logo
A populist party that began on YouTube helped disrupt Japan's ruling coalition

A populist party that began on YouTube helped disrupt Japan's ruling coalition

Minta day ago
TOKYO—The surprising success story of Sunday's election in Japan was a political party born online during the pandemic that tapped into a wellspring of discontent over issues galvanizing voters worldwide: inflation, immigration and a political class dismissed as elitist and out of touch.
Sanseito—which translates as the participate-in-politics party—is into organic farming and worshiping the Emperor, and isn't keen on vaccines or foreigners. It polled fourth in Sunday's parliamentary election, helping to deprive Prime Minister Shigeru Ishiba's ruling coalition of its majority in the Japanese Diet's upper house, an upset that complicates trade negotiations with the U.S. just days before sweeping new tariffs are due to come into force.
The breakthrough marks yet another example of right-wing challenges to established political parties that have transformed politics in Europe and the U.S., such as Germany's AfD, Britain's Reform UK or Donald Trump's Make America Great Again movement.
Just as those groups have drawn on angst over immigration, Sanseito's anti-foreigner rhetoric has found fertile ground in a country that is slowly opening up to newcomers to fill jobs in its rapidly aging society and where worries over surging tourism abound.
'There is frustration there and they profited from that frustration," said Tobias Harris, founder of Washington, D.C.-based consulting firm Japan Foresight.
Sanseito didn't immediately respond to a request for comment.
Sanseito leader Sohei Kamiya has railed at shadowy globalists he says are keeping Japan down.
Sanseito has its roots in a conservative YouTube channel started by its current secretary-general, a spiky-haired former teacher called Sohei Kamiya, and two other political junkies who have since left the party.
Dissatisfied with Japan's political old guard, their channel was devoted to setting up a political party from scratch and Sanseito was founded in early 2020.
Kamiya ran on a Sanseito ticket in 2022 in an upper house election, winning a seat that wasn't up for grabs this time around. Including Kamiya, Sanseito now has 15 lawmakers in the 248-member upper house and three in the 465-member lower house. That gives it some scope to put forward its own ideas as bills but no chance of seeing them pass without other parties' support.
Sanseito advocates a bundle of policies similar to other right-wing populists, whose platforms are distinct from the free-market, small-government conservatism that dominated the electoral right for years. It supports expansionary fiscal policies including more spending on child care and tax cuts. In line with the pronatal policies of leaders such as Hungary's Viktor Orban, it wants women to be less career-focused and have more children.
It also espouses antivaccine views that brought it to national attention during the Covid-19 pandemic and is hostile to chemical fertilizers, echoing some of the themes of U.S. Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. Make America Healthy Again program. Sanseito bemoans the fact that Japan imports food, saying its goal is for 100% self-sufficiency in food by 2050.
In stump speeches, Kamiya frequently railed at shadowy globalists he says are keeping Japan down. The party wants to ditch Japan's pacifist constitution that was drafted largely by the U.S. in the wake of World War II, and create a new one that harks back to an earlier, more spiritual age when the Japanese emperor was the head of state and the focus of national reverence.
Analysts say Sanseito's success in Sunday's vote owes much to two phenomena: immigration and inflation, as well as a general dissatisfaction with the ruling Liberal Democratic Party and the unpopular Ishiba, especially among right-leaning voters who feel the party has drifted too far from the conservatism of the late Prime Minister Shinzo Abe.
Sanseito has pledged to limit immigration and curb the rights of foreigners living in Japan, whose numbers had grown to 3.5 million as of Feb. 1, according to Japan's statistics bureau, from 1.7 million a decade earlier. Such an increase, while small in terms of Japan's population of around 120 million, has been jarring for some Japanese, many of whom are also upset at high levels of tourism and foreign purchases pushing up real-estate prices, both of which Sanseito promised to rein in.
Consumer prices in Japan, meantime, rose 3.3% year over year in June, outpacing wage growth and squeezing household incomes.
After a long spell of low or no inflation, Japanese voters are extra sensitive to price increases, said David Boling, director of Japan and Asian trade at Eurasia Group, a consulting firm. The run-up in inflation after the pandemic proved fatal for incumbent governments in a run of elections around the world in 2024; in Japan the reckoning has just come a little later, he said.
The question now is whether Sanseito can build on its gains and get a shot at real political power. It has only a marginal presence in the Japanese parliament's more-powerful lower house, and has shown little appetite to work with big parties to advance its agenda. Japan's political system frequently throws up new political groups that vanish quickly.
'New parties are cheap in Japan. They come and go," said Paul Sheard, an economist and author who followed Japan for years in senior positions at financial firms including S&P Global and Nomura.
Still, he said Sanseito has identified a rich potential seam of voters who believe they aren't being catered to by the main parties, including a swath of younger, social-media savvy Japanese attracted to the party's do-it-yourself, antiestablishment ethos.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

India restarts visas for Chinese tourists after a 5-year pause
India restarts visas for Chinese tourists after a 5-year pause

