Alberta premier's request for separation referendum question approval rebuffed
On social media, Smith and Justice Minister Mickey Amery said earlier Tuesday that Albertans should be able to embark on gathering signatures 'without needless bureaucratic red tape or court applications slowing the process.'
Their remarks came after chief electoral officer Gordon McClure announced he had referred the proposed referendum question on separation to the courts so a judge could decide if it contravenes Canada's Constitution.
McClure, in a statement Tuesday, responded by saying he's merely following procedure and that the gravity of such a potential referendum invites judicial oversight and close inspection.
'In seeking the opinion of the Court, the Chief Electoral Officer is fulfilling his duty under the Citizen Initiative Act in an independent, neutral and non-partisan manner,' he said.
Story continues below advertisement
The proposed question — which needs McClure's approval before the group behind it can start gathering the signatures necessary to get it on a ballot — seeks a yes or no answer to: 'Do you agree that the Province of Alberta shall become a sovereign country and cease to be a province in Canada?'
1:52
Albertans speak about separatist sentiments on Canada Day
Amery says in his post that since the province would ultimately be responsible for implementing any referendum result, the electoral officer's request for judicial scrutiny is premature.
Get breaking National news
For news impacting Canada and around the world, sign up for breaking news alerts delivered directly to you when they happen. Sign up for breaking National newsletter Sign Up
By providing your email address, you have read and agree to Global News' Terms and Conditions and Privacy Policy
'We encourage Elections Alberta to withdraw its court reference and permit Albertans their democratic right to participate in the citizen initiative process,' he wrote.
Smith's post said she agrees with Amery, but adds she believes in 'Alberta sovereignty within a united Canada.'
McClure, in his statement, said the question is 'serious and significant,' and that it has 'the potential to have profound impact on all Albertans.'
Story continues below advertisement
He also clarified that he's specifically looking for a judge to rule if the proposed question contravenes specific sections of the Constitution, including the rights set out in the Charter, the enforcement of those rights, and treaty rights.
2:56
Alberta's UCP government lowers required threshold for citizens to initiate referendum
Smith and Amery's comments came after the group that submitted the question called the electoral officer's Monday decision a 'delay tactic.'
Opposition NDP deputy leader Rakhi Pancholi, in a statement, accused Smith and Amery of going against the administration of a law they themselves set in order to appease separatists within the United Conservative Party.
'Yet again, Danielle Smith and her UCP government's authoritarian tendencies, corruption and incompetence are on full display,' Pancholi said.
'Albertans deserve better than a government hell-bent on tearing our country apart to save their political skins.'
Tweet This
Click to share quote on Twitter: "Albertans deserve better than a government hell-bent on tearing our country apart to save their political skins."
Story continues below advertisement
Mitch Sylvestre with the Alberta Prosperity Project, whose name is attached to the application submitted to the electoral officer, has not responded to interview requests this week.
Sylvestre has said he thinks interest among Albertans in holding a separation referendum increases with every speaking event his group organizes.
'The more people that hear what the message is, the more people that will be in favour,' he said in an interview last month.
1:51
One of Alberta's referendum petition pushes moving on to next step
Provincial law says a hearing date must be scheduled within 10 days of the court referral, and McClure's office says he would have 30 days after a court ruling is issued to determine if the proposed referendum question meets other legislated requirements.
If approved, Sylvestre and the Alberta Prosperity Project would need to collect 177,000 signatures in four months to put the question of Alberta separation on a ballot.
Story continues below advertisement
In June, the chief electoral officer approved a competing question that seeks to have Alberta make it official policy that the province will never separate from Canada.
That petition, put forward by former Alberta Progressive Conservative deputy premier Thomas Lukaszuk, was approved before new provincial rules took effect that lowered the threshold for citizen-initiated referendums to get on ballots.
