
UN Unveils New Plans to Support Refugees in Sudan
The United Nations has announced new initiatives to support refugees in Sudan, emphasizing the need for immediate international solidarity to address the ongoing humanitarian crisis.
UN Secretary-General António Guterres stressed that now is the time for the global community to stand with the Sudanese people, who have historically extended generosity to their neighbors during times of hardship.
Speaking at the High-Level Humanitarian Conference in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia, Guterres highlighted Sudan's role in sheltering displaced individuals from neighboring countries, including Eritrea, Chad, South Sudan, and Ethiopia. He commended the Sudanese people's resilience and hospitality, stating that the pledges made at the conference reflect a strong commitment to humanitarian support.
$6 Billion Response Plans for 2025
Guterres revealed that the UN will launch two major response plans for Sudan in 2025:
A Humanitarian Response Plan
A Refugee Assistance Plan
These initiatives require $6 billion in funding to support approximately 26 million people inside and outside Sudan. The scale of these emergency aid requests surpasses all previous UN appeals, underscoring the unprecedented needs of the Sudanese people.
The Escalating Sudanese Crisis
Describing the Sudanese crisis as "immense and brutal," Guterres warned that the conflict is spreading across the region, necessitating urgent intervention from the African Union and the international community. He emphasized the importance of:
Protecting civilians and humanitarian workers
Ensuring safe and sustainable aid access
Halting external military support and arms flows
Push for Ceasefire and Peace Initiatives
The Secretary-General reiterated that Sudanese citizens demand an immediate ceasefire and civilian protection. He confirmed that his personal envoy, Ramtane Lamamra, is actively engaging with warring parties to explore concrete steps for peace, including the full implementation of the Jeddah Declaration.
As the holy month of Ramadan approaches, Guterres made a global appeal:
"Ramadan is a time for peace, mercy, and giving. I urge you all to use your influence for good—support humanitarian aid, uphold international law, stop hostilities, and work towards the lasting peace that the Sudanese people desperately need."
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Egypt Today
an hour ago
- Egypt Today
Egypt hosts 10 million refugees, asylum seekers, and migrants from 62 nationalities
A ship and remains of illegal migrants - CC via pxfuel CAIRO – 20 June 2025: On World Refugee Day, commemorated annually on June 20, Egypt joins the international community in honoring the resilience of millions forced to flee their homes in search of safety and dignity. The day serves as a reminder of the global refugee crisis and a renewed call for solidarity with both displaced persons and the communities that host them. Egypt has long been a safe haven for individuals fleeing conflict, persecution, and hardship. Today, the country hosts more than 10 million refugees, asylum seekers, and migrants from 62 different nationalities. In 2024, Egypt ranked second globally in the number of asylum applications submitted. Egypt's approach to refugee protection is rooted in respect for human dignity. It guarantees refugees and asylum seekers freedom of movement, access to basic services, and opportunities for integration—on par with Egyptian citizens. This inclusive policy reflects Egypt's continued commitment to its international obligations and humanitarian principles. Against a backdrop of worsening global crises and military escalations—particularly in the Middle East—Egypt emphasizes that international cooperation remains the only viable path to effectively and sustainably address refugee challenges. The growing scale and complexity of displacement underscore the need for equitable burden and responsibility sharing. In December 2024, Egypt became the first country in North Africa to adopt a dedicated legal framework on asylum by enacting the Foreign Asylum Law. On this occasion, Egypt reiterates the urgent need to mobilize international resources to support host countries in maintaining and enhancing the services provided to both refugees and their host communities. Furthermore, Egypt stresses the importance of a comprehensive approach to refugee issues—one that integrates humanitarian response with long-term development strategies to bolster the resilience of host communities. This must be accompanied by efforts to address the root causes of displacement through peace-building and conflict resolution initiatives, helping to create the conditions necessary for the voluntary, safe, and dignified return of refugees. Egypt reaffirms its commitment to continued cooperation with international organizations, especially the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR), and to advancing its efforts at regional and international levels in support of peace, development, and the protection of displaced populations.


