logo
Standard BioTools Reports First Quarter 2025 Financial Results

Standard BioTools Reports First Quarter 2025 Financial Results

Yahoo06-05-2025

Services revenue, which includes both Lab Services and Field Services, was $17.6 million in the first quarter of 2025, down 16% year-over-year. Lab Services revenue was down 19% due to a tough comparable to prior-year levels that benefited from elevated backlog as well as project timing.
Instruments revenue was $7.8 million in the first quarter of 2025, up 24% year-over-year. Instrument revenue was driven by strong growth in our Hyperion XTi spatial proteomics platform.
Consumables revenue was $14.5 million in the first quarter of 2025, down 16% year-over-year. Consumables revenue declined due to lower volume.
Revenue was $40.8 million in the first quarter of 2025, down 10% year-over-year:
Dr. Egholm added, "On a product level, I am particularly excited by our strategic foothold in proteomics and the momentum building for SomaScan and SOMAmers. The advantages and performance over legacy antibody-based approaches is now well-documented, most recently at the AACR Annual Meeting and through a growing list of publications. As population-based proteomics studies continue to favor our technology, the upcoming launch of our Illumina partnered NGS-based product will only further expand access. Together we expect this momentum to accelerate as we help usher in an exciting new era of proteomic discovery.
'Standard BioTools delivered a solid first quarter in line with our expectations, reflecting focused execution in a challenging Life Sciences macro backdrop,' said Michael Egholm, PhD, President and Chief Executive Officer of Standard BioTools. "We remain grounded and disciplined, driving a 29% year-over-year improvement in adjusted EBITDA through Standard BioTools Business System (SBS). We believe our unique model, world class operational platform and healthy capital position will allow us to continue to take advantage of the current environment and deliver shareholder value over time.'
Strong balance sheet with $261 million in cash & cash equivalents and no material debt as of March 31, 2025
SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, Calif., May 06, 2025 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- Standard BioTools Inc. (NASDAQ: LAB) (the 'Company' or 'Standard BioTools') today announced financial results for the first quarter ended March 31, 2025.
Story Continues
Gross margins in the first quarter of 2025 were 48.4%, versus 53.1% in the first quarter of 2024; and non-GAAP gross margins, which exclude depreciation, amortization, and stock-based compensation, were 53.2% in the first quarter of 2025 versus 56.2% in the first quarter of 2024. Gross margins were impacted by lower volume, price realization and product mix, partially offset by incremental improvements from SBS.
Operating expenses in the first quarter of 2025 were $52.7 million, a decrease of $31.7 million, or down 38%, compared to the first quarter of 2024; and non-GAAP operating expenses, which exclude merger-related costs, stock-based compensation, and restructuring charges, were $38.6 million in the first quarter of 2025, a decrease of $10.7 million, or down 22%, compared to the first quarter of 2024. The decrease in operating expenses is a result of the realization of merger cost synergies and continued productivity gains from SBS.
Net loss for the first quarter of 2025 was $26.0 million, compared to a net loss of $32.2 million in the first quarter of 2024, representing an improvement of $6.2 million or 19%, while adjusted EBITDA for the first quarter of 2025 was a loss of $16.9 million, versus an adjusted EBITDA loss of $23.7 million in the first quarter of 2024, an improvement of $6.8 million, or 29%.
Full Year 2025 Revenue Outlook
For fiscal year 2025, the Company continues to expect revenue in the range of $165 million to $175 million. This outlook assumes a high single-digit millions decline in our Americas academic revenue due to anticipated NIH funding pressures, no expected effect from U.S. export controls and limited impact from tariffs.
Conference Call Information
Standard BioTools will host a conference call and webcast on May 6th, 2025, at 4:30 p.m. ET to discuss the first quarter 2025 financial results. Live audio of the webcast will be available online along with an archived version of the webcast under the Events & Presentations page of the Company's website.
Individuals interested in listening to the conference call may do so by dialing:
US domestic callers: (888) 346-3970
Outside US callers: (412) 902-4297
Use of Non-GAAP Financial Information
Standard BioTools has presented certain financial information in accordance with U.S. GAAP and on a non-GAAP basis. The non-GAAP financial measures included in this press release are non-GAAP gross margin, non-GAAP gross profit, non-GAAP operating expenses, and adjusted EBITDA. Management uses these non-GAAP financial measures, in addition to GAAP financial measures, as a measure of operating performance because the non-GAAP financial measures do not include the impact of items that management does not consider indicative of the Company's core operating performance. Management believes that non-GAAP financial measures, taken in conjunction with GAAP financial measures, provide useful information for both management and investors by excluding certain non-cash and other expenses that are not indicative of the Company's core operating results. Management uses non-GAAP measures to compare the Company's performance relative to forecasts and strategic plans and to benchmark the Company's performance externally against competitors. Non-GAAP information is not prepared under a comprehensive set of accounting rules and should only be used to supplement an understanding of the Company's operating results as reported under U.S. GAAP. Standard BioTools encourages investors to carefully consider its results under GAAP, as well as its supplemental non-GAAP information and the reconciliations between these presentations, to more fully understand its business. Reconciliations between GAAP and non-GAAP operating results are presented in the accompanying tables of this release.
