is by no means alone in expressing vocal support for the Palestinian cause and the enjoys enormous support from other dozens of artists and cultural figures who've signed petitions and are organising campaigns against what they deem to be censorship.
Organisers of the Sziget festival say they've not had official notification of the government's decision, and reject pressure to cancel the 11 August performance.
"Our festival remains true to what we have achieved over the past 30 years. There is no place for hate, incitement, prejudice or any form of racism or anti-Semitism" said Sziget in a statement.
This year's edition features some of the biggest names in music, including Post Malone, Shawn Mendes and Charli XCX.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
4 hours ago
- Yahoo
Voices: Why I am joining the Palestine Action protesters
Today, I will be in Parliament Square to demand that the UK government uphold our right to freedom of speech, and to denounce the genocide that the Israeli government is perpetrating in Gaza against the Palestinian people. As a human rights defender, a mother, grandmother and great-great grandmother who has denounced genocide, war crimes and crimes against humanity and ethnic cleansing throughout the world, I cannot remain silent, witnessing the genocide and the abhorrent starvation of the Palestinian people. I will be holding a sign that will read: 'The UK Government is in flagrant violation of Article 10 of the European Convention on Human Rights, which states 'Everyone has the right to freedom of expression. This right shall include freedom to hold opinions and to receive and impart information and ideas without interference by public authority and regardless of frontiers.'' Volker Türk, UN human rights chief, stated that '[the proscription of Palestine Action] appears to constitute an impermissible restriction on those rights that are at odds with the UK's obligations under international human rights law.' Since 5 July, when the order proscribing the Palestine Action protest group under terrorism legislation came into force, hundreds of people have been arrested for holding up peaceful signs motivated by their consternation and horror at the genocide in Gaza. I was shocked to see 83-year-old Reverend Sue Parfitt on television being arrested on the day that Palestine Action was proscribed. Reverend Parfitt was attending a demonstration in Parliament Square, sitting in a camp chair around fellow protesters holding a placard stating her support of the outlawed protest group. While being carried away by police, Reverend Parfitt described the ban as "total nonsense", and went on to add that it symbolised a "loss of civil liberties in this country". Some have had their homes raided by the police. No one arrested seemed to pose any threat to the public. Türk has also said that the UK's counter-terrorism legislation 'misuses the gravity and impact of terrorism to expand it beyond those clear boundaries, to encompass further conduct that is already criminal under the law'. He added: 'The decision also conflates protected expression and other conduct with acts of terrorism and so could readily lead to further chilling effects on the lawful exercise of these rights by many people.' Yesterday, Amnesty International wrote to the Metropolitan Police Commissioner, Sir Mark Rowley, stating that arresting protesters would violate international law: 'The arrest of otherwise peaceful protesters solely for expressing the statement 'I Oppose Genocide – I Support Palestine Action' is a violation of the UK's international obligations to protect the rights of freedom of expression and peaceful assembly. 'Further arrests [carried out on the 9 August demonstration] would violate international human rights law. As such, we urge you to instruct your officers to comply with the UK's international obligations and act with restraint in their response to any such protests that occur, by not arresting protesters who are merely carrying placards that state they oppose genocide and support Palestine Action.' The European Association of Lawyers for Democracy & World Human Rights recently wrote a paper, supported by numerous legal advocacy groups, that states: 'Evidence suggests active and sustained cooperation between the UK and Israeli armies. Concerns surround reports that the UK military has carried out over 500 surveillance flights around Gaza since December 2023, sharing intelligence with Israel – including during the ceasefire.' Only yesterday, further evidence emerged of the RAF's ongoing support for Israel: 'Britain continues to run near daily surveillance flights over Gaza with the help of a US contractor at a time of growing questions about how the intelligence obtained is used and shared with the Israeli military. 