logo
A populist party that began on YouTube helped disrupt Japan's ruling coalition

A populist party that began on YouTube helped disrupt Japan's ruling coalition

Mint22-07-2025
TOKYO—The surprising success story of Sunday's election in Japan was a political party born online during the pandemic that tapped into a wellspring of discontent over issues galvanizing voters worldwide: inflation, immigration and a political class dismissed as elitist and out of touch.
Sanseito—which translates as the participate-in-politics party—is into organic farming and worshiping the Emperor, and isn't keen on vaccines or foreigners. It polled fourth in Sunday's parliamentary election, helping to deprive Prime Minister Shigeru Ishiba's ruling coalition of its majority in the Japanese Diet's upper house, an upset that complicates trade negotiations with the U.S. just days before sweeping new tariffs are due to come into force.
The breakthrough marks yet another example of right-wing challenges to established political parties that have transformed politics in Europe and the U.S., such as Germany's AfD, Britain's Reform UK or Donald Trump's Make America Great Again movement.
Just as those groups have drawn on angst over immigration, Sanseito's anti-foreigner rhetoric has found fertile ground in a country that is slowly opening up to newcomers to fill jobs in its rapidly aging society and where worries over surging tourism abound.
'There is frustration there and they profited from that frustration," said Tobias Harris, founder of Washington, D.C.-based consulting firm Japan Foresight.
Sanseito didn't immediately respond to a request for comment.
Sanseito leader Sohei Kamiya has railed at shadowy globalists he says are keeping Japan down.
Sanseito has its roots in a conservative YouTube channel started by its current secretary-general, a spiky-haired former teacher called Sohei Kamiya, and two other political junkies who have since left the party.
Dissatisfied with Japan's political old guard, their channel was devoted to setting up a political party from scratch and Sanseito was founded in early 2020.
Kamiya ran on a Sanseito ticket in 2022 in an upper house election, winning a seat that wasn't up for grabs this time around. Including Kamiya, Sanseito now has 15 lawmakers in the 248-member upper house and three in the 465-member lower house. That gives it some scope to put forward its own ideas as bills but no chance of seeing them pass without other parties' support.
Sanseito advocates a bundle of policies similar to other right-wing populists, whose platforms are distinct from the free-market, small-government conservatism that dominated the electoral right for years. It supports expansionary fiscal policies including more spending on child care and tax cuts. In line with the pronatal policies of leaders such as Hungary's Viktor Orban, it wants women to be less career-focused and have more children.
It also espouses antivaccine views that brought it to national attention during the Covid-19 pandemic and is hostile to chemical fertilizers, echoing some of the themes of U.S. Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. Make America Healthy Again program. Sanseito bemoans the fact that Japan imports food, saying its goal is for 100% self-sufficiency in food by 2050.
In stump speeches, Kamiya frequently railed at shadowy globalists he says are keeping Japan down. The party wants to ditch Japan's pacifist constitution that was drafted largely by the U.S. in the wake of World War II, and create a new one that harks back to an earlier, more spiritual age when the Japanese emperor was the head of state and the focus of national reverence.
Analysts say Sanseito's success in Sunday's vote owes much to two phenomena: immigration and inflation, as well as a general dissatisfaction with the ruling Liberal Democratic Party and the unpopular Ishiba, especially among right-leaning voters who feel the party has drifted too far from the conservatism of the late Prime Minister Shinzo Abe.
Sanseito has pledged to limit immigration and curb the rights of foreigners living in Japan, whose numbers had grown to 3.5 million as of Feb. 1, according to Japan's statistics bureau, from 1.7 million a decade earlier. Such an increase, while small in terms of Japan's population of around 120 million, has been jarring for some Japanese, many of whom are also upset at high levels of tourism and foreign purchases pushing up real-estate prices, both of which Sanseito promised to rein in.
Consumer prices in Japan, meantime, rose 3.3% year over year in June, outpacing wage growth and squeezing household incomes.
After a long spell of low or no inflation, Japanese voters are extra sensitive to price increases, said David Boling, director of Japan and Asian trade at Eurasia Group, a consulting firm. The run-up in inflation after the pandemic proved fatal for incumbent governments in a run of elections around the world in 2024; in Japan the reckoning has just come a little later, he said.
The question now is whether Sanseito can build on its gains and get a shot at real political power. It has only a marginal presence in the Japanese parliament's more-powerful lower house, and has shown little appetite to work with big parties to advance its agenda. Japan's political system frequently throws up new political groups that vanish quickly.
'New parties are cheap in Japan. They come and go," said Paul Sheard, an economist and author who followed Japan for years in senior positions at financial firms including S&P Global and Nomura.
Still, he said Sanseito has identified a rich potential seam of voters who believe they aren't being catered to by the main parties, including a swath of younger, social-media savvy Japanese attracted to the party's do-it-yourself, antiestablishment ethos.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Bengaluru man arrested in Glasgow for provocative outburst on EasyJet flight, creating panic: Report
Bengaluru man arrested in Glasgow for provocative outburst on EasyJet flight, creating panic: Report