Forward-Looking Statements
This press release contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995, including, among others, statements regarding future financial and business performance, including with respect to future revenue; operational and strategic plans; deployment of capital; market and growth opportunity and potential; and the potential to realize the expected benefits and synergies of prior and potential future acquisitions, including the potential for such transactions to drive long-term profitable growth. Forward-looking statements are subject to numerous risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ materially from currently anticipated results, including, but not limited to, risks that the anticipated benefits and synergies of prior and potential future acquisitions and the integration of any such businesses, including the potential for such transactions to drive long-term profitable growth, may not be fully realized or may take longer to realize than expected; risks that the Company may not realize expected cost savings from such transactions; possible integration, restructuring and transition-related disruption resulting from such transactions, including through the loss of customers, suppliers, and employees and adverse impacts on the Company's development activities and results of operation; integration and restructuring activities, including customer and employee relations, management distraction, and reduced operating performance; risks that internal and external costs required for ongoing and planned activities may be higher than expected, which may cause the Company to use cash more quickly than it expects or change or curtail some of the Company's plans, or both; risks that the Company's expectations as to expenses, cash usage, and cash needs may prove not to be correct for other reasons such as changes in plans or actual events being different than our assumptions; changes in the Company's business or external market conditions; anticipated NIH funding pressures; the expected effect from U.S. export controls and the expected impact from tariffs; challenges inherent in developing, manufacturing, launching, marketing, and selling new products; interruptions or delays in the supply of components or materials for, or manufacturing of, the Company's products; reliance on sales of capital equipment for a significant proportion of revenues in each quarter; seasonal variations in customer operations; unanticipated increases in costs or expenses; continued or sustained budgetary, inflationary, or recessionary pressures; uncertainties in contractual relationships; reductions in research and development spending or changes in budget priorities by customers; uncertainties relating to the Company's research and development activities, and distribution plans and capabilities; potential product performance and quality issues; risks associated with international operations; intellectual property risks; and competition. For information regarding other related risks, see the 'Risk Factors' section of the Company's annual report on Form 10-K filed with the SEC on March 11, 2025, and in the Company's other filings with the SEC. These forward-looking statements speak only as of the date hereof. The Company disclaims any obligation to update these forward-looking statements except as may be required by law.
About Standard BioTools Inc.
Standard BioTools Inc. (Nasdaq: LAB), has an established portfolio of essential, standardized next-generation technologies that help biomedical researchers develop medicines faster and better. As a leading solutions provider, the company provides reliable and repeatable insights in health and disease using its proprietary SomaScan, mass cytometry and microfluidics technologies, which help transform scientific discoveries into better patient outcomes. Standard BioTools works with leading academic, government, pharmaceutical, biotechnology, plant and animal research and clinical laboratories worldwide, focusing on the most pressing needs in translational and clinical research, including oncology, immunology and immunotherapy. Learn more at standardbio.com or connect with us on X, Facebook®, LinkedIn, and YouTube™.
For Research Use Only. Not for use in diagnostic procedures.
Limited Use Label License and other terms may apply: standardbio.com/legal/salesterms.
Patent and License Information: standardbio.com/legal/notices.
Trademarks: standardbio.com/legal/trademarks. Any other trademarks are the sole property of their respective owners. ©2025 Standard BioTools Inc. (f.k.a. Fluidigm Corporation). All rights reserved.
Investor Contact:
ir@standardbio.com
STANDARD BIOTOOLS INC.
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(In thousands, except per share amounts)
(Unaudited)
Three Months Ended March 31,
2025
2024
Revenue:
Product revenue
$
22,232
$
23,592
Services revenue
17,607
21,027
Collaboration and other revenue
956
921
Total revenue
40,795
45,540
Cost of revenue:
Cost of product revenue
10,730
12,781
Cost of services revenue
10,302
8,509
Cost of collaboration and other revenue
22
62
Total cost of revenue
21,054
21,352
Gross profit
19,741
24,188
Operating expenses:
Research and development
11,328
15,980
Selling, general and administrative
38,707
46,943
Restructuring and related charges
1,552
4,284
Transaction and integration expenses
1,124
17,163
Total operating expenses
52,711
84,370
Loss from operations
(32,970
)
(60,182
)
Bargain purchase gain