'Specialist flight trackers estimate that RAF Shadow aircraft have run more than 600 flights over the Palestinian territory from the Akrotiri airbase in Cyprus in an attempt to locate the remaining hostages held by Hamas since December 2023.' Palestine Action is being punished for exposing the crimes of the British government and taking action to uphold international law. We cannot turn a blind eye to the horrific crimes against humanity that are being perpetrated by Israel in Gaza. I will be joining the demonstration in Parliament Square to oppose genocide and defend human rights and freedom of speech. Bianca Jagger is the founder and president of the BIanca Jagger Human Rights Foundation, a Council of Europe goodwill ambassador, and a member of the executive director's leadership council of Amnesty International USA
Fox News
12 hours ago
- Fox News
Trump, Putin will hold first in-person meeting since Ukraine invasion next week in Alaska
President Donald Trump and Russian President Vladimir Putin will meet next Friday, August 15, for the first in-person meeting between leaders of the U.S. and Russia since Moscow launched its deadly 2022 invasion of Ukraine. The leaders are expected to meet in Alaska, Trump said in a post on Truth Social. The location of the meeting was a major point of interest after the summit was first floated following a call between Trump and Putin on Wednesday after White House envoy Steve Witkoff traveled to Moscow to meet with the Kremlin chief. Hungary, Switzerland, Italy, and the UAE were all under consideration, with Putin originally favoring Hungary, according to sources familiar with the planning. The Kremlin chief also shot down the idea of meeting in Italy, according to reports on Friday, due to Rome's perceived closeness with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy. Following the Wednesday Trump-Putin call, the U.S. president also spoke with Zelenskyy along with European leaders on the potential for a trilateral meeting. Moscow – which has thus far refused to hold direct meetings with Putin and Zelenskyy – has not appeared likely to engage in a trilateral meeting any time soon, as the Kremlin's foreign policy advisor noted on Wednesday that the potential for such a meeting was "mentioned" but "not discussed." Reporting later suggested that Putin may be open to meeting face to face with Zelenskyy, but only if certain "conditions" are met, though what these conditions are remains unclear. Putin has allegedly suggested that Ukraine would need to formally cede the regions of Donetsk and Luhansk, which Moscow illegally annexed in 2022, but which it does not have full control over. Though Zelenskyy has countered similar territorial demands by noting that under Ukraine's Constitution a national referendum would need to occur for any territorial concessions. Despite the immense hurdles that remain, Trump appeared optimistic when speaking to reporters on Wednesday that "there's a very good prospect that [Putin and Zelenskyy] will" meet. Zelenskyy said at least one bilateral meeting between the U.S. and Russian leaders was suggested, which would potentially be followed by a meeting with Trump, Putin and Zelenskyy. It remains unclear what the president hopes to definitively get out of meeting with Putin in person after expressing frustration with the Kremlin chief despite months of attempts to forge a ceasefire. Trump wouldn't comment on how likely he thought a peace deal between Moscow and Kyiv could be on the horizon and echoed his previous frustrations with Putin by telling reporters, "I've been disappointed before with this one."
Yahoo
12 hours ago
- Yahoo
Fox News whips up another Sydney Sweeney ‘controversy' by claiming left is ‘melting down' over old ice cream ad
After helping to manufacture a nearly two-week-long outrage cycle over the Sydney Sweeney 'good jeans' American Eagle commercial, Fox News appears to be trying to prolong the so-called 'controversy' by suggesting that liberals are also 'melting down' over a month-old ice cream ad featuring the Hollywood star. During Friday's broadcast of the midday roundtable show Outnumbered, the panel devoted an entire segment to the 'buzz' surrounding a resurfaced Baskin-Robbins spot featuring the Euphoria star unveiling her own 'signature scoop' and 'signature fizz,' known as 'Sweet on Sydney' offerings. The intent of the Fox News discussion, however, wasn't to put the spotlight on the new 'It Girl for the MAGA crowd' so much as it was to gin up the narrative that yet another Sweeney ad is triggering mass hysteria from the left and Democrats. 'If you are tired of her, sorry, Sydney Sweeney continues to make headlines, but this time not for her American Eagle ad,' Fox News host, and presidential daughter-in-law, Lara Trump declared at the top of the segment. 'Amid the furor over that great jeans campaign, the Baskin-Robbins commercial from a month ago has now resurfaced.' After airing a clip of the ice cream ad, Trump claimed that the 'commercial is now making the rounds on social media' before insisting that it is 'drawing criticism from both sides of the aisle.' The proof of that supposed outrage, though, was two tweets – both apparently from right-leaning accounts. 'One online critic said this is a big fail because 'ice cream tanks your testosterone, spikes your risk of diabetes, and wrecks your metabolism.' I bet our HHS secretary would agree with that,' Trump said, reading a post from a self-described 'canceled scientist' who added that conservatives shouldn't be 'acting like it's some huge win.' 'Another said this ad 'is gonna melt liberal minds,' and now they want to eat ice cream,' Trump continued, reading off another X post. Neither tweet, however, showed someone from the left criticizing the ad. Yet, the rest of the panel conversation centered on how Baskin-Robbins should 'really lean into this' and not 'cave to the woke mob' because American Eagle 'got a boost from President Trump', and saw its stock price jump. 'Are they going to stand by their girl Sydney Sweeney, Baskin-Robbins?' Trump wondered despite the lack of any actual uproar over this month-old commercial. 'I hope they do! I'm not sick of her whatsoever. I think she's amazing,' co-host Emily Compagno reacted. Indeed, as liberal media watchdog Media Matters reported Thursday, the conservative cable giant devoted nearly five hours of airtime to the American Eagle advertisement since July 28. The network, which has made a concerted effort in recent weeks to downplay the ongoing controversy over the Trump administration's handling of the Jeffrey Epstein files, only discussed that story for a total of 40 minutes. 'So, David, liberals are already melting down about this,' Lara Trump claimed, turning to panelist David Webb. 'But to Emily's point, she's cute, she's funny, you've gotta embrace this stuff! Are they really going to start melting down on the left over the ice cream?' Insisting that the 'left just melts down to begin with,' Webb went on to gush over Sweeney and her commercials, describing them as 'so Americana' and a throwback to Brooke Shields' famous Calvin Klein ad campaign -- though he incorrectly claimed Shields was pitching Jordache jeans. 'It was that American girl aspiration. You were a guy who wants to see a girl in her Jordache jeans. This is just advertising, folks. The left just can't help themselves,' he added. Doubling down on what the rest of the panel was selling, Fox News contributor Lisa Marie Boothe noted that while 'David was talking about how the left is melting down,' they also 'bully.' She went on to proclaim that liberals 'lost their ability to do so when President Trump won the popular vote.' After Trump mentioned how much fun she was having reading the comments on the Baskin-Robbins ad's YouTube page -- because conservatives were declaring that 'America is back' -- Fox News correspondent Alicia Acuna weighed in. 'I think that is the point for some of this, because the backlash against the backlash is so fun to watch,' Acuna stated. While MAGA media – and especially Fox News – feasted on the supposed liberal meltdown over the Sweeney ad, the New York Times reported Thursday that analysis of social media data revealed that conservative influencers with large followings were responsible for creating the outrage cycle in the first place. 'In reality, most progressives weren't worked up much at all,' the New York Times noted. 'Criticism of the ad campaign had come almost entirely from a smattering of accounts with relatively few followers, according to an analysis of social media data by The New York Times. Conversation about the ad did not escalate online or in traditional media until days later, after right-leaning influencers, broadcasters and politicians began criticizing what they described as a wave of progressive outrage.' Of course, this isn't a new tactic for the conservative media sphere, which has long specialized in focusing on the hot takes of a handful of little-known progressive accounts or a single op-ed about culture war issues to whip up their audience into a righteous fury, all with the hopes of it breaking through into the national discourse. 'This is a crystal clear illustration of how right-wing media's outrage-industrial complex works,' CNN's Andrew Kirell wrote in Reliable Sources this week. 'It all begins with a viral, often audacious post, typically from an obscure social media account, which then gets amplified by MAGA media influencers who dishonestly declare that it represents the entirety of the 'left.'' He concluded: 'From there, it reaches critical mass at Fox News — the final boss of conservative media — until Trump personally weighs in, generating more coverage and breathing new life into the outrage cycle. Rinse, repeat.'
