Would many publicans have a drink with Sir Keir Starmer?
It warned at the time that the rise in labour costs, which according to UKHospitality will amount to a £3 billion rise in the industry's annual wage bill, would have a huge effect on jobs, growth, and investment. Now it appears those fears, which have been shared by other sectors such as retail, are beginning to be realised. Publicans are unlikely to glean any satisfaction from being able to say, 'I told you so'.
A new analysis published by top 30 accountancy firm Price Bailey this week found that pub insolvencies surged in April - the month the increases in employer NICs and pay rates took effect - to the highest monthly total since last summer. The analysis found 67 pubs went out of business in April, the highest tally since July 2024 when 75 entered insolvency.
The growing cost pressures on the industry have had an impact on consumers too, as the average price of a pint has steadily risen. The British Beer & Pub Association (BBPA) recently warned the average price of a pint would increase by as much as 21p as a result of the changes announced at the Autumn Budget, taking the average price from £4.80 to £5.01 (though in major cities the average price is significantly higher). The Office for National Statistics also tracks the average price of a draught pint and its most recent figures put the cost at 483p in January, following years of steady increases.
After signs that the number of pubs entering insolvency had peaked in 2024 and was in decline by the end of that year and into the first quarter of 2025, Price Bailey said the number of pub insolvencies is ticking upwards again.
'The early signs are that the tax and minimum wage hikes which took effect in April are already tipping some struggling pubs over the edge,' said Matt Howard, head of the insolvency and recovery team at Price Bailey.
'It was widely believed that pub businesses would initially find ways to absorb the additional payroll costs and that the full impact would only be felt much later in the year. That the impact has been so immediate shows that many pubs had already exhausted their financial buffers.'
Mr Howard added: 'April's sharp rise in inflation, driven in part by rising energy costs, is adding to the misery of many publicans. One in five pubs are technically insolvent, and while it is possible to keep trading and salvage the situation, being hit with sharp payroll and energy price rises will prove too much for many of them.'
The Price Bailey report came shortly before a survey published by UKHospitality, The British Institute of Innkeeping, the BBPA, and Hospitality Ulster on June 2 revealed that one-third of hospitality businesses are now operating at a loss. This was an 11 percentage point increase on the previous quarter.
The survey also found that six in 10 operators have had to cut jobs amid the "devastating" impact of April's cost hikes, while 63% have reduced the hours available to staff as the industry has taken steps to mitigate the higher overheads.
But signs of distress in the economy are not limited to hospitality. New research from R3, the UK insolvency and restructuring trade body, found insolvency-related activity hit a 29-month high in May as businesses faced challenges on a raft of fronts.
R3 highlighted the hikes in employer NICs and national living and minimum wage among a host of factors that are weighing on businesses as its analysis found there were 141 cases of insolvency-related activity – including administrator and liquidator appointments with creditors' meetings – in Scotland in May. This was the highest number since the December 2022 figure of 142, and 30.6% up on April's 108.
'We have seen a substantial rise in insolvency-related activity in Scotland since the start of the year, but last month's rise to the highest point in more than two years is a reminder of just how tough trading conditions are,' declared Tim Cooper, immediate past president of R3 and a partner at law firm Addleshaw Goddard. 'Levels are now higher than they were for much of 2023 and for 2024, when many businesses were grappling with the aftermath of Covid and the impact of the cost of living crisis.
'A number of factors are likely contributing to the increase we're seeing, including a rise in MVLs (members' voluntary liquidations) from directors choosing to close their businesses in response to recent tax and policy changes, such as the increases to employers' national insurance and the minimum wage.
'We are also seeing a rise in winding up petitions as creditors take the lead from HMRC, which has become increasingly more willing to chase the debts it is owed. HMRC's more assertive stance seems to be influencing other creditors to follow suit, particularly where there are signs of persistent non-payment.
'This increase in insolvency-related activity also reflects the wider economic picture in Scotland. Business activity remains subdued, and firms continue to face persistent cost pressures, higher tax obligations, and weak demand. For some, the combination of these pressures is tipping already fragile businesses into formal insolvency processes.'