2:13
Alberta group proposes anti-separatism referendum: 'I'm thankful to this country'
Amery said Tuesday the rule changes were intended to make the process 'broadly permissive' and that McClure's referral to the court didn't match the intent behind the changes.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Global News
13 minutes ago
- Global News
Putin says U.S., Russia could make nuclear arms deal
Russian President Vladimir Putin said on Thursday that the United States was making 'sincere efforts' to halt the war in Ukraine and suggested Moscow and Washington could agree on a nuclear arms deal as part of a wider effort to strengthen peace. Putin was speaking to his most senior ministers and security officials on the eve of a summit in Alaska with U.S. President Donald Trump, who is pressing for an end to the war. He said in televised comments that the U.S. was 'making, in my opinion, quite energetic and sincere efforts to stop the hostilities, stop the crisis and reach agreements that are of interest to all parties involved in this conflict.' This was happening, Putin said, 'in order to create long-term conditions for peace between our countries, and in Europe, and in the world as a whole – if, by the next stages, we reach agreements in the area of control over strategic offensive weapons.' Story continues below advertisement His comments signaled that Russia will raise the issue of nuclear arms control as part of a wide-ranging discussion on security when he sits down with Trump in Anchorage for the first Russia-U.S. summit since June 2021. Get breaking National news For news impacting Canada and around the world, sign up for breaking news alerts delivered directly to you when they happen. Sign up for breaking National newsletter Sign Up By providing your email address, you have read and agree to Global News' Terms and Conditions and Privacy Policy Russia and the United States have by far the biggest nuclear arsenals in the world. The last remaining treaty between them that limits the numbers of these weapons is due to expire on February 5 next year. The New START treaty covers strategic nuclear weapons – those designed by each side to hit the enemy's centers of military, economic and political power – and caps the number of deployed warheads at 1,550 on each side. Both are likely to breach that limit if the treaty is not extended or replaced. 2:49 Trump warns 'severe consequences' if Putin doesn't end war in Ukraine In a symptom of nuclear tensions between the two sides, Trump this month said he had ordered two U.S. nuclear submarines to move closer to Russia because of what he called threatening comments by former Russian president Dmitry Medvedev about the possibility of war between the two countries. The Kremlin played down the move but said 'everyone should be very, very careful' with nuclear rhetoric. Story continues below advertisement Putin's aide Yuri Ushakov said earlier that Putin and Trump will also discuss the 'huge untapped potential' for Russia-U.S. economic ties, as well as the prospects for ending the war in Ukraine. Ushakov told reporters that the summit would start at 1930 GMT, which would be 1130 a.m. local time in Anchorage, with the two leaders meeting one-on-one, accompanied only by translators. He said delegations from the two countries would then meet and have a working lunch, and the presidents would give a joint news conference. Ushakov said it was 'obvious to everyone' that Ukraine would be the focus of the meeting, but broader security and international issues would also be discussed. He added: 'An exchange of views is expected on further developing bilateral cooperation, including in the trade and economic sphere. I would like to note that this cooperation has huge, and unfortunately hitherto untapped, potential.' Ushakov, who is Putin's foreign policy adviser, said the other members of the Russian delegation would be Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov, Defence Minister Andrei Belousov, Finance Minister Anton Siluanov and Kirill Dmitriev, Putin's special envoy for investment and economic cooperation. —Reporting by Dmitry Antonov and Moscow bureau, writing by Mark Trevelyan, editing by Philippa Fletcher)\
CBC
14 minutes ago
- CBC
Judge's decision on future of Alberta separation question review expected today
