Five candidates run in High School District 218, but only two contested
Incumbents Thomas Kosowski, Candice Cantelo and Steve Radice are seeking reelection to the seven-person board with Thomas McGinnis and Jennifer Bednarczyk challenging.
District 218 holds elections based on seven subdistricts, so the seats sought by the candidates depend on where they live. The districts include Eisenhower High School in Blue Island, Richards High School in Oak Lawn and Shepard High School in Palos Heights.
McGinnis, who lives in Crestwood, is challenging Kosowski, who lives in Alsip, according to Cook County filings. Bednarczyk, Cantelo and Radice are running unopposed.
District 218 saw structural and leadership changes at the beginning of the school year under Superintendent Josh Barron. New principals at Richards and Shepard are part of Barron's plan of restructuring the district to build on academic improvements seen in recent years.
McGinnis said Wednesday he works as a physical education teacher in Cook County District 130, a feeder school of District 218, and is running to continue improving students' lives. He also works directly with high school students as a coach and driver's education instructor.
'We're working together for a common goal — to make the kids' lives better, make the schools better, make the teachers want to be at the schools,' McGinnis said. 'I want District 218 to be a place that people brag about and people want to send their kids to.'
McGinnis said he is an advocate for 'equality and inclusion.'
'I know that's a big buzz word,' McGinnis said. 'There's been a huge push now for social emotional learning, especially with the pandemic.'
He said as a teacher, he noticed students struggling more with communication since the COVID-19 lockdowns and hopes to encourage programs that build those relational skills.
Kosowski did not respond to requests for comment from the Daily Southtown.
In the uncontested races, Radice, of Oak Lawn, was appointed to the board last spring. He said he didn't have any particular interest in school board leadership at the time, but has since grown fond his board colleagues and making decisions that support students and staff.
'I enjoy having my finger on the pulse of what's going on in the community, helping make sure things are done right, or at least for the right reasons,' Radice said Thursday.
He is retired from the village of Oak Lawn, where he was director of economic development.
Radice said he has effortlessly fallen in sync with the rest of the board, who he said are 'very in tune with things we should be doing or shouldn't be doing.'
He said he's supportive of facilities projects underway at Shepard and Eisenhower and is excited to see them through completion.
Fellow uncontested incumbent Cantelo said in a written statement to the Daily Southtown she teaches in District 130 and has worked at the Blue Island Park District for 20 years. She was first elected in 2021 with the motivation to 'provide our communities with an educator's view on pivotal decisions that directly affect our youth,' she said.
Cantelo said she is proud of the district's financial management, and her approach to minimize taxpayer strife amid record high property taxes is to maximize the value of each dollar spent.
'This includes evaluating expenses, seeking alternative funding sources and engaging in transparent communication with the community regarding our financial decisions,' she said. 'I will also continue to support our fiscal responsibilities while making it a priority our staff is well paid for their hard work while continuing to grow state of the art facilities for our students.'
Radice said he hasn't heard complaints about property taxes from constituents but similarly understands the importance of fiscal responsibility.
'Most of us are homeowners, so you can't make a decision based on just personal gains or losses,' Radice said. 'The better the school district, the more you can offer at the schools, and then the property values increase.'