25,213
Interest income
2,916
6,207
Interest expense
(2
)
(1,033
)
Other income (expense), net
3,872
(2,234
)
Loss before income taxes
(26,184
)
(32,029
)
Income tax benefit (expense)
151
(128
)
Net loss
$
(26,033
)
$
(32,157
)
Induced conversion of redeemable preferred stock

(46,014
)
Net loss attributable to common stockholders
$
(26,033
)
$
(78,171
)
Net loss per share attributable to common stockholders, basic and diluted
$
(0.07
)
$
(0.27
)
Shares used in computing net loss per share attributable to common stockholders, basic and diluted
378,228
294,125
STANDARD BIOTOOLS INC.
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(In thousands)
(Unaudited)
March 31,
December 31,
2025
2024
ASSETS
Current assets:
Cash and cash equivalents
$
150,880
$
166,728
Short-term investments
107,182
126,146
Accounts receivable, net
35,480
33,608
Inventory
42,125
40,737
Prepaid expenses and other current assets
8,352
8,661
Total current assets
344,019
375,880
Inventory, non-current
18,281
18,528
Property and equipment, net
43,593
42,556
Operating lease right-of-use asset, net
27,422
28,828
Other non-current assets
6,506
6,301
Acquired intangible assets, net
28,057
28,954
Goodwill
111,719
111,297
Total assets
$
579,597
$
612,344
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY
Current liabilities:
Accounts payable
$
11,778
$
12,282
Accrued liabilities
21,972
30,739
Operating lease liabilities, current
6,334
6,228
Deferred revenue, current
12,763
13,118
Deferred grant income, current
3,389
3,527
Total current liabilities
56,236
65,894
Convertible notes, non-current
299
299
Deferred tax liability
1,031
1,081
Operating lease liabilities, non-current
24,897
26,469
Deferred revenue, non-current
32,548
32,674
Deferred grant income, non-current
6,501
7,243
Other non-current liabilities
3,490
6,962
Total liabilities
125,002
140,622
Total stockholders' equity
454,595
471,722
Total liabilities and stockholders' equity
$
579,597
$
612,344
STANDARD BIOTOOLS INC.
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(In thousands)
(Unaudited)
Three Months Ended March 31,
2025
2024
Operating activities
Net loss
$
(26,033
)
$
(32,157
)
Bargain purchase gain

(25,213
)
Stock-based compensation expense
9,009
11,611
Amortization of acquired intangible assets
898
2,106
Depreciation and amortization
3,273
3,088
Accretion of discount on short-term investments, net
(841
)
(2,660
)
Non-cash lease expense
1,438
1,446
Provision for excess and obsolete inventory
815
655
Change in fair value of warrants
(232
)
853
Change in fair value of contingent consideration
(3,400
)

Other non-cash items
385
293
Changes in assets and liabilities, net
(15,595
)
(22,498
)
Net cash used in operating activities
(30,283
)
(62,476
)
Investing activities
Cash and restricted cash acquired in merger

280,033
Purchases of short-term investments
(32,321
)
(73,177
)
Proceeds from sales and maturities of investments
52,000
112,000
Purchases of property and equipment
(5,054
)
(781
)
Net cash provided by investing activities
14,625
318,075
Financing activities
Repayment of term loan and convertible notes

(8,192
)
Payment of term loan fee

(545
)
Repurchase of common stock

(11,051
)
Payments for taxes related to net share settlement of equity awards and other
(46
)
(17
)
Proceeds from exercise of stock options

