Political influence and powerful allies: how relative unknown Sam Rae catapulted himself into Labor's ministry
Rae remains an unknown figure to many outside Victoria, where he wielded political influence and cultivated powerful allies long before entering federal parliament in 2021 as the member for Hawke, on Melbourne's north-western fringe.
His elevation to minister for aged care and seniors, just like his preselection in Hawke, came after a bruising factional fight. Rae, along with fellow Victorian rightwinger Daniel Mulino, was promoted after frontbenchers Ed Husic and Mark Dreyfus were dumped. Labor insiders concede the demotions were brutal.
Rae's promotion has raised some eyebrows within Labor, including from former prime minister Paul Keating, who described Rae's Victorian right faction as 'demonstrably devoid of creativity and capacity'. Victorian Labor sources insist this criticism is unfair and fails to reflect Rae's experience.
Sign up for Guardian Australia's breaking news email
Rae worked as a factory labourer, a call centre operator and a childcare worker before becoming an electorate officer and adviser to former communications minister and Victorian right-faction power broker Stephen Conroy in 2015.
In his first speech to parliament, Rae listed Conroy as a mentor along with Labor power broker Don Farrell and the deputy prime minister, Richard Marles, who leads the Victorian right faction. On Sunday, Husic accused Marles of being a 'factional assassin' who had orchestrated his demise.
After six years with Conroy, Rae moved to Victorian Labor and ran its research and tactics unit. He then became the state party's secretary and ran the 2018 Labor campaign, which secured Daniel Andrews a second term. Rae worked alongside pollster Kos Samaras, who was not surprised by his promotion.
'He grew up in a single parent household with two other brothers and worked in factories to get himself through university,' Samaras said. 'It's not exactly been a blessed life. This is the sort of person you definitely want in the cabinet.'
Samaras said Rae had shown 'an incredible ability to grasp huge complex logistical problems' during the 2018 state election, which he described as the best campaign he had worked on.
Months after the 2018 election, Rae became a partner at PwC Australia. During this period, Rae worked with James MacKenzie, who is the chair of law firm Slater & Gordon and a board member of the Suburban Rail Loop Authority. MacKenzie is a Labor stalwart who overhauled the Victorian ALP headquarters in the late 1970s.
Rae is 'definitely not a political hack,' said MacKenzie, who worked with him on non-government projects. 'The factions don't give out MBAs. The sort of work I engaged with while he was a partner at PwC was akin to serious policy work; that is what he brings to the table.
'I was impressed by his understanding of what is a well-formulated and well-structured policy and his broad business understanding. It's not very often you come across a 'political hack' who understands what the cost of capital is.'
Sign up to Breaking News Australia
Get the most important news as it breaks
after newsletter promotion
Rae left PwC Australia after being preselected to run in the seat of Hawke, which also unleashed factional divisions. Some members aligned to former leader Bill Shorten wanted a woman selected. But Rae was selected by Labor's national executive, not branch members, due to the state branch being placed into administration after branch-stacking allegations.
Several unions argued there should have been a ballot, and unsuccessfully launched court action to overturn the national executive's intervention.
As an MP, Rae lists campaigning to deliver urgent care clinics to Sunbury and Melton among his greatest achievements. He told Guardian Australia he 'was a massive pain in the arse' within the party to ensure the money was allocated.
One former senior Victorian Labor staffer, who worked with Rae but declined to be named so they could speak freely, said criticism of him as an unknown factional player was 'unfair'.
'He's a member of Labor's national executive, for one,' the source said. 'He's a deep thinker and you don't lead a landslide victory at a state election without having an understanding of both policy and politics.'
In a statement, Rae said he was 'deeply honoured to have been asked to serve as minister for aged care and seniors'.
