Kids are glued to their devices, but this school has a plan for taking back control
The Armadale school will launch its 'Ctrl Alt Del' program on Wednesday, aimed at giving parents a strength-in-numbers approach to 'taking back control of their kids' childhoods'.
Opat, a former child psychologist and the school's wellbeing leader, has little doubt that a global crisis in child and adolescent mental health is linked to the rise of social media use and addiction among young people.
The school was moved to take action after parents who responded to a survey reported that their secondary-school-aged children were spending more than three hours a day on platforms like Snapchat and TikTok and Opat noticed a strong correlation between students struggling with their mental health and time spent online.
While he acknowledges that government actions like the Commonwealth's social media ban for under-16s are important, he says family life is the front line in the fight for young people's mental health and the best way to separate a child from a screen is not to give them one.
Loading
The Ctrl Alt Del – Take Control, Find Alternatives and Delete the Problems – program will encourage families to take a pledge to not provide a mobile phone to their children until year 7, at the earliest.
'In the end, the most effective thing is what families can control, and that obviously is when you give the kids a device,' Opat said.
'Obviously, parents receive huge amounts of pressure from their kids saying, 'Everybody's got a phone, I have to have one.' Then the parents buy the argument that their kid will be socially cut off if they don't have one.'
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
News.com.au
4 days ago
- News.com.au
‘Pay me back': Internet divided over common coffee act
Few rituals are as sacred to Aussies as the coffee run. Whether you're ducking into your work's cafe before tackling the 9-5 grind or taking a quick break with colleagues for a 3pm pick-me-up. Yet, why, for something so central to our daily lives, do we never quite know how to handle that awkward little negotiation with friends about who pays? In an era where every dollar counts, how should we deal with the humble coffee shout? There are three main approaches: 1. Shout your mate and expect nothing in return. This is the classic act of generosity, and considering coffees are around $5-$6, many believe it's a small price to pay to avoid having to talk about it. 2. Take turns shouting. This method depends a lot on trust and works best when you catch up regularly and know it'll balance out over time 3. Just pay for your own coffee. No fuss, no tracking, no IOUs – just pay for your own and move on. A recent TikTok has blown this debate wide open. The short clip, which has over 8.8 million views, shows a woman in her 20s sitting in a cafe sipping an iced latte: 'I don't know what friend gave you PTSD but you do not have to pay me back for a coffee'. Clearly striking a chord, thousands of cafe-goers commented to share their thoughts. Some believed keeping tabs was essential. 'You ALWAYS have to pay back,' insisted one. 'It's not even about friends giving you PTSD. It's financial PTSD from parents,' added another, touching on the fact that money anxiety can stem from a person's upbringing. Others agreed with the poster, but with some exceptions. 'Yes, until they start to take advantage,' said one. 'It's all fun and games until every time you go out, you're the one paying,' another commented. Many, however, echoed her selfless approach. 'The whole point is DO NOT give with the expectation of reciprocity,' said one. 'If someone owes me under $10, I wouldn't ask for it,' said another. 'It doesn't even count'. The video was shared by a content creator in London, making me wonder what people think about this issue in Australia, where coffee prices have risen 37 per cent from pre-pandemic levels and now average $5.50. So, I conducted some very serious, peer-reviewed research by polling my Instagram followers. Out of 80 responses, 23 per cent said 'I shout, no need to pay back,' 61 per cent said 'We take turns,' and 15 per cent said 'We pay for our own'. Less than one per cent responded 'Other,' and that person explained their simple rule: 'Whoever is closest to the register pays'. To add a touch more credibility, I consulted an etiquette expert – the only one in the world with a Master's thesis on modern manners – no less. Jo Hayes, founder of told that for a simple coffee, it's actually best to shout. 'As a general rule, if it's just a coffee, no extras like brunch or snacks, one of the duo should shout the other,' she said. 'This small gesture of kindness doesn't break the bank but fosters friendship, kindness, and goodwill.' She also mentioned that if you're both ordering at the same counter, most reasonable folk agree it's 'a bit tight' for both to pay for a coffee separately. The key to pulling off this move in a classy way, as many commenters suggested, is expecting nothing in return. 'This is what gifting is,' she added. A simple, discreet 'I've got it,' with a friendly smile, is the best way to handle it. 'Don't make a big deal of it, and quickly switch the topic,' she advised. 'One doesn't want to dwell on money talk longer than necessary.' She also noted that with regular coffee catchups, you should take turns paying. 'Most of us remember who paid last time and, wanting to show mutual generosity, step up to offer the shout,' she explained. If you notice you're always covering your friend's coffee and they never reciprocate, Hayes warns this is a serious breach of etiquette. 'I would reconsider that friendship,' she said. 'Such stinginess raises questions about their character and shows a lack of social courtesy'. If that feels too harsh, try subtle cues next time, like hanging back when it's time to pay or letting them order first. She reminds us that a golden rule applies here, and in all areas of life: 'We reap what we sow'. If we're generous, we'll see generosity return, if we're stingy, that's what we'll get back.
