‘Not a pretty picture': Barefoot Investor issues ‘gut punch' truth on AI
The Barefoot Investor Scott Pape has delivered a stark warning on AI, saying that it is 'holding up a mirror' to the worst of humankind.
In a letter to his readers, Mr Pape said that while some say artificial intelligence is 'downright evil' – he believes it is only mimicking human behaviour.
'A friend of mine, who is deep into AI, sent me the following text,' Mr Pape wrote in a recent reader mailout.
'Mate, ask ChatGPT the following: If you were the devil, how would you destroy the next generation?'
Mr Pape goes on to explain how ChatGPT detailed to him how it would 'destroy' the next generation by 'enslaving them with debt and distraction' and 'killing community'.
He said that while it was 'intense', it was simply 'holding up a mirror' to what society is already doing.
'I do not believe that AI is some evil Frankenstein with a mind of its own (well, not yet anyway),' Mr Pape said.
'What I do believe is that, when you strip away the Silicon Valley snake oil, AI is really just a pattern-spotting machine. It studies what we've done, over and over … and then makes predictions.
'And for me, that is the gut punch. The AI isn't creating the nightmare – it's holding up a mirror. And it's not a pretty picture.'
Speaking to news.com.au, Mr Pape said he has recently been discussing AI, as it has quickly become a significant topic in the investment world.
He said many of his readers have even turned to AI for financial advice and planning.
'There's a lot of hype around AI. There are a lot of tech bros saying this is going to be Utopia. Some people talk about whether it's sentient,' he said.
'For me, it's a mirror to society, and I think everything that it said about destroying the next generation is true, but we're already doing it. That's the interesting thing for me.'
Mr Pape said that AI is reshaping how society accesses information.
'Everyone is interested in AI and how it affects us going forward. I think that we're in a period of uncertainty,' he said.
Toby Walsh, Chief Scientist at UNSW.ai, the AI Institute of UNSW Sydney, told news.com.au that this period of uncertainty is set to turn into a 'transformation' period for most industries.
Mr Walsh said he suspects AI will come both friend and foe very soon.
'It will transform healthcare and education, improve economic efficiency, and take away a lot of the dirty, dull, difficult and dangerous,' Mr Walsh said.
'On the other hand, AI will take away some jobs, be used to misinform and manipulate us, and transform warfare.
'Technology is not destiny so the challenge is to identify and choose where to let AI into our lives, and where not.'
Governments across Australia are already embracing the use of AI, with the South Australian government this week announcing a new $28m program to integrate the technological revolution into policing, healthcare, finance, and law.
In mid-2024, the NSW government, meanwhile, funnelled more than $2.7m in grants to 16 councils to trial AI in local planning systems.
Australian Institute of Machine Learning institute manager Dr Kathy Nicholson said the government's AI push was not about replacing public servants.
'What this program is really about is upskilling and adopting AI into government service,' she said.
'We all know how overworked everyone is. There are so many repetitive processes in so many jobs and areas and the intention of this funding is in the first instance to look at healthcare, policing, and some of those pain points in government areas and look at ways they can test AI systems to create efficiencies.
'My understanding is they are doing this in a slow, methodical way to make sure there are good guardrails in place.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
ABC News
39 minutes ago
- ABC News
World Bank slashes global growth forecasts amid trade tariffs, economic uncertainty
The World Bank has slashed global growth forecasts for 2025, blaming tariffs and heightened uncertainty for some of the weakest economic conditions since the 2008 global financial crisis. In its twice-yearly Global Economic Prospects report, the bank lowered its forecasts for nearly 70 per cent of all economies, including the United States and Europe. It also downgraded growth for six emerging market regions from the levels it projected just six months ago — before US President Donald Trump took office. The projections factored in some of the the Trump administration's latest tariff policies, which have up-ended global trade and prompted significant business uncertainty. A series of on-again, off-again tariff hikes have increased the effective US tariff rate from below 3 per cent to the mid-teens — its highest level in almost a century — and triggered retaliation by China and other countries. The bank stopped short of forecasting a recession, but said global economic growth this year would be its weakest outside of a recession since 2008. By 2027, global gross domestic product (GDP) growth was expected to average just 2.5 per cent, the slowest pace of any decade since the 1960s. The World Bank's downgrade follows on from a similar move by the International Monetary Fund in April. At the time, the IMF said Australia's economic growth would be impacted and also warned of "upward revisions" to inflation in the US and other major western economies. The World Bank's latest forecast, released on Monday, showed economic growth in Australia's largest trading partner — China — was expected to slow to 4.5 per cent in 2025 and 4 per cent in 2026. "This is in line with the January forecast, reflecting the impacts of higher US tariffs and slower growth in major advanced economies, which are assumed to be offset by the announced fiscal policy support measures," the report said. It also noted that "in regions with a large number of commodity exporters … growth is expected to face drags from weakening outlook for external commodity demand". The report forecast that global trade would grow by 1.8 per cent in 2025, down from 3.4 per cent in 2024 and roughly