Derek Eland: The war artist sharing untold stories from Ukraine
Derek Eland is a former British paratrooper who jumped to a different career as a war artist, documenting the personal stories of soldiers and civilians in conflict zones. Eland has traveled to Afghanistan and most recently Ukraine to collect handwritten accounts from people on the frontlines – soldiers, medics, artists, and civilians. He gained remarkable access to frontline units and captured poignant accounts of loss, determination, and the desire for peace, despite the ongoing violence.
Speaking to Al Arabiya's Riz Khan, Eland said: 'There's a desperate yearning for peace, but when you talk to them, there's also a strong sense that that peace will not be at any price. The soldiers I met said, 'We definitely don't want to give up our land. This is our homeland, our motherland and the blood of our soldiers is in the ground.'
Eland believes these personal narratives are crucial to understanding the human toll of the war and providing a platform for voices that may otherwise go unheard. His goal is to give a voice to those experiencing the realities of war and to provide a human perspective beyond the political narratives.
As Eland looks to the future, he is considering taking his work to other conflict zones, such as Gaza, where he hopes to continue giving voice to those affected by war and displacement.
Watch the full Riz Khan Show interview above.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Saudi Gazette
an hour ago
- Saudi Gazette
Putin accepts plan for US, EU to provide NATO-style security guarantees to Ukraine
NEW YORK — Russian President Vladimir Putin has agreed to allow the United States and its European allies to offer Ukraine security guarantees similar to NATO's Article 5 as part of potential peace deal efforts, U.S. special envoy Steve Witkoff said Sunday. 'We were able to win the following concession: that the United States could offer Article 5-like protection, which is one of the real reasons why Ukraine wants to be in NATO,' Witkoff said in an interview on CNN's 'State of the Union.' He called the shift 'game-changing,' noting it was the first time Moscow had accepted such a framework. Article 5, the cornerstone of NATO's collective defense, holds that an attack on one member is considered an attack on all 32 alliance members. The offer of similar guarantees by Washington and its allies could serve as a workaround to Putin's long-standing opposition to Ukraine joining NATO. Witkoff, who joined Secretary of State Marco Rubio during Friday's summit with Putin at a U.S. military base in Alaska, shared few details on how the proposed security architecture would be the move was welcomed in Brussels. European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen, speaking alongside Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy, said: 'We welcome President Trump's willingness to contribute to Article 5-like security guarantees for Ukraine and the 'Coalition of the Willing' — including the European Union — is ready to do its share.'Zelenskyy expressed cautious optimism, noting that while the willingness was encouraging, the framework remained vague. 'It is important that America agrees to work with Europe to provide security guarantees for Ukraine,' he said.'But there are no details on how it will work, and what America's role will be, Europe's role will be, and what the EU can do.'Witkoff also said Russia had agreed to pass legislation ensuring it would not violate the sovereignty of other European states, another significant gesture, though the details of enforcement remain defended Trump's decision not to insist on an immediate ceasefire, saying the pivot toward a broader peace framework reflected the summit's unexpected progress.'We covered almost all the other issues necessary for a peace deal,' Witkoff who appeared on several Sunday morning shows, emphasized that Ukraine was not present at the summit and therefore no final decisions could be made. 'There's not going to be a truce unless Ukraine is in the room,' Rubio said on ABC's 'This Week.'He warned that imposing new sanctions now would reduce diplomatic leverage. 'The minute you issue new sanctions, our ability to get them to the table will be severely diminished,' he said on NBC's 'Meet the Press.'Rubio and Witkoff both noted that while the summit yielded signs of moderation from Moscow, critical issues—such as territorial control—remain unresolved.'The fundamental issue, which is some sort of land swap... could not have been discussed at this meeting,' Witkoff said. 'We intend to discuss it on Monday.'Trump is set to host Zelenskyy and several European leaders at the White House on Monday to continue negotiations.'Maybe not enough for a peace deal, but we are on the path for the first time,' Witkoff added. — Agencies
Saudi Gazette
2 hours ago
- Saudi Gazette
Trump seeks trilateral summit with Russia and Ukraine on Aug. 22: Report