Hindustan Times

time2 hours ago

  • Hindustan Times

Bengaluru man arrested in Glasgow for provocative outburst on EasyJet flight, creating panic: Report

A 41-year-old man originally from Bengaluru was apprehended in Glasgow after creating panic onboard an easyJet flight by loudly expressing hostility toward US President Donald Trump and chanting religious slogans, according to police officials. The man, identified as Abhay Devadas Nayak, reportedly suffers from a psychiatric condition. The Bengaluru man, suffering from schizophrenia, sparked fear among passengers. (Image for representation) (REUTERS) ALSO READ | Bengaluru resident questions city's liveability after 9 years: 'We're all just surviving' Authorities have contacted Nayak's family in southern Bengaluru, who explained that he has been diagnosed with schizophrenia. Nayak is from a business family with roots in the Honnavar area of Uttara Kannada, while his siblings are doctors working overseas, The Indian Express reported. His family stated that he has traveled extensively and that his passport was issued in Bengaluru. The incident occurred on an easyJet flight traveling from London Luton airport to Glasgow on July 27, when Nayak disrupted the flight by shouting provocative statements, including threats about bombs and exclamations such as 'Death to America, death to Trump,' and 'Allahu Akbar.' Videos circulated online captured Nayak standing up, shouting, and then being restrained by fellow passengers and crew. During the scuffle, Nayak claimed that he was protesting because Trump was in Scotland that day, hoping his actions would send a message. ALSO READ | L&T terminated Corridor-2, Corridor-4 contracts of suburban rail project illegally: K-RIDE During the ordeal, Nayak told passengers that he was a refugee in the UK without a passport, possessed residency documentation for Wales, and that his earlier bomb threat was false. An ATM card in his wallet revealing his first name helped confirm his identity, the report said. ALSO READ | Japanese man compares Bengaluru airport to a luxury hotel: 'Never seen anything like this before' Scotland police reported responding to the disturbance after the plane landed in Glasgow at around 8:20 am on July 27. Nayak was taken into custody upon landing and appeared in court the following day without entering a plea. Official sources in Karnataka suggest that Nayak could be returned to India without formal charges being pressed. Public records from India show Nayak established a business, Antrix Ventures, in Bengaluru in 2010 with a relative. UK authorities have charged him with violations of the Air Navigation Order for recklessly endangering the aircraft and those onboard.

Regional blocs emerging against US tariff regime
Regional blocs emerging against US tariff regime