Bednarczyk also did not respond to requests for comment from The Daily Southtown.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
New York Post
7 hours ago
- New York Post
Want to fix the nation's broken higher-ed system? Look to the South
Universities in the American South are becoming models for fixing higher education. After the COVID lockdowns and amid antisemitic violence and the anti-American and DEI-infused agendas that have taken hold over the past two decades, Southern colleges are now displacing the broken universities in the Northeast that were once benchmarks for elite education. The number of Northeastern high-school students going to Southern colleges has nearly doubled in the last 20 years, thanks largely to lower costs and less-ideologically driven campus cultures. College-admissions experts note that the rise in these schools' popularity has allowed them to become more selective, boosting their prestige even further among high-school students. From 2014 to 2024, the last full year for available admissions data, Auburn University's freshman-class acceptance rate decreased from 85% to 46%; Clemson University's dropped from 52% to 38%. The trend line holds even for the South's most selective colleges: Rice University's acceptance rate dipped from 14% to 8%; Emory University's, from 26% to 15%. By contrast, elite Northeastern universities have only been able to maintain their enrollments by taking in more foreign students. Why are young people are flocking to Southern universities? Because, on the whole, they're run better. They take a pragmatic approach to education that's attractive to students who want to learn without the far-left craziness that prevails at so many schools. As an adjunct professor at the University of Kentucky, I'm immersed in a common-sense-oriented culture that's absent at elite Northeastern schools, one that lets administrators run the institution more sensibly based on what works best and not the optics of a vocal minority's radical ideology. This summer, the University of Kentucky swiftly fired a professor who launched an online petition calling for international warfare against Jews. About the same time, Columbia University was agreeing to a $221 million settlement with the Trump administration over its multi-year failures to police protesters who caused millions of dollars in damage and harassed peers in the name of far-left ideology pushed by their professors. The contrast could not be starker. Common-sense governance in higher education inspires leaders to be pragmatic and take action to keep students safe and the campus running normally. Pragmatism translates into rational decision-making and logical solutions across all areas of university life. The Universities of Florida and North Carolina systems, for example, have among the strongest track records of enforcing DEI bans and fortifying campus safety against wanton protesters. These policies transcend collegiate bureaucracies and change campus cultures for the better. At the University of North Carolina, students shut down their peers' anti-American protest by raising the American flag in front of them. At the University of Florida, Jewish students felt reassured after Oct. 7 because then-President Ben Sasse immediately issued a zero-tolerance statement for campus antisemitism. Southern universities' resolve to defy far-left craziness resonates with prospective college students because the results give young people positive visions of what they can experience on campus, achieve as students and accomplish after graduation. When learning devolves into activism, education loses its purpose as a tool for practical future success. Seminar discussions and quad gatherings simply won't translate into good jobs after graduation. Students fleeing the Northeast are reacting to that disconnect between college as a stagnant, unserious experience versus a real vehicle for future success. Southern universities are more disposed to traditional approaches to education, which prioritizes civics education and reinforces the campus as a place for cultivating intellectual and spiritual growth. Public institutions like the University of South Carolina and North Carolina State University have recently invested millions on civic-engagement curriculum. Texas, Florida and Tennessee have also allocated millions to beef up civics and classical education at their state universities. And Southern schools are more willing to welcome students of faith — a draw for some. The 2023 Christian revival at Asbury University in Kentucky was an expression of students' attraction to traditional education. The 16-day prayer celebration numbered 20,000 participants and inspired thousands more at Baylor, Texas A&M and Auburn to hold similar events that year. Students said their search for truth, connection and self-discovery in a society dominated by hyper-politicization motivated them to attend such events. Northeastern colleges thought pursuing radical change through social-justice activism would keep them on top — but that course has only precipitated their decline in reputation and relevance. They could learn much from the South. Zachary Marschall is editor-in-chief of Leadership Institute's Campus Reform and an adjunct assistant professor of arts administration at the University of Kentucky.
Chicago Tribune
14 hours ago
- Chicago Tribune
Illinois' rental assistance program has restarted. Here's what you need to know.
Struggling to pay your rent? Need to get paid for rent you are owed? There's a solution for those issues again after a two-month hiatus: Illinois' court-based rental assistance program reopened on July 31. While the program saw a third of its funds wiped away for the 2026 fiscal year that began July 1, $50 million in state funds are available. The reduction came as rents in Chicago keep rising and after the state grappled with serious fiscal challenges when balancing its budget this year, issues exacerbated by a federal government focused on axing spending. State lawmakers cut spending in various areas beyond housing as well. The state rental assistance program was previously funded by federal aid distributed during the COVID-19 pandemic and focused on helping tenants experiencing COVID-19-related hardships and at risk of eviction. The program has helped tens of thousands of renters and landlords since its inception in 2020. In the 2025 fiscal year, the inaugural year as a state-funded effort, more than $63 million in aid was distributed to help more than 7,680 families facing eviction. Around 39% of aided households were extremely low income, earning less than $36,000 a year for a household of four, the state said. The need was greater than the Illinois Housing Development Authority, the group in charge of administering the funds, expected, the agency said, which is why the program closed about three weeks before the end of the last fiscal year. Eviction filings in Cook County have hovered around pre-pandemic levels since 2022. Here's what you need to know about the state's court-based rental assistance program: Eligible tenants have to make 80% or less of the area median income and do not have to be facing a COVID-19-related hardship. For a household of four in Chicago, the income eligibility threshold is $95,900 or less, according to the Chicago Department of Housing's area median income calculations. For this year's round of assistance, the state said tenants will be ineligible if they have received aid in the last 18 months. Renters do not have to prove their citizenship status and must have an active eviction case due to nonpayment of rent to qualify. Housing providers are not allowed to evict tenants during the grant's coverage period for nonpayment of rent. For tenants whose landlords are unwilling to participate in the program, the state offers up to two months of future rent payments to help them find a new place to live. Renters in Chicago and Cook County maintain the right to stay in their homes if they pay their debts in full to their landlord at any time before an official eviction order is filed. Tenants and landlords can receive up to $10,000 in rental assistance per eviction case. This is a reduction from last year's $15,000 ceiling when the program was better funded. Kristin Faust, the Illinois Housing Development Authority's executive director, previously told the Tribune this decision was made based on data from last year's program and conversations with legal aid, tenants and landlords. The average grant amount last year was around $8,300, or eight months of rent. The authority estimates about 6,500 households will be able to receive assistance this year. The money can go toward paying past-due rent, up to $700 in court costs — up from $500 last year — and up to two months of future rent. To apply for the Illinois Court-Based Rental Assistance Program, go to The court-based rental assistance program is just one aspect of the state's eviction diversion program, known formally as the Early Resolution Program. Tenants and small landlords can also receive legal aid to help settle eviction cases before they go to trial. Those resources can be found at or by calling (855) 956-5763. The central hub for eviction help in the state is a website called Eviction Help Illinois: There are also separate rental assistance dollars allocated to the Illinois Department of Human Services, with $89.5 million total (including the $50 million court-based program) earmarked to support those efforts this fiscal year, the state said. More information for IDHS housing support programs can be found here: A three-year Chicago pilot program aiding low-income households with legal representation was recently extended through the end of the year thanks to carryover funds from its initial grant (federal stimulus money from the pandemic era) and city dollars, said Michelle Gilbert, legal and policy director for Law Center for Better Housing, one of the organizations involved in the program. The city will need to appropriate more funds in next year's budget (starting Jan. 1, 2026) for the program to continue.
Boston Globe
14 hours ago
- Boston Globe
Forget about Epstein. This 20-point polling gap should really worry Trump.
Almost impressively, Trump has gone on the offensive to push the Epstein story (and the awkward ties to his former friend) out of the daily news cycle. In recent weeks, we've seen aggressive ICE raids, threats to charge former President Barack Obama with treason, gerrymandering fights across the country, a federal takeover of the Washington police force, and now a high-profile meeting with Russian President Vladimir Putin. The tactic seems to be working: Get Starting Point A guide through the most important stories of the morning, delivered Monday through Friday. Enter Email Sign Up But Trump can't simply wish away persistent inflation concerns — both real and perceived. And in an environment where economic sentiment often drives elections, this could soon become a much bigger problem for Trump and Republicans. Advertisement The latest government report showed a key measure of inflation Advertisement Polls suggest voters have noticed. Trump's approval rating has been sliding since April. Today, about 46 percent of Americans approve of his job performance, while 52 percent disapprove, according to the In other words, the political danger here is not speculative. It's already measurable. It's also, like the Epstein problem, self-inflicted. Trump clearly fueled the Epstein controversy, both while out of office and now through his decision to break a campaign promise. Economists say his policies are doing the same for inflation. Tariffs have always been politically risky; they function as a tax on imports that eventually trickles down to consumers. Trump, however, has shown no sign of abandoning them. It's worth noting the contrast with Joe Biden's presidency, when inflation became a central political liability heading into the midterms and last year's election. Biden's inflation spike was largely attributed to snarled supply chains as the economy reopened from the pandemic and the spike in oil prices from the Ukraine war, exacerbated by the massive COVID relief spending he pushed. By comparison, Trump's inflation problem appears to be rooted more completely in his own policy choices, particularly on trade. Advertisement The irony is that Trump's 2024 victory was powered more by economic discontent than any other factor. Now, less than a year into his second term, those same voters may be reassessing that assumption as prices continue to rise. Two questions loom. First, what, if anything, will Trump do to bring prices down? So far, there's little indication he plans to soften his tariff stance. Second, will Democrats seize this moment to hammer inflation as a clear and objective failure of Trump's leadership? History suggests they might and that voters could respond. The Epstein headlines may fade, but prices for a wide variety of consumer goods don't appear to be. James Pindell is a Globe political reporter who reports and analyzes American politics, especially in New England.
