‘Move Out, Immediately:' Trump's vision for ridding DC streets of homeless
Trump plans to seize control of Washington's Metropolitan Police Department, sweep homeless people off the city's streets, and end 'crime, bloodshed, bedlam and squalor and worse,' he said at an Aug. 11 press conference.
'We're going to be removing homeless encampments from beautiful parks, which now, a lot of people can't walk on,' Trump told reporters, adding that his administration is getting 'rid of the people from underpasses and public spaces from all over the city.'
More: Think it's hard working for Trump? Try running the DEA and the DC police
More: Drastic changes coming to homeless services, new Trump order promises
But it's unclear exactly how the president's order for people sleeping outdoors to "move out, immediately" would actually work. In the Aug. 11 order, the president offered few specific details on the logistics of the effort. He told reporters there were 'many places' people could go and his administration planned to 'help them as much as you can help.'
According to the National Alliance to End Homelessness, there were about 5,600 homeless people in Washington, DC down from about 8,300 in 2016. Of those homeless people counted in January 2025, about 1,000 were sleeping on the streets any given night. The majority of the rest were either staying with friends, in hotels or in one of the city's shelters.
There are about 3,200 emergency shelter beds in the city, and about another 1,000 beds in shelters for people transitioning into more permanent housing, according to the DC-based Community Partnership for the Prevention of Homelessness.
Donald Whitehead, executive director of the National Coalition for the Homeless said all of those shelters are currently at capacity, creating more uncertainty over where Trump would move people on the streets. Whitehead questioned whether the president would consider jailing the homeless, sending them to an unknown location or moving them outside of the city.
Advocates question Trump approach
In an Aug. 10 social media post, Trump suggested he would move people sleeping outside 'FAR from the Capital.'
But Washington Legal Clinic for the Homeless, a nonprofit providing legal aid to people experiencing homelessness, argued the president does not have the power to move people outside the city's borders.
"No one can be banished from a jurisdiction. We will not stand by if the federal government attempts to abuse its power against our community in this way," the group said in a post on X, formerly known as Twitter.
The president has also promised in recent weeks to use more "involuntary commitment" to detain people sleeping in public ‒ the process in which mental health workers can forcibly detain and medicate people against their will. His order comes after a landmark 2024 Supreme Court ruling said cities could punish people for sleeping and camping on public property.
DC Attorney General Brian Schwalb warned area hospitals to expect more patients as a result of the involuntary commitment, Washingtonian magazine reported.
"There is no crime emergency in the District of Columbia," Schwalb said in an Aug. 11 social media post. "Violent crime in DC reached historic 30-year lows last year, and is down another 26% so far this year. We are considering all of our options and will do what is necessary to protect the rights and safety of District residents."
Schwalb also called Trump's actions "unprecedented, unnecessary, and unlawful."
Advocates for homeless communities have said Trump's plan is dehumanizing and more expensive than other methods of decreasing homelessness, namely providing permanent housing with support services. Low wages and the high cost of housing and are major causes of homelessness in DC.
Insha Rahman, vice president of advocacy at the Vera Institue of Justice, a nonprofit organization focused on criminal justice, said homelessness is an economic and public health issue, rather than a criminal one.
"Tent encampment sweeps and threats of criminalization will not solve the problem," she said. "Proven interventions like sustained outreach to connect people to service and supportive housing, interim housing or permanent housing, as well as other stabilizing benefits like cash assistance, will."
Researchers at the University of Southern California attributed a drop in homelessness in Los Angeles to increased outreach efforts over the last few years, for example. The unsheltered population dropped by 14% in LA County in the past two years, as programs moving people into temporary housing expanded.
Jesse Rabinowitz, communications director for the National Homelessness Law Center, pointed to statistics that show homeless people are more likely to be the victims of crime, rather than the perpetrators.
A 2022 report published by the National Coalition for Homelessness found nearly 2,000 incidents of violence against homeless people since the start of the century. It suggested there was a link between policies prohibiting homelessness and a rise in violence against those without shelter.
'We know that housing plus support solves homelessness, there just isn't enough housing to go around,' Rabinowitz said. 'The truth is we've tried institutionalization as a country … It never works.'