News.com.au
4 days ago
- News.com.au
Reality behind ‘insane' op shop trend
OPINION Every week, it seems like someone new has posted a TikTok or Reddit rant about a 'wildly overpriced' op shop item – an $80 jumper, a $50 platter, a $300 dress – and it instantly blows up. The general consensus is that charity shops are meant to be cheap, and this feels like a betrayal. Given the cost-of-living crunch, I get why people are fired up. But here's the thing. As someone who's been turning to op shops for as long as I can remember to help keep my insatiable shopping habit in check, I have to say, I don't actually see the issue. Not only is the outrage often misdirected, but the story behind the expensive price tags is often much more nuanced than TikTok wants it to be. And frankly, if we're going to talk about op shop prices in 2025, let's do it with some facts. Here's why I'm standing in defence of 'expensive' items in charity shops. 1. The issue has been massively overblown The idea that op shop prices are spiralling out of control is just a huge misrepresentation. There are currently 3000 op shops in Australia, selling 160 million household and clothing items per year at an average price of $5.81 per item. Yes, $5.81. This average includes clothes, toys, books, furniture and homewares … so, no, the average price has not gone up, and there are millions of very low-priced products available. In other words, the vast majority of items are genuinely affordable for everyday Aussies, and offer a decent cost-of-living relief. According to Charitable Reuse Australia, a national network of charitable reuse enterprises, shopping second-hand saves Australians $2 billion a year. Drilling down by state, where there are government-funded studies, shopping second-hand saves the NSW community a whopping $432 million in cost-of-living relief a year, with an average item price of $5.33 across 107 million items resold locally. In Tasmania, shopping second-hand saves the community $147 million in cost-of-living relief, with an average price of $4.91 across 13 million items resold locally. In South Australia, the savings range from $147 million to $432 million. 2. Shopping second-hand is still the more sustainable option By aligning quality and prices with current retail trends, op shops discourage mindless consumerism and fast fashion. 'Charity Shops will assess and sell suitable items,' Omer Soker, CEO of Charitable Reuse Australia told 'Staff and volunteers will price them accordingly to what they feel is a fair price, and saleable to Australian consumers. 'Charity shops can't resell lower-quality items that aren't designed to last as they don't have the quality or durability for people to want them. A durable second-hand item in a charity shop will last much longer than a cheap new one of inferior quality, so it gets worn again and again, providing better value and sustainability over time.' According to the organisation's National Reuse Impact Report 2025, 190,000 tonnes of waste were diverted from landfill to reuse, and op shops saved 1.4 million tonnes of CO2 emissions per year. 3. There is a market for higher-priced items, and it all goes to a good cause Of course, thrifting has become increasingly trendy over the years, thanks to the renewed movement towards sustainability and slow fashion, as well as the influence of social media platforms like Pinterest and TikTok. Because of this, some op shops in certain areas will sell items for $100 to $200, or even $300 or above for designer pieces. According to a spokesperson for St Vincent de Paul Society, Vinnies stores are 'stocked and priced according to location and demographic'. For example, city stores will stock differently from regional centres. 'There are also boutique-style vintage stores in the suburbs where they resonate with style-conscious consumers,' they added. And it's important to remember that these pricier items are still a huge bargain when you consider the value the item is worth. The other day, I was visiting one of my favourite local op shops, Op for Change in Manly, and I came across a $290 dress, which I initially baulked at. However, after a quick Google Reverse Search, I found that the Agua dress retailed for $1143, which was a 75 per cent markdown. Another dress from the brand Alexis was priced at $240, but retailed for $1288, an 80 per cent reduction. This is objectively good value, and although these sorts of items 'may not be within budget for every customer,' as the Vinnies spokesperson notes, they do cater to the large number of higher-income buyers who enjoy and value shopping second-hand. Interestingly, when these media reports come out about expensive items, op shops say they actually sell them almost straight away because there are many buyers eager to snap up these bargains. 'Op shop buyers are happy to pay a high price for a preloved item that would have cost them in the thousands, especially when they know the proceeds go towards social good,' Mr Soker explains. 'Most importantly, selling items at fair prices to buyers that want them has a social impact in helping those in need, and op shops raise $1 billion every year and generate a net profit of $180 million for social welfare programs across the country.' The Vinnies spokesperson explains: 'Your purchase could be used to help people experiencing homelessness, women escaping domestic and family violence, or families who are struggling to put food on the table. 