
Analysis: Pitchman president drives Americans to their corners
At the White House this week, there are events to pump up Tesla and cryptocurrency, as President Donald Trump pushes products and investments close to the hearts of his backers.
Outside the White House there is backlash, particularly against Tesla, and Americans are showing an interest in boycotts.
Left-leaning Tesla owners are turning against their electric cars as a protest against Elon Musk, who has evolved from backing Tesla to address climate change to helping elect a president promising to refocus on hydrocarbons and 'drill, baby drill.'
Musk needed the free advertising of a Tesla-only White House driveway show to halt the tanking of the company's stock price. It was the least Trump could do after Musk spent more than a quarter of a billion dollars to get him elected, according to FEC reports, and plans to pour $100 million more into Trump's political operation, according to the New York Times.
Musk and Trump's mutual endorsements now taint Tesla in the eyes of many Americans — as does the fact that Trump has let Musk and his Department of Government Efficiency cronies run wild with cuts across the federal government and little transparency about what they're doing.
Another White House event has the potential to turn into a commercial on Friday, when cryptocurrency executives who backed Trump's campaign take place in a crypto 'summit.' The president recently promised to build up a strategic reserve of bitcoin and other currencies, which some have referred to as a 'bitcoin bailout' for assets that have fallen in value after a post-election surge.
Washington Post subscribers, who signed up to support a paper that changed its motto to 'Democracy dies in Darkness' during the first Trump administration, are canceling subscriptions in droves, fearing that darkness has descended on the Post. First, Amazon founder and Post owner Jeff Bezos scrapped a planned endorsement of Kamala Harris; now, he has said the paper's opinion section will focus on 'personal liberties and free markets.' Maybe that ends up being an ACLU-style opinion page, but maybe it means a shift to placate Trump at a time when he is attempting to stifle dissent.
Amazon also paid homage to Trump by acquiring streaming rights to the first seven seasons of 'The Apprentice,' it announced Monday. In January, it paid a premium – $40 million, according to the Wall Street Journal – to license a Melania Trump-produced documentary about Melania Trump.
That cozying up to Trump did not drive the weeklong anti-corporate and relatively unorganized 'economic blackout' movement targeting Amazon and other major corporations this month, but frustration at corporate America is clearly festering.
There's a campaign to give up Target for Lent, part of a coordinated effort to punish the retailer for retreating from its programs to promote diversity in its hiring practices.
From CNN's report:
Target is one of dozens of Fortune 500 companies that have backtracked on DEI in response to conservative court decisions, pressure from activists and right-wing legal groups, and, more recently, the Trump administration's threats to investigate what it characterizes as 'illegal DEI,' including potential criminal cases against companies. Companies are caught between pursuing efforts to increase diversity and avoiding a conservative legal crackdown. But no company has faced as fierce a blowback from DEI supporters as Target. Customers online have protested the decision and Anne and Lucy Dayton, the daughters of one of Target's co-founders, called the company's actions 'a betrayal.'
The fact that Target is facing backlash for responding to backlash to its DEI efforts demonstrates how complicated it is to appeal to all Americans.
Donald Trump Jr., is part of an investment firm made up of like-minded MAGA conservatives looking to monetize their politics in a sort of 'parallel economy.' The firm, 1789 Capital, got the opportunity to invest in Musk-owned companies, according to a Bloomberg profile. Trump Jr. said he has turned his back on opportunities where he doesn't like the politics.
'I've turned down major deals where the ethoses don't align…There are people who have become MAGA more recently – and I don't know they actually believe,' Trump Jr., told Bloomberg, which reported that since Inauguration Day, the firm has raised $500 million. Bloomberg reported that 1789 Capital will market itself to public pension plans in red states.
1789 Capital describes itself as advocating an EIG investment strategy, short for entrepreneurship, investment and growth.
It's a play on ESG investing, which aims to prioritize investing in companies that care about the environment, social justice and open corporate governance. A conservative judge in Texas recently ruled against 26 red states and in favor of a Biden-era rule that allowed public pension plans to choose such a socially conscious investing strategy.
Musk's evolution from California-based liberal concerned about climate change to Texas-based libertarian coughing up serious coin for Trump and quietly slashing federal regulations tracks with a change in Tesla's brand.