New Indian Express

time3 hours ago

  • New Indian Express

Regional blocs emerging against US tariff regime

The White House has just announced a new global trade regime, effective 7 August. It impacts every nation. What we are seeing unfold is not just a change in policy; it is a new global order being written by the United States. Once the lead advocate of globalization, the Trump regime is now pivoting away from free trade to a new era of protectionism. These Make-America-Great-Again (MAGA) changes will no doubt bring short term gains for some US business interests; but, long-term, they spell the erosion of US hegemony. What has been announced is the universal tariff of 10% will remain for countries with which the US has a trade surplus. For 40 nations with who the US has a trade deficit – countries like India to which the US exports less than it imports – face a base rate of 15%. Where there are no deals, rates vary from 39% for Switzerland and 35% for Canada, to a readjusted 20% for Bangladesh and 19% for Indonesia. At home in India, we were lulled into believing an interim deal was around the corner. Those who understood Donald Trump's brinkmanship and his disdain for both friend and foe, saw it coming. For Trump there are no half measures. After mocking India as a 'dead economy', the US President announced 25% tariff. In addition, he threatened a barrage of unspecified penalties if India continued to buy oil and arms from Russia. The Budget Lab at Yale University estimates that by 28 July, 2025, the average effective tariff rate imposed on imports into the US stood at 18.2 % -- the highest since 1934. It was just 2.4% in 2024, before Trump assumed office. In the short-term, the US has had a windfall. President Trump claims the US has creamed $150 billion in taxes since the new tariffs kicked in in April. Slowdown coming The immediate object of Donald Trump's new tariff regime is to stoke domestic manufacturing by making foreign-produced goods more expensive; and to bring down the massive federal deficit budget which is currently touching $1.9 trillion. It is next to impossible to turn the clock back, but that Is a different discussion. In the near term, there will be turmoil and pain. In the case of India, while government spokespersons are putting on a brave face, a slowdown is imminent. Exports will face more competition. Textiles and apparels, for instance, which compete with Bangladesh products, will be knocked out as the tariffs are lower for Dhaka. An array of sectors from jewelry to electronics are almost entirely dependent on US exports. These will go into deep freeze. Market watchers from ratings agency ICRA to brokerage house Nomura are forecasting GDP growth slowing between 30-40 basis points. This will be hard on an economy struggling to emerge from the dark recesses of the Covid pandemic. For other export-led economies in Africa and south-east Asia that are facing tariffs in the 25-35% range, the barriers to the US market will be devastating too. Meanwhile, it will be US businesses and consumers who will be paying for the higher tariffs. Manufacturing units will face higher input costs as Trump doubles down on steel and aluminum imports. An array of imported finished products too such as electronics, automobiles, toys and processed foods will potentially become more expensive. US households could see an average increase of $2,400 annually due to the tariffs, analysts say. The cascading effect of reignited inflation, and weakening consumer demand might ultimately lead to a slowdown in the U.S., and even recession, stagnation in wages and job losses. Not exactly Trump's MAGA vision he claims to be fighting for. End of US hegemony? Long-term, the chaos sown by the biting tariffs may actually contribute to building regional blocs that could challenge US' hegemony. There are historical parallels. The Smoot-Hawley Tariff Act of 1930, which massively hiked U.S. tariffs on over 20,000 imported goods, created a slew of retaliatory measures from trading partners that worsened the Great Depression. It is therefore no surprise that Trump is allergic to blocs such as BRICS as they strive to develop regional trade and an alternative currency to keep the dollar's domination at bay. As the US-dominated global trade fragments and becomes even more inequitable for the poorer nations, the building of regional markets and supply chains will intensify. As it is, Europe, Canada Japan and South Korea, who thought themselves as natural allies of the US, are now seeking local collaboration. Friedrich Merz, the new German chancellor, has called on the NATO allies for heavy investments in defense, calling the Trump regime 'unreliable'. Germany has also promoted a 500-billion-Euro fund to develop Europe as an independent energy and infrastructure hub. China-Russia trade is close to $300 billion currently, while ASEAN countries, on one hand, and the China-led Belt and Road Initiative (BRI) are developing independent partnerships in Africa and Asia to reduce dependence on the US markets and financial systems. India, too, would do well to stand its ground and not bow to US pressure to end its multilateral trade and military options. Over the years, India's regional leadership role has considerably diminished with friction with many of its neighbours including Bangladesh, Sri Lanka and Nepal. These relations have to be repaired, near-defunct bodies such as SAARC revived, and regional trade promoted.

Who's feeling the pain of Trump's tariffs?
Who's feeling the pain of Trump's tariffs?

Mint

time4 hours ago

  • Mint

Who's feeling the pain of Trump's tariffs?