WASHINGTON — US President Donald Trump is aiming to convene a high-stakes trilateral summit with Russian President Vladimir Putin and Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy as early as Aug. 22, according to a report published Saturday by Axios. The effort comes on the heels of Trump's summit Friday with Putin in Anchorage, Alaska, their first in-person meeting since the start of Russia's invasion of Ukraine in February 2022, and Putin's first trip to U.S. soil for bilateral talks since 2007. During a phone call with European leaders following the meeting, Trump proposed arranging a three-way summit with Putin and Zelenskyy, according to Axios. The U.S. president is expected to host Zelenskyy at the White House on Monday and has invited several European leaders to attend. While Zelenskyy's participation is confirmed, Putin has not yet publicly committed to attending the proposed trilateral summit. At a press conference after the Alaska summit, Trump said he and Putin had made 'some headway' but acknowledged no formal agreement was reached to end the war. Putin, for his part, said the two leaders had reached an 'understanding,' without providing details. The idea of a trilateral summit raises both hope and skepticism in European capitals, as pressure builds to find a negotiated end to the war while ensuring Ukraine is not forced into an unfavorable peace. — Agencies
Saudi Gazette
2 hours ago
- Saudi Gazette
US and 3 European allies split over UN peacekeepers in Lebanon ahead of critical vote
WASHINGTON — The Trump administration is pushing to end the United Nations peacekeeping mission in southern Lebanon, a move strongly opposed by key European allies, raising tensions ahead of a critical vote at the U.N. Security Council later this month. At stake is the future of the U.N. Interim Force in Lebanon, or UNIFIL, a multinational force that has monitored hostilities between Israel and Hezbollah since 1978. Its mandate expires at the end of August and must be renewed by the Security Council for operations to continue. The U.S. administration, led by Secretary of State Marco Rubio, views the mission as ineffective and costly, arguing that UNIFIL has failed to disarm Hezbollah and restore full Lebanese government control in the south. According to administration officials and congressional aides, Rubio signed off last week on a plan to shut down the force within six months. The decision follows a broader Trump-era foreign policy shift to reduce U.S. funding and engagement in multilateral institutions. Washington has already slashed contributions to UN peacekeeping operations and withdrawn from several U.N. agencies. France, Italy, and Britain — whose troops contribute significantly to UNIFIL — are urging a one-year extension, arguing that an abrupt end would create a dangerous security vacuum. With Lebanon's military still under-resourced and stretched thin, European diplomats warn that Hezbollah could swiftly exploit any withdrawal. Israel, which has long criticized the peacekeepers' effectiveness, reluctantly agreed to the one-year extension, according to U.S. and European officials. The debate comes amid growing friction between Washington and its European allies over foreign policy issues ranging from Israel's war in Gaza to the war in Ukraine and international trade. France's latest draft resolution, seen by The Associated Press, extends UNIFIL's mandate by a year without a firm end date — a key U.S. demand. The draft mentions the Council's 'intention to work on a withdrawal,' language that U.S. officials say is too vague. Even if the mandate is renewed, officials say the mission may face reductions due to financial pressures. A U.N. official familiar with the talks said one compromise under discussion is scaling back troop numbers while expanding UNIFIL's technological surveillance capabilities. There are currently around 10,000 U.N. peacekeepers in southern Lebanon. The Lebanese army, which also patrols the area, has approximately 6,000 soldiers there, with plans to reach 10,000. UNIFIL has been criticized by Hezbollah supporters, who accuse it of cooperating with Israel, and by Israel, which claims the force has ignored Hezbollah's growing arsenal. During and after last year's war between Israel and Hezbollah, several Hezbollah weapons caches and tunnels were discovered near UNIFIL bases. Sarit Zehavi, a former Israeli intelligence officer, said the peacekeepers had 'damaged the mission to disarm Hezbollah.' She cited weapons finds near UNIFIL positions as evidence. U.N. spokesman Stephane Dujarric confirmed that unauthorized rocket launchers and explosives had been discovered again this week and reported to Lebanese authorities. Lebanese officials have urged that the mission be extended, citing the country's ongoing economic and political crises and the military's limited capacity. Retired Gen. Khalil Helou said that ending the mission now would force troops to be pulled from other vulnerable areas. 'UNIFIL is maybe not fulfilling 100% of what the West or Israel want,' he said. 'But for Lebanon, their presence is important.' U.N. spokesman Dujarric said the mission remains vital to regional stability. UNIFIL spokesperson Andrea Tenenti added that the decision is up to the Security Council: 'We are here to assist the parties in implementation of the mission's mandate and we're waiting for the final decision.' — Agencies
