logo
Google Says Reviewing CCI Orders Over Alleged AdTech Market Dominance

Google Says Reviewing CCI Orders Over Alleged AdTech Market Dominance

India.coma day ago
New Delhi: Google on Sunday said it is reviewing the Competition Commission of India (CCI) orders into its conduct in the online display advertising market. The trade regulator ordered a thorough probe over a complaint filed by the Alliance of Digital India Foundation (ADIF). The CCI said it has decided to club the complaint with ongoing investigations in similar cases and directed the Director General (DG) to carry out a consolidated probe into Google's conduct in the AdTech ecosystem.
In a separate order, the CCI dismissed a complaint filed by ADIF against Google, concluding that the allegations raised were already examined and settled in previous cases. The regulator said it is not convinced by the reasons stated by ADIF for distinguishing its allegations from the issues examined in previous orders passed by the regulator.
"We are reviewing the CCI's orders. We welcome the CCI's decision to dismiss one part of the complaint,' a Google spokesperson said in a statement.
'We remain confident that our ongoing work with the CCI will affirm that Google's advertising practices have consistently benefited advertisers, publishers, and users, and are fully compliant with competition law,' the company added. ADIF alleged in its complaint that Google has engaged in anti-competitive practices across various layers of its advertising technology stack.
ADIF further alleged that Google, through its multiple group entities, has engaged in anti-competitive conduct by self-preferencing its own services in the AdTech ecosystem, including tying and bundling of its publisher ad server (DFP) with its ad exchange (AdX), and linking access to YouTube ad inventory with the use of its demand-side platform (DV360).
The CCI said it was prima facie satisfied that Google's conduct warranted scrutiny under Section 4 of the Competition Act, which deals with abuse of dominant position.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Google Pixel 10 vs Pixel 9: Camera, price, battery, processor and what more could change
Google Pixel 10 vs Pixel 9: Camera, price, battery, processor and what more could change

Mint

time43 minutes ago

  • Mint

Google Pixel 10 vs Pixel 9: Camera, price, battery, processor and what more could change

As anticipation builds for Google's annualMade by Google event on 20 August, leaks and reports surrounding the Pixel 10 suggest that several key changes are in store for the tech giant's next flagship smartphone. While the new model appears to retain many of the familiar elements seen in the Pixel 9, a closer look reveals some notable updates, particularly in camera technology, battery capacity, and performance. Design-wise, early renders point to minimal visual changes. The hallmark camera bar is expected to make a return, and the device will reportedly keep the same 6.3-inch Actua display found in the Pixel 9. However, there could be a refresh in colour variants. The Pixel 10 is tipped to arrive in Obsidian, Indigo, Frost, and Limoncello, whereas the previous model was available in Obsidian, Porcelain, Winter Green, and Peony. The most substantial differences may lie in the camera department. While the Pixel 9 offered a dual rear setup, a 50 MP primary sensor paired with a 48 MP ultrawide lens, the Pixel 10 is rumoured to include a third rear camera. Though some lenses may see a downgrade in resolution, the new addition is said to be a 10.8 MP telephoto lens capable of 5x optical zoom. This could mark a significant step towards more versatile mobile photography on the entry-level Pixel. Battery life could also receive a slight bump. The Pixel 10 is expected to house a 4,970mAh battery, up from the 4,700mAh unit in the Pixel 9. Furthermore, leaked visuals show the device positioned on a wireless charger, indicating the likely inclusion of magnets for Qi2 wireless charging support, suggesting improved alignment and potentially faster charging speeds. Under the hood, the Pixel 10 will reportedly be powered by Google's latest Tensor G5 chip, succeeding the Tensor G4 used in the Pixel 9. This change is anticipated to bring improvements in processing power and efficiency. On the software side, the Pixel 9 is already running Android 16, so the Pixel 10 is likely to ship with Android 16 straight out of the box. Following last year's price increase from the Pixel 8 to the Pixel 9, raising the entry-level cost to $799, media reports indicate that the Pixel 10 will likely maintain this pricing. If accurate, this means the base model will again launch at $799, approximately ₹ 69,845 in India, offering some pricing stability in a market where costs often rise annually. While the Pixel 10 might closely resemble the Pixel 9 in terms of design and pricing, subtle but important upgrades, particularly in camera hardware, battery capacity, and chipset performance, probably hint at a more refined user experience. With Google's official announcement just weeks away, further details will soon confirm whether these reported changes translate into meaningful real-world improvements.

