logo
You Don't Have To Carry Proof Of U.S. Citizenship. But Amid ICE Detainments, You Might Want To.

You Don't Have To Carry Proof Of U.S. Citizenship. But Amid ICE Detainments, You Might Want To.

Yahoo24-04-2025

In his first few months of office, President Donald Trump has targeted immigrantswith tattoos and foreign university students with green cards or visas for deportation ― and a recent alarming case is raising concerns that U.S. citizens could be next.
Last Wednesday, Juan Carlos Lopez-Gomez, a Georgia-born U.S. citizen, was arrested in Florida and charged with illegally entering the state as an 'unauthorized alien.'
Even though a judge later said Lopez-Gomez's birth certificate was 'authentic' and there was no probable cause for his charge, he was still put on an ICE detainer, as the Florida Phoenix first reported.
An ICE detainer is when U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement gets local authorities to agree to hold a person in jail for up to 48 hours beyond the time they would ordinarily be released so that ICE can pick them up and place them in immigration detention.
Lopez-Gomez's case sparked protest, and he was released last Thursday. He maintains that he told a state trooper he was a U.S. citizen and had shared his Georgia ID and Social Security card ― but the Department of Homeland Security denies this, claiming that Lopez-Gomez had told a Florida Highway Patrol trooper that he was in the country illegally.
'Immediately after learning the individual was a United States citizen, [Lopez-Gomez] was released,' a DHS senior official told the Florida Phoenix in a statement.
HuffPost reached out to ICE about Lopez-Gomez's case and what would necessitate ICE to investigate a U.S. citizen.
Lopez-Gomez's case and others like it, along with rising anti-immigrant sentiment in general, are raising concerns about whether U.S. citizens need to be carrying proof of their citizenship while they drive or go to bars with friends ― and if that is even helpful or necessary. HuffPost talked with immigration experts about what people should know.
Legal noncitizen immigrants like green card-holders are already required to keep their immigration papers with them at all times, but U.S. citizens aren't obligated to carry proof of their citizenship.
In an ideal world, U.S. citizens wouldn't be questioned about whether or not they are authorized to be in the U.S., but it happens.
In 2020, the American Civil Liberties Union settled a case with U.S. Customs and Border Protection over two U.S. citizens in Montana who were detained for 'speaking Spanish in the store in a state where it's predominantly English speaking,' according to the agent who detained them.
'If somebody were to be picked up by ICE who's a US citizen, they have a very strong civil rights suit because of the racial profiling involved and the detention that would be involved,' said Saira Hussain, a senior staff attorney at the Electronic Frontier Foundation, a digital rights organization.
But under this political climate, it's understandable why you might want to carry proof of U.S. citizenship ― particularly if you fear being a target of the Trump administration.
Jennifer Ibañez Whitlock, senior policy counsel for the National Immigration Law Center, said it's a '100% valid' concern for U.S. citizens to be afraid of being detained by ICE.
She noted that people who 'don't appear American' ― a broad, subjective category reliant on stereotypes and misconceptions about who can be an American ― are the most at risk of being targeted by immigration authorities.
With the immigrant populations she works with, 'There's a sense of that you need to have [documentation] on you, just in case, no matter how long you lived here, and even if you're a naturalized citizen if you speak with an accent,' or have a last name someone may assume is Latin American, Whitlock said. In these cases, there is a belief 'you may need to have that on your person to avoid being taken into custody.'
'The bigger problem, I think that all of us should be concerned about, is 'Why are we looking over our shoulder?'' Whitlock continued. 'And the answer is because we have an executive that thinks that they can be judge, jury, executioner. So if they think that you don't belong here, they think they should they have the right to arrest you,' referring to Trump's mass deportation plans.
Hussain said that U.S. citizens are not legally required to carry documentation, but added, 'The law is divorced from reality.'