'It's a challenging portfolio and I'm proud to take it alongside Labor's talented team,' Rae said. 'There's a lot of work to do and we're ready to get started.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Guardian
23 minutes ago
- The Guardian
Bruce Lehrmann's lawyer asks defamation appeal for more time to prepare but justices tell her ‘start now'
Bruce Lehrmann's defamation appeal lawyer has repeatedly asked the federal court to adjourn early to give her more time to prepare but the justices refused, telling the solicitor she has had 'plenty' of time. Sydney criminal solicitor Zali Burrows is representing Lehrmann who is appealing Justice Michael Lee's April 2024 judgment, which found the former Liberal staffer was not defamed by Lisa Wilkinson and Network 10 when The Project broadcast an interview with Brittany Higgins in 2021 in which she alleged she was raped in Parliament House. Lehrmann 'couldn't afford' his chosen barrister Guy Reynolds for the appeal, the court heard on day one of the hearing on Wednesday. The federal court judges have already questioned the logic of Lehrmann's grounds of appeal, in particular the claim that he was not given an opportunity to be questioned about the type of rape found by Lee. Before lunch on Thursday Burrows was called to reply to submissions from Network 10 and Wilkinson, but proceedings were halted when she asked three times if the court could finish early because she wasn't ready. Justice Michael Wigney conferred with the other two judges on the full bench of the federal court, Craig Colvin and Wendy Abraham, and replied that Burrows had already 'obtained the court's indulgence' to commence her reply to submissions a day later than scheduled and she should start her reply. On Wednesday Burrows declined to detail all the grounds of appeal, saying she would prefer to address them in her reply. Wigney warned her that this was unconventional and she could not introduce anything new in reply. On Thursday she asked if she could now reply on Friday morning. 'Well Ms Burrows, we're inclined to require you to commence your reply now, in particular, in relation to your reply to the appeal proper,' Wigney said. 'If I can put it this way, nothing that has occurred this morning has impacted, or could impact, on your ability to reply to those matters.' Burrows tried again, saying the appeal was set down for three days and 'we still have tomorrow… we were just thinking if we could have a 10.15 start tomorrow we'd be finished before lunchtime'. Wigney again declined the request, telling Burrows to 'start now' and reminding her she had 'more time over lunch' to sort out any issues she said she had with the transcript. Burrows did begin speaking but immediately asked for a clarification in respect to a earlier question asked by justice Colvin about a challenge to the underlying findings. 'It seems to me to be a very important and central issue for your appeal,' Wigney said. 'It's your appeal. What are the… do you understand the reference to the underlying facts?' Wigney said Burrows had been in possession of Ten's written submissions 'for some time, quite clearly' and they list 'in quite simple terms' the underlying facts. 'So you've had plenty of opportunity to consider this issue,' he said. Burrows came back a third time, asking 'would it be possible if we could have an early lunch and then resume earlier'. Wigney agreed, adjourning about 10 minutes early. Before the morning session, the court published written submissions from the appellant and the respondents, including Lehrmann's reply to Wilkinson's notice of contention which challenges Lee's finding that Wilkinson and The Project team had failed in their defence of qualified privilege, known as section 30. The Project's decision not to name Lehrmann as the alleged Parliament House rapist was used as evidence of the 'reasonableness' of Wilkinson's journalism in her bid to assert qualified privilege. However, Lehrmann claimed the decision not to name him was a 'crafted strategy' to increase interest in the interview with Higgins. 'Mr Lehrmann does not agree with Ms Wilkinson's assertion it was a factor to consider on assessing reasonableness, that in effect she should be commended for not naming Mr Lehrmann in the program is viewed is disingenuous, and viewed as a crafted strategy,' the reply said. Not naming him was a ploy to 'maximise the ratings of a story, to achieve an exciting air of mystery akin to a 'whodunnit''. Lehrmann was charged with sexual intercourse without consent in 2021, and at his criminal trial in 2022 pleaded not guilty, denying that any sexual activity had occurred. After his criminal trial was aborted in December 2022, prosecutors dropped charges against Lehrmann for the alleged rape of Higgins, saying a retrial would pose an 'unacceptable risk' to her health. Lehrmann has maintained his innocence. The hearing continues.