See - Sada Elbalad
2 hours ago
- See - Sada Elbalad
Finland Approves Withdrawal from Anti-Personnel Landmine Treaty
Israa Farhan Finland's parliament has voted in favor of withdrawing from the international treaty banning the use of anti-personnel landmines, aligning the country with several of its NATO neighbors amid growing security concerns in the region. The decision, passed on Thursday with 157 votes in favour and only 8 against, will officially take effect six months after Finland formally notifies the United Nations. The move signals a significant shift in defense policy as Finland reconsiders its military strategies in response to heightened regional tensions. Several of Finland's NATO allies, including the Baltic states—Latvia, Lithuania, and Estonia—as well as Poland, have already withdrawn from the treaty. The Finnish Parliament's Foreign Affairs Committee had approved the proposal earlier in April, paving the way for the vote. The Finnish military has argued that maintaining the option to use anti-personnel mines is essential for national defense. This perspective has gained traction in recent years as the security environment in Northern and Eastern Europe has evolved rapidly. The treaty, formally known as the Ottawa Convention, came into force in March 1999. It prohibits the use, stockpiling, production, and transfer of anti-personnel landmines. Finland joined the treaty in 2012 but had maintained reservations about its limitations in military defiance scenarios. Major global powers, including the United States, Russia, China, India, and Pakistan, have never signed the treaty, citing security and strategic concerns. Finland's decision to withdraw places it in closer alignment with NATO's evolving defense posture, particularly along its eastern flank, as the alliance continues to adapt to rising geopolitical challenges. read more Gold prices rise, 21 Karat at EGP 3685 NATO's Role in Israeli-Palestinian Conflict US Expresses 'Strong Opposition' to New Turkish Military Operation in Syria Shoukry Meets Director-General of FAO Lavrov: confrontation bet. nuclear powers must be avoided News Iran Summons French Ambassador over Foreign Minister Remarks News Aboul Gheit Condemns Israeli Escalation in West Bank News Greek PM: Athens Plays Key Role in Improving Energy Security in Region News One Person Injured in Explosion at Ukrainian Embassy in Madrid News China Launches Largest Ever Aircraft Carrier Sports Former Al Zamalek Player Ibrahim Shika Passes away after Long Battle with Cancer Lifestyle Get to Know 2025 Eid Al Adha Prayer Times in Egypt Business Fear & Greed Index Plummets to Lowest Level Ever Recorded amid Global Trade War Arts & Culture Zahi Hawass: Claims of Columns Beneath the Pyramid of Khafre Are Lies News Flights suspended at Port Sudan Airport after Drone Attacks Videos & Features Video: Trending Lifestyle TikToker Valeria Márquez Shot Dead during Live Stream News Shell Unveils Cost-Cutting, LNG Growth Plan Technology 50-Year Soviet Spacecraft 'Kosmos 482' Crashes into Indian Ocean News 3 Killed in Shooting Attack in Thailand


Al-Ahram Weekly
a day ago
- Al-Ahram Weekly
Sudan's clashes escalate - World - Al-Ahram Weekly
The Rapid Support Forces' takeover of the border triangle shared by Sudan, Egypt, and Libya threatens to expand the Sudan war into a regional conflict Compounding the conflict in Sudan, the Rapid Support Forces (RSF) announced last week they had taken control of the border triangle shared by Egypt, Sudan, and Libya following the Sudanese Armed Forces' (SAF) withdrawal. The SAF accused the Libyan Army, under the command of Field Marshal Khalifa Haftar, of supporting the RSF, which has been at war with the SAF for more than two years now. The border triangle holds strategic significance due to its geographic location and abundant resources. While it could have served as a vital corridor for trade and cooperation among the three nations, it has become a zone of instability — now functioning as a conduit for the smuggling of people, weapons, and resources — and is at risk of turning into a haven for criminals, smugglers, armed groups, and terrorists. Known as the Gabal Al-Uwaynat Triangle, the area has long been neglected due to its harsh terrain and sparse population. However, in recent years its economic and security relevance has grown with the discovery of gold and other minerals as well as its emergence as a major transit point for smuggling. The SAF accused the RSF of taking control of the border triangle with the backing of Haftar's forces, describing it as part of a broader regional conspiracy against Sudan, following failed attempts by the RSF to defeat the SAF in other areas. The Sudanese army asserted its right to respond, condemning Haftar's involvement, and referring the matter to both the Arab League and the African Union. It added that the area was vacated as part of what it said were defensive measures aimed at repelling aggression. The Libyan army denied its involvement in Sudan's border affairs or internal conflict, stating that it has not interfered in Sudan's Civil War. It dismissed the Sudanese Army's claims of territorial seizure or alignment with one party to the conflict against the other as false, arguing that such accusations are an attempt to deflect attention from Sudan's internal crisis by fabricating an external threat. The RSF described its control of the border triangle as a qualitative victory that would open new fronts in the ongoing conflict. Meanwhile, the Joint Forces, comprising armed movements allied with the SAF, said that the RSF and their Libyan allies would not be able to maintain control over the border triangle for long, describing the move as an attempt to raise the morale of RSF members following a series of defeats. The Joint Forces added that the primary aim of the RSF's advance into the triangle was to obstruct military progress on the Kordofan fronts, which the allied forces aim to fully reclaim in the coming days. Undoubtedly, clashes in the border triangle, coupled with the exchange of accusations between the Sudanese and Libyan armies, are exacerbating tensions in Sudan and raising the spectre of wider regional conflict. The RSF's seizure of the triangle represents a major shift in its favour, strengthening its military position, securing its rear, and enabling access to Sudan's Northern State. RSF Commander Mohamed Hamdan Dagalo (aka Hemedti) has previously threatened to launch attacks on the Northern State. Meanwhile, the Sudanese Army is unlikely to allow the RSF to consolidate control over the area, saying it will launch air strikes against RSF positions. The RSF's deployment of long-range drones will further fuel the conflict. The war in Sudan is now evolving into a regional conflict involving multiple regional and international parties, including Libya. Accusations of interference have previously been directed at Chad, Kenya, and other nations. Violence and retaliatory killings have intensified the crisis, especially after the Sudanese Army entered Al-Jazira State, leading to the death of several South Sudanese alleged to have collaborated with the RSF. This, in turn, provoked retaliation in South Sudan, where Sudanese nationals were reportedly killed. Expanding the scope of the war is drawing in more foreign parties, leading to the destabilisation of Sudan and threatening international interests in the region. At the same time, fights are intensifying between the SAF and RSF in Al-Fasher, the capital of North Darfur State. Situated near the border triangle, Al-Fasher remains the last stronghold in Darfur where the army and its allied armed movements maintain a presence. The RSF is attempting to seize control of the city through attacks and heavy artillery bombardment. Meanwhile, Sudan's internal political landscape is facing challenges. Prime Minister Kamil Idris is having a hard time forming his long-anticipated government amid political tensions, disputes, and negotiations. Armed movements and blocs insist on securing their share of power. Furthermore, the leadership of the Tasees coalition — comprising the RSF and its allies and advocating the formation of a parallel government — find themselves entangled in their own internal power struggles. This comes at a time when the Sudanese people are desperately awaiting a political breakthrough that might offer relief from the war's devastating impact. * A version of this article appears in print in the 19 June, 2025 edition of Al-Ahram Weekly Follow us on: Facebook Instagram Whatsapp Short link: