Police statements by Jipson Quah in fake vaccine case involving Iris Koh allowed in court: Judge
So, six of the police statements given by suspended doctor Jipson Quah, 37 - which implicate his two co-accused Iris Koh and Thomas Chua Cheng Soon - were deemed to be admissible in court.
District Judge Paul Quan found that the investigation officers whom Quah accused of inducing him to make those statements had not done so.
Delivering his remarks on July 28, Judge Quan said any sort of inducement could well have been self-perceived by Quah.
The ruling marks the end of the ancillary hearing, or a trial within a trial, to determine the admissibility of statements Quah gave to investigation officer (IO) Ng Shiunn Jye from Central Police Division.
The issue came up during the main trial concerning Quah, his former clinic assistant Chua, 43, and Koh, 49, the founder of anti-vaccine group, Healing the Divide.
The trio allegedly conspired to falsely inform the Health Promotion Board that patients had been given Covid-19 vaccination when they had not.
During the main trial, Quah sought to throw out six of his 11 police statements on the basis they had been recorded under threat, inducement or promise by the authorities.
Top stories
Swipe. Select. Stay informed.
Singapore Tanjong Katong sinkhole backfilled; road to be repaved after LTA tests
Singapore Tanjong Katong Road sinkhole did not happen overnight: Experts
Singapore Authorities say access to Changi intertidal areas unaffected by reclamation, in response to petition
Singapore New Mandai North Crematorium, ash-scattering garden to open on Aug 15
Singapore Not feasible for S'pore to avoid net‑zero; all options to cut energy emissions on table: Tan See Leng
Singapore With regional interest in nuclear energy rising, S'pore must build capabilities too: Tan See Leng
World US and EU clinch deal with broad 15% tariffs on EU goods to avert trade war
Asia Displaced villagers at Thai-Cambodian border hope to go home as leaders set to meet for talks
The disputed statements were recorded between Jan 22 and Jan 29, 2022.
Quah claimed IO Ng told him he would not be released on bail unless he provided the names of 15 patients mentioned in his statements to the Ministry of Health.
Quah also spoke of a 'secret meeting' he had with Superintendent Tan Pit Seng, the head of investigation at Central Police Division, while he was in custody.
He said that at the meeting, Supt Tan suggested that Quah could show remorse and his willingness to cooperate by naming Koh as the mastermind of the scheme.
Evaluating the interaction between IO Ng and Quah, Judge Quan said the investigation officer was giving factual replies to Quah's queries.
The judge said: 'Dr Quah was the one who initiated the conversation about bail, (and) IO Ng was merely responding to Dr Quah with factually neutral answers expected of him.'
Additionally, before Quah had a conversation with IO Ng, he had already named 15 to 17 patients implicated in the case when his clinic was raided on Jan 21, 2022.
Judge Quan said: 'At best, Dr Quah was not certain of what IO Ng asked of him. Any inducement from (IO Ng) could well have been self-perceived.'
As for Quah's conversation with Supt Tan, the judge found that the police superintendent had met Quah as there was due cause for concern due to the latter's referral to the Institute of Mental Health (IMH).
Though some details of their meeting were disputed, Judge Quan found that Supt Tan was a credible and truthful witness and these discrepancies were not fatal to the prosecution's case.
Noting that these discrepancies could be attributed to human fallibility, Judge Quan added: 'A perfect, watertight and ironclad case would otherwise have been suspicious for an uneventful meeting that took place more than three years ago.'
Contrary to Quah's claim that he was asked by Supt Tan to name Koh as the mastermind of the scheme, the judge pointed out that Quah had already implicated Koh in two earlier police statements.
Quah had also mentioned Koh's involvement in the case to a psychiatrist during an assessment at IMH.
Quah, who was dressed in a navy three-piece suit and bow tie, listened to the ruling mostly with his eyes closed and brows furrowed.
After Judge Quan delivered his remarks, Chua said he would also like to contest the voluntary admission of his police statements and intends to engage a lawyer.
The trial continues.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Straits Times
3 minutes ago
- Straits Times
EU to suspend US tariff countermeasures for 6 months
Sign up now: Get ST's newsletters delivered to your inbox BRUSSELS - The European Union will suspend its two packages of countermeasures to U.S. tariffs for six months following a deal with U.S. President Donald Trump, a Commission spokesperson said on Monday. The EU-U.S. agreement leaves many questions open, including tariff rates on spirits, and Trump's executive order last week setting tariffs on most EU goods at 15% did not include carve-outs such as for cars and car parts. EU officials have said they expect more executive orders to follow soon. "The EU continues to work with the U.S. to finalise a Joint Statement, as agreed on 27 July," the spokesperson said in a statement. "With these objectives in mind, the Commission will take the necessary steps to suspend by 6 months the EU's countermeasures against the US, which were due to enter into force on 7 August." The retaliatory tariffs are in two parts: one in response to U.S. steel and aluminium duties, and the other to Trump's baseline and car tariffs. REUTERS
Business Times
3 minutes ago
- Business Times
US could require up to US$15,000 bonds for some tourist visas under new pilot programme
[WASHINGTON] The US could require up to US$15,000 bonds for some tourist and business visas under a new pilot programme launching in two weeks, a US government notice said on Monday (Aug 4), an effort that aims to crack down on visitors who overstay their visas. The programme gives US consular officers the discretion to impose bonds on visitors from countries with high rates of visa overstays, according to a Federal Register notice. The bonds also could be applied to people coming from countries where screening and vetting information is deemed insufficient, the notice said. US President Donald Trump has made cracking down on illegal immigration a central focus of his presidency, surging resources to secure the border and arresting people in the US illegally. The Republican president issued a travel ban in June that blocks citizens of 12 nations from entering the US on national security grounds. The new visa programme, effective Aug 20, will last for approximately a year, the government notice said. The US government launched a similar pilot programme in November 2020 during the last months of Trump's first term in office, but it was not fully implemented due to the drop in global travel associated with the Covid-19 pandemic, the notice said. REUTERS
Business Times
3 hours ago
- Business Times
Brexit's parallels with Trump tariffs tell a tale
In figuring out why the US tariff shock has not sent the economy or financial world into a tailspin, Britain's exit from the European Union trade bloc provides something of a playbook – and without a particularly happy ending. Aside from vast differences in economic scale and global reach, the two episodes bear some comparison in how they upended years of deeply integrated free trade and possibly in how business, the economy at large and financial markets reacted. The 2016 Brexit referendum and US President Donald Trump's tariffs this year were each widely billed as economic shocks that would send the financial world into paroxysms. They did not, at least not at the outset. To be sure, both were followed by dramatic downward lurches in the two countries' respective currencies. But to some extent, sterling's steep drop after the referendum vote and the US dollar's plunge on Trump's tariff plan this year helped offset some of the wider impact – at least on stock markets that are loaded with global firms with outsized foreign revenue. More broadly, however, the difficulty in isolating their immediate net impact means no 'big bang' economic crisis unfolds to prove critics right – even if their enduring legacy turns out to be a slow burn of economic potential and lost output, often obscured by multiple other crosswinds. Slow burn In Britain's case, the seismic effects of the Covid-19 pandemic distorted any attempt to easily assess Brexit when it actually happened. Tortuous negotiations with the EU meant the UK's departure eventually occurred on the eve of the health crisis in 2020, and the new trade rules did not come into force until a year later. BT in your inbox Start and end each day with the latest news stories and analyses delivered straight to your inbox. Sign Up Sign Up But in the four years between the referendum surprise and the pandemic, the UK economy never entered a recession nor recorded a negative quarterly gross domestic product print – confounding pro-EU supporters at the time and bolstering the Brexit lobby. Emerging from the twin hits, however, the economy has almost flatlined since. FTSE 100 stocks, helped by the weaker pound, kept pace with the S&P 500 and world indexes for about a year after the referendum before chronic underperformance set in. Since 2018, the UK market has lagged MSCI's all-country index by some 35 per cent. What is more, it has taken more than eight years for the pound's effective exchange rate to recover its pre-referendum levels. Few mainstream economists now doubt that Brexit has taken a serious toll on the UK economy – even if blame for that gets sprayed in multiple directions – and oceans of ink have been spilled trying to disentangle the precise impacts. One academic study by a number of Bank of England economists earlier this year concluded that uncertainty following the referendum resulted in little change in goods exports and imports before the exit was finalised. But after the new rules hit, UK imports fell 3 per cent and overall exports fell 6.4 per cent, largely because of the 13 per cent hit in exports to the EU. While this slump seems relatively modest compared to the official forecasts of the longer-term hit, the pain has been borne disproportionately by small businesses. Additionally, these findings exclude the Brexit hit to services and London's finance sector, which registered a much bigger economic dent. And the cumulative damage to London and the service sector over the next 10 years continues to worry the city. 'Lighting a fire' The US tariff story is of a completely different order, of course, as it will reverberate across the world economy. But there are some parallels, not least in certain aspects of the market reactions and the initial resilience. Economists estimate that the tariffs could lop anywhere from 0.5 per cent to 1 per cent off US GDP over time. That is a US$150 billion to US$300 billion hit which, though painful, would not be an instant crisis for an economy that is growing at a roughly 2 per cent annualised rate, where imported goods represent just 11 per cent of GDP, and where tech and artificial intelligence trends are generating considerable tailwinds. But as former White House economic adviser Jason Furman pointed out in a New York Times essay last week, the tariff damage is likely not a one-off hit. The loss of 0.5 per cent of GDP, he argued, is 'the equivalent of every household in America taking around US$1,000 and lighting it on fire – then doing it again every year. Forever.' In the end, the main point of the British comparison is to show how extreme partisan arguments on the pros or cons of such giant economic policy changes do not necessarily get resolved cleanly in adaptive, hardy and hyper-complex modern economies. The upshot is there is rarely a big crash to prove a point. And that in itself is unnerving if politically-motivated policies then appear workable on the surface and resist instant pushback – only to act as a drain on the economy over a protracted period. Many observers reasonably argue that sovereign democratic politics should always trump economic conventions and even directions. But do people eventually notice when it goes wrong? The latest YouGov opinion poll shows 56 per cent of Britons now think it was wrong to leave the EU – some nine years after their narrow vote to leave. The jury on Trump's tariffs is still out. REUTERS