Hussain used herself as an example. On a recent trip to San Diego, California, which is near a U.S. border, she and her husband both brought their U.S. passports. She did this in case she was stopped by Border Patrol and needed to show evidence of U.S. citizenship.
'That isn't something that should have to happen, because the case law is very clear about that,' Hussain said. 'But the practical reality on the ground is that it seems like the Department of Homeland Security and all of their subcomponents, like ICE and CBP [Customs and Border Protection] may not necessarily be following case law at the moment.'
Whitlock said she would not recommend walking around with original documents like your naturalization or birth certificate. However, she said that 'having a scanned copy of your documents is a good idea so that you can easily pull it up on your phone.'
Immigration attorney David Nachman also said that carrying proof of citizenship is not necessary for a U.S. citizen and is a 'personal choice.' At the same time, he has clients who are U.S. citizens and do carry documentation with them to work, because they work in places that Homeland Security investigations often target, like warehouses and restaurants, he said.
Nachman shared the example of one hospitality worker who keeps a laminated copy of his naturalization certificate in his wallet because he does not want to be erroneously swept up in an ICE raid.
Keeping copies like this on your person 'at least raises a presumption' of your citizenship, Nachman said, noting that he finds it 'sad and depressing' to state that carrying documentation is 'not a bad idea' for some U.S. citizens because the message being communicated is 'Hey, our government is going to stereotype.'
Your U.S. passport, passport card, birth certificate or naturalization certificate can be strong evidence of your U.S. citizenship ― but the reality is that many Americans may not have all of these documents readily available, either.
Only half of Americans have a valid passport, according to the Center for American Progress policy institute.
Even having IDs in your pocket may not be a foolproof solution to unwanted questioning from immigration authorities. Lopez-Gomez's case is not the first time ICE has detained a U.S. citizen this year. In January, a U.S. citizen ― who had his identification in his wallet ― was reportedly detained by ICE in Chicago for 10 hours before being released.
Additionally, in April, a 19-year-old U.S. citizen was detained by Border Patrol agents in Arizona for 10 days; DHS claims the teen said he had entered the country illegally from Mexico. The charges were dismissed after his family presented documents showing his U.S. citizenship.
In the case of Lopez-Gomez and the Chicago-area man, they both had access to their IDs when they were detained, 'a reminder that legal rights can be asserted, but are often retrospective and may not provide full protection in the moment if law enforcement is insistent on violating the law,' Hussain said.
Between 2018 and 2024, ICE reported that the agency arrested 80 U.S. citizens, 13 of them in 2024.
That number might grow under Trump's second term. In March, ICE said in a statement that it has 'made more at-large arrests in the first few weeks of President Trump's presidency than the entire last year under the previous administration.'
And it's not just ICE who might arrest you; it might be a local police department they partner with.
Since Trump's reelection, the number of active '287(g) agreements,' or partnerships between ICE and local law enforcement agencies, has doubled. Under these agreements, ICE can delegate immigration enforcement duties to state and local police. Some states like California strictly limit the scope of these 287(g) agreements, while states like Florida ― where Lopez-Gomez was arrested ― have announced that every county jail will agree to comply with ICE.
'The bigger the net, the more likely [ICE is]...going to arrest people who have [legal] status, or are U.S. citizens,' Whitlock said. 'And then the burden, unfortunately, is going to fall on the individual to prove that they're here legally.'
U.S.-Born Citizen Arrested As 'Unauthorized Alien'
Why You Can (And Should) Opt Out Of TSA Facial Recognition Right Now
Does Border Patrol Have The Right To Go Through Your Phone? Here Are The Alarming Facts.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

More Musk-Trump Fallout: Tesla Sales Will Shrink At Historic Pace, Goldman Says
More Musk-Trump Fallout: Tesla Sales Will Shrink At Historic Pace, Goldman Says

Forbes

time9 minutes ago

  • Forbes

More Musk-Trump Fallout: Tesla Sales Will Shrink At Historic Pace, Goldman Says

A pessimistic prediction for Tesla sales from Goldman Sachs added further fuel to the Tesla fire, as the unraveling relationship between Tesla CEO Elon Musk and his former close ally President Donald Trump plays out publicly, accelerating Wall Street's concerns about the increasing exposure of Tesla to Musk's outspoken politics. Elon Musk has alienated 'multiple sides of the political spectrum' from Tesla, according to one ... More prominent Wall Street analyst. In a late Thursday note to clients, Goldman Sachs analysts led by Mark Delaney slashed their forecast for second-quarter Tesla vehicle deliveries to 365,000, far below consensus analyst forecasts of 405,000, according to FactSet. That would be an 18% decline from the same period last year, equating to by far the weakest quarterly deliveries growth since at least 2015, the extent of quarterly delivery data available on Tesla's investor relations website. It's another knock for Tesla as analysts warn this week's quarrel between Musk and the president, who Musk donated $288 million last year to help elect alongside other Republican candidates, could further weigh on Tesla, which is already grappling with declining brand sentiment on the left, historically the base for EV purchasers. This disagreement 'could potentially (temporarily) alienate multiple sides of the political spectrum," warned Morgan Stanley analyst Adam Jonas in a Friday note. Tesla stock bounced back Friday, gaining 6% by early afternoon as part of a broader rally. That only recovered a small portion of Thursday's historic loss, as the Musk-led firm's share price is down 9% since Wednesday. The Musk-Trump division "clearly raises the degree of [near-term' uncertainty' for Tesla, according to TD Cowen analyst Itay Michaeli. Amid the kerfuffle, Trump threatened to cancel all of the federal government's contracts with Musk's portfolio of companies. That would likely impact the private aerospace and communications firm SpaceX far more than Tesla, which does not rely on government contracts for a significant portion of its revenues, but there is a way Trump could target Tesla's bottom line directly. Trump could restrict Tesla's ability to sell its automotive regulatory credits, according to Morningstar strategist Seth Goldstein, referring to the essentially free profit Tesla gets from selling its emissions credits to gas-powered automakers. That could dramatically reduce Tesla profits, as it reported $595 million in those regulatory credits compared to a $934 million net income during 2025's first quarter, meaning the credits directly contributed about two-thirds of its net profit. Since Musk announced his purchase of Twitter (now X) in 2022, Tesla stock has frequently faced downward pressure as its top decisionmaker and shareholder Musk became increasingly outspoken on politics to much controversy. Musk endorsed Trump in July and rose to become perhaps the most prominent and powerful figure in the early days of Trump's second administration, though the perceived impact of Musk's buddying up to Trump turned negative this year as sales globally for the automaker tumbled. In a further sign of fray in the relationship between Musk and Trump, the president has decided to sell his Tesla Model S, according to the New York Times. Tesla is expected to report its Q2 delivery numbers July 2.

Stop Posting, and Start Legislating—A Message to the GOP from Gen Z
Stop Posting, and Start Legislating—A Message to the GOP from Gen Z