This article originally appeared on USA TODAY: Trump homeless crackdown angers advocates: 'No one can be banished'
Solve the daily Crossword
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
9 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Intel's Frankfurt-listed shares rise 3.6% after report US could take stake in chipmaker
LONDON (Reuters) -Intel's Frankfurt-listed shares rose 3.6% on Friday, a day after Bloomberg News reported the Trump administration is in talks with the struggling chipmaker to have the U.S. government potentially take a stake in the company. Intel's U.S. shares surged more than 7% in regular trading Thursday and then another 2.6% after the bell. Intel on Thursday declined to comment on the report. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data


Newsweek
9 minutes ago
- Newsweek
America's F-22 Faces Off Against Russia's Rival Su-57 For First Time
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. Russian President Vladimir Putin will meet with U.S. President Donald Trump later on Friday, marking the first time the Republican has spoken face-to-face with the Kremlin chief since returning to the White House. But the summit may mark another milestone. It could also be the first time Russia's fifth-generation Su-57 operates in the same airspace as the U.S.' F-22 Raptor jets. The meeting, described by Trump himself as "highly anticipated," is taking place at Joint Base Elmendorf–Richardson (JBER), home to a chunk of the U.S. Air Force's F-22s and key for U.S. power projection into the Arctic, a region where Russia is dominant and the U.S. is increasingly invested. If Putin flies into the base, it's likely he could be accompanied by the advanced Su-57s. Publicly-available information suggests F-22s and Su-57s have not crossed paths, although an Su-57 and an American F-35 fifth-generation jet both participated in an air show in India in February, which the Indian government described as a historic moment. The Su-57, also known by its NATO moniker, Felon, is often positioned as the Kremlin's rough equivalent of the F-22. Both are fifth-generation stealth fighter jets, which means they have advanced radars and avionics, designed to fly undetected and take out enemy air defense systems. A Russian Sukhoi Su-57 stealth fighter jet is seen at the 15th China International Aviation and Aerospace Exhibition, or Airshow China 2024, on November 7, 2024 in Zhuhai, China. A Russian Sukhoi Su-57 stealth fighter jet is seen at the 15th China International Aviation and Aerospace Exhibition, or Airshow China 2024, on November 7, 2024 in Zhuhai, China. VCG/VCG via AP Fifth-generation jets are the most advanced generation of aircraft currently in operation, although programs to get sixth-generation jets airborne are well underway. The U.S. is the only country to operate F-22s, but 19 militaries fly the Lockheed Martin-made F-35. "If both aircraft meet up over the skies in Alaska, you can be sure both sides will try to learn as much about the other as possible, and both sides will try to hide as much as possible about the true capabilities of their aircraft as they can," said Frederik Mertens, a strategic analyst with TNO, a Dutch think tank. "As far as I know, Su-57 and F-22 have never met each other in the same airspace," he told Newsweek. "There aren't that many of both around." The U.S. has an estimated 165 F-22 Raptors, according to the 2025 edition of the Military Balance, the annual count of the world's armed forces compiled by the British defense think tank, the International Institute for Strategic Studies (IISS). Russia, meanwhile, has roughly 19 Su-57s. Unlike other jets widely used in Ukraine, such as Russia's Su-35 aircraft, Su-57 stealth fighters have not played a major role in the Kremlin's air campaign against its neighbor. Moscow launched its full-scale invasion of Ukraine in February 2022. When it has been used, the stealth fighter has generally remained far away from frontline clashes, intelligence reports from the British government indicated in early 2023. But reports filtering out of Ukraine have suggested Moscow has upped its use of the Su-57 in recent weeks. Ukraine said in mid-2024 it had successfully struck an Su-57 on an airfield hundreds of miles across the border. Although much about the exact specifications of the Su-57 and the F-22 are shrouded in secrecy, the Raptor generally comes out on top as the most advanced aircraft, Mertens said. "The F-22 has far superior stealth characteristics, where the Russian aircraft still shows its direct descendance from the Su-27 line," Mertens added. Several features of the Su-57 make it easier to pick up on radars or infrared sensors than the F-22, which is also kitted out with a very advanced radar, he said. However, the Su-57 is still a "very capable and very dangerous aircraft," Mertens continued. F-22s likely use radar reflectors, much like those on the F-35s that fly around NATO's eastern flank, he said. "If the Russians are smart, they will do the same." "But whatever happens, having the F-22 and the Su-57 next to each other will be a propaganda boon to the Russians, as this will at least give the impression that these aircraft are true equals," Mertens said.


CNBC
11 minutes ago
- CNBC
Oil maintains gains ahead of Trump-Putin summit
Oil prices nudged higher on Friday to fresh one-week highs after U.S. President Donald Trump warned of "consequences" if Russia blocked a Ukraine peace deal, injecting concerns about supply. Sentiment was also boosted by strong economic data out of Japan, which is among the largest global crude importers. Brent crude futures gained 16 cents, or 0.2%, to $67.00 a barrel by (0017 GMT). U.S. West Texas Intermediate crude futures were up 14 cents, also 0.2%, to $64.10. All eyes are on Friday's meeting of Trump and Russian leader Vladimir Putin in Alaska where a ceasefire in the Ukraine war is at the top of the agenda. A continued conflict between Russia and Ukraine supports oil markets by limiting the supply of Russian oil. Trump, however, also said he believes Russia is prepared to end the war in Ukraine. Fresh Japanese government data released on Friday showed the economy expanded an annualized 1.0% in the April-June quarter, compared with a median market forecast for a 0.4% increase. The rise in gross domestic product (GDP) translated into a quarterly increase of 0.3%, compared with a median estimate of a 0.1% increase. Strong economic activity typically spurs oil consumption. Prospects of higher-for-longer U.S. interest rates, however, kept oil prices from rising further. Higher-than-expected inflation data and weak jobs numbers out of the U.S. raised concerns that the Federal Reserve would keep interest rates high, usually a dampener of oil consumption.