A Columbia Business School study compares the politics and brand affinity of people according to their social media habits. In February of 2017, before Musk's transformation, the study found Tesla to be more associated with people who followed Democrats on social media. By 2022, after he had moved Tesla and SpaceX to Texas as a form of protest against California, but before he had gone all in for Trump, the situation was reversed and Tesla was more associated with people who followed Republicans. It stands to reason that the transformation of Musk's X to an echo chamber for conservatives has further impacted the Tesla brand.
There is some indication that Americans on both sides of the aisle are frustrated by the access and power of people like Musk and the perception that their politics plays into their business interests.
Musk is less popular than Trump in a new CNN Poll conducted by SSRS. From CNN's report by Ariel Edwards-Levy:
Just 35% of Americans express a positive view of Musk, with 53% rating him negatively and 11% offering no opinion. … Roughly 6 in 10 Americans say that Musk has neither the right experience nor the right judgment to make changes to the way the government works. There is uneasiness about Musk even among some of the president's supporters: 28% of those who see Trump's changes to the government as necessary doubt the tech billionaire has the judgment to carry them out.
Meanwhile, California's Gov. Gavin Newsom talked to right-wing provocateur Steve Bannon on a podcast Wednesday.
Bannon argued to Newsom that California created Musk, something Newsom agreed with, pointing to Tesla's use of carbon credits, among other things, to help its bottom line.
'It was our regulatory process and our subsidies to create this market, you're 100% right,' Newsom said.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
13 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Sen. Ted Cruz proposes withholding broadband funding from states that regulate AI
The Brief Senator Ted Cruz proposed that states attempting to regulate AI should lose federal broadband funding. This proposal is an addition to a House-passed bill aiming for a 10-year ban on state AI regulation. Critics argue Cruz's plan is "undemocratic and cruel," forcing states to choose between broadband access and AI consumer protection. WASHINGTON - U.S. Senator Ted Cruz (R-Texas) proposed on Thursday an alternative punishment for planned legislation that would set a 10-year ban on state regulation of Artificial Intelligence model learning. Under Cruz's budget reconciliation proposal, an attempt to regulate AI would be prohibited from collecting federal funding provided by the Broadband Equity, Access, and Deployment (BEAD) program. The Proposal The U.S. House of Representatives passed their version of House Resolution 1, the "One Big Beautiful Bill Act," on May 22. In part, the budget bill would ban state regulation on AI for 10 years. As chairman of the Senate Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation, Cruz authored a budget reconciliation that he says is intended to "fulfill President Trump's agenda." In a summary of the proposal, he refers to state regulation as "strangling AI deployment," comparing it to EU precautions against tech development. Cruz's proposal adds $500 million to the BEAD program, which has already administered $42.45 billion to the states in order to expand high-speed internet access across the country. It also prevents states from receiving any of that funding if they attempt to regulate AI. Dig deeper Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene (R-Georgia) has recently spoken out against HR 1, saying the anti-regulatory section alone will cost Congress her vote. Greene explained that she discovered the controversial provision, located on pages 278-279 of the bill, only after the House had already passed the legislation. Once the bill returns to the House following Senate deliberations, Greene says she will change sides based on the matter of AI. What they're saying Advocacy group Public Citizen released a commentary on Cruz's proposal, referring to it as a "display of corporate appeasement." In the article, J.B. Branch, a Big Tech accountability advocate, included the following statement: "This is a senatorial temper tantrum masquerading as policy. Americans have loudly rejected Senator Cruz's dangerous proposal to give tech giants a decade of immunity from state regulation. State legislatures, attorneys general, and citizens across all 50 states have demanded that Congress step away from overhauling consumer protections put in place in the absence of federal leadership. But instead of listening to the American people, Senate Republicans threw a fit and tied vital digital funding to corporate impunity. "With this move, Republicans are telling millions of Americans: 'You can have broadband but only if your state gives up the right to protect you from AI abuses.' It's undemocratic and cruel. Republicans would rather give Big Tech a 10-year hall pass to experiment on the American people unchecked, rather than give underserved rural and urban communities the ability to compete in the digital economy. Congress must reject this corporate giveaway and refocus their energy on representing the public interest." In her statements criticizing the anti-regulation portion of HR 1, Greene expressed concerns about developing rapidly evolving tech without checks and balances. "No one can predict what AI will be in one year, let alone 10," Greene said. "But I can tell you this: I'm pro-humanity, not pro-transhumanity. And I will be voting NO on any bill that strips states of their right to protect American jobs and families." What's next HR 1 is expected to continue undergoing changes in the Senate before returning to the House for another vote. Cruz's proposal has yet to be officially added to the legislation. The Source Information in this article comes from public U.S. Congress filings, Public Citizen, and previous FOX 4 coverage.
