Chad announces suspension of visas to US citizens in response to Trump travel ban
President Donald Trump on Wednesday resurrected a hallmark policy of his first term when he announced the visa ban on 12 countries including Chad, accusing them of having 'deficient' screening and vetting, and historically refusing to take back their own citizens who overstay in the United States.
The new ban targets Afghanistan, Myanmar, Chad, the Republic of Congo, Equatorial Guinea, Eritrea, Haiti, Iran, Libya, Somalia, Sudan and Yemen.
There will also be heightened restrictions on visitors from seven others in the new travel policy, which takes effect Monday at 12:01 a.m.
Get daily National news
Get the day's top news, political, economic, and current affairs headlines, delivered to your inbox once a day. Sign up for daily National newsletter Sign Up
By providing your email address, you have read and agree to Global News' Terms and Conditions and Privacy Policy
In a Facebook post, Chad's president on Thursday said he is directing his government to suspend visas to U.S. citizens 'in accordance with the principles of reciprocity.'
Story continues below advertisement
'Chad has no planes to offer, no billions of dollars to give but Chad has his dignity and pride,' Deby said, referring to the $400 million luxury plane offered to his administration as a gift by the ruling family of Qatar.
Republic of Congo calls the ban a mistake
The new travel policy has triggered varied reactions from Africa, whose countries make up seven of the 12 countries affected by Trump's outright visa ban with some exemptions.
In the Republic of Congo, government spokesperson Thierry Moungalla said he believes the country was among those affected because of a 'misunderstanding' over an armed attack in the U.S. with the perpetrators 'mistaken' to be from the Republic of Congo.
'Obviously, Congo is not a terrorist country, is not home to any terrorist, is not known to have a terrorist vocation. So we think that this is a misunderstanding and I believe that in the coming hours, the competent diplomatic services of the government will contact the American authorities here,' he said in the capital of Brazzaville.
In Sierra Leone, among countries with heightened travel restrictions, Information Minister Chernor Bah said the country is committed to addressing the concerns that prompted the ban.
'We will work with U.S. authorities to ensure progress,' he added.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Winnipeg Free Press
3 minutes ago
- Winnipeg Free Press
Gabbard says UK scraps demand for Apple to give backdoor access to data
LONDON (AP) — Britain abandoned its demand that Apple provide so-called backdoor access to any encrypted user data stored in the cloud, U.S. Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard said Monday. Gabbard indicated London and Washington had resolved their high-stakes dispute over electronic privacy, writing on X that she and President Donald Trump and Vice President JD Vance spent the 'past few months' working with the U.K. government. 'As a result, the UK agreed to drop its mandate for Apple to provide a 'back door' that would have enabled access to the protected encrypted data of American citizens and encroached on our civil liberties,' she said. The dispute surfaced at the start of the year with a news report that British security officials had issued the U.S. tech giant with a secret order requiring the creation of backdoor access to view fully encrypted material. Apple challenged the order, which raised fears of electronic spying by national security officials. The British government reportedly served Apple with what is known as a 'technical capability notice' ordering it to provide the access under a sweeping law called the Investigatory Powers Act of 2016, which has been dubbed the snoopers' charter. The U.K. Home Office did not respond directly to Gabbard's statement, saying it 'does not comment on operational matters, including confirming or denying the existence of such notices.' 'We have long had joint security and intelligence arrangements with the US to tackle the most serious threats such as terrorism and child sexual abuse, including the role played by fast-moving technology in enabling those threats,' the office said. 'We will always take all actions necessary at the domestic level to keep UK citizens safe.' Gabbard previously said a demand for backdoor access would violate the rights of Americans and raise concerns about a foreign government pressuring a U.S.-based technology company. Apple did not immediately respond to a request for comment. The company had reacted to the order by withdrawing its Advanced Data Protection encryption feature for new users in the U.K. and disabling it for existing users. The opt-in feature protects iCloud files, photos, notes and other data with end-to-end encryption when they are stored in the cloud. ___ Associated Press writer Sylvia Hui contributed to this report.
