Madras HC orders reinstatement of employee of ordnance factory after 15 year battle
A division bench of Justices MS Ramesh and N Senthilkumar passed the orders recently to reinstate K Saravanan, an upper division clerk employed with the Heavy Alloy Penetrative Project, Tiruchy, an arm of the Ordnance Factory Board.
He was asked to go on compulsory retirement on July 26, 2011 by the management for violation of the Rule 11 of Central Civil Services (Conduct) Rules, 1964. He approached the CAT against the order.
The tribunal found that there was nothing to question the employee's integrity and the punishment was 'shockingly disproportionate and vindictive'. It set aside the order of compulsory retirement with the rider of a lesser punishment.
During arguments in the high court, the management submitted that the Ordnance Factory is linked to national safety and the charges were serious.
The bench reasoned, 'Even assuming that the photocopies were in the personal possession of the employee, no consequential prejudice was caused to the management, since he had not shared such official communications with any third person. In this view of the matter, both the charges can only be held to be minor in nature, which may not warrant the maximum penalty.'
The bench ordered his reinstatement with a minor penalty within three months.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
New Indian Express
2 hours ago
- New Indian Express
Madras HC orders man's release after SC freed co-convicts
CHENNAI: The Madras High Court has ordered the release of a convict in a case of dacoity and murder since his co-convicts were released based on the orders of the Supreme Court commuting their sentence from life imprisonment to 10 years. A division bench of Justices MS Ramesh and V Lakshminarayanan passed the orders on Tuesday on a petition filed by Indira Gandhi who prayed for the court to release her husband D Balu alias Balasubramaniam, who has been languishing in the Cuddalore Central Prison after being convicted for the 2002 dacoity and murder at Virudhachalam, on the basis of parity with the co-convicts. The bench said it has no difficulty in arriving at the inevitable conclusion that had he filed an appeal in the SC, his sentence too would have been reduced to 10 years. 'Even otherwise, such a benefit of reduced sentence ought to be extended to him as well by applying the principle of parity, in line with the three accused as held by the Supreme Court. Failure to do so would be violative of Article 21 of the Constitution and may amount to travesty of justice,' the bench said. The bench further said, 'We cannot lose sight that there are several reasons, including poverty, which prevent a person from appealing before the higher forums of law. The lack of procedural appeal should not prevent equal treatment of similarly-placed accused.' Pointing to Article 14 and 21 of the Constitution, it said by resorting to these constitutional provisions, it becomes the constitutional duty of the court to ensure parity.
Hindustan Times
7 hours ago
- Hindustan Times
Delhi court acquits Maliwal in rape victim disclosure case
NEW DELHI Throughout the trial, Maliwal's counsel had argued that the act was done in good faith. (Representative photo/Shutterstock) A Delhi court on Wednesday acquitted former Delhi Commission for Women (DCW) chief and Rajya Sabha MP Swati Maliwal and her media advisor at the time, Bhupinder Singh, in a 2016 case accusing them of disclosing the name of a 14-year-old rape victim, who later succumbed to her injuries. The acquittal order was passed by additional chief judicial magistrate Neha Mittal. The court said that the prosecution failed to prove the commission of offences under Section 74 of the Juvenile Justice Act, read with rule 86 of JJ Rules, by the accused beyond reasonable doubt as neither the notice sent on WhatsApp by Singh revealed the identity of the minor victim nor was the allegation of sharing of a copy of the notice with a news channel could be proved. In their FIR, the Delhi Police charged the two of them with violating provisions of the Juvenile Justice Act for revealing the identity of a sexual assault victim by circulating a notice in electronic media. Singh was accused of preparing the notices and forwarding them to media channels through the DCW WhatsApp group. The victim died in a hospital after being sexually assaulted by her neighbour, who allegedly forced a corrosive substance down her throat, damaging her internal organs. Maliwal had circulated a notice addressed to the deputy commissioner of police (North) and the SHO of Burari Police Station in the media, seeking an update in the probe. The FIR said the notice was 'intentionally circulated' on various WhatsApp groups and shown by the television channel Times Now. Maliwal and Singh were booked under Section 74, read with Section 86 of the Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Act, 2015. Police had later dropped charges under IPC Section 228A (prohibition on disclosure of identity of the victim) after the victim's parents stated that they had given their consent to disclose their child's name. The court, in its judgment, noted that Section 74 of the Juvenile Justice Act prohibits identification in a newspaper, magazine or audio-visual media. The court said, 'The sending of notice by accused No.1 to SHO PS Burari seeking explanation regarding the lapses in the investigation is not a report in any newspaper, magazine or news-sheet or other form of communication'. On the aspect of the copy of the notice revealing the name of the victim being sent to the news channel, the court observed, 'There is nothing to show in the chargesheet that the accused persons sent the notice to Times Now…further, the anchor of the programme has not revealed the name of the minor victim in the entire programme…the allegations are baseless and unfounded.'
Time of India
9 hours ago
- Time of India
No illegal loudspeaker in any place of worship in Sambhajinagar city
Chhatrapati Sambhajinagar: In what the police describe as a first-of-its-kind achievement for the city, authorities successfully removed all illegal loudspeakers from places of worship within the jurisdiction of Chhatrapati Sambhajinagar city police. Tired of too many ads? go ad free now Police commissioner Pravin Pawar told TOI on Wednesday that a total of 6,591 loudspeakers installed at various religious sites were removed following a sustained awareness and persuasion drive. "Today, there is no illegal loudspeaker at any religious place in the city," Pawar said, adding that the police worked with religious heads, social workers, and politicians before approaching individual places of worship. "This was not about confrontation; it was about convincing everyone to abide by the law," said Pawar. The exercise comes against the backdrop of statewide directives to enforce the Supreme Court and high court rulings on permissible sound levels, along with the Noise Pollution (Regulation and Control) Rules. Starting in July, the police issued notices and held meetings at the levels of police stations, division, and zone levels, with some even escalating to the level of the police commissioner. Deputy commissioner of police (crime) Ratnakar Navale said the Sambhajinagar police drive focused on educating stakeholders about the legal provisions. "We highlighted the directives of the Supreme Court, the Bombay HC, the Noise Pollution Rules, and orders from the director general of police's office. The best part is that people readily cooperated and removed all the loudspeakers themselves," Navale said. Tired of too many ads? go ad free now The campaign was carried out in phases, starting with meetings in police stations, followed by visits to mosques, temples, gurdwaras, Buddha vihars, churches, among other places. The special branch, led by inspector Avinash Aghav, said the presence of community leaders during these visits helped prevent misunderstandings and ensured uniform application of the law across all faiths. According to senior officers, no force or confiscation was necessary during the operation. "We achieved 100% compliance purely through dialogue and mutual respect," a senior officer said. The move has been welcomed by environmental activists, who point out that it will reduce ambient noise levels in densely populated areas. City police officers said they will continue monitoring to ensure no unauthorised loudspeakers are reinstalled.
