Stone charity shops get creative with unsellable donations
"It does cost. There is a trade waste aspect to that. But people do tend to give us really high quality items."In the investigation, the BBC found staff who said their week could involve rifling through 100 bags of donated clothes, much of it unusable.The Charity Retail Association insisted current industry conditions were a "blip".
Stone's high street has six charity shops, all with their different ways of dealing with unwanted items.Sue Mitford, at The Children's Society shop in the town, uses a rag merchant to make money from any clothes not fit for sale.But she said she would welcome any clarity from those donating, to make the process simpler."They will come and say these items are not for sale, they'll actually write on the bag 'rags' so we know we can get the money for them," Ms Mitford said.
Adele Allen manages the Cats Protection branch shop in Stone and has her own feline-themed method of repurposing."People buy rags for sewing, crafting, we've got volunteers that make cat beds, cat blankets and anything to do with crafting," she listed.Ms Allen admitted she had to be "picky" about what was sold in the shop and had sold lesser quality items at local boot sales.She said she was grateful for all donations made to the charity but asked people to be selective."If it's really damaged, broken items, try and take it to the local recycling centre," she asked.
Follow BBC Stoke & Staffordshire on BBC Sounds, Facebook, X and Instagram.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Herald Scotland
27 minutes ago
- The Herald Scotland
What can students expect from this summer's exam results?
– When are exam results this year? A-level and AS results are out on August 14, while GCSE results will be released on August 21. Pupils in England will receive results for T-levels – which were launched to provide high-quality technical alternatives to A-levels – on August 14. Thousands of pupils will also receive results for vocational technical qualifications (VTQs) this month. Results for VTQs at Level 3 taken alongside or instead of A-levels, such as BTecs, will be released to students on or before August 14. Results for many Level 2 VTQs are expected on or before August 21. – What can students expect? Education Secretary Bridget Phillipson told the PA news agency that she expects a 'pretty straightforward year' for students as things have 'returned to normal' since the pandemic. Last year, 27.8% of UK A-level entries were awarded an A or A* grade, up from 27.2% in 2023. It was the highest proportion of entries scoring top grades outside the pandemic-affected years of 2020-22. In 2019 – the last year that summer exams were taken before the pandemic – 25.4% of entries were awarded A or A* grades. The Covid-19 pandemic led to an increase in top A-level and GCSE grades in 2020 and 2021, with results based on teacher assessments instead of exams. – How does the situation differ in the devolved nations? In 2023, GCSEs and A-levels returned to pre-pandemic grading arrangements in England. In Wales and Northern Ireland, exam regulators returned to pre-pandemic grading last summer – a year later than in England. Scotland has a different qualification system and students received their results on Tuesday last week. Figures released by the Scottish Qualifications Authority (SQA) showed that 78.4% of those sitting National 5 exams passed with grades A to C – up from 77.2% last year. For Highers, 75.9% passed with the top bands, up from 74.9% last year, and for Advanced Highers 76.7% of students achieved A to C grades, up from 75.3% last year. – Will it be tougher to get university places? A record number of 18-year-olds are likely to be successful in securing their first choice of university this A-level results day even if they narrowly miss their grades, the head of Ucas has suggested. Jo Saxton, chief executive of the university admissions service, told PA it was a 'good year to be a UK-domiciled 18-year-old' that wants to go to university. She has suggested that British universities are keen to recruit UK school and college leavers because there is more 'uncertainty' around the international market and which overseas students are going to turn up. Dr Saxton added that domestic undergraduates offered universities 'stability' for their 'financial planning'. Nearly 22,700 courses with vacancies for undergraduate students living in England were available on the Ucas clearing site as of Wednesday last week – eight days before results day, a PA analysis showed. A sample of 129 of the UK's largest higher education providers showed 17 of the 24 elite Russell Group universities had more than 3,600 courses with vacancies for English residents on clearing. – What can students do if they do not get their first-choice university? Clearing is available to students who do not meet the conditions of their offer on A-level results day, as well as those who did not receive any offers. Students who have changed their mind about what or where they wish to study, and also those who have applied outside the normal application window, can also use the clearing process through Ucas. Applicants will be able to add a clearing choice from 1pm on results day. In England, if a student is unhappy with their grade they can ask their school or college to request that the exam board review the marking. If there are still concerns, the student can ask their school or college to appeal against the result. – Were pupils given extra support in exams due to Covid-19? Exam aids have been given to GCSE pupils in England in mathematics, physics and combined science since 2022 to limit the impact of Covid-19 on learning. In October last year, the Education Secretary asked England's exams regulator Ofqual to continue providing formulae and equation sheets to GCSE pupils in these subjects in 2025, 2026 and 2027. Most pupils who took their GCSE exams this summer were in Year 6 when schools closed after the national lockdown in 2020.