National Post
33 minutes ago
- National Post
Adam Zivo: Zelenskyy meeting with Trump a resounding success
Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy's visit to the White House on Monday was a resounding diplomatic success. With the support of Europe's most powerful leaders, Zelenskyy repaired his relationship with U.S. President Donald Trump and seemingly reoriented Washington's foreign policy in Ukraine's favour, bolstering hope that a just peace might yet be negotiated for the besieged country. Article content Article content The meeting came just three days after Trump, hoping to negotiate a ceasefire deal for Ukraine, hosted Russian President Vladimir Putin at a summit in Alaska. While Putin and Trump initially greeted each other at that summit warmly, their talks terminated prematurely, after just three hours, with both the American and Russian delegations leaving stonefaced. Article content Article content Following the Alaska summit, Trump told Zelenskyy and his European allies that Putin had demanded that Ukraine hand over its Donetsk province — which Russia only partially occupies — in exchange for freezing the frontlines elsewhere, and possibly conceded other territory Russia holds, and suggested that Washington would support such a deal. Article content As Donetsk contains Ukraine's most significant defensive fortifications, ceding this territory would leave the country vulnerable to further invasion. However, White House officials claimed on Sunday that Russia had, in a major compromise, agreed to allow Ukraine to receive NATO-style security guarantees, the details of which remain unspecified. Article content Article content But as Trump's public rhetoric grew more aggressive towards Ukraine throughout the weekend, some feared that Zelenskyy would be pressured into a bad peace deal — one where devastating land concessions would be inadequately compensated for with toothless promises. Article content This week's White House meeting could have provided the perfect opportunity for such a move. Zelenskyy's last visit in February had infamously devolved into a shouting match with Trump and U.S. President J.D. Vance, after a hostile journalist berated the Ukrainian President for not wearing a suit. The incident was widely interpreted as a MAGA ambush designed to humiliate Kyiv — so was this going to be another repeat with sinister policy implications? Article content In an apparent bid to protect Zelenskyy from bullying, the leaders of Britain, France, Germany, Italy and Finland, as well as the heads of the EU and NATO, abruptly announced that they would accompany the Ukrainian leader at the White House. In the leadup to the meeting, they firmly expressed their support for the Ukrainian president and reportedly provided private coaching on how to handle Trump. Article content Despite their best efforts, the beginning of the trip was not promising. While Trump had rolled out the red carpet for Putin days earlier and personally greeted him, Zelenskyy was given no such welcome. Article content Instead, the Ukrainian president first met with Trump's Special Envoy Keith Kellogg before convening with Kyiv's European partners. Zelenskyy then changed into an all-black suit — somber enough to acknowledge his country's wartime realities, but more formal than his usual attire — and joined Trump in front of the White House, where the two men seemed polite but uncomfortable with one another. Article content Inside their Oval Office public meeting, though, the mood quickly brightened. Article content Zelenskyy began by profusely thanking Trump for his support — an important move, as, during his last visit, both Vance and Trump had accused him of being ungrateful. He said that he appreciated that Trump's wife, Melania, had written a letter to Putin asking for an end to the war for the sake of Ukraine's children (the letter was given to Putin in Alaska). He then handed Trump a letter written to Melania from his own wife, Olena Zelenska, which seemed to set the American president at ease. Article content The relationship between the two men turned amicable. They even cracked small jokes with each other. 'You look fabulous in that suit!' said the aforementioned MAGA journalist who had criticized Zelenskyy's attire during his last visit. 'I said the same thing,' quipped Trump in reply. While some reporters asked leading questions that seemed intended to sow discord, none materialized. Article content Trump emphasized that, although the United States would stop donating military or financial aid, it would continue to sell weapons to Ukraine using NATO as an intermediary and would find other ways to assist. 'When it comes to security there's going to be a lot of help. It's going to be good,' he said. 'People are being killed, and we want to stop that. So I would not say it's the end of the road.' Article content In an unexpected twist, Trump did not rule out sending U.S. troops to Ukraine to assist in peacekeeping after a reporter asked him about the possibility. Article content However, contradicting months of his previous messaging, the American president stated that he did not believe that it is necessary to negotiate a ceasefire, and argued that Ukraine and Russia should seek a full peace deal instead. This approach is generally considered to be favourable to Russia, as Moscow has insisted for years that fighting should cease only at the end of the peace process, not the beginning, presumably so that Russian forces can press their advantages during negotiations. Article content After a closed-door session focusing on security guarantees, Zelenskyy told assembled reporters that he had a 'very good' meeting with Trump: 'It really was the best one. Sorry, or maybe the best one will be in the future.' Reciprocally, Trump said that he 'just had the honour of being with President Zelenskyy' and that they had 'had a very successful day thus far.' Such language would have been unthinkable earlier this year. Article content In the late afternoon, Trump and Zelenskyy met with the assembled European leaders for a group photo and joint discussion. The warm feelings evidently persisted. Article content Mark Rutte, NATO's general secretary, told Trump that Washington's willingness to 'participate in security guarantees is a big step, is really a breakthrough, and it makes all the difference.' However, German Chancellor Friedrich Merz said he couldn't 'imagine that the next meeting would take place without a ceasefire,' and that Russia should be pressured to accept one. French President Emmanuel Macron proposed that the next meeting — presumably between Trump, Zelenskyy and Putin — should include a European representative, as security guarantees are relevant to the entire continent.
Toronto Star
2 hours ago
- Toronto Star
The Trump-Putin summit was a disaster. And things could still get worse
Watching the Alaskan summit last Friday, historians remember the 1938 Munich Agreement, or the Yalta Conference in 1945: both which serve as cautionary tales in appeasing dictators, selling out smaller states, and ignoring the principles of collective security. While the contexts and players are different, the melody is frighteningly familiar. The only positive result from the Trump-Putin meeting is that no deal was made, at least not publicly. What precisely the two discussed remains in question, but given the mercurial nature of Trump's foreign policy, Ukrainians worry that their interests were not well represented by American officials. Opinion articles are based on the author's interpretations and judgments of facts, data and events. More details
