Sebi Considers Review Of Categorisation Of Mutual Fund Schemes To Address Overlap
Sebi suggests that MFs should be permitted to offer both Value and Contra funds, subject to the condition that no more than 50% of the schemes' portfolios would overlap.
Markets regulator Sebi on Friday proposed to review the categorisation of mutual fund schemes in a bid to improve clarity and address the issue of overlap in portfolios of schemes. The proposal came after Sebi noted a significant overlap of portfolios in some schemes and felt the necessity to introduce clear limits to the industry to avoid schemes with similar portfolios.
In its consultation paper, Sebi suggested that mutual funds should be permitted to offer both Value and Contra funds, subject to the condition that no more than 50 per cent of the schemes' portfolios would overlap at any point in time.
The overlap condition should be monitored at the time of New Fund Offer (NFO) deployment and subsequently on a semi-annual basis using month-end portfolios.
In case of a higher-than-permitted overlap, the Asset Management Company (AMC) should rebalance the portfolios within 30 business days. An extension of up to an additional 30 business days may be obtained from the Investment Committee (IC) of the AMC, with the reasons for granting the additional days properly recorded and maintained.
'If the deviation persists beyond this period, investors of both the schemes shall be given an exit option without any exit load," Sebi proposed.
The regulator proposed that mutual funds should be permitted to invest the residual portions of their portfolios in equity, debt (including money market instruments), gold and silver, Real Estate Investment Trusts (REITs), and Infrastructure Investment Trusts (InvITs) under the equity category schemes.
Sebi also recommended changes in the nomenclature of debt schemes to enhance investor understanding. It proposed that the term 'Duration' be replaced with 'Term' for better clarity. Additionally, the 'Low Duration Fund' should be renamed as 'Ultra Short to Short Term Fund' to better reflect the investment objective, and the name of each debt scheme should indicate the fund's duration, such as Overnight Fund (1 Day) or Medium Term Fund (3 to 4 years).
The regulator further proposed that mutual funds should be allowed to launch sectoral debt funds, provided that no more than 60 per cent of the portfolio in a sectoral debt scheme overlaps with any other sectoral debt or debt category scheme.
This move should also ensure sufficient availability of investment-grade papers within the chosen sectors.
Moreover, mutual funds should be permitted to invest the residual portion of their debt category schemes in REITs and InvITs, except for those with shorter durations, such as Overnight Fund, Liquid Fund, Ultra-Short Duration Fund, Low Duration Fund, and Money Market Fund, subject to regulatory limits applicable to this asset class.
In terms of arbitrage funds, Sebi suggested that such schemes should be allowed to take exposure in debt instruments only through government securities with a maturity of less than one year and in repos backed by government bonds. For equity savings schemes, the regulator proposed that net equity exposure and arbitrage exposure should be mandated between 15 per cent and 40 per cent.
With respect to hybrid category schemes, mutual funds should be allowed to invest the residual portion in REITs and InvITs, except in Dynamic Asset Allocation and Arbitrage Funds.
Furthermore, mutual funds should be permitted to offer different types of schemes within the solution-oriented category, offering varying mixes of equity and debt components.
Sebi also recommended that mutual funds be allowed to offer solution-oriented life cycle fund of funds with a target date. These schemes could include lock-in features tailored for specific financial goals such as housing, marriage, and other objectives.
Additionally, the schemes may offer varying lock-in periods, such as 3 years, 5 years, or 10 years, to suit different investor needs.
Also, Sebi proposed a change in terminology, suggesting that the word 'fund' in scheme names be replaced with 'scheme'. For example, instead of 'Large Cap Fund', it should be referred to as 'Large Cap Scheme'.
Overall, mutual fund offerings would continue to be grouped under five broad categories — Equity-oriented schemes, Debt-oriented schemes, Hybrid schemes, Solution-oriented schemes, and Others.
The Securities and Exchange Board of India (Sebi) has sought public comments till August 8 on the proposals.
(This story has not been edited by News18 staff and is published from a syndicated news agency feed - PTI)
Stay updated with all the latest news on the Stock Market, including market trends, Sensex and Nifty updates, top gainers and losers, and expert analysis. Get real-time insights, financial reports, and investment strategies—only on News18.
view comments
First Published:
Disclaimer: Comments reflect users' views, not News18's. Please keep discussions respectful and constructive. Abusive, defamatory, or illegal comments will be removed. News18 may disable any comment at its discretion. By posting, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Indian Express
2 hours ago
- Indian Express
Jane Street seeks more time from Sebi to respond to July 3 interim order
New York-based proprietary trading firm Jane Street on Monday asked the Securities and Exchange Board of India (Sebi) more time to respond to July 3 interim order, which accused the group of engaging in manipulative trading practices. 'We are engaging constructively with Sebi and have sought an extension to respond to the interim order issued on July 3,' Jane Street group said in a statement. The group said it is committed to conduct that upholds the integrity of India's capital markets and contributes to their continued development. On July 3, the Sebi ordered the seizure of alleged Rs 4,843.57 crore 'illegal gains' Jane Street made through manipulative trading in Nifty futures. The markets regulator also barred the firm from participating in any securities trading until the amount was recovered. In its interim order, Sebi had given 21 days (from July 3) to Jane Street to file their reply or objections. In response to the Sebi order, the US firm, on July 14, deposited Rs 4,843.57 crore in an escrow account with a lien in favour of the regulator. The group clarified that the deposit was made without prejudice to its legal rights and remedies, which it intends to pursue. Following the deposit of the money, Sebi permitted Jane Street to resume operations on July 21. However, the US firm will stay away from trading in both the options and cash markets until it resolves several issues with the regulator, a report by Reuters had said. Jane Street, a major player in India's derivatives space, had strongly rejected Sebi's allegations. In internal communications, the firm called the regulator's claims 'extremely inflammatory' and said it was deeply disappointed.