AI search pushing an already weakened media ecosystem to the brink
AI search pushing an already weakened media ecosystem to the brink

Time of India

time2 hours ago

  • Time of India

AI search pushing an already weakened media ecosystem to the brink

Generative artificial intelligence assistants like ChatGPT are cutting into traditional online search traffic, depriving news sites of visitors and impacting the advertising revenue they desperately need, in a crushing blow to an industry already fighting for survival."The next three or four years will be incredibly challenging for publishers everywhere. No one is immune from the AI summaries storm gathering on the horizon," warned Matt Karolian, vice president of research and development at Boston Globe Media. "Publishers need to build their own shelters or risk being swept away."While data remains limited, a recent Pew Research Center study reveals that AI-generated summaries now appearing regularly in Google searches discourage users from clicking through to source articles. When AI summaries are present, users click on suggested links half as often compared to traditional searches. This represents a devastating loss of visitors for online media sites that depend on traffic for both advertising revenue and subscription conversions. According to Northeastern University professor John Wihbey, these trends "will accelerate, and pretty soon we will have an entirely different web." The dominance of tech giants like Google and Meta had already slashed online media advertising revenue, forcing publishers to pivot toward paid subscriptions. But Wihbey noted that subscriptions also depend on traffic, and paying subscribers alone aren't sufficient to support major media organizations. Limited lifelines The Boston Globe group has begun seeing subscribers sign up through ChatGPT, offering a new touchpoint with potential readers, Karolian said. However, "these remain incredibly modest compared to other platforms, including even smaller search engines." Other AI-powered tools like Perplexity are generating even fewer new subscriptions, he added. To survive what many see as an inevitable shift, media companies are increasingly adopting GEO (Generative Engine Optimization) -- a technique that replaces traditional SEO (Search Engine Optimization). This involves providing AI models with clearly labeled content, good structure, comprehensible text, and strong presence on social networks and forums like Reddit that get crawled by AI companies. But a fundamental question remains: "Should you allow OpenAI crawlers to basically crawl your website and your content?" asks Thomas Peham, CEO of optimization startup OtterlyAI. Burned by aggressive data collection from major AI companies, many news publishers have chosen to fight back by blocking AI crawlers from accessing their content. "We just need to ensure that companies using our content are paying fair market value," argued Danielle Coffey, who heads the News/Media Alliance trade organization. Some progress has been made on this front. Licensing agreements have emerged between major players, such as the New York Times and Amazon, Google and Associated Press, and Mistral and Agence France-Presse, among others. But the issue is far from resolved, as several major legal battles are underway, most notably the New York Times' blockbuster lawsuit against OpenAI and Microsoft. Let them crawl Publishers face a dilemma: blocking AI crawlers protects their content but reduces exposure to potential new readers. Faced with this challenge, "media leaders are increasingly choosing to reopen access," Peham observed. Yet even with open access, success isn't guaranteed. According to OtterlyAI data, media outlets represent just 29 percent of citations offered by ChatGPT, trailing corporate websites at 36 percent. And while Google search has traditionally privileged sources recognized as reliable, "we don't see this with ChatGPT," Peham noted. The stakes extend beyond business models. According to the Reuters Institute's 2025 Digital News Report, about 15 percent of people under 25 now use generative AI to get their news. Given ongoing questions about AI sourcing and reliability, this trend risks confusing readers about information origins and credibility -- much like social media did before it. "At some point, someone has to do the reporting," Karolian said. "Without original journalism, none of these AI platforms would have anything to summarize." Perhaps with this in mind, Google is already developing partnerships with news organizations to feed its generative AI features, suggesting potential paths forward. "I think the platforms will realize how much they need the press," predicted Wihbey -- though whether that realization comes soon enough to save struggling newsrooms remains an open question.

AI vs jobs: What Vinod Khosla, Sundar Pichai, Satya Nadella, other tech leaders really think
AI vs jobs: What Vinod Khosla, Sundar Pichai, Satya Nadella, other tech leaders really think

India Today

time4 hours ago

  • India Today

AI vs jobs: What Vinod Khosla, Sundar Pichai, Satya Nadella, other tech leaders really think

