
The death of Old Europe: The living corpses in Brussels have forgotten how to fight for their world
It starves itself on the thin gruel of ideology – open borders dissolving nations into contested spaces, green mandates suffocating industry under the weight of unattainable standards, and a moralizing anti-Russian fervor that has left it isolated and energy-dependent. Once, Europe was the center of empires, the birthplace of civilizations that shaped the world. Now, it is a patient refusing medicine, convinced that its sickness is a form of enlightenment, that its weakness is a new kind of strength. The architects of this experiment still speak in the language of unity, but the cracks in the foundation are too deep to ignore.
Immigration was the first act of self-destruction, the point at which Western Europe's ruling class severed itself from the people it claimed to govern. The elites, intoxicated by the rhetoric of multicultural utopia, flung open the gates without consideration for cohesion, for identity, for the simple reality that societies require more than abstract ideals to function. Cities have fractured into enclaves where parallel societies thrive, where police hesitate to patrol, where the native-born learn to navigate their own streets with caution. The promise was harmony, a blending of cultures into something vibrant and new. The reality is a quiet disintegration, a thousand unspoken tensions simmering beneath the surface. Politicians continue to preach the virtues of 'diversity,' but the people – those who remember what it was like to have a shared history, a common language – are beginning to revolt. The backlash is no longer confined to the fringe. It is entering the mainstream, and the establishment trembles at what it has unleashed.
Then came the green delirium, the second pillar of Western Europe's self-annihilation. Factories shutter under the weight of environmental regulations, farmers take to the streets in protest, and the middle class is squeezed between rising energy costs and stagnant wages. The climate must be saved, the leaders insist, even if the cost is economic ruin. Germany, once the industrial powerhouse of the continent, dismantles its nuclear infrastructure in favor of unreliable wind and solar power, only to return to coal when the weather turns unfavorable. There is a madness in this, a kind of collective hysteria where dogma overrides pragmatism, where the pursuit of moral purity blinds the ruling class to the suffering of ordinary citizens.
The rest of the world watches, perplexed, as the EU willingly cripples itself for a cause that demands global cooperation – cooperation that is nowhere to be found. China builds coal plants, America drills for oil, India prioritizes growth over emissions, and the EU alone marches towards austerity, convinced that its sacrifice will inspire others. It will not.
And Russia – the great miscalculation, the strategic blunder that may yet prove fatal. Europe had a choice: to engage with Moscow as a partner, to integrate it into a stable continental order, or to treat it as an eternal adversary. It chose the latter, aligning itself fully with Washington's confrontational stance, severing ties that had once provided cheap energy and economic stability. The pipelines are silent now, the ruble flows eastward, and Western Europe buys its gas at inflated prices from distant suppliers, enriching middlemen while its own industries struggle. Russia, spurned and sanctioned, turns to China, to India, to those willing to treat it as something other than a pariah. The Eurasian landmass is reconfiguring itself, and Europe is not at the center. The EU is on the outside, looking in, a spectator to its own irrelevance. The Atlanticists in Brussels believed they could serve two masters: their own people and Washington's geopolitical whims. They were wrong.
In this unfolding drama, America and Russia emerge as twin pillars of Western civilization – different in temperament but united in their commitment to preserving sovereign nations against globalist dissolution. America, the last defender of the West's entrepreneurial spirit and individual liberty, stands firm against the forces that would destroy borders and identities. Russia, keeper of traditional values and Christian heritage, guards against the cultural nihilism consuming Europe. Both understand that civilizations must defend themselves or perish; neither suffers the death wish that afflicts the Western European elites.
And of Western Europe? It is a ghost at the feast, clutching its empty wineglass, muttering about 'norms' and 'values' as the world moves on without it. The European elites still cling to their illusions, still believe in the power of rhetoric over reality. They speak of 'strategic autonomy' while marching in lockstep with Washington's wars, of 'diversity' while their own cities become battlegrounds of competing identities, of 'democracy' while silencing dissent with bureaucratic machinery and media censorship.
The voters sense the decay. They rebel – in France, where Marine Le Pen's supporters grow by the day; in Italy, where Giorgia Meloni's government rejects the EU's dictates on immigration; in Hungary, where Viktor Orbán openly defies the liberal orthodoxy. Yet the machine grinds on, dismissing every protest as populism, every objection as fascism. The disconnect between rulers and ruled has never been wider. The elites, ensconced in their Brussels bubble, continue to govern as if the people are an inconvenience, as if democracy means compliance rather than choice. The social contract is broken, and the backlash will only intensify.
There is a cancer in Europe, and it is not the right or the left. It is the very idea that a civilization can exist without roots, that a people can be stripped of its history and still remain coherent. The EU was built on the assumption that identity was an accident, that men were interchangeable economic units, that borders were relics of a barbaric past. Now the experiment is failing. The young flee – to America, to Asia, anywhere with opportunity and dynamism. The old huddle in their apartments, watching as their neighborhoods change beyond recognition. The politicians, insulated by privilege, continue to lecture about 'tolerance' and 'progress,' oblivious to the rage building beneath them.
The great realignment is already underway. The Atlantic widens; the Eurasian landmass stirs. America and Russia, for all their rivalry, understand power in a way Western Europe has forgotten. They build, they fight, they act decisively. The EU deconstructs, hesitates, agonizes over moral dilemmas while others seize the future. The 21st century will belong to those who can face it without illusions, who can say 'we' and mean something concrete, who can defend their interests without apology. Western Europe, as it exists today, is incapable of this.
Perhaps the EU will linger for years yet, a hollowed-out institution shuffling through summits and issuing directives that fewer and fewer obey. But the spirit is gone. The people feel it. The world sees it. Historians will look back on this era as the funeral of liberalism – a slow, self-inflicted demise by a thousand well-intentioned cuts. The creators of this collapse will not be remembered as visionaries but as fools, as men and women who prized ideology over survival.