72
Net cash used in financing activities
(46
)
(19,733
)
Effect of foreign exchange rate fluctuations on cash and cash equivalents
357
(21
)
Net increase in cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash
(15,347
)
235,845
Cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash at beginning of period
168,818
52,499
Cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash at end of period
$
153,471
$
288,344
Cash, cash equivalents, and restricted cash consists of:
Cash and cash equivalents
$
150,880
$
287,057
Restricted cash
2,591
1,287
Total cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash
$
153,471
$
288,344
STANDARD BIOTOOLS INC.
REVENUE
(In thousands)
(Unaudited)
Three Months Ended March 31,
2025
2024
Product revenue:
Instruments
$
7,778
$
6,285
Consumables
14,454
17,307
Total product revenue
22,232
23,592
Service revenue:
Lab services
12,106
14,862
Field services
5,501
6,165
Total service revenue
17,607
21,027
Product and service revenue
39,839
44,619
Collaboration and other revenue
956
921
Total revenue
$
40,795
$
45,540
STANDARD BIOTOOLS INC.
RECONCILIATION OF GAAP TO NON-GAAP FINANCIAL INFORMATION
(In thousands)
(Unaudited)
ITEMIZED RECONCILIATION OF GROSS PROFIT TO NON-GAAP GROSS PROFIT AND MARGIN PERCENTAGE
Three Months Ended March 31,
2025
2024
Gross profit
$
19,741
$
24,188
Amortization of acquired intangible assets
717
1,956
Depreciation and amortization
736
1,024
Stock-based compensation expense
495
239
Loss on disposal of property and equipment
32

Cost of sales adjustment

(1,812
)
Non-GAAP gross profit
$
21,721
$
25,595
Gross margin percentage
48.4%
53.1%
Amortization of acquired intangible assets
1.8%
4.3%
Depreciation and amortization
1.7%
2.3%
Stock-based compensation expense
1.2%
0.5%
Loss on disposal of property and equipment
0.1%
0.0%
Cost of sales adjustment
0.0%
(4.0)%
Non-GAAP gross margin percentage
53.2%
56.2%
STANDARD BIOTOOLS INC.
RECONCILIATION OF GAAP TO NON-GAAP FINANCIAL INFORMATION
(In thousands)
(Unaudited)
ITEMIZED RECONCILIATION OF GAAP TO NON-GAAP OPERATING EXPENSES
Three Months Ended March 31,
2025
2024
Operating expenses
$
52,711
$
84,370
Restructuring and related charges
(1,552
)
(4,284
)
Transaction and integration expenses
(1,124
)
(17,163
)
Stock-based compensation expense
(8,514
)
(11,372
)
Amortization of acquired intangible assets
(181
)
(150
)
Depreciation and amortization
(2,537
)
(2,064
)
Loss on disposal of property and equipment
(154
)
(14
)
Non-GAAP operating expenses
$
38,649
$
49,323
R&D operating expenses
$
11,328
$
15,980
Stock-based compensation expense
(740
)
(1,328
)
Depreciation and amortization
(590
)
(871
)
Loss on disposal of property and equipment
(112
)

Non-GAAP R&D operating expenses
$
9,886
$
13,781
SG&A operating expenses
$
38,707
$
46,943
Stock-based compensation expense
(7,774
)
(10,044
)
Amortization of acquired intangible assets
(181
)
(150
)
Depreciation and amortization
(1,947
)
(1,193
)
Loss on disposal of property and equipment
(42
)
(14
)
Non-GAAP SG&A operating expenses
$
28,763
$
35,542
STANDARD BIOTOOLS INC.
RECONCILIATION OF GAAP TO NON-GAAP FINANCIAL INFORMATION
(In thousands)
(Unaudited)
ITEMIZED RECONCILIATION OF GAAP NET LOSS TO ADJUSTED EBITDA
Three Months Ended March 31,
2025
2024
Net loss
$
(26,033
)
$
(32,157
)
Income tax (benefit) expense
(151
)
128
Interest income
(2,916
)
(6,207
)
Interest expense
2
1,033
Amortization of acquired intangible assets
898
2,106
Depreciation and amortization
3,273
3,088
Bargain purchase gain

(25,213
)
Restructuring and related charges
1,552
4,284
Transaction and integration expenses
1,124
17,163
Stock-based compensation expense
9,009
11,611
Cost of sales adjustment

