Egyptian-US forum to tackle investment at Suez Canal Economic Zone
Suez Canal - FIlE
CAIRO - 8 May 2025: An Egyptian-U.S. two-day forum will be held by the end of May in Egypt, featuring major American companies, Prime Minister Mostafa Madbouly said Wednesday.
In cooperation with the American Chamber of Commerce, and with the Egyptian Embassy in Washington holding meetings with companies that will participate in the forum, investment opportunities will be presented at the forum, including the Suez Canal Economic Zone.
Economic reforms will also be reviewed, as will incentives that contribute to improving the investment climate.
In a meeting with several ministers with the head of the Cabinet on Monday, Minister of Investment Hassan al-Khatib noted that in 2024, Egyptian exports to the U.S. amounted to 5.5% of Egypt's total non-oil exports to the world, while U.S. exports to Egypt represent approximately 6.1% of Egypt's total non-oil imports from the world.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Egypt Independent
2 hours ago
- Egypt Independent
US and China agree on plan to ease export controls after trade talks in London
Hong Kong CNN — The United States and China have agreed on a framework to implement their trade truce, officials on both sides said Wednesday, after concluding two days of talks in London to defuse tensions and ease export restrictions that threaten to disrupt global manufacturing. American and Chinese negotiators agreed 'in principle' to a framework on how to implement the consensus reached by the previous round of talks in Geneva last month and a phone call between the two countries' leaders last week, China's trade negotiator Li Chenggang told reporters in London, according to Chinese state broadcaster CGTN. Officials on both sides will now take the proposal back to their leaders for approval, US Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick told reporters in a separate briefing in London, Reuters reported. 'If that is approved, we will then implement the framework,' he said. While neither side disclosed any specifics of the deal, Lutnick indicated that both had agreed to roll back export controls on goods and technologies that are crucial to the other. China's restrictions on exports of rare earth minerals and magnets to the US will be resolved as a 'fundamental' part of the framework agreement, Lutnick said, according to Reuters. 'Also, there were a number of measures the United States of America put on when those rare earths were not coming,' he added. 'You should expect those to come off, sort of as President Trump said: 'In a balanced way.'' Frustrated by what it saw as Beijing's retreat from its pledge made in Geneva to ease rare earth exports, the US restricted chip design software sales to China and vowed to 'aggressively revoke' Chinese student visas. Kevin Hassett, director of the National Economic Council, told CNBC Monday that the Trump administration may be open to loosening restrictions on some microchips that China views as critical to its manufacturing sector. The US will maintain restrictions on 'very, very high-end Nvidia' chips that are capable of powering artificial intelligence systems, he added. CNN has reached out to the White House for comment. Export controls take center stage The latest round of talks, held at the ornate Lancaster House in central London, underscored the increasingly central role export controls have played in the trade war between the world's largest economies. Li Chenggang, China's vice commerce minister, second left, and Wang Wentao, China's commerce minister, second right, arrive for trade talks at Lancaster House in London, UK, on June 10, 2025. Chris J. Ratcliffe/Bloomberg/Getty Images It also highlighted Beijing's powerful leverage from its dominance of the rare earth supply chain – and its growing readiness to wield it in pressing the US to ease export restrictions on China. Rare earth minerals and their magnets are essential for everything from cars to fighter jets, and China holds a near-monopoly on these materials that are critical to American industries and defense. Following their long-anticipated phone call last week, Trump said Xi had agreed to restart the flow of rare earth minerals and magnets, though he did not elaborate on how fast that would happen or the volume of the materials that would be released. Since early April, when Beijing imposed new licensing rules on certain minerals in response to Trump's tariffs, China's overseas shipments of rare earths have plunged, threatening industries globally, from electronics and defense to energy and carmaking. Over the past