Social Sharing A judge is expected to decide today whether a special court review of a proposed Alberta referendum question on separation should go ahead. Gordon McClure, Alberta's chief electoral officer, referred the question to court last month for a judge to determine whether it violates the Constitution, including treaty rights. The group that submitted the question applied to have the referral quashed, and Court of King's Bench Justice Colin Feasby heard arguments last week. The Alberta Prosperity Project wants to ask: "Do you agree that the province of Alberta shall become a sovereign country and cease to be a province in Canada?" A lawyer for the group says judicial scrutiny is premature, since there's no guarantee enough signatures would be gathered to put the question on a ballot. He also argues the act of asking a question doesn't violate the Constitution. Lawyers for Justice Minister Mickey Amery and the chief electoral officer have not taken a position on quashing the referral. Amery and Premier Danielle Smith have criticized the electoral officer's decision to refer the question to the court, saying it should be approved and only face judicial scrutiny if it garners a majority vote in a referendum. "Alberta's government believes that the proposal is not unconstitutional and therefore should be approved and permitted to proceed," said Amery's press secretary, Heather Jenkins, in a statement last week. "It is settled law that any province is entitled to consult its population by referendum on any issue." A letter from Amery's lawyer to the judge last week said the minister plans to make submissions if there is a review. Other groups, including the Athabasca Chipewyan First Nation in northern Alberta, have said they also hope to make submissions. If the proposed question is approved, the Alberta Prosperity Project and its chief executive officer, Mitch Sylvestre, would need to collect 177,000 signatures in four months to get it on a ballot. A competing referendum question was approved by McClure in June and asks if Alberta should declare an official policy that it will never separate from Canada. Efforts to gather signatures for that proposal, put forward by former Progressive Conservative deputy premier Thomas Lukaszuk, got underway earlier this month. Lukaszuk needs to collect nearly 300,000 signatures in 90 days in order to get his question on a ballot, as his application was approved before new provincial rules with lower signature thresholds took effect.
CTV News
17 minutes ago
- CTV News
Judge's decision on future of Alberta separation question review expected today
A courtroom is seen at the Edmonton Law Courts building, in Edmonton on June 28, 2019. THE CANADIAN PRESS/Jason Franson EDMONTON — A judge is expected to decide today whether a special court review of a proposed Alberta referendum question on separation should go ahead. Alberta's chief electoral officer, Gordon McClure, referred the question to court last month for a judge to determine whether it violates the Constitution, including treaty rights. The group that submitted the question applied to have the referral quashed, and Court of King's Bench Justice Colin Feasby heard arguments last week. The Alberta Prosperity Project wants to ask: 'Do you agree that the Province of Alberta shall become a sovereign country and cease to be a province in Canada?' A lawyer for the group says judicial scrutiny is premature, since there's no guarantee enough signatures would be gathered to put the question on a ballot. He also argues the act of asking a question doesn't violate the Constitution. Lawyers for Justice Minister Mickey Amery and the chief electoral officer have not taken a position on quashing the referral. Amery and Premier Danielle Smith have criticized the electoral officer's decision to refer the question to the court, saying it should be approved and only face judicial scrutiny if it garners a majority vote in a referendum. 'Alberta's government believes that the proposal is not unconstitutional and therefore should be approved and permitted to proceed,' Amery's press secretary, Heather Jenkins, in a statement last week. 'It is settled law that any province is entitled to consult its population by referendum on any issue.' A letter from Amery's lawyer to the judge last week said the minister plans to make submissions if there is a review. Other groups, including the Athabasca Chipewyan First Nation in northern Alberta, have said they also hope to make submissions. If the proposed question is approved, the Alberta Prosperity Project and its chief executive officer, Mitch Sylvestre, would need to collect 177,000 signatures in four months to get it on a ballot. A competing referendum question was approved by McClure in June and asks if Alberta should declare an official policy that it will never separate from Canada. Efforts to gather signatures for that proposal, put forward by former Progressive Conservative deputy premier Thomas Lukaszuk, got underway earlier this month. Lukaszuk needs to collect nearly 300,000 signatures in 90 days in order to get his question on a ballot, as his application was approved before new provincial rules with lower signature thresholds took effect. This report by The Canadian Press was first published Aug. 14, 2025. Jack Farrell, The Canadian Press