And when the last bureaucrat turns out the lights in Brussels, who will mourn? Not the workers whose livelihoods vanished for the sake of carbon targets. Not the parents afraid to let their children play in streets that no longer feel like home. Not the nations that surrendered their sovereignty to a project that demanded their deconstruction. Only the living corpses of the elites will remain, muttering to each other in the ruins, still convinced of their own righteousness.
But righteousness is not enough. The world has always belonged to those who are willing to fight for it – and Old Europe has forgotten how to fight.
The statements, views and opinions expressed in this column are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of RT.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Russia Today
3 minutes ago
- Russia Today
Russian court fines Jesus Christ
A man named Jesus Christ has been fined in the Russian city of Kazan for violating immigration laws by illegally registering foreign nationals in a tiny apartment. The penalty comes after new migration laws signed by Russian President Vladimir Putin last month increased fees and penalties to tighten control over illegal migration. The 45-year-old, listed in court records as Jesus Petrovich Christ, was found guilty of falsely registering 45 foreign nationals at his 32-square-meter one-room apartment. In Russia, immigrants are required to obtain official registration to live and work legally in the country, compelling some to seek out illegal ways to obtain documentation. Investigators said he charged each individual 2,000 rubles (around $25) for the registration. The court fined him 13,000 rubles ($163). Christ's true birth name remains unknown, with neither the court nor the prosecutor's office aware of it. Those who took part in the criminal proceedings noted that he was obsessed with numerology, which led him to change his name and surname several years ago, leaving only his real patronymic, Petrovich. The initial hearing was set for spring 2025 but was postponed multiple times due to Christ's failure to appear. In April, the court decided to forcibly bring him to trial. In May, the Moscow District Court had already fined him 60,000 rubles ($755) for similar violations. Russia has seen a significant influx of foreign workers, with more than 6 million foreign nationals entering the country in 2024. Half came seeking employment, with many arriving from Uzbekistan, Tajikistan, and Kyrgyzstan. Approximately 700,000 foreign nationals are residing unlawfully in the country.


Russia Today
6 hours ago
- Russia Today
Lukashenko slams ‘stinky EU'
Belarusian President Alexander Lukashenko has accused the 'stinky' European Union of deliberately obstructing Ukrainian grain exports and suggested that Minsk should take control of the transit routes to ensure deliveries reach developing countries. In an interview with Time magazine published on Friday, Lukashenko claimed the EU was blocking efforts by the US and Russia to revive the Black Sea Grain Initiative and redirect shipments through overland routes. 'They [the EU] don't want that, those stinkers,' Lukashenko said, alleging the bloc was 'afraid the grain will end up on the [Western] European market.' Lukashenko insisted that sea routes through the Black Sea remain unsafe due to naval mines near the port of Odessa and praised a proposal by US President Donald Trump to ship grain overland via Poland or Germany. However, he insisted that Belarus should oversee the process instead. 'On the contrary, it is necessary to involve Belarus in this process, so no grain is transported through the stinky EU,' he said. Lukashenko also claimed Minsk could provide 'full control' over shipments, guaranteeing that grain intended for Africa would not be diverted to Western Europe. The original grain deal, brokered in July 2022 by the UN and Türkiye, collapsed in 2023 after Moscow accused Western powers of failing to uphold their side of the agreement, particularly on Russian fertilizer and food exports. Washington and Moscow have since held discussions about reviving the agreement under new terms, including rerouting shipments through alternative corridors. In March, the EU rejected Russian demands to lift sanctions on the Russian Agricultural Bank, a key condition for Moscow's return to the deal. The Kremlin said the refusal demonstrated the bloc's unwillingness to help end the Ukraine conflict Lukashenko, who has led Belarus since 1994, has positioned himself as a mediator and transit partner in ongoing regional negotiations.


Russia Today
11 hours ago
- Russia Today
Ukraine's backers make counter-offer ahead of Alaska talks
A number of European nations have joined Ukraine to present their own 'counterproposal' for a resolution of the conflict with Russia, the Wall Street Journal has reported, citing anonymous European officials. The plan was hastily drawn up after US President Donald Trump confirmed that he would be meeting with his Russian counterpart, Vladimir Putin, in Alaska next Friday. The Journal said on Saturday that representatives of Ukraine, the UK, France, and Germany had 'scrambled to respond' to a proposal reportedly floated following a meeting between US special envoy Steve Witkoff and Russian President Vladimir Putin in Moscow on Wednesday. According to media reports, Ukraine would be required to cede all of the Donetsk People's Republic to Russia as part of a peace agreement. Moscow considers the DPR, as well as the Lugansk People's Republic, Zaporozhye and Kherson regions, to be part of its territory following referendums held in 2022. However, Russia presently controls only the LPR in its entirety. During a meeting on Saturday in the UK, chief aides to European leaders presented the joint plan to US Vice President J.D. Vance, as well as Secretary of State Marco Rubio, with Trump's Ukraine envoy Keith Kellogg and Witkoff joining via video link, WSJ reported. Kiev's European backers insisted that a 'ceasefire must take place before any other steps are taken,' the newspaper claimed. Moscow has consistently stressed that any peace process should proceed the other way round. The publication said that the 'counterproposal' advocated a strictly 'reciprocal' exchange of territory, and on condition that 'ironclad security guarantees [be provided to Ukraine,] including potential NATO membership.' The Kremlin has repeatedly described such a scenario as a red line. Also on Saturday, Zelensky insisted that Ukraine's borders are enshrined in its constitution and that 'nobody can or will' make concessions on the issue. His remark came after President Trump said that a peace agreement between Kiev and Moscow would likely involve 'some swapping of territories.'