The rise of AI is making global headlines, but with its growth, there's also a growing concern: what will happen to jobs? Will AI take over human roles, or will it help people work better? Over the past few months, some of the biggest names in the tech world, including Vinod Khosla, Sundar Pichai, Satya Nadella, and others, have spoken publicly about what they think AI means for the future of work. While opinions differ slightly, there is one common theme: AI will deeply change how people work across Khosla warns of a major shake-up in India's IT sectorIndian-American venture capitalist Vinod Khosla has been particularly vocal about the possible dangers AI poses to India's traditional tech industry. Speaking on a podcast hosted by Zerodha co-founder Nikhil Kamath, Khosla said that business process outsourcing (BPO), a sector that employs lakhs of Indians, could disappear in its current form. In his words, 'BPO as a business will disappear.'Khosla didn't stop at BPO. He also pointed out that even IT services, which have been a backbone for India's economy, will need a massive overhaul. 'Software IT services will mostly disappear. Disappear means transform pretty radically,' he said. According to him, whether these companies survive or not will depend on how quickly and efficiently they change. In another podcast, Khosla compared today's AI-driven technological change to what happened during the 1960s, but said the pace now is far more intense. 'I've never seen a cycle like this,' he added, highlighting how AI is transforming almost every job and even physical believes that in just a few years, AI will be able to handle 80 per cent of most human jobs. 'Within the next five years, any economically valuable job humans can do, AI will be able to do 80% of it.' Khosla predicts that by 2040, most people may not need to work to earn a living and may instead take up work only for personal CEO sees AI improving work, not replacing workersWhile Khosla's warning was rather sharp, Alphabet and Google CEO Sundar Pichai had a more balanced view. Speaking with Lex Fridman on his podcast, Pichai said that AI tools are already helping Google engineers write code. He revealed that about 30 per cent of code at Google now uses AI assistance in some Pichai pointed out that AI hasn't slowed down hiring. On the contrary, he said Google is planning to hire more software engineers because the scope of what AI allows them to do is growing. He said that thanks to AI, the company has seen a 10 per cent increase in engineering speed. 'Our estimates are that number is now at 10 per cent,' Pichai said, referring to the improvement in also mentioned that engineers enjoy more freedom now as AI handles the repetitive parts of the job, which allows them to focus on problem-solving and design work — tasks that many find more Nadella focuses on changing how people work, not just what they doMicrosoft CEO Satya Nadella has been stressing another important point — while AI tools are improving fast, the bigger challenge is helping people adapt their work a fireside chat hosted by Y Combinator, Nadella said that when people start working with AI systems like agents that can carry out tasks on their behalf, it forces a change in how jobs are done. He explained that as AI takes over more routine work, the very nature of roles and responsibilities will pointed to changes already happening within Microsoft's ecosystem. For example, at LinkedIn (which Microsoft owns), the company is merging different roles like product design, engineering, and management into a single position known as the "full-stack builder." This shows how job definitions are being updated in response to what AI makes like many other companies, has been restructuring its workforce. In May, it announced plans to cut around 6,000 jobs. Though the company clarified that the move wasn't based on employee performance, reports suggested that the goal was to trim middle management and ensure more direct involvement of engineers in boss says all jobs will feel the impactNvidia CEO Jensen Huang offered a realistic but hopeful view. While he admitted that many jobs will be affected and some might disappear, he was confident that AI will also create new roles."Everybody's jobs will be affected. Some jobs will be lost. Many jobs will be created,' he said. His company makes the powerful chips that power AI tools, so he's been at the centre of this revolution. According to him, AI will make many tasks faster and cheaper, which may reduce the need for some workers, but at the same time open up new opportunities in areas like AI development, data science, and high-end also expressed hope that AI-led growth could benefit the economy in a way that ultimately helps all sections of will take over coding fast, says Anthropic CEODario Amodei, the CEO of AI firm Anthropic, is among those who believe AI is moving extremely quickly in specific fields, especially software engineering. Speaking at an event by the Council on Foreign Relations, Amodei said AI could be writing 90 per cent of code within the next three to six months. He went on to say that in a year's time, AI might be able to handle almost all coding a prediction, if it holds true, could upend how companies approach software development, making human programmers more like supervisors than actual Kevin Weil expects AI to become your digital teammateKevin Weil, who serves as Chief Product Officer at OpenAI, made a similar prediction. On a podcast called Overpowered, he said he wouldn't be surprised if AI could take over most coding tasks even before 2027. Weil believes the way AI models are improving, it's only a matter of time before almost anyone, not just trained engineers, can build software using AI he added that this doesn't mean human workers will vanish. Instead, people will work closely with AI, using it like an assistant that can handle the basic tasks. 'People are going to increasingly be sort of managers of these AI employees,' he CEO Sam Altman agrees the future may need fewer software engineersOpenAI's CEO Sam Altman, who leads the company behind ChatGPT, also weighed in on the topic. In a conversation with tech analyst Ben Thompson on Stratechery, Altman said that AI is already doing a large chunk of the coding in many companies. 'I think in many companies, it's probably past 50 per cent now,' he expects that engineers will become far more productive in the near term. But eventually, the number of engineers needed may go down, depending on how fast AI improves. He added that the next big leap will come with "agentic coding," a term referring to AI systems that can work almost like autonomous developers.- Ends

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store