Clearly, these are worrying times for businesses across a range of sectors and, for a UK Government that has made growth its top priority, it is showing little sign of delivering the kind of conditions in which business can thrive.
The latest UK labour market review by the ONS, published on June 10, found the number of payrolled employees for May decreased by 109,000 on the month before. This was reportedly the largest monthly fall since the same period in 2020, amid the first Covid lockdown. The rate of unemployment was found to have increased to 4.6% in the three months to April, from 4.5% in the three months to March, reaching the highest level since the three months to July 2021. Pay growth also eased, the ONS found.
Moreover, official figures published last week found the UK economy went into reverse in April, as gross domestic product fell by 0.3% month on month. The decline was worse than the 0.1% expected by most economists, and Liz McKeown, director of economic statistics at the ONS, noted declining output in both the services and the manufacturing sectors in April.
While a modest contraction in GDP over a single month offers a limited window into the health of the UK economy, there is no doubt it took a little wind out of the sails of the Chancellor, who received some praise from the Scottish business community for the Government's Spending Review which she announced the day before. That included a thumbs-up from Scottish Chambers of Commerce on a range of measures, including a commitment to fund the Acorn carbon capture and storage project in Aberdeenshire, held up as the kind of initiative that will be key to Scotland's energy transition hopes. Scottish Chambers' chief executive Liz Cameron said Acorn had the potential to create 15,000 jobs in its construction and attract billions of pounds of private sector investment as she also welcomed a commitment to increase defence spending.
Although these funding commitments are clearly important, the Acorn Project and moves to hike defence expenditure will mean little to the many business owners who are struggling to keep the lights on as costs continue to rise and economic growth flatlines.
The sense that the UK Government is struggling to address the issues facing many businesses was summed up by the Scottish Hospitality Group and the Federation of Small Businesses in their responses to the Spending Review. Stephen Montgomery, director of the Scottish Hospitality Group, declared the review did 'absolutely nothing' to support the sector.
He said: 'Today we heard all about the spending plans, however nothing about helping those who will pay for it through taxes.
'To help the economy to grow, you need business to grow, so today we yet again see the sector let down by Rachel Reeves.'
The reaction was not much better from the FSB, which said the review left its members 'wondering when they will feel the benefits'.
If the business community were to write a report card for Sir Keir and Ms Reeves for the 11 months they have been in office, the verdict would surely not be anything more positive than 'could do better'.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Telegraph
10 hours ago
- Telegraph
Retirees pull billions from pension pots to escape Reeves's tax raid
Middle-class Britons risk a retirement 'disaster' after a record £5bn was pulled from pension pots in the wake of Rachel Reeves's inheritance tax raid. Official figures showed 672,000 retirees, representing roughly 5pc of all pensioners, pulled £5bn from their pots in the first three months of this year. HM Revenue and Customs (HMRC) said the amount taken from retirement funds was 25pc higher than the same quarter a year ago, with 13pc more people withdrawing money. It means withdrawals during the period were the highest since George Osborne introduced pension freedoms a decade ago. It comes after the Chancellor announced in her maiden Budget last October that pension pots would no longer be exempt from inheritance tax from April 2027, making them subject to a levy of up to 40pc. Baroness Altmann, a former Tory pensions minister, urged the Chancellor to reverse the policy, warning that many more people would choose to withdraw money from their retirement pot as soon as possible, creating a 'pensioner poverty time bomb'. Sweeping changes mean retirees can now withdraw unlimited amounts from their pot as soon as they hit 55. The figures also revealed a 50pc increase in the number of octogenarians taking money out of their pensions over the course of last year with the amount withdrawn by those aged 81 and over up by 80pc to £360m. 'It's a disaster' The Chancellor hopes to raise £1.5bn from her decision to bring pensions within the scope of inheritance tax. Pension withdrawals from defined contribution pots above the 25pc tax-free lump sum incur an income tax charge of 20pc for basic rate taxpayers and a 40pc levy at the higher rate. The changes mean heirs will be subject to both inheritance and income tax at the marginal rate from 2027. 