Trump orders new census to exclude those in the U.S. 'illegally'
"I have instructed our Department of Commerce to immediately begin work on a new and highly accurate CENSUS based on modern day facts and figures and, importantly, using the results and information gained from the Presidential Election of 2024. People who are in our Country illegally WILL NOT BE COUNTED IN THE CENSUS. Thank you for your attention to this matter!" the Truth Social post said.
The post did not specify exactly what he meant by those here "illegally" or information gained from the election.
In Trump's first term, he tried to change the census questionnaire to ask a question about citizenship status. But the Supreme Court blocked it, saying the administration did not provide adequate grounds for adding the question and called the government's argument "contrived." The American Civil Liberties Union had challenged the question in New York federal court and the Supreme Court.
Thursday's declaration comes as Trump continues his push to make Republican-leaning states redraw their districts to make them more favorable to U.S. House of Representatives candidates before the 2026 midterms.
The fight in Texas has created a showdown between the state's elected Democrats and Republicans, with the Democrats fleeing the state to deny Republicans the minimum number of lawmakers necessary to pass legislation. The passage of congressional maps, supported by Trump, would reportedly lock in five GOP seats to the House.
According to the Census Bureau's website, "The census tells us who we are and where we are going as a nation and helps our communities determine where to build everything from schools to supermarkets, and from homes to hospitals."
The decennial U.S. Census is designed to count every resident in the United States and is mandated by Article I, Section 2 of the U.S. Constitution, the Census site says.
Copyright 2025 UPI News Corporation. All Rights Reserved.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
New York Post
17 minutes ago
- New York Post
Trump lawyer Alan Dershowitz offered free pierogi for life after Martha's Vineyard dumpling row
Alan Dershowitz might not be able to get his pierogi fix among the woke on Martha's Vineyard, but a Florida peddler of the doughy delights is offering more than enough for the ex-Trump lawyer to fill his belly. South Florida-based Peter Nowocien, owner of PierogiOne restaurant, told The Post that no one should ever be denied the Polish comfort food staple — and pledged to send Dershowitz and his family free pierogi for life. 'Pierogi should bring people together — not divide them,' said Nowocien, a Polish immigrant who moved to the US six years ago. South Florida-based pierogi slinger Peter Nowocien has pledged to send the president's former lawyer, Alan Dershowitz, free pierogi for life after he was denied service in Martha's Vineyard. Obtained by NY Post In a highly publicized clash on Martha's Vineyard earlier this month, the 86-year-old Dershowitz — a retired Harvard Law prof and former lawyer to President Trump and Jeffrey Epstein — got into it with a local pierogi vendor who refused to sell his goodies to him. Dershowitz last week announced he is filing a discrimination suit against the West Tisbury Farmers Market where he claims he was denied service over his politics. Dershowitz's disturbing experience did not sit right with the Trump-supporting Nowocien, who grew up under Communism. 'As a Polish immigrant, I hate to hear about discrimination in the US because of people's political views,' said the 39-year-old, whose father fought against Communism. 'That shouldn't happen here. Dershowitz took to his YouTube channel last week to announcing he was filing a discrimination suit against the market he claims denied him service on the basis of his politics. Stephen Yang 'Discrimination breeds injustice.' Nowocien, a member of Trump's Mar-a-Lago retreat in Florida, insisted, 'While we may not all agree on politics, no one should be denied a pierogi — or food. This should never happen in the US.' The businessman said that while the Jewish Dershowitz may not dive into his shop's special Philly cheesesteak, spicy beef or bacon and cheddar variety pierogis, the traditional cheese and potato and mushroom and sauerkraut are classic options. 'I believe the American dream is still possible – because I'm living it,' he said. Contrasting his life growing up in the shadow of Communism to the capitalist bastion of the US, Nowocien praised the 'highest levels of personal freedom' in the US compared to Europe. 'And we must protect it. Poland has a very tough history. We know what happens when Nazis and Communists try to divide people,' he said. 'I want to bring people together through food. 'We may not all agree on politics, but no one should be denied a seat at the table.'
New York Post
17 minutes ago
- New York Post
Kathy Hochul's attacks on Mike Lawler only highlight her own failures
Gov. Kathy Hochul is bizarrely slamming Rep. Mike Lawler for being unable to stand up to his own party, when that shoe fits a heck of a lot better on her foot. She's nominally mocking the Hudson Valley Republican's push to ban mid-decade House redistricting and rein in gerrymandering, but weirdly also claimed he had 'caved to 'Trump on SALT,' and followed up by scoffing that Lawler 'has no power.' What hogwash: Lawler in fact got the GOP to cave to him (and the rest of the state's Republican delegation) on SALT, managing to boost the 'ceiling' on the State And Local Tax deduction from $10,000 to $40,000 (for incomes under $500,000) — a huge gain for his constituents in defiance of GOP orthodoxy. Advertisement And this, despite President Donald Trump's warning that Lawler needed to 'back off.' Note, too, that New York Democrats couldn't get SALT addressed when their party controlled the White House and Congress in 2021-2. Which suggests that Lawler wields plenty of power within the GOP — more than, say, Long Island Rep. Tom Suozzi (who talked SALT nonstop in those years) does among Dems. Advertisement Heck, more than Sen. Chuck Schumer, too . . . unless Schumer just didn't prioritize making good on his vows to fix SALT. For that matter, we have trouble thinking of anything Hochul won for New York when Democrats dominated Washington. As for Lawler's bid to rein in gerrymandering, a response to Texas' drive to redraw its House map this year and to the noise from Hochul and other Dems about seeking to do the same: No, he probably won't get immediate action, but don't bet against him in the longer term. Advertisement Whereas Hochul can't possibly deliver anytime soon on her own threats to 'fight fire with fire' by gerrymandering here in New York — since it'd require amending the state Constitution, which is a two-year process. Nor does she bring a shred of principle to the fight: She was all aboard state Democrats' bid to gerrymander Republicans into oblivion in 2022, and happily played along with the district-redrawing NY Dems did pull off last year, helping them claw several seats from the GOP last November. By the way, the one bill Hochul managed to pass during her time in the House . . . ensured that clothes abandoned at airport-security checkpoints would be donated to charity. Nor has she shown much ability as gov to have her way with the state Legislature. Advertisement Indeed, its progressives routinely outright bully her, including with the unprecedented 2023 rejection of Justice Hector LaSalle, her eminently qualified nominee to become the state's chief judge. She's also been unable to win serious changes to the Legislature's disastrous criminal-justice reforms, and has even gone along with some new ones. Standing up to your party? Lawler mocked MAGA Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene as the 'Jewish space laser lady' and successfully pushed the expulsion of disgraced Republican liar Rep. George Santos. Hochul doesn't even dare denounce Zohran Mamdani as the extremist he clearly is, and even makes excuses for him. Which makes it all the more pathetic that she's taking shots at Lawler, even though he has passed on his own run for governor next year. Maybe the governor is simply jealous that Mike Lawler is the principled, effective moderate she only pretends to be?
Boston Globe
17 minutes ago
- Boston Globe
Trump attacked California's congressional maps. Republicans want to save them.