Hindustan Times

timean hour ago

  • Hindustan Times

India restarts visas for Chinese tourists after a 5-year pause

India on Wednesday announced the resumption of tourist visas for Chinese nationals, making another step in the normalisation of bilateral ties that were taken to their lowest point in six decades by a military standoff on the Line of Actual Control (LAC). External Affairs Minister S Jaishankar meets China President Xi Jinping, in Beijing. (@DrSJaishankar X) The move, unveiled by the Indian embassy in Beijing on social media, came almost two months after India and China agreed in April on the resumption of the Kailash Mansarovar Yatra after a gap of five years – seen as the first major breakthrough in people-to-people exchanges. A post on WeChat by the Indian embassy in Beijing said Chinese nationals could apply for tourist visas to visit India by filling applications online from July 24. The post said applicants could then book appointments to submit documents at centres in Beijing, Shanghai and Guangzhou. Barring the social media post, there was no official word from the Indian side on the development. People familiar with the matter confirmed the resumption of tourist visas for Chinese citizens and said on condition of anonymity that the process for accepting applications will now commence. India had imposed wide-ranging restrictions on visas for Chinese nationals after border skirmishes between troops of the two countries in April-May 2020 triggered the face-off in Ladakh sector of the LAC. A brutal clash in Galwan Valley in June 2020 that killed 20 Indian soldiers and at least four Chinese troops sent bilateral ties plummeting to their lowest point since the border war of 1962. China did not impose restrictions on visas for Indian nationals though travel between the two countries was impacted by the lack of direct flights. China issued about 85,000 visas to Indians, mainly students, tourists and business professionals, between January and June 2025. Before the Covid-19 pandemic and the standoff on the LAC, India issued almost 200,000 visas to Chinese nationals in 2019, but the figure declined to just 2,000 in 2024. The two sides reached an understanding on disengagement of forces along the LAC last October, and this was followed by a meeting in the Russian city of Kazan between Prime Minister Narendra Modi and President Xi Jinping, who agreed to revive several mechanisms to normalise bilateral relations and address the long-standing border dispute. Since then, there have been several meetings between the foreign and defence ministers and national security advisers of India and China, and the Special Representatives for the border issue – NSA Ajit Doval and Chinese foreign minister Wang Yi. These meetings have resulted in forward movement in normalising relations, including the resumption of the Kailash Mansaorvar pilgrimage to a holy mountain and lake in Tibet. External affairs minister S Jaishankar met his Chinese counterpart Wang Yi in Beijing on July 14 when he visited China for a meeting of foreign ministers of the Shanghai Cooperation Organisation (SCO) and discussed ways to take bilateral ties forward. This was Jaishankar's first visit to China after the start of the stand-off on the LAC. 'The two sides agreed to take additional practical steps, including travel to each other's country and direct flight connectivity, for facilitating people-to-people exchanges,' an Indian readout issued after the meeting said. Jaishankar said at the meeting that India and China must build on 'good progress' in normalising their relations by addressing issues related to the border, including de-escalation, and avoiding 'restrictive trade measures and roadblocks' to economic cooperation. He was referring to China's curbs on exports of rare earth minerals – in many of which Beijing has a near monopoly – and fertilisers. The restrictions on rare earth exports have been officially raised through diplomatic channels by India, especially in view of the impact on manufacturers of electric vehicles.

India to resume tourist visas for Chinese citizens after five-year freeze
India to resume tourist visas for Chinese citizens after five-year freeze

The Print

timean hour ago

  • The Print

India to resume tourist visas for Chinese citizens after five-year freeze

China suspended visas to Indian citizens and other foreigners around the same time due to the COVID-19 pandemic, but lifted those restrictions in 2022, when it resumed issuing visas for students and business travelers. Tensions between the two countries escalated following a 2020 military clash along their disputed Himalayan border. In response, India imposed restrictions on Chinese investments, banned hundreds of popular Chinese apps, and cut passenger routes. Hong Kong: India will resume issuing tourist visas to Chinese citizens from July 24 this year, its embassy in China said on Wednesday, the first time in five years as both countries move to repair their rocky relationship. Tourist visas for Indian nationals remained restricted until March this year, when both countries agreed to resume direct air service. Relations have gradually improved, with several high-level meetings taking place last year, including talks between Chinese President Xi Jinping and Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi in Russia in October. India and China share a 3,800 km (2,400-mile) border that has been disputed since the 1950s. The two countries fought a brief but brutal border war in 1962 and negotiations to settle the dispute have made slow progress. In July, India's foreign minister stated that both countries must resolve border friction, pull back troops and avoid 'restrictive trade measures' to normalise their relationship, he told China's Foreign Minister Wang Yi. This report is auto generated from the Reuters news service. ThePrint holds no responsibility for its content. Also Read: 'Will work out a deal with China where it'd give death penalty for fentanyl trafficking,' says Trump