'It's a disaster,' Lady Altmann said, adding that she expected withdrawals to accelerate as more people became aware of the looming inheritance tax charge. She added that the 'draconian' way the policy was introduced was storing up a crisis for the future, and said she was pushing for changes in the Lords that would see beneficiaries charged a maximum 20pc 'pension recovery tax' instead on inherited pots. Lady Altmann said: 'This policy could end up being as damaging to workplace pensions as Gordon Brown's tax rate was for DB [defined benefit] pensions. 'I honestly think this is an existential threat to the long-term survival of our DC [defined contribution] pensions, because there's a clear incentive to take the money out as soon as you possibly can.' She added that this would leave many middle-class families in danger of not leaving themselves enough to fund their retirement. Lady Altmann said: 'This IHT [inheritance tax] imposition will ensure that more and more people – especially those who don't have massive amounts of money – will just say, 'Why on earth would I want to lose two thirds of my pension to the taxman? I'll just take it out as soon as I can.' 'Those who build up, say, between £200,000 and £300,000 over their working life are now in danger of having a real financial incentive not to keep money in their pensions for their later life and then end up in poverty.' 'Taking a big hit' Guy Opperman, another former pensions minister, said: 'Pensions are taking a big hit from the Government's actions. 'The consequences of this policy are clear: people will save less for their pension and will withdraw more. This will also affect the ability to pass money on. There is time for the Government to think again and they should. It is very short-term.' Jamie Jenkins, director of policy at pensions giant Royal London, which manages more than £170bn of client cash, said there was already clear evidence that people were changing their retirement planning ahead of the changes. He said: 'There is increased interest from advisers and their clients in how they can mitigate the potential inheritance tax bill.' Claire Trott, at wealth managers St James's Place, added: 'Every individual's circumstances are different, but IHT changes to pensions have certainly triggered more conversations about gifting strategies and whether it makes sense to start drawing from pensions earlier.' An HM Treasury spokesman said: 'We continue to incentivise pensions savings for their intended purpose – of funding retirement instead of them being openly used as a vehicle to transfer wealth – and more than 90pc of estates each year will continue to pay no inheritance tax after these and other changes.'
Telegraph
21 hours ago
- Telegraph
Reeves making bigger mistakes than Truss, says Badenoch
Sir Keir Starmer and Rachel Reeves are making 'even bigger mistakes' than Liz Truss and have not learnt the lessons of her mini-budget, Kemi Badenoch has warned. Writing in The Telegraph, the Tory leader accuses the Government of taking Britain's finances 'to the brink' over concerns that it is pushing the country into a 'debt spiral'. Comparing Labour to Ms Truss marks Mrs Badenoch 's first major public criticism of the former Conservative prime minister, whose tax-cutting 2022 mini-budget was followed by a market meltdown. Mrs Badenoch says: 'For all their mocking of Liz Truss, Keir Starmer and Rachel Reeves have not learnt the lessons of the mini-budget and are making even bigger mistakes. 'They continue to borrow more and more, unable and unwilling to make the spending cuts needed to balance the books.' Her comments are a bid to blunt Labour's continued efforts to pin Britain's current economic woes on the Tory legacy of Ms Truss's premiership. Almost three years on, Ms Reeves and Sir Keir still regularly resort to blaming the mini-budget for unpopular decisions on tax and spending. But the remarks also risk reopening old wounds within the Tories, with some allies of Ms Truss arguing that she had the right vision for a low-tax economy. A source close to Liz Truss told The Telegraph: 'Kemi has not learned the lessons of the Mini Budget, which is that when Conservative MPs fail to back tax cuts, fracking and welfare restraint, they get booted out of office. 'The Bank of England has since admitted that two thirds of the market movement in 2022 was down to their failure properly to regulate pensions. 