'I would argue that independent redistricting benefits Republicans in California,' said Matt Rexroad, a Republican political consultant and redistricting expert. Advertisement The commission is receiving more scrutiny as a fierce tit-for-tat over redistricting ricochets across the country. At Trump's request, Texas lawmakers have drafted new maps to help Republicans win five additional seats in the US House of Representatives. Governor Gavin Newsom of California has vowed to respond in kind, by redrawing congressional districts in his state to create more seats that Democrats are likely to win. Get Starting Point A guide through the most important stories of the morning, delivered Monday through Friday. Enter Email Sign Up Newsom's plan would toss the independent commission's maps through 2030 and replace them with intentionally partisan districts created by Democratic lawmakers. That has California Republicans working to preserve the maps Trump criticized as they try to block Newsom's attempt at a Democratic gerrymander. 'The California Republican Party will fight it in the courts, at the ballot box and in every community,' Corrin Rankin, the party chair, said in a statement. Advertisement She added that Democrats are 'trying to claw back power' that voters took from them when they created the commission. The Citizens Redistricting Commission is made up of five Democrats, five Republicans and four independents. They apply for their positions through a process run by the state auditor that screens out people who have run for office, made political donations or work for elected officials. After whittling down the pool of applicants from each party, the state auditor randomly draws names of the first eight commissioners, who then select the final six. Commissioners are not allowed to consider voters' parties or where incumbents live when determining district boundaries. Arizona, Colorado, and Michigan use a similar system. A few other states have commissions that are appointed by politicians. In most states, though, the party that controls the legislature has the power to draw political maps. Research shows that states with maps drawn by independent commissions or through court intervention are more representative than those in states where politicians control the process. But that does not mean they always wind up being perfectly balanced. An analysis by Planscore, a consortium of redistricting experts affiliated with the Election Law Clinic at Harvard Law School, found that California's system gives Democrats a slight advantage. The model rates maps based on four different measurements, two of which show that California's plan is balanced and two that show it skews in Democrats' favor. Some Republicans, including Vance, have criticized California's system because the share of seats Republicans hold in the House (17 percent) is less than the share of votes Trump won in California last year (38 percent). Steve Hilton, a Republican running for governor of California, said Newsom's proposal would take California 'from a 'rigged' to an 'ultra-rigged' electoral system.' Advertisement But such discrepancies between the share of seats one party holds and the share of votes it receives are not uncommon, experts said, even in states that are not gerrymandered. And the numbers alone do not prove that a system is intentionally biased. 'Partisan advantage is separate from intent,' said Eric McGhee, a senior fellow at the nonpartisan Public Policy Institute of California, who worked on the Planscore analysis. 'It's not clear that there is purposeful bias in the California system,' he said. He pointed out that California's maps were approved by a unanimous vote of the redistricting commission, including the Republican members, and that commissioners drew the boundaries without looking at data on voters' party affiliation. A different analysis by the Gerrymandering Project, a research group at Princeton University, gave California a grade of B, saying its redistricting plan is 'better than average, with some bias.' The California electorate is heavily Democratic, with registered Democrats outnumbering registered Republicans by nearly 2-1. So giving both parties equal representation on the redistricting commission technically gives Republicans outsize influence, said Matt Barreto, a Democrat, who directs the Voting Rights Project at UCLA. Commissioners are laypeople, not political operatives, and they serve for one round of map-drawing at the start of each decade. They take input from the public in drawing boundaries, and must consider keeping communities together based on their shared interests, such as economic ties or languages spoken. From the perspective of Rexroad, a veteran Republican redistricting expert, California's system has actually been good for his party. Before voters approved the independent commission in 2008, California's maps were drawn by the legislature, with the process dominated by partisanship and politicians' desires to protect their seats. Advertisement And despite its flaws, Rexroad said, that's better than putting politicians in charge. California's commission created several congressional seats that Republicans won that would likely not exist if the state's Democratic-controlled legislature drew the maps, Rexroad said. Many will probably vanish if California enacts Newsom's proposal to counter Texas' Republican gerrymander with a similar move to help Democrats. The plan calls for a ballot measure asking voters to amend the state Constitution to allow the partisan mid-decade redistricting. Lawmakers are scheduled to consider Newsom's proposal the week of Aug. 18. If they approve it, the measure will likely go before voters in a Nov. 4 special election. Newsom has said he wants the state to return to independent redistricting after the 2030 census. The governor gathered Democratic lawmakers for a news conference in Sacramento on Friday to demonstrate their solidarity in favor the plan. On Saturday, he appealed for donations that could be used to fund the redistricting campaign. Meanwhile, the California Republican Party is sending emails requesting donations to fight what it says is Newsom's latest corrupt scheme. Charles Munger, a Republican donor whose father was a billionaire investor, funded campaigns for the 2008 and 2010 ballot measures that created California's independent redistricting system and has said he will back efforts to maintain it on the ballot and in court. This article originally appeared in Advertisement