Times
41 minutes ago
- Times
Even I see the point of prenups these days
As summer weddings roll by, does the thought of prenuptial contracts reassure or disgust you? It may depend on your generation, but their rising popularity certainly reflects a change in the idea of marriage. Even 20 years ago most of us associated 'prenups' with American billionaires, Hollywood stars with chronically unsettled emotions or George Clooney getting gloriously suckered in the Coen brothers' Intolerable Cruelty. But ideals erode: four years ago the Marriage Foundation estimated that one in five couples in the UK sign prenups, and a YouGov survey finds more than 60 per cent liking the idea. Inquiries to law firms reflect the change and so, cautiously, does the law itself: since a 2009 Supreme Court ruling, a contract between a couple ring-fencing their separate assets can be taken into consideration during divorce proceedings. • Why are couples who meet online more likely to fall out of love? And last year Sir Robert Buckland KC wrote here that it's already time to make prenups fully enforceable. As Boris Johnson's lord chancellor he knows the turf, having introduced no-fault divorce. He calls prenups a 'wise and practical choice'. It's worth discussing, though traditional spirits may wince. Ancient vows echo down the centuries: 'For richer, for poorer, in sickness and in health, forsaking all others, till death us do part.' The bride's promise to obey, of course, got shuffled out of the service in the 1920s, though Princess Elizabeth endearingly opted to say it to Philip Mountbatten in 1947. But even harder to find in use is one magnificent 16th-century promise that bridegrooms made: 'With all my worldly goods, I thee endow.' Women never said it, since it was pretty much implied for centuries that we'd hand everything over, unless protected by some upper-crust web of trusts or entails. But now, even in church weddings, that majestic phrase is nearly gone, enduring only if you choose the 1559 Book of Common Prayer. Otherwise it's Alternative Services: Series One (as used by the Prince of Wales) which more cautiously says: 'All my worldly goods with thee I share.' Still more commonly in our age of self-analysis and identity-pride, each just says: 'All that I am I give to you.' In the Catholic service there's no mention of money-sharing. Yet there is an ancient, haunting bravery about that lordly promise to 'endow' every penny of your wealth on the beloved. The word suggests permanent, irrecoverable; an almost monastic plunge of dedication. It certainly contrasts with the fashion for writing your own florid vows, like 'You are my sunrise and sunset, the dream I have dreamt all my life'; 'I promise to never lose our spark' or — apparently quite popular — the Backstreet Boys-style 'You are my fire, my one desire'. None of these specifically implies endowing any assets. • Inside Picasso's studios: the secrets of the places where he lived and loved Tracking the phrase, I hit upon Mumsnet. Here, in a very modern take, is a young woman worriedly unsure whether, during her register office wedding, she somehow accidentally 'endowed' her chap with a right to half the £10,000 she got by selling a possession from her single days. Was it, she asks, written in law? Because if so, 'I'm just uncomfortable with the idea of not having control of my stuff!'. Someone else asks if selling her clothes on eBay entitles him to half the dibs. The discussion continues sensibly enough, with talk of fairness and joint accounts and pensions in divorce. But the uncomfortable lack of clarity, and frequent depressing stories of rough divorces, began to change my mind about prenups. And, as one commenter sapiently observed, by marrying in the UK you're sort of signing one anyway: it's just that if you do separate it'll be the courts, not you, deciding who gets what. And — aside from the obvious need for child support — who wants strange lawyers running your life? It is easy to mock prenup absurdities, American or domestic. One law firm, conceivably tongue in cheek, suggests terms that couples might include. Like at what age you can each retire, the frequency of family visits, restricted screen time, sexual action or stipulations on future weight (one comedian jokes that there are two stone of her man which she certainly never married). Another suggested stipulation was to dictate 'how long either party is expected to wait before dating somebody else if they separate'. • Alison Steadman: 'My secret? A few gins and tonic in the evening' Most of these are enough to make any onlooker turn down the wedding invitation and bin the gift list; few firms would even draft them and no court admits their validity. But it could be that if they became fully enforceable, as Buckland suggests, only rational and financial ones would be written. And money does matter when more than four out of ten marriages break up. We have an inexcusably wide wealth gap; a twistedly absurd housing market makes it worse. Prenups are very tempting if one party has built up assets: it's middle-aged couples who still inquire most about prenups because implicitly 'endowing' half a business or property feels risky. Our intergenerational wealth gap is an even bigger driver of worry. Homeowner parents who donated a deposit on a first flat or might leave a small fortune within a decade or so may flinch and murmur about a prenup if their child's whirlwind romance looks like a gambler, drinker or reckless investor. Some might make paying for the wedding conditional on such a precaution, since only the wealthiest can afford the complexity of setting up trusts. It's all fuel for sad long-term rifts. But maybe if prenups do become the norm, like insurance or fire extinguishers, and were known to be fully enforceable, it might all feel less creepy. Maybe it's time. But, sigh! It's not romantic …
Times
41 minutes ago
- Times
How to erase the misery of student loneliness
T here are many implausible things about the Netflix campus romance My Oxford Year — an American visits the dreaming spires and falls for her handsome, castle-dwelling, cancer-stricken tutor — but perhaps the most unlikely part is the way new students confidently start chatting on first meeting. In my experience, they are more likely to stare intently at their shoes or phones in awkward silence, especially the boys. The real story is that many feel deeply lonely during their degrees, as several polls and studies confirm. A bit of future loneliness may not seem like a big deal to parents facing the ordeal of A-level results day this week, more concerned about whether their offspring will get to university at all. They probably assume things haven't much changed since their own time spent propping up the student bar; that eventually all but the most antisocial are bound to make friends. But in fact, quite a lot has changed — even leaving aside the negative effects of smartphones or lockdowns on burgeoning social skills.