'Kemi needs to do the work and actually look at what happened in 2022 and hold the Bank of England to account.' The former Tory prime minister has said it was failures by the Bank of England, rather than her tax cuts, which led to the subsequent financial turmoil. Her supporters have also pointed out that borrowing costs on Government bonds have risen to a higher level now than in the aftermath of the mini-budget. In her now infamous mini-budget in September 2022, Ms Truss and Kwasi Kwarteng, the chancellor at the time, announced a series of surprise tax cuts, including the abolition of the top 45p income tax rate. It was not accompanied by a forecast from the Office for Budget Responsibility, nor did it contain any spending restraints to balance the books. The budget provoked a calamitous market reaction, with the pound hitting an all-time low against the US dollar, government borrowing costs surging and increased mortgage rates. Ms Truss was swiftly forced to abandon the 45p cut and sack Mr Kwarteng, replacing him with Jeremy Hunt, to try and calm the financial markets. She resigned two weeks later. Since coming to power last year, Labour has also been criticised for its financial decisions. Ms Reeves used June's spending review to set out a £300bn spree over the next five years, to be funded by higher taxes and more debt. She has handed a £190bn increase to public services, paid for by the tax raid on businesses which has been blamed for stalling economic growth. A further £113bn will be ploughed into infrastructure projects after the Chancellor tore up her fiscal rules to allow herself to borrow more for investment. Last month's borrowing figure came in at £20.7bn, the second-highest level on record behind June 2020, when the Treasury was funding furlough payments. As a result, Mrs Badenoch warns that Britain is entering a 'debt spiral'. She says the reversal on £5bn of cuts to sickness benefits has added 'more pressure to the public purse' and has fuelled fears of further growth killing tax rises. The UK now faces higher borrowing costs than once-bankrupt Greece and is spending more on debt interest repayments every year than the entire defence budget. Mrs Badenoch writes: 'Keir Starmer and Rachel Reeves have taken profligate spending to a different level. The UK economy is teetering on the brink. 'Bond markets are increasingly jittery about the levels of borrowing today with no balancing spending decreases. This is how countries enter a debt spiral. 'But it is not inevitable, it is a choice. A debt crisis would make everyone in the country a lot poorer and ruin people's lives. 'The Prime Minister must not let pride stop him doing what, I sincerely hope, he knows deep down is essential – cutting government spending.' Mrs Badenoch's comments also come against the backdrop of internal disagreement over whether the Tory party should continue to apologise for its time in office. She used her first speech as leader, delivered in December last year, to directly say sorry to voters for the Conservatives' failures on immigration. One of her closest allies, Baroness Maclean of Redditch, told a meeting in June that the party had 'done the apologies' and should now move on to setting out policies. But a few weeks later Alex Burghart, the shadow chancellor of the Duchy of Lancaster, told activists that the Tories should keep acknowledging their mistakes. Sir Mel Stride, the shadow chancellor, had led internal Tory criticism of the mini-budget, vowing last month that the party would 'never, ever' repeat it. Until now Mrs Badenoch had held her fire, though she did privately tell her shadow cabinet that it would be helpful if Ms Truss made fewer public interventions. Her warning comes after the International Monetary Fund and senior City figures sounded the alarm about Britain's spiralling debt. Ray Dalio, a billionaire US hedge fund investor, warned last week that the UK has entered a 'doom loop' of more borrowing, higher taxes and low growth. Ms Reeves has repeatedly refused to rule out returning with more tax rises in the autumn despite warnings that doing so would further damage the economy. The Chancellor is under growing pressure from Left-wing backbenchers to introduce a wealth tax, which would probably prompt a fresh exodus of entrepreneurs. Starmer and Reeves have not learnt the lessons of the mini-budget By Kemi Badenoch Picture the scene: a new Prime Minister and Chancellor spending billions without also making the necessary savings to offset their splurge and balance the books. The markets react adversely, interest rates spike and the cost of living gets worse with prices soaring. For all their mocking of Liz Truss, Keir Starmer and Rachel Reeves have not learnt the lessons of the mini-budget and are making even bigger mistakes. They continue to borrow more and more, unable and unwilling to make the spending cuts needed to balance the books. They are egged on by a Left-wing Reform Party, chasing Labour votes with ever more outlandish promises of nationalisation and welfare giveaways. The Conservative Party is now under new leadership, and my abiding principle will be that the country must live within its means. Before you dismiss us as being part of the problem, (after all, the mini-budget happened on our watch), the difference is that in 2022 we recognised what had gone wrong and took action to fix it. Labour aren't doing this. In fact they're making a bad situation even worse. Since the pandemic, Britain has become more and more reliant on debt to pay for public services. We now spend almost twice as much on debt interest than we do on defence. And the deficit is over £70bn. Keir