(1,812
)
Loss on disposal of property and equipment
185
14
Other non-operating (income) expense
(3,871
)
2,234
Adjusted EBITDA
$
(16,928
)
$
(23,728
)

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

What to know about inspections of Iran's nuclear program by the IAEA ahead of a key board vote
What to know about inspections of Iran's nuclear program by the IAEA ahead of a key board vote

Hamilton Spectator

time36 minutes ago

  • Hamilton Spectator

What to know about inspections of Iran's nuclear program by the IAEA ahead of a key board vote

VIENNA (AP) — Iran's nuclear program remains a top focus for inspectors from the International Atomic Energy Agency, particularly as any possible deal between Tehran and the United States over the program would likely rely on the agency long known as the United Nations' nuclear watchdog. This week, Western nations will push for a measure at the IAEA's Board of Governors censuring Iran over its noncompliance with inspectors, pushing the matter before the U.N. Security Council. Barring any deal with Washington, Iran then could face what's known as 'snapback' — the reimposition of all U.N. sanctions on it originally lifted by Tehran's 2015 nuclear deal with world powers, if one of its Western parties declares the Islamic Republic is out of compliance with it. All this sets the stage for a renewed confrontation with Iran as the Mideast remains inflamed by Israel's war on Hamas in the Gaza Strip . And the IAEA's work in any case will make the Vienna-based agency a key player. Here's more to know about the IAEA, its inspections of Iran and the deals — and dangers — at play. Atoms for peace The IAEA was created in 1957. The idea for it grew out of a 1953 speech given by U.S. President Dwight D. Eisenhower at the U.N., in which he urged the creation of an agency to monitor the world's nuclear stockpiles to ensure that 'the miraculous inventiveness of man shall not be dedicated to his death, but consecrated to his life.' Broadly speaking, the agency verifies the reported stockpiles of member nations. Those nations are divided into three categories. The vast majority are nations with so-called 'comprehensive safeguards agreements' with the IAEA, states without nuclear weapons that allow IAE monitoring over all nuclear material and activities. Then there's the 'voluntary offer agreements' with the world's original nuclear weapons states — China, France, Russia, the United Kingdom and the U.S. — typically for civilian sites. Finally, the IAEA has 'item-specific agreements' with India, Israel and Pakistan — nuclear-armed countries that haven't signed the Nuclear Nonproliferation Treaty. That treaty has countries agree not to build or obtain nuclear weapons. North Korea, which is also nuclear armed, said it has withdrawn from the treaty, though that's disputed by some experts. The collapse of Iran's 2015 nuclear deal Iran's 2015 nuclear deal with world powers, negotiated under then-President Barack Obama, allowed Iran to enrich uranium to 3.67% — enough to fuel a nuclear power plant but far below the threshold of 90% needed for weapons-grade uranium. It also drastically reduced Iran's stockpile of uranium, limited its use of centrifuges and relied on the IAEA to oversee Tehran's compliance through additional oversight. But President Donald Trump in his first term in 2018 unilaterally withdrew America from the accord , insisting it wasn't tough enough and didn't address Iran's missile program or its support for militant groups in the wider Mideast. That set in motion years of tensions, including attacks at sea and on land . Iran now enriches up to 60%, a short, technical step away from weapons-grade levels. It also has enough of a stockpile to build multiple nuclear bombs, should it choose to do so. Iran has long insisted its nuclear program is for peaceful purposes, but the IAEA, Western intelligence agencies and others say Tehran had an organized weapons program up until 2003. IAEA inspections and Iran Under the 2015 deal, Iran agreed to allow the IAEA even greater access to its nuclear program. That included permanently installing cameras and sensors at nuclear sites. Those cameras, inside of metal housings sprayed with a special blue paint that shows any attempt to tamper with it, took still images of sensitive sites. Other devices, known as online enrichment monitors, measured the uranium enrichment level at Iran's Natanz nuclear facility. The IAEA also regularly sent inspectors into Iranian sites to conduct surveys, sometimes collecting environmental samples with cotton clothes and swabs that would be tested at IAEA labs back in Austria. Others monitor Iranian sites via satellite images. In the years since Trump's 2018 decision, Iran has limited IAEA inspections and stopped the agency from accessing camera footage . It's also removed cameras . At one point, Iran accused an IAEA inspector of testing positive for explosive nitrates , something the agency disputed. The IAEA has engaged in years of negotiations with Iran to restore full access for its inspectors. While Tehran hasn't granted that, it also hasn't entirely thrown inspectors out. Analysts view this as part of Iran's wider strategy to use its nuclear program as a bargaining chip with the West. What happens next Iran and the U.S. have gone through five rounds of negotiations over a possible deal, with talks mediated by the sultanate of Oman . Iran appears poised to reject an American proposal over a deal this week, potentially as soon as Tuesday. Without a deal with the U.S., Iran's long-ailing economy could enter a freefall that could worsen the simmering unrest at home. Israel or the U.S. might carry out long-threatened airstrikes targeting Iranian nuclear facilities. Experts fear Tehran in response could decide to fully end its cooperation with the IAEA, abandon the the Nuclear Nonproliferation Treaty and rush toward a bomb. If a deal is reached — or at least a tentative understanding between the two sides — that likely will take the pressure off for an immediate military strike by the U.S. Gulf Arab states, which opposed Obama's negotiations with Iran in 2015, now welcome the talks under Trump. Any agreement would require the IAEA's inspectors to verify Iran's compliance. But Israel, which has struck at Iranian-backed militants across the region, remains a wildcard on what it could do. Last year, it carried out its first military airstrikes on Iran — and has warned it is willing to take action alone to target Tehran's program, like it has in the past in Iraq in 1981 or Syria in 2007. ___ Associated Press writer Stephanie Liechtenstein contributed to this report. ___ The Associated Press receives support for nuclear security coverage from the Carnegie Corporation of New York and Outrider Foundation . The AP is solely responsible for all content. ___ Additional AP coverage of the nuclear landscape: Error! Sorry, there was an error processing your request. There was a problem with the recaptcha. Please try again. You may unsubscribe at any time. By signing up, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy . This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google privacy policy and terms of service apply. Want more of the latest from us? Sign up for more at our newsletter page .