Time of India
2 hours ago
- Time of India
Panasonic in talks to buy controlling stake in Focus Lighting and Fixtures
Panasonic may acquire a controlling stake in Focus Lighting and Fixtures. This would be Panasonic's second electricals acquisition in India. The deal involves buying the Sheth family's shares and a public offer. Negotiations are advanced, but due diligence has revealed issues. The acquisition could cost Panasonic ₹526 crore. Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads New Delhi | Kolkata: Panasonic is in talks to buy a controlling stake in business-to-business (B2B) light fittings maker Focus Lighting and Fixtures , in what would be its second acquisition in the electricals segment in India after nearly two decades, said people aware of the Sheth family, founding shareholders of Focus Group, owns 55% of the NSE-listed company. The remainder is with the public including individuals and bodies is looking to acquire the promoters' entire shareholding in Focus Lighting, said the people cited above. A potential deal would trigger a mandatory open offer to the company's public shareholders for at least 26% stake as per Sebi guidelines, they acquisition would cost Osaka-headquartered Panasonic about ₹526 crore, including the 26% open offer, based on Focus Lighting's current market capitalisation, as per ET's to the people cited above, the negotiations are at an advanced stage, but the due diligence of Focus has brought to light issues which need to be addressed before inking the contract.A spokesperson for Panasonic's electric works business divisions (erstwhile Anchor) said the speculation "appears to be unfounded." "No such information has been shared, and to our knowledge, no such facts exist," he which listed on NSE's small and medium enterprises (SME) board in 2017, did not respond to ET's company makes light fittings for commercial uses such as retail store facades and interiors. Its clientele includes Reliance Retail and DLF The Indian B2B market for lighting products and fixtures is mostly unorganised with the presence of several small and local companies in the segment. Matsushita Electric , Panasonic's previous avatar, had acquired household name Anchor Electricals in 2007, getting a foothold in the business-to-customer (B2C) home electricals and light fitting electric works business, which includes LED lighting products, switches and wires, cables, smart home products and energy solutions is the largest revenue contributor for Panasonic in India, accounting for over half of Panasonic Life Solutions India Pvt Ltd sales, the flagship entity. The rest comes from AC, televisions, industrial and system solutions, lithium-ion battery trading, and smart factory solutions of SMT machines, robotic arms and welding efforts to acquire control of Focus Group underscores its strategy to enhance its footprint in the B2B segment, its biggest revenue-generator globally.
&w=3840&q=100)
Business Standard
2 hours ago
- Business Standard
Renault Group gets CCI nod to acquire remaining 51% stake in Indian JV
Fair trade regulator CCI on Monday approved French auto major Renault group's proposal to buy out its Japanese partner Nissan's remaining 51 per cent stake in their Indian manufacturing joint venture -- Renault Nissan Automotive India Pvt Ltd. Renault Group B V and its nominee Renault SAS are acquiring the entire shareholding of the Nissan entities in Renault Nissan Automotive India Pvt Ltd (RNAIPL). "The proposed combination involves the acquisition of equity shares and fully paid-up zero coupon non-convertible redeemable preference shares held by Nissan Motor Company Ltd," the Competition Commission of India (CCI) said in a release. Japan (Nissan) and Nissan Overseas Investments B V (Nissan Overseas) are collectively divesting their stakes in the joint venture. Renault Group B V is engaged in the designing and manufacturing of passenger cars and light commercial vehicles worldwide and Renault SAS is engaged in the construction, maintenance and manufacturing of parts and equipment. "CCI approves the proposed acquisition of certain shareholding of Renault Nissan Automotive India Pvt Ltd by Renault Group BV and Renault SAS," CCI said in a post on X. In March this year, Renault Group said it will buy out Nissan's 51 per cent stake in their Indian joint venture RNAIPL for an undisclosed amount. The JV firm operates the alliance's Chennai-based production facility, which rolls out models for both Renault and Nissan brands. As part of a global framework agreement signed between Renault Group and Nissan, Renault Group would own 100 per cent of Renault Nissan Automotive India, by acquiring the 51 per cent shareholding currently held by Nissan. The company, however, did not disclose the financial details of the transaction. Nissan will continue to use RNAIPL for sourcing vehicles for India and for exports in the coming years, Renault Group said. Meanwhile, Renault Group and Nissan will continue to operate jointly, Renault Nissan Technology & Business Center India (RNTBCI) in which Nissan will retain its 49 per cent stake and Renault Group will hold its 51 per cent stake. In a separate release, the CCI cleared the proposed combination involving Anantam Highways Trust, Alpha Alternatives Fund Advisors LLP and others (Sponsor and Sponsor Group) and Dilip Buildcon Ltd (DBL) and DBL Infraventures (DIPL). Anantam Highways is a Sebi-registered infrastructure investment trust (InvIT). DBL is engaged construction of road and highways. DIPL is a wholly owned subsidiary of DBL, and belong to the DBL Group. Deals beyond a certain threshold require approval from the regulator, which keep a tab on unfair business practices as well as promotes fair competition in the marketplace. (Only the headline and picture of this report may have been reworked by the Business Standard staff; the rest of the content is auto-generated from a syndicated feed.)