Daily Mail
23 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
A WEALTH tax, inheritance fees and the end to the 50 per cent capital gains tax discount: Extraordinary push to change Australia - here's who would get hit
A left-leaning think tank has called for the Albanese government to consider levelling a two per cent 'wealth tax' on Australians earning more than $5million. In a submission to the government's three day economic roundtable, the Australia Institute recommended three 'simple' tax reforms to bolster the nation's finances. A wealth tax alone - which would exclude superannuation and the family home - would raise more than $41billion per year, the Institute said. The other suggested two reforms, aimed at tackling intergenerational inequality, were to revive the inheritance tax of the 1960s and scrap the 50 per cent capital gains tax (CGT) discount. Australians receive a 50 per cent CGT discount when they dispose of an asset - for instance, if they sell property - if they have owned it for at least 12 months and are a resident for tax purposes. Researchers believe that these measures would raise an extra $10 billion and $19 billion respectively, meaning the Institute's three proposals would rake in a grand total of $70billion. The Institute claims the money would help pay for 'well-funded schools and hospitals; decent, affordable housing for all; a world-class NDIS; a fair welfare system and dozens of other things'. Matt Grudnoff, Senior Economist at the Australia Institute, said that these were not 'radical ideas' and countries like the UK, US and Japan all had inheritance taxes. 'Australia is a low-tax country that does not do a good job of taxing wealth,' Mr Grudnoff said. 'It is one of the few developed economies in the world which has neither a wealth tax nor an inheritance tax.' 'Correcting this would raise huge amounts of extra revenue for essential services and ease growing inequality in Australia. 'Even if you were to exempt the family home and superannuation, a 2 per cent wealth tax on people worth $5 million would raise $41 billion per year. 'If you limited it to just the 200 richest households in the country, it would still raise $12.5 billion per year.' He added: 'It's time to scrap the capital gains tax discount, for many reasons. 'Not only would it put downward pressure on house prices and reduce inequality, it would raise an extra $19 billion a year.' But AMP Chief Economist Shane Oliver said the plan would 'hurt the economy'. '"Tax the rich" sounds fine in theory, but all of those reforms will further increase the tax on high-income earners,' he told 'Our tax system is already skewed, it's already highly progressive.' Mr Oliver pointed to the fact that the top 10 per cent of income earners in Australia already pay almost 50 per cent income tax. He said these tax reforms, while they would raise a lot of money initially, would be destructive in the long term. 'You might help the budget initially but you'll damage the economy long-term because there'll be less work incentive,' Mr Oliver added. 'Wealth tax I think is incredibly dangerous … You want Australians to feel confident to go out and start businesses and build up their wealth – that's how we get ahead.' A pair of university economists last week suggested that Australians pay capital gains tax on the family home in order to tackle the housing crisis. Peter Siminski from the University of Technology, Sydney, and Roger Wilkins from the University of Melbourne, say the longstanding capital gains tax exemption on the family home favours the rich and costs the government much-needed revenue.
Daily Mail
23 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Unbelievable dispute erupts over a very petty reason as cafe fights to save seven-year tradition
An extraordinary battle has broken out in a wealthy beachside suburb after a council decided to ban stools being set up outside a bakery. Rollers Bakehouse in Manly, on Sydney 's northern beaches, has been setting up the stools behind bollards set up on Rialto Lane since 2018. The Northern Beaches Council ruled on Tuesday that the seating posed 'ongoing safety risks' and voted to remove it permanently. A complaint to council had initially raised concerns about diners accidentally being hit by passing vehicles, such as Coles delivery trucks. The council placed numerous bollards in the lane and, after a nine-month trial, found eleven had been struck by vehicles - though there were no incidents involving patrons. An online petition begged locals to save their seating 'again' following the decision to ban the stools. 'Our outdoor space has been a cornerstone of community connection without impeding essential road activities,' marketing executive Eliza Roberts wrote. More than 3,500 people have signed the petition. Enraged locals shared their support and slammed the 'nanny-state'. 'Spontaneous initiatives like these that create community should be treasured,' local woman Anjo said. 'Constantly threatening these initiatives with nanny-state rules only creates division and anger in our society.' 'Manly and all of its locals, local businesses, and visitors continue to benefit from harmless offerings like this,' Mitch added. 'They create an eclectic and buzzing atmosphere for all to enjoy. To continue this self-sabotaging trend of wanting to mute Manly's soul is not in the best interest of locals or visitors.' Former Northern Beaches political figures have voiced their support for the cause on social media. Rollers Bakehouse manager Loucka Stevens previously told the Manly Daily he hoped the council would strike down the proposal before Tuesday's vote. 'We've been here seven years and there hasn't been an issue,' he said. 'Our regulars really want to keep the seating, especially in the summer when they can sit outside and enjoy our croissants and pastries in the sunshine. 'We've been very mindful about keeping the furniture away from the roadway and keeping our customers safe.' Independent Northern Beaches councillor Vincent De Luca said there had been no record of previous incidents and feared the ban would finish the small business. He lodged a rescission motion lodged to return the matter for further debate at a council meeting next month. Councillors Bob Giltinan, Sunny Singh, both independents; Sarah Grattan for Your Northern Beaches; Bonnie Harvey with the Greens, and Ethan Hrnjack, also a Green, all voted in support of the bakery. Cr De Luca said customers had never been involved in incidents, and the business is privately insured for injury. He added the council did not notify the Manly Chamber of Commerce before tabling the recommendation to end outdoor dining at the bakery.