The new arsenal of punitive sanctions
The new arsenal of punitive sanctions

Deccan Herald

time3 hours ago

  • Deccan Herald

The new arsenal of punitive sanctions

Have you ever considered economic sanctions or tariffs to be weapons of mass destruction (WMD)? How about drones and social media? Wikipedia describes a WMD as a biological, chemical, radiological, nuclear, or any other weapon that can kill or significantly harm many people or cause great damage to artificial structures, natural structures, or the biosphere. However, this definition is by no means officially accepted since most governments limit their definition of WMD to chemical, biological, radiological, and nuclear weapons (CBRN) capable of a high order of destruction or causing mass casualties. By including the word 'biosphere', the Wikipedia definition takes into account the damage caused to the environment when CBRN weapons are any case, neither of the two definitions specifies what constitutes significant harm to people or structures and how this is to be measured. In the 9/11 terrorist attacks, commercial aircraft carrying full tanks of jet fuel were used. Accepted definitions of WMD certainly do not include commercial aircraft as weapons, do they?.Calls for including certain classes of cyberweapons (e.g., drones and malware) have been rejected because they cannot directly injure or kill human beings as efficiently as guns or bombs, and they do not meet the legal and historical definitions of WMD. History cannot be altered, but surely, the laws surrounding WMD can be origin of the term 'weapon of mass destruction' can be traced back to 1937 when William Lang, the Archbishop of Canterbury, in his Christmas address, spoke of the appalling slaughter and suffering inflicted on Spain and China and remarked, "Who can think without horror of what another widespread war would mean, waged as it would be with all the new weapons of mass destruction?" He was acutely aware of the 1937 bombings of cities by the fascists in Spain and by the Japanese in China as well as the chemical attacks on Abyssinia by Italy in updated legal definition of WMD, one that takes into account different contexts in which what constitutes a weapon, the nature of the destruction (kinetic, economic, psychological etc.), and the scale of destruction, is called for. This difficult task should be entrusted to the United Nations and not left to individual governments, no matter how powerful, or select organisations such as NATO, which hardly represent much of the world..I would suggest that the current WMD interpretation of the word 'weapon' go beyond its conventional CBRN meaning and be made flexible to include sanctions, tariffs, drones, and social media, all of which have proven themselves capable of producing a great deal of harm, be it physical, economic, or psychological, across the globe. When applied to social media, WMD stands for weapon of mass destruction as well as weapon of mass serve as a foreign policy tool used by the US, EU, and others to influence the behaviour of other countries. The US has imposed two-thirds of the world's sanctions since the 1990s. According to The Washington Post, in 2024, it imposed "three times as many sanctions as any other country or international body,' and 60% of low-income countries (e.g., Somalia, Darfur, and Libya) were under some form of US financial sanction. Comprehensive sanctions are currently in place for all of Cuba, North Korea, Iran, Russia, and Syria. Sanctions prohibit US citizens from engaging in financial transactions with individuals, entities, or governments on the sanctions list, except by licence from the US Government, and require the US to oppose loans by the World Bank and other international financial institutions. The sanctions on Cuba and Iran date back to 1962 and 1979, respectively. If a country is sanctioned by the US, a third country wishing to conduct business with the sanctioned country is itself subject to US and sanctions are directed at individuals (e.g., Putin) or entities (International Criminal Court) that engage in activities contrary to US foreign policy or national security goals. The ICC has been sanctioned because it dared to brand the genocidal leader of Israel, Benjamin Netanyahu, as a war criminal and issued a global warrant for his arrest. There are currently 37 active sanctions programmes – not one of them is directed at Israel despite its genocidal activities in why should sanctions be made part of any redefinition of WMD? Consider this. US sanctions on Venezuela have resulted in over 100,000 deaths since the country was prevented from access to medicine and medical devices. In May 1996, Madeleine Albright, the US Ambassador to the UN, when asked to comment on the fact that over 500,000 Iraqi children died from the comprehensive sanctions imposed on Iraq in 1990, and whether the price was worth it, had this to say, "I think this is a very hard choice, but the price, we think the price is worth it." She was rewarded for her callousness by being appointed US Secretary of a 2020 interview, the same Albright remarked, "We learned in many ways that comprehensive sanctions often hurt the people of the country and don't really accomplish what is wanted in order to change the behaviour of the country being sanctioned. So we began to look at something called 'smart sanctions' or 'targeted sanctions.'" This use of the word 'smart' came long before AI entered the common man's vocabulary. Denis Halliday, the UN Humanitarian Coordinator in Baghdad, Iraq, resigned in October 1998 after a 34-year career with the UN to have the freedom to criticise the sanctions regime, saying he didn't want to administer a programme "that satisfies the definition of genocide.".The 1941 siege of Leningrad has now been replaced by the 2025 sanctions on Saint Petersburg. Not much has changed in the intervening 84 years, has it?.(The writer is a retired professor; he has written extensively and presented lectures on the societal and geo-political implications of technology)

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store