Starmer and Rachel Reeves have taken profligate spending to a different level. Labour politicians are used to entering office with a surplus built up by cost-cutting Conservatives. Their instincts are simply to spend more, and they were wholly unprepared for the post-Covid economic situation. We saw it when both Starmer and Farage refused to back my call to keep the two-child benefit cap, a policy that saves £3 billion a year. And we saw it again when the Prime Minister watered down his own Welfare Bill. Instead of making savings, it now actually increases welfare spending – adding more pressure to the public purse. Before that debate, I made a straightforward offer: Conservative MPs would give him the numbers in Parliament to get the Bill through, if the Prime Minister committed to cutting welfare costs, getting people into work, and ruling out further tax rises this autumn. He refused. So instead, we watched as the Government stripped its own legislation of any serious reform. The markets were also watching. The UK's borrowing costs are reaching levels not seen for 30 years – higher than even those in Greece. Incredibly, borrowing costs are higher now than after the mini-budget. That means prices rising and the long-running cost of living crisis continuing. The UK economy is teetering on the brink. There are now warnings, in the City and in Westminster, that a fiscal crisis may even be on the horizon. Ray Dalio, the billionaire founder of hedge fund Bridgewater Associates, said this week that Britain had entered a 'doom loop' of rising debts, higher taxes and slower growth. Dalio's warnings came days after the International Monetary Fund said the government must take radical action to avoid a debt spiral. As we all saw in 2022, the Chancellor and the Prime Minister are reliant on the bond markets. Yet those bond markets are increasingly jittery about the levels of borrowing today with no balancing spending decreases. Rachel Reeves's unfunded series of U-turns have only added to the pressure. She is boxed in by her party on one side, and her fiscal rules on the other. Everyone now assumes tax rises are coming in the November Budget and the Government isn't denying it. The OBR is warning that higher tax is not good for growth. They are right. The Institute of Directors say that taxes and dire economic outlook is leading to the worst business confidence since the pandemic. Labour's mismanagement of our economy is having real consequences, and it's working people, savers and business owners who will pay more for declining public services. At the same time, rising welfare and poor incentives are pushing more people out of the workforce, making our problems even harder to fix. This is how countries enter a debt spiral. But it is not inevitable, it is a choice. A debt crisis would make everyone in the country a lot poorer and ruin people's lives. The Prime Minister must not let pride stop him doing what, I sincerely hope, he knows deep down is essential: cutting government spending. He should do so, for all our sakes.
Leader Live
a day ago
- Leader Live
Reeves: Of course you are going to disappoint people as Chancellor
The politician said she understood that being Chancellor meant making unpopular decisions. She told an audience at the Edinburgh Fringe Festival that Labour had got the balance right between tax, spending and borrowing. But she said that balancing the books meant making tough decisions, even if the are unpopular. Appearing on the Iain Dale All Talk fringe show, she said: 'The reason people voted Labour at the last election is they want to change and they were unhappy with the way that the country was being governed. 'They know that we inherited a mess. They know it's not easy to put it right, but people are impatient for change. 'I'm impatient for change as well, but I've also got the job of making sure the sums always add up – and it doesn't always make you popular because you can't do anything you might want to do. You certainly can't do everything straight away, all at once.' Ms Reeves pointed to Labour's £200 million investment in carbon capture in the north east of Scotland, which she said was welcomed by the industry. At the same time, Labour's windfall tax, she said, was not liked by the sector. 'I can understand that that's extra tax that the oil and gas sector are paying, but you can't really have one without the other,' she said. Defending Labour's record, she said her party had the 'balance about right'. 'But of course you're going to disappoint people,' she added. 'No-one wants to pay more taxes. 'Everyone wants more money than public spending – and borrowing is not a free option, because you've got to pay for it. 'I think people know those sort of constraints, but no-one really likes them and I'm the one, I guess, that has to sort the sums up.' Ms Reeves said Labour had to deliver on its general election campaign of change, adding that her party did not 'deserve' to win the next election if it does not deliver the change it promised.
