"Don't Play Pakistan In World Cup, Olympics": India Asked To Promise After Legends Match Decision
Former Pakistan opening batter Salman Butt questioned the Yuvraj Singh -led India Champions team's decision to withdraw from the contest against Pakistan. Butt sought a promise from the Indian team that they would maintain the same stance when the two teams are scheduled to play against each other in an ICC event.
Whenever it comes to a cricketing contest between India and Pakistan, such narratives often become the talk of the town but it isn't the same when other sporting contests between the two countries are scheduled. Butt wants India vs Pakistan sporting battles to be prohibited even in events like the Olympics.
"The whole world is talking about them - what message have they sent to cricket as a whole and to the fans? What are you trying to show? What are you trying to prove? Now don't play in the World Cup...don't play against us in any ICC tournament. Make this a promise. See, we understand that everything has its own place. But now that you are interlinking, don't play against us at any level or tournament. Not even the Olympics. Please do that. I would love to see. The stakes would be high, and I'd see how much nationalism they can show at that level," he said on his YouTube channel.
To conclude, the former Pakistan opener said the WCL decision seemed 'pressured' from his point of view.
"What is this mindset? I just can't understand. Who is making this decision? Those 4-5 people who decided not to play, because of them, others, who probably had the mindset to play, felt pressured," he added.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
New Indian Express
20 minutes ago
- New Indian Express
Xavi Hernandez's application for India coach role stuns AIFF, but federation unable to afford him
NEW DELHI: Spain's World Cup-winning midfield maestro Xavi Hernandez was among those who applied for the position of India's head coach, leaving the All India Football Federation (AIFF) pleasantly surprised, but allegedly unable to process his application for reasons that had nothing to do with football. Xavi, it is learnt, 'sent an email from his own account' to apply for the post. However, the AIFF could not proceed with the processing of his application as the costs involved in recruiting one of the world's finest midfielders were allegedly far beyond the federation's means. 'Yes, he (Xavi) applied for the job of the Indian senior men's team football head coach. He has himself mailed his application to the people in the technical committee, and it looks like he was very much interested in the job,' a source in the AIFF told PTI on Friday. 'However, those tasked with the responsibility of recommending the shortlist of coaches to the executive committee for final approval know that it's difficult. You understand that Xavi is one of the greatest midfielders of all time. People talk about Messi all the time, but he, along with (Andres) Iniesta, are right up there as far as Barcelona is concerned. So, yes, it is what it is,' he added. The experienced Anglo-Cypriot Stephen Constantine, Stefan Tarkovic of Slovakia, and home-bred Khalid Jamil were among three candidates shortlisted on Wednesday by the technical committee of the AIFF. Out of the three, Jamil appears to be the frontrunner to replace Manolo Marquez, who quit earlier this month after a string of poor performances by the national team.
NDTV
29 minutes ago
- NDTV
Gautam Gambhir's 'Surprising' Call Stuns Experts; Ricky Ponting Gives Blunt 'Logic' Take
The decision taken by the Indian cricket team management to send Shardul Thakur to bat at No. 7 ahead of Washington Sundar stunned experts during the fourth Test match against England at Old Trafford. When Sai Sudharsan got out on Wednesday, there was still an hour left on the clock but India decided to go with Shardul ahead of the in-form Sundar. The decision by head coach Gautam Gambhir and Co could the commentators by surprise as they did not expect the visitors to use Shardul as a 'night watchman'. While Ravi Shastri and Dinesh Karthik tried to make sense of the decision, former Australia cricket team skipper Ricky Ponting went on to say that he was trying to work out the 'logic' behind the call. "I'm just trying to work out the logic from India here as to why they've sent Shardul in ahead of Washington Sundar. Just looking at the numbers, I mean, Washington averages nearly 39 in Test cricket and Shardul is down at 17. And he's [Sundar] not being sent out. He's [Shardul] not a night watchman, there's still 40 minutes of play here, and a new ball around the corner," Ponting said. Shastri, who was also in the commentary box, agreed with the him saying: "All the more reason [to send Sundar ahead of Shardul]". He played in the first Test match. Dismissed pretty cheaply, a couple of loose shots," referring to Thakur's scores of 1 and 4 in the series opener in Leeds last month." Karthik, who replaced Ponting in the commentary box after some time, echoed similar sentiments. "I was extremely surprised too, considering how well Washington has batted, not only in this series, but in the recent past – and he's batted better with batters around. He's not been that effective with the tail."
India Today
35 minutes ago
- India Today
If Rishabh Pant's bravery doesn't lift India in Manchester, nothing will: Ravi Shastri
Ravi Shastri praised Rishabh Pant's brave return in the Manchester Test, calling it a special moment for Indian cricket. The left-handed Pant had retired hurt on 37 after being hit by a yorker from Chris Woakes on Day 1 at Old injury left him in serious pain, but he returned the next day with India in trouble at 314 for six. Despite limping and barely able to run, Pant scored a fighting 54 from 75 balls, including three boundaries and two sixes. His effort helped India reach 358 and gave the team a big crowd gave him a standing ovation, and even the England players applauded. Shastri said Pant showed what it means to play for the team. His innings was not just about skill—it showed heart, courage, and love for Test cricket. 'For him to come back and do what he did - that was something special. What he did today, if that doesn't lift the team up, nothing will,' Shastri said in a video uploaded on BCCI's official website.'The ovation he got while going away, and the ovation he got coming back and the applause he got from everyone from the England team out there—that's what you live for. That's what you play for. That's what makes heroes.''What he's done now proves he just wants to play. He loves Test cricket. He loves playing for the country. And if anyone ever doubted whether he was a team man—they saw it firsthand today. That kind of commitment requires more than just talent. It takes heart,' Shastri added.'Would have played with broken finger'Ahead of the Manchester Test, Ravi Shastri had a short but revealing exchange with Rishabh Pant that shed light on the wicketkeeper's determined about an injury Pant had picked up at Lord's, Shastri asked if his finger was broken and whether he'd be fit to play. Pant's response was immediate and unwavering—he assured Shastri he would play regardless of the injury.'Before the Test I asked him, 'How's the finger? Toota to nahi hain? (Isn't it broken?) Will you play this game?' He said 'Of course, I will play, toota bhi hota to khelta (I would have played even if my finger was broken',' Shastri at Stumps on Day 2 in Manchester, England trailed by only 133 runs with eight wickets left in their first innings.- EndsMust Watch