'Every purchase should be considered a donation.' On the other side, donors also want to see charity shops receive a fair price for their high-quality or designer items, and will stop donating these items if they are sold too cheaply. 'For example, someone who has generously donated a designer handbag would expect that we would price that bag at a higher value in order to raise more funds for charity,' the Vinnies spokesperson pointed out. Mr Soker says charity shops have noticed that when donors return to see how much their preloved designer items are selling for, they are often disappointed to see that the prices charged are lower than they would have expected. 4. Initiatives are in place to help lower-income shoppers While these higher priced items still make up a small minority of items for sale, and most items are considered affordable – those who are doing it tough can always access initiatives at op shops to help them shop. 'There are often people who turn to our shops who are facing financial constraints or disadvantage,' the spokesperson said. 'We will provide people in need with vouchers to go into our shops and have dignity to shop like any other customer. For anyone who requires further assistance, the St Vincent de Paul Society has Vinnies Support Centres (VSC) across Australia.' 5. Who really benefits from complaining about high prices? While there might be a lot of outrage online about op-shop prices these days, it's important to think about who might actually be behind these sorts of posts. There's a trend for 'resellers' to go around to different op shops and buy in bulk at low prices, to then resell with higher prices on platforms like Depop, Facebook Marketplace, car boot sales and clothing markets. Resellers represent a large proportion of op shop buyers, so it makes sense that they have a commercial interest in driving down prices at op shops for their own personal gain. It's also worth noting that not many people complain about the high prices on resell platforms, even though a lot of their stock is originally bought from an op shop. If thrift shoppers were to see something for $300 on Depop (which is not uncommon), they might automatically assume it's a high-value item. Whereas if the same thing was seen at an op shop, that same person might take a video for TikTok, labelling it a 'rip off' – despite it being the exact same thing. 6. Running a op shop comes at a cost There is a misconception that running op shops is free or low-cost, because items are donated. But like any organisation, op shops also have budgets from an organisational perspective that link back to planning, resourcing, priorities and sustainability. They are also privy to the commercial realities of running a brick-and-mortar store, which means leases, utilities, sorting facilities, and recycling costs. So, before we rush to call out that hundred-dollar dress, let's try and think about who is really losing when we expect charity shops to sell everything, even designer items, for next to nothing.
7NEWS
6 days ago
- 7NEWS
Inside the eye-watering pay of Aussie lollipop workers: Union rates, long hours, and divided opinions
Australian traffic controllers have revealed their eyewatering salaries for holding a stop sign, with some raking in hundreds of thousands of dollars each year. There are more than 16,000 lollipop workers employed across the country, and some workers have reported annual pay of up to $200,000 a year — nearly double the average annual salary for full-time workers. The role involves the direction of road and pedestrian traffic to ensure the safety of emergency response teams, construction workers and the general public. Sky News reported that the high wages are being earned by trade union workers part of Victoria's Big Build project, who pull in about $206,000. But the job is far from standard, with employees working 56 hours over a six-day week. Private company salaries appear to be much lower, starting at $55,000, with an hourly rate of about $30. The union rate is $49 per hour, and doubles to $98 per hour for 16 hours of double time. A Facebook group called Traffic Controller Australia sees many workers call out the high pay perception as far from the truth for non-union workers. One user said, 'I don't even make half of that, and that's with working away a lot'. Others have said they are treated badly by the public. One Facebook user wrote, 'there is no power being a traffic controller' and that 'most of the population think we are pests and do nothing'. In a TikTok interview, one worker said they are 'not allowed to sit down' and that workers have to learn to occupy themselves. Workers seem to disagree on how difficult the job really is. Some lollipop workers have come forward, saying the work is easy and they get paid to just stand there. Ruth Birch, a TikTok user, told her followers she would 'rather be paid to be bored than to be stressed'. She encouraged other women to get their traffic control ticket so they could do the same work. But others highlighted the danger of the work, even saying they have risked their lives while on the job. Many say they experience an increased risk of physical harm, especially when called to crash sites. One Reddit user said the work is 'definitely not hard' but is 'very dangerous'.