Why China's auto, tech giants threaten Tesla's self-driving future
Why China's auto, tech giants threaten Tesla's self-driving future

Yahoo

timean hour ago

  • Yahoo

Why China's auto, tech giants threaten Tesla's self-driving future

By Norihiko Shirouzu AUSTIN, Texas (Reuters) -Chinese electric-vehicle makers led by BYD beat Tesla in the competition to produce affordable electric vehicles. Now, many of those same fierce competitors are pulling into the passing lane in the global race to produce self-driving cars. BYD shook up China's smart-EV industry earlier this year by offering its 'God's Eye' driver-assistance package for free, undercutting the technology Tesla sells for nearly $9,000 in China. 'With God's Eye, Tesla's strategy starts to fall apart,' said Shenzhen-based BYD investor Taylor Ogan, an American who has owned several Teslas and driven BYD cars with God's Eye, which he called more capable than Tesla's 'Full Self-Driving' (FSD). It's not just BYD. Other Chinese auto and tech companies are offering affordable EVs with FSD-like technology for a relative pittance. China's Leapmotor and Xpeng, for instance, offer systems capable of highway and urban driving in $20,000 vehicles. A slew of Chinese firms are chasing the same technology, an industry push backed by China's government. BYD's assisted-driving hardware costs are far lower than Tesla's, according to analyses performed for Reuters by companies that dismantle and analyze vehicles for automakers. The comparisons, which have not been previously reported, show that BYD's costs to procure components and build a system with radar and lidar are about the same as Tesla's FSD, which doesn't have such sensors. That undercuts Tesla's unusual technological approach, which aims to save costs by nixing such sensors and relying solely on cameras and artificial intelligence. The rising competition from Chinese smart-EV players is among the chief problems confronting Tesla CEO Elon Musk after his rocky tenure as a Trump administration advisor as he refocuses on his business empire - as Tesla vehicle sales are tanking globally. The stakes are made higher by a moment-of-truth challenge this month in Tesla's home base of Austin, Texas, where it plans to launch a robotaxi trial with 10 or 20 vehicles after a decade of Musk's unfulfilled promises to deliver self-driving Teslas. Tesla did not respond when reached for comment about its Chinese competitors. Previously, Musk has described Chinese car companies as the most competitive in the world. Chinese competition was one factor driving Tesla's strategic pivot away from mass-market EVs last year, when Reuters reported it had killed plans to build an all-new EV expected to cost $25,000. Musk has since staked Tesla's future instead on self-driving robotaxis, the hopes for which now underpin the vast majority of the automaker's stock-market value of roughly $1 trillion. Now Tesla faces the same stiff competition on vehicle autonomy from many of the same Chinese automakers who undercut its affordable-EV plans. Adding to the challenge are tech firms including Chinese smartphone giant Huawei, which supplies autonomous-driving technology to major Chinese automakers. Short of full autonomy, today's driver-assistance systems offer a critical competitive edge in China, the world's largest car market, where Tesla sales are falling amid a protracted price war among scores of homegrown EV brands. Tesla is further handicapped by China's regulations preventing it from using data collected by Tesla cars in China to train the artificial intelligence underpinning FSD. Tesla has been negotiating with Chinese officials, so far without success, to get permission to transfer such data back to the United States for analysis. Tesla's competitors in China do benefit from subsidies and other forms of policy support from Beijing for advanced assisted driving technology. Their advantages also stem from another consequential factor: cut-throat smart-EV competition that has characterized their industry over the past decade. The resulting EV boom created economies of scale and the industry's tendency to forgo some profit margins to expand new technologies' market penetration quickly, leading to lower manufacturing costs. STREETS OF SHENZHEN BYD investor Ogan, of Shenzhen-based Snow Bull Capital, has a front-row seat to China's autonomous-tech battleground. He recently drove several BYD models equipped with God's Eye, he said, and didn't have to take over driving in any of them while traveling the congested streets of Shenzhen, a bustling southern China megalopolis of 18 million people. Another notable smart-EV player in China is Huawei, experts say. Huawei lends its technology and branding to a half dozen automakers including heavyweights Chery, SAIC and Changan, and has lower-profile partnerships with more than a dozen other carmakers, Huawei representatives said. Reuters journalists rode in an Aito M9 — a luxury electric SUV from Seres with Huawei driver-assistance technology — as it navigated Shenzhen roadways in April. With a driver's hands off the wheel, the vehicle exited a highway seamlessly into a congested urban zone, where the M9 proceeded cautiously and slowed to a crawl as a construction worker appeared like he might walk into the roadway. At one point the vehicle turned right and slowly drifted left to avoid two men unloading boxes from a parked truck. The vehicle then parallel parked itself at Huawei's Shenzhen headquarters. Huawei was among several Chinese companies, including automakers Zeekr, Changan and Xpeng, that touted progress towards fully-autonomous cars at April's Shanghai auto show, even as Beijing announced a new marketing crackdown on terms such as 'smart' and 'intelligent' driving in the wake of a deadly crash in a Xiaomi vehicle involving driver-assistance technology. Huawei said it's ready to undergo a new validation regime being developed by Chinese regulators to certify so-called Level 3 driving systems, meaning they are capable enough to allow drivers to look away unless notified by the system to take over. Zeekr, a luxury brand of China auto giant Geely, also plans to soon sell cars with Level 3 systems. Tesla has yet to release such an "unsupervised" version of FSD because its technology needs more training to operate without a driver's hands on the wheel and eyes on the road. Tesla plans to launch self-driving robotaxis in Austin this month. Little is known about its plans. The company has said it aims to initially deploy between 10 and 20 fare-collecting driverless robotaxis in restricted geographic areas of the city, which Tesla has not publicly identified. 'GOD'S EYE' ON THE CHEAP Chinese EV makers are moving quickly to develop driver-assistance systems in a market where car-buyers are demanding them at a faster pace than in other regions, analysts say. Their ability to do so at lower costs poses the biggest threat to Tesla's new autonomy-based business model. BYD buyers can get an FSD-comparable version of God's Eye as a standard feature in cars priced at about $30,000. The cheapest FSD-equipped Tesla in China is a Model 3 selling for about $41,500. According to an analysis by A2MAC1, a Paris-based tear-down firm that benchmarks components, the mid-level God's Eye version most comparable to Tesla's FSD runs on an Nvidia computing chip with data collected through 12 cameras, five radars, 12 ultrasonic sensors, and one lidar sensor, at a cost of $2,105. That compares to $2,360 for Tesla's FSD, which uses cameras without sensors and two AI chips, the firm estimates. Cameras, radar and ultrasonic sensors are 40% cheaper in China than comparable devices in Europe and the United States, A2MAC1 estimates. Lidar sensors cost about 20% less, the firm says. Sensor costs have fallen because China's EV boom created economies of scale, said A2MAC1 engineer Elena Zhelondz. The fierce competition also pushed carmakers and suppliers to accept lower profits on driver-assistance equipment, she said. BYD's 22% gross margin will likely fall as it gives away God's Eye but it will benefit from a vehicle-sales boost, said Chris McNally, head of global automotive and mobility research for advisory firm Evercore. MORE CARS, MORE MILES, BETTER AI Falling behind the Chinese brands on driver-assistance technology would compound Tesla's challenges in China, where it's already losing market share to rivals including BYD, which sells an entry-level EV for less than $10,000. The growing scale of BYD and others could also provide a technological advantage: Racking up more miles on China roads helps train the AI technology needed to perfect automated-driving systems. BYD has a 'clear and ongoing market-share driving advantage' over Tesla in gathering such on-road data to refine God's Eye, Evercore's McNally said, adding that advantage might only increase as offering God's Eye for free helps sell more BYD vehicles. BYD's scale also helps lower costs by providing uncommon leverage over suppliers. In November, a BYD executive in charge of passenger-vehicle operations wrote to suppliers telling them that the automaker sold 4.2 million vehicles last year (more than double the number of Teslas sold) because of 'technical innovation, economies of scale, and a low-cost supply chain.' The executive noted the new year would likely bring more growth, but also fiercer competition. Without specifically mentioning God's Eye, he ended the letter by asking the suppliers for an across-the-board 10% price cut on all parts and systems starting on January 1, calling the new year a final 'knockout round.' Sign in to access your portfolio

Jennifer Chrisler named interim president of Hampshire College
Jennifer Chrisler named interim president of Hampshire College

Yahoo

time2 hours ago

  • Yahoo

Jennifer Chrisler named interim president of Hampshire College

AMHERST, Mass. (WWLP) – Hampshire College has appointed Jennifer Chrisler as its interim president, effective July 1, following the departure of President Ed Wingenbach, who is leaving to lead the American College of Greece. Underage drinking dangers during graduation season Chrisler, currently serving as Hampshire's vice president for institutional support, joined the College in 2019 as chief advancement officer during a pivotal time in the institution's history. That year, the College reversed its decision to pursue a merger and recommitted to remaining an independent and autonomous institution. Since then, Chrisler has played a key role in stabilizing Hampshire's financial outlook. She led the 'Change in the Making' campaign, which has raised over $50 million in direct operating support, including three $5 million gifts — the largest contributions the College has received since its founding. 'The board has every confidence in Jenn's outstanding leadership abilities, and we know that her work will be informed by her love of Hampshire and familiarity with the community,' said Jose Fuentes, chair of Hampshire's Board of Trustees. 'As interim president, she will ensure the College continues to increase and stabilize enrollment and successfully close our fundraising campaign, all while delivering a distinctive, world-class education.' Chrisler expressed her deep commitment to the College's mission in a statement. 'I joined Hampshire six years ago because I believe in this College's mission and the unique education it offers. Six years later, I can say for certain that the breadth and depth of Hampshire's impact on the world are needed now more than ever,' Chrisler said. 'The people who are educated, teach, work, and live here are truly remarkable. I'm honored that the board and campus have entrusted me with this role, and I look forward to continuing the consequential work of securing Hampshire's future.' Chrisler's interim presidency begins as the Board of Trustees conducts a national search for a permanent president in partnership with Greenwood Asher & Associates. Before her current role, Chrisler led institutional support functions including fundraising, alumni and family relations, enrollment, financial aid, marketing and communications, public relations, and event services. She previously served as vice chancellor for advancement at the University of Massachusetts Dartmouth and as vice president of alumnae relations at Smith College, her alma mater. Chrisler also brings a national profile as an advocate for LGBTQIA+ rights. From 2005 to 2013, she was executive director of the Family Equality Council, where she grew its annual fundraising to nearly $3 million and expanded major donor and corporate support. She currently chairs the board of Fenway Health, a Boston-based organization that centers LGBTQIA+ individuals, BIPOC communities, and other underserved groups in health care and research. WWLP-22News, an NBC affiliate, began broadcasting in March 1953 to provide local news, network, syndicated, and local programming to western Massachusetts. Watch the 22News Digital Edition weekdays at 4 p.m. on Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store