month, Trump has imposed punitive measures on Beijing, including limits on technology sales to China and threatening to revoke the US visas of Chinese students, which was prompted by a belief that China had failed to live up to commitments it made in Geneva, administration officials told CNN in May. The measures also include a ban on US companies selling to China software used to design semiconductors. The White House additionally warned US companies against using artificial intelligence chips made by China's national tech champion Huawei. The moves have triggered backlash from China, which views Washington's decisions as violating the Geneva consensus. The US and China agreed in the Swiss city on May 12 to temporarily roll back crippling tariffs on each other and use a 90-day window to hash out a broader deal to address their trade imbalance. But despite the reprieve, China's exports to the US suffered a steep decline of 34.5 percent in May, according to Chinese customs data, and the renewed friction necessitated another round of talks. 'The progress made during this round of talks in London is conducive to further building trust between China and the United States, promoting the stable and healthy development of China-US economic and trade relations,' Li, China's top international trade negotiator and vice commerce minister, said Wednesday, CGTN reported. Semiconductor chokepoint Although US access to rare earths has not been a source of friction until recently, the feud over advanced technology has been rumbling for some time. In recent years, Washington has stepped up efforts to restrict China's access to chip-related technologies, aiming to prevent Beijing from using American innovations to bolster its military and AI capabilities. During his first term, Trump imposed targeted restrictions on companies like Huawei, including limits on chip sales to them. In 2022, then-President Joe Biden intensified these efforts, curbing the sale of advanced semiconductors to China over concerns that they could power its military. The controls were subsequently expanded to include restrictions on sales of chipmaking equipment, high-bandwidth memory chips and even products manufactured outside the US using American technology, in order to limit China's technological progress. The mounting restrictions have put heavy pressure on China's strategic sectors that Xi has prioritized, including semiconductors and AI. But in recent years Huawei, the Chinese telecom and electronics giant, has re-emerged as a national champion, with Beijing pinning its hopes on the company to lead innovation in these sectors. Although US restrictions initially crippled its smartphone business, the company made a stunning comeback in 2023 with a handset powered by advanced chips, technology Washington believed it had blocked. The launch of the Mate 60 smartphone in 2023 even triggered investigations by the US government. In a rare interview Tuesday, Ren Zhenfei, the founder of Huawei, dismissed the impact of the technology restrictions the US had imposed on China and Huawei, while conceding that its chip technology remains one generation behind US technology. 'The US has exaggerated Huawei's capabilities. We're not that advanced yet,' he told the People's Daily, a newspaper run by China's Communist Party. But he added that China's current needs could be met by bundling microchips together, an approach the industry commonly refers to as packaging or stacking. 'There's actually no need to worry about the chip issue. By using methods like stacking and clustering, the computational results are comparable to the most advanced levels,' he said. This story has been updated with additional reporting and context.
CairoScene
5 hours ago
- CairoScene
WATCH: Egyptian Startups Secure $228M in First Five Months of 2025
In total, 16 deals were recorded during the period, with 11 of them publicly disclosing investment of $156 million altogether. Jun 11, 2025 Egyptian startups have attracted $228 million in venture capital and debt financing from January to May 2025, according to a statement from the Ministerial Group for Entrepreneurship. The figures mark a 130% year-on-year increase in disclosed investment volume, reflecting continued growth in Egypt's startup ecosystem despite ongoing economic challenges. In total, 16 deals were recorded during the period, with 11 of them publicly disclosing investment amounts that collectively reached $156 million. In addition to equity investments, two notable debt financing deals were secured: proptech platform Nawy raised $23 million, while fintech firm MNT-Halan secured $49 million.
Daily News Egypt
6 hours ago
- Daily News Egypt
Between Agreement and War: Israel's Strategic Dilemma over a Possible US-Iran Nuclear Deal
Israel harbours deeper concerns over US President Donald Trump's potential nuclear deal with Iran than it ever did regarding the agreement negotiated under Barack Obama. According to Tel Aviv, the imminent accord would leave Iran merely months away from acquiring a nuclear weapon while severely limiting Israel's ability to deliver a decisive military strike against Tehran's nuclear infrastructure. In this scenario, Iran would preserve its controversial program, and Israel would lose what it perceives as a historic opportunity to dismantle Tehran's nuclear ambitions. Over a month ago, Trump unexpectedly announced the beginning of direct negotiations with Tehran, aiming to curtail Iran's nuclear program in exchange for the easing of economic sanctions. His declaration came in the presence of Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, who had traveled to Washington seeking American approval for pre-emptive strikes on Iranian nuclear facilities. Over the past two years, Israel has weakened Iran's regional influence through sustained military operations against its allies—Hamas in Gaza, Hezbollah in Lebanon—and by the removal of its key ally, former Syrian President Bashar al-Assad. At the same time, severe Western sanctions have crippled Iran's oil-dependent economy. Upon finalizing the deal, Trump is expected to assert that he has extracted greater concessions from Iran than his predecessors, Obama and Joe Biden. His claim would hinge on two major factors: the inclusion of US nuclear inspectors alongside IAEA monitors in Iran's nuclear sites and a complete halt to uranium enrichment—even at low levels—for a symbolic period that may last a year. However, Israeli officials remain deeply concerned, viewing this agreement as even riskier than the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA) of 2015, which they largely dismissed as flawed. Dr. Hatem Sadek President Biden's most significant diplomatic achievement was persuading Tehran to freeze its 60% uranium enrichment—a feat achieved in 2023 through a US agreement releasing $6 billion of Iran's frozen assets. Obama, on the other hand, succeeded in reducing Iran's medium-enriched uranium stockpile to 3.67% but failed to halt enrichment entirely or secure Tehran's consent for American inspectors to participate in monitoring. There are several additional concessions Trump may secure that neither Biden nor Obama could—such as guarantees against attacks on US forces or a temporary moratorium on Iran's ballistic missile tests, which have both conventional and nuclear applications. If accomplished, why does this alarm Israeli officials? Israeli intelligence leaders, including the Mossad Director and the head of military intelligence, have spent substantial diplomatic capital lobbying the Trump administration and its envoy, Steve Witkoff, in numerous meetings across the Middle East, Europe, and the US Their objective was to push negotiations toward two extreme outcomes: Tehran's submission or a decisive military strike. However, these efforts clashed with Trump's transactional style, which prioritizes immediate gains over long-term strategy. While Israeli officials believe they made some progress, fears persist that Trump's main goal is securing a deal—regardless of whether it aligns with Israel's stringent security concerns. Additionally, if Trump pressures Israel to abandon military action, it might not only prevent overt strikes but also hinder covert operations, such as Mossad-led sabotage missions that have delayed Iran's nuclear weapons program in recent years. In 2015, Iran relied on about 20,000 aging IR-1 centrifuges, requiring roughly a year to produce enough weapons-grade uranium for a bomb. By 2025, however, Iran possesses thousands of advanced IR-4 and IR-6 centrifuges, a fraction of which could be concealed in undisclosed facilities much smaller than the known sites at Natanz and Fordow. This would allow Tehran to achieve weapons-grade uranium within months. Reports indicate Iran's current enrichment levels reach 60%—a threshold demonstrating mastery of nuclear science, making bomb acquisition more a matter of timing than technical capability. From Israel's perspective, any agreement at this stage would consolidate Iran's nuclear potential while lifting international sanctions, enabling Tehran to accelerate its program. By contrast, Israeli leadership sees the current moment as an unparalleled strategic opportunity: with Hamas and Hezbollah weakened, no time is more suitable for a pre-emptive strike. In conclusion, whatever restrictions and safeguards Trump's team negotiates, at best they would leave Iran just months from a nuclear breakout while denying Israel its clearest chance in decades to strike. Tehran may be open to a deal but remains wary of Trump's unpredictable leadership and sceptical of any non-binding agreement that a future US administration might discard. The most it would likely accept is a temporary enrichment suspension in exchange for the release of frozen funds and recognition of its right to civilian nuclear energy—an outcome Israel would see as disastrous. Meanwhile, Gulf states and regional actors, while wary of Iran's ambitions, increasingly prefer uneasy coexistence over a catastrophic war that could disrupt economies and stall development plans. The negotiation landscape remains murky and fraught with uncertainty for all involved. Dr. Hatem Sadek – Professor at Helwan University The post Opinion | Between Agreement and War: Israel's Strategic Dilemma over a Possible US-Iran Nuclear Deal appeared first on Dailynewsegypt.