Yahoo
13 minutes ago
- Yahoo
HVAC prices rise over refrigerant shortage
(NewsNation) — Anyone hoping to repair or replace their air conditioning units this summer may face higher prices. New federal rules are contributing to a nationwide refrigerant shortage, meaning getting cool could cost you just as it's about to get hot. Starting this year, the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is mandating a switch to more climate friendly refrigerants, but the rush to roll out new coolants has set off a supply crisis. 'During the Biden administration, the EPA enacted an HVAC management rule,' said Jorge Alvarez, co-founder of iGas USA. 'And why it was done, nobody knows. It was simply done in order to speed up the process, the EPA said. Let's speed it up. Let's bring this change to happen within 15 months in lieu of 10 years or 20 years.' That fast-track shift means short supply and skyrocketing costs. Hiring is cooling but not in freefall yet 'Refrigerant cost, because there is no refrigerant available, is up 600%,' Alvarez said. 'A 5-ton air conditioning system a year ago installed used to cost roughly $8000 today. That exact same system is a minimum of $11,000.' The shortage is driven by regulation, global supply issues and surging demand, and a big chunk of the coolant supply now comes from China. 'Eighty percent of the refrigerant gas we need today is now coming from China. That's 100% against Trump's initiative,' he said. So what can homeowners do? Experts say if your unit is more than 10 years old, it may be time to replace but act quickly. Waiting could mean paying even more or sweating it out. 'Americans in 2025 will pay in excess of $25 billion extra for… air conditioning simply because of this management rule,' Alvarez said. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Yahoo
13 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Army, Trump ready June 14th birthday parade with tanks, rocket launchers
June 7 (UPI) -- The U.S. Army celebrates its 250th birthday on June 14th in the nation's capital, which coincides with President Donald Trump's 79th birthday, and will be marked by a parade that may include tanks, rocket launchers and more than 100 military vehicles. With the two birthdays occurring on the same day, the previously scheduled parade that was intended as a relatively small event at the National Mall in Washington, D.C., has grown in size and cost. Up to 300 soldiers and civilians, the U.S. Army Band and four cannons were initially slated to honor the Army's 250th birthday, with seating available for 120 attendees, The Washington Post reported. U.S. Army leaders last year sought a permit for the event, but Trump's election victory has changed its scope, while doubling as an unofficial celebration of the president's birthday. Axios reported the parade will live up to Trump's request for a showcase the U.S. miliatary's might, with dozens of tanks, rocket launchers, missiles and more than 100 other military aircraft and vehicles participating. About 6,600 Army troops will participate, and the Army is paying to house them in area hotels. The parade route has been moved to the northwest portion of Constitution Avenue and will include a flyover of F-22 fighter jets, World War II planes and Vietnam-era aircraft. The event is scheduled to start at 6:30 p.m. EDT at 23rd Street and continue along Constitution Avenue N.W. to 15th Street. Trump will review the parade on the Ellipse. The event has an estimated cost of nearly $45 million, including more than $10 million for road repairs after the heavy military equipment passes over. The parade's estimated cost has Senate Armed Services Committee Chairman Roger Wicker, R-Miss., skeptical about its benefits. "I would have recommended against the parade," Wicker told an interviewer on Thursday, but the Department of Defense wants to use it as a recruiting tool. "On the other hand, [Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth] feels that it will be a once-in-a-lifetime opportunity for thousands of young Americans to see what a great opportunity it is to participate in a great military force," Wicker said. "So, we'll see."