In the bygone age that was 2024, America charged levies averaging just 2% on its imports of goods. In the new era of trade wars, it now has an 'effective' tariff of over 16%, the highest since the 1930s (see chart 1). (The Economist) Rates look set to go even higher. On July 31st President Donald Trump signed an executive order that significantly raises tariffs on most of America's trading partners, with the increases due to go into effect on August 7th. Duties on most products from the European Union and South Korea, which recently struck deals with America, will rise to 15%. India faces a tariff of 25%; South Africa, 30%; Canada, 35%. As we published this, Mr Trump seemed inclined to extend America's tariff truce with China. But that still leaves the world's second-largest economy facing levies of around 40% on sales to the world's largest. Who pays for these tariffs, in all their infinite variety? Most economists reckon that ordinary Americans will lose out, as prices in shops rise. Mr Trump and his coterie, by contrast, blithely insist that the rest of the world will shoulder the load by cutting their selling prices. So far, the evidence is giving the know-nothings a glimmer of hope. Mr Trump's critics in the economics profession have history and research on their side. Studies show that when a country imposes duties on its imports, its foreign suppliers often keep their prices roughly the same. The tariff is layered on top. So it was during the first Trump administration, which slapped tariffs on China and others. A study from 2019 found 'complete pass-through of the tariffs into domestic prices of imported goods'. Some foreign firms are taking a similar stance in response to Mr Trump's new levies. In April Ferrari added up to 10% to the price of its cars. Britain's Ineos said it would charge more for its Grenadier off-roader. Canon, a camera-maker, has warned dealers to brace for price increases. But the broader pattern is more benign. There is, for example, surprisingly little evidence so far of tariff 'pass-through' into inflation. In June America's 'core' consumer prices (ie, excluding food and energy) rose by 0.2% on the previous month, below the consensus estimate of 0.3%. Economists have found some evidence of tariff-induced price rises—in car parts, for instance—but they have had to look harder for it than they had expected. What explains these surprising results? American firms, not consumers, may be paying for the trade war by accepting lower profits, suggests research by Deutsche Bank. Some firms also boosted inventories before the tariffs were implemented, allowing them to avoid raising their prices for now. America's foreign suppliers may also be sharing more of the load than they did in Mr Trump's first term. Nintendo, a Japanese electronics firm, is keeping the American price of the Switch 2 games console at $449.99. Many Chinese manufacturers seem prepared to follow Nintendo and absorb duties: Fuling, a supplier of cutlery, says its clients expect it to shoulder 'part of the increased tariff costs'. TIRTIR, a South Korean beauty brand popular with American Gen Zers, has signalled that it can absorb most of the tariffs. Games Workshop, a British manufacturer of war games, also seems resigned to taking the hit, warning investors that tariffs could reduce annual profits by £12m ($16m). 'We found tentative evidence that Korean auto exporters are shouldering the cost of higher US tariffs, at least for now,' wrote Kim Jin-Wook of Citigroup, a bank, in a recent note. The Bank of Japan tracks the prices of the country's car exports to America. In yen terms, they have fallen by 26% in the past year. Some of that decline may reflect exchange-rate movements. An unchanged dollar price brings in fewer yen when the American currency is weak. But that only raises another question: why are Japan's carmakers not raising their dollar prices more vigorously in response? More comprehensive data point in a similar direction. The Economist assembled a series on export prices from a number of America's largest trading partners, including Canada, Germany and South Korea. In the past exporters in these countries have been perfectly willing to raise prices: during the inflationary surge of 2021-22, they increased them by more than 15% over a 12-month span (see chart 2). Yet in the past year the average local-currency price of their exports has fallen by 3.6%. Nothing of the sort happened during Mr Trump's first trade war. (The Economist) Some economists have noted a disconnect between what foreigners report and what American importers say they are paying. For instance, it is hard to find much evidence of plunging prices for Japanese car imports. Economists at Citi speculate that the time it takes to ship a foreign product to an American port may explain the puzzle. It 'implies a lag between falling export prices and when US import-price data would capture the decline', they say. Why might foreign suppliers be so forgiving? Some bosses worry more than before about the American consumer. With high inflation a recent memory, people already think that everything is too expensive. They have little tolerance for paying even higher prices. The opposite may be true of the foreign companies themselves. They are in a good financial position to withstand the tariffs. Aggregate margins of listed companies in emerging markets have become fatter over the past decade, increasing by over two percentage points. European firms have enjoyed similar gains. These companies can afford to take a small hit to profits, at least for now. Before long America's economy is likely to feel the pain of the trade war more acutely. Although some Chinese firms may have lowered their prices, these cuts are not nearly deep enough to offset the huge rise in tariffs they now face, points out Deutsche Bank's research. In addition, foreign companies that have borne the costs until now may not be able to bear them for ever—especially if tariff rates keep ratcheting up. The president loves defying his adversaries, in the economics profession and beyond. But he is always his own worst enemy. © 2025, The Economist Newspaper Limited. All rights reserved. From The Economist, published under licence. The original content can be found on Disclaimer: © 2025, The Economist Newspaper Limited. All rights reserved. From The Economist, published under licence. The original content can be found on

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store