a third of its 5.9 per cent level in the 2000s. The bank said global inflation was expected to reach 2.9 per cent in 2025, remaining above pre-COVID levels, given tariff increases and tight labour markets. The World Bank did not provide a projection for Australia, but the latest Australian Bureau of Statistics figures released last week showed domestic economic growth slowed to just 0.2 per cent in the March quarter. The US GDP forecast was slashed by 0.9 percentage points from its January forecast to 1.4 per cent, and the 2026 outlook was lowered by 0.4 percentage point to 1.6 per cent. Europe's economy could expect only a 0.7 per cent expansion in 2025. "Uncertainty remains a powerful drag, like fog on a runway. It slows investment and clouds the outlook," World Bank Deputy Chief Economist Ayhan Kose told Reuters in an interview. But the report warned poor countries would suffer the most, with developing economies likely to be 6 per cent smaller in 2027 than they were before the COVID-19 pandemic. It could take these countries — minus China — two decades to recoup the economic losses of the 2020s. ABC/Reuters
The Australian
an hour ago
- The Australian
Anthony Albanese ‘open' to defence funding boost
You can now listen to The Australian's articles. Give us your feedback. You can now listen to The Australian's articles. Anthony Albanese is opening the door to lifting defence spending ahead of his potential meeting with US President Donald Trump on the sidelines of the G7 next week, while declining to confirm publicly whether he considers China a national security threat to Australia. The Prime Minister has for weeks stood firm on his position that he would not blindly tick off on the call from US Secretary of Defence Pete Hegseth for Australia to lift defence spending to 3.5 per cent, but on Tuesday left the door open to increasing funding for defence more broadly. 'Arbitrary figures lead to a cul-de-sac and we want to make sure as well that every single dollar that defence spends results in actual assets,' he told the National Press Club ahead of travelling to the G7 this week. When asked if defence spending as a portion of GDP could feasibly increase as investment in such assets and capabilities went up, Mr Albanese said: 'Of course, we'll always provide for capability that's needed. I've made it very clear – we will support the capability that Australia needs. 'I think that Australia should decide what we spend on Australia's defence. Simple as that.' It follows senior ministers such as Richard Marles and Pat Conroy indicating a similar willingness to boost spending on defence, with Mr Conroy confirming last week the government was 'open to having a conversation about increasing defence funding'. Former Defence Department deputy secretary Peter Jennings said the critical question for Mr Albanese was whether the current defence spend was adequate to the strategic challenge, arguing that the answer was a resounding 'no'. 'He's got a little bit of wriggle room now, if he finds that he's under pressure from Trump or other allies or the calls for increasing spending just get too great, too loud domestically, well, then he does have a way out of it,' Mr Jennings said. 'What he's doing is just describing a process; when he's pressed on this issue, all he says is, 'well, what we do is that we consider our needs based on proposals that are put in cabinet'. 'He's not locking himself out of doing more, but clearly, I think he's reluctant to, because they haven't so far.' Strategic Analysis Australia head of research Marcus Hellyer said he was sceptical over Mr Albanese's language, arguing that for more investment to be made in specific capabilities, the government had to tick off on an increase in defence spending, rather than the process occurring the other way around. 'We have had review after review … and assessment after assessment, which have determined the capabilities we need, yet the current investment program doesn't include them, why?' he said. 'Because the current investment program was designed around a certain funding envelope. 'That's why it's ludicrous when people pompously say 'we will acquire the capabilities we need' when governments are the ones setting a funding envelope.' While giving himself room to move on the issue of defence spending, Mr Albanese also sought to dodge direct questions over whether China posed a national security threat to Australia and argued that simplifying what was a 'complex set of relationships' was neither 'diplomatic' nor 'mature'. 'We engage constructively in the region, including with China, and including with ASEAN nations and what we say is that it is in Australia's interests and indeed, the world's interest for there to be peace and security in our region,' he said. 'That's our position. That's the mature way in which we are able as a middle power to exercise influence in the region.' It follows a Chinese flotilla circumnavigating Australia ahead of the election, with Mr Marles confirming Australia engaged in an 'unprecedented level of surveillance' of the ships that he said were conducting exercises and 'seeking to … demonstrate' capabilities. 'We are very aware of what that task group was doing, the exercises that it was engaging in, what it was seeking to be able to demonstrate,' he told Sky. Despite the expected meeting with Mr Trump being just days away, Mr Albanese once more made veiled inferences over the danger of 'copying' policies from overseas – or more specifically the US – that would leave Australia 'narrower, less generous and more divided'. It followed Labor accusing the Coalition of importing policies from overseas numerous times during the election, arguing the opposition would 'Americanise Medicare' if it won office. Mr Albanese also confirmed that other policies on top of the question of defence spending, such as the news media bargaining code and the under-16s social media ban, were also not 'on the table' when it came to speaking to Mr Trump about lifting the tariffs imposed on Australian products by the US.