Newsweek

time11 minutes ago

  • Newsweek

Stop Posting, and Start Legislating—A Message to the GOP from Gen Z

We remember. We remember the Paul Ryan years. We remember the lofty promises, the press conferences with tax cut charts, the selfies with Trump in the Roosevelt Room. And we remember the disappointment—because when Republicans controlled the House, Senate, and White House, barely anything bold got done. The border wasn't secured. Obamacare wasn't repealed. The swamp wasn't drained. The only thing that moved quickly was the clock—and opportunity slipped away. The bills stalled. The hearings dragged. The excuses piled up. And in the end, the status quo won. Again. A Make America Great Again (MAGA) baseball hat supporting President Donald Trump is pictured. A Make America Great Again (MAGA) baseball hat supporting President Donald Trump is here we are again. President Donald Trump is back in the Oval Office. Conservatives have momentum. The political stars are aligned like they haven't been in years. And yet? The same old D.C. inertia is setting in. Congress is snoozing through a once-in-a-generation opportunity to deliver real change. There's no sense of urgency. No fire. No strategy. Just more performative politics as usual. The difference is: this time, we're paying attention. Gen Z conservatives didn't get off the couch and show up to the ballot box to watch history repeat itself. We're tired of politicians who post more than they produce. House and Senate Republicans—stop acting like influencers and start acting like lawmakers. You don't get to post selfies with Elon Musk or tweet your appreciation to DOGE if you won't even codify basic spending cuts like the DOGE Act. You can't coast on vibes while the country's on fire. You were sent to legislate, not livestream. You weren't elected to trend on X—you were elected to fix what's broken. Brilyn Hollyhand and President Donald Trump are pictured at the University of Alabama on May 1, 2025. Brilyn Hollyhand and President Donald Trump are pictured at the University of Alabama on May 1, 2025. Photo Courtesy of the White House Despite facing one of the most pivotal moments in modern political history, Congress still isn't working full weeks. Many lawmakers fly in Tuesday afternoon and are wheels-up by Thursday. Three-day workweeks in the middle of a national crisis? That's not leadership—that's laziness. Meanwhile, families across America are grinding five, six, even seven days a week just to stay afloat. Blue-collar workers don't get to call it a week by Wednesday night. Neither should the people writing our laws. If our representatives can't even put in a full week's work during a make-or-break presidency, maybe they don't deserve the job. I will never forget my first ever dinner with a U.S. senator. It was my 12th birthday, and we were in D.C., eating downtown after I had recorded some episodes of my podcast on Capitol Hill. He leaned across the table to me and said, "Brilyn, the first thing you're going to learn in this business is that in politics there are work horses and show horses. The work horses bring home the pork for the state that sent them there. The show horses run to the TV cameras. Be a work horse, and only join a cable show when you have an accomplishment to tout." That stuck with me—and I'm reminded of it right now more than ever. Because D.C. is overflowing with show horses. They gallop into every hearing, prance onto every panel, and leave before the hard work begins. This isn't just about optics. This is about outcomes. Republicans were given a second chance to do what they promised the first time. It's not enough to give speeches about the border. Close it. It's not enough to post videos in front of the IRS. Defund it. It's not enough to warn about weaponized government. Dismantle it. This is the moment to act, not admire the problem. Stop playacting reform—deliver it. The base isn't looking for another firebrand quote; we're looking for a signed bill. We're not asking for the moon—we're demanding that you work. Get off the couch. Get off cable news. And get legislation on the president's desk. Defund the weaponized bureaucracy. Close the border. Cut the waste. Stop acting like your job is to coast to retirement and start acting like your job is to represent us. If you need inspiration, look outside the Beltway—real Americans are hustling every day without fanfare. Why can't Congress? Gen Z is watching. And we have receipts. We're the most online, most informed, and most fed-up generation to ever engage in politics. We can see through the talking points. We recognize when someone's all flash and no follow-through. And we're not afraid to call it out—publicly, loudly, and often. You can't gaslight us with headlines. You can't distract us with Instagram posts. We see the floor schedule. We track the votes. We know the difference between working and pretending. If the GOP wastes another Trump term, it won't just be a policy failure—it'll be a generational betrayal. My generation won't forget. We didn't come this far just to watch you do nothing, again. We showed up because we believe in a different future—one that isn't dictated by lobbyists, legacy institutions, and leadership that loves the camera more than the country. Clock in, Congress. Or clock out—and make room for someone who will. Brilyn Hollyhand is an 18-year-old political commentator, chairman of the Republican National Committee's Youth Advisory Council, and bestselling author of One Generation Away: Why Now is the Time to Restore American Freedom. For more of his hot takes you can follow him on socials @BrilynHollyhand or visit The views expressed in this article are the writer's own.

Paramount controlling shareholder Shari Redstone diagnosed with thyroid cancer
Paramount controlling shareholder Shari Redstone diagnosed with thyroid cancer

Fox News

time12 minutes ago

  • Fox News

Paramount controlling shareholder Shari Redstone diagnosed with thyroid cancer

Media mogul Shari Redstone, CBS parent Paramount's controlling shareholder, has been diagnosed with thyroid cancer. "Shari Redstone was diagnosed with thyroid cancer earlier this spring. While it has been a challenging period, she is maintaining all professional and philanthropic activities throughout her treatment, which is ongoing. She and her family are grateful that her prognosis is excellent," Redstone's spokesperson told Fox News Digital. The