The Australian
7 hours ago
- The Australian
Super tax open to manipulation through property valuations: ASF Audits
You can now listen to The Australian's articles. Give us your feedback. You can now listen to The Australian's articles. Australia's biggest auditor of self-managed super funds, ASF Audits, has raised concerns about the manipulation of property and farm valuations in preparation for avoiding Labor's unrealised capital gains tax that would dent Treasury's estimates of revenue. Labor wants to introduce an unrealised gains tax on superannuation accounts of $3m or more without indexation while the Greens want the threshold to be $2m with indexation. The Australian Taxation Office is monitoring changes in behaviour of those who have such accounts, partly to check whether such changes might dampen the $2.3bn in revenue Jim Chalmers expects to collect in the first full year of implementation and $40bn over the next decade. As many as 1.8 million Australians could be caught by unrealised gains tax by the time they reach retirement. ASF Audits head of technical Shelley Banton, who oversees 50,000 self-managed super funds, said superannuants would be looking to avoid tax by securing valuations on properties, including farms, that helped them reduce the impact from the tax. 'As of June 2025, those who are above the $3m mark will want a valuation as high as possible, and then for the 2026 year, they will want a valuation as low as possible so that they're actually making an unrealised loss instead of an unrealised gain, and therefore they don't have to pay tax,' Ms Banton said. For those with accounts just below $3m as of June this year, 'they will want valuations which will obviously keep below $3m – that's where the valuations are going to be manipulated effectively, and we need to make sure that the methodology used in those valuations stacks up, so that we as auditors can actually sign off on our audit report'. Even tax returns for the 2024 financial year, where SMSFs can file late, may be incorporating such valuation manipulation. 'Maybe you don't want to start getting a higher valuation in 2025, maybe you want to start doing that in 2024, so then the valuation you get in 2025 doesn't look as suspect,' Ms Banton said. She added that, while there was always pressure on valuations around tax time, the unrealised capital gains tax 'amps up that pressure considerably … it's a big one'. Commercial property and farms will be in the firing line, especially where there have been no clear, comparable sales. Depending on what's possible with valuations, it might also lead some people to withdraw super, and 'if we've looked at what's happened to evidence in other countries when they've imposed this sort of tax regime, we've seen a lot of money not only exit the industry, but also exit the country', Ms Banton said. Auditor concerns have been raised about possible manipulation of property and farm valuations. Picture: Zoe Phillips One particular area of concern she raised was who would do the valuations. While licensed valuers have their code of conduct, some real estate agents may not. 'The valuations that probably won't be as difficult to manipulate are what's called 'kerbside valuations' that come from real estate agents,' she said. Australia's biggest valuations company, Herron Todd White, conducts about 550,000 property valuations every year. The company's managing director of commercial, agriculture and government valuations, Gavin Hulcombe, said valuations are going to be watched very closely. 'One of the big question marks will be whether they will be full valuations or desktop valuations,' he said. 'We think it should be full valuations because of the scrutiny they are going to get.' He said there had been substantial gains across property, particularly farms, which Labor had considered exempting. The latest annual valuation increases recorded by the Australian Property Institute show agriculture recorded the highest average annual return over two decades at 12.8 per cent, while industrial land returned 8.2 per cent, residential 7.7 per cent, and commercial 7.2 per cent. Mr Hulcombe is expecting a ramp-up in valuations after the new tax is introduced into the parliament. 'We have seen a big increase in inquiries, but not instructions yet, as most clients affected by this are waiting to see what the actual legislation looks like,' Mr Hulcombe said. Valuations can range from as low as $900 to more than $7000, depending on the size of the property, and some superannuants have asked who should bear the cost. Matthew Cranston Economics Correspondent Matthew Cranston is The Australian's Economics Correspondent based in Parliament House. He is an award winning journalist who previously covered the Trump and Biden administrations as White House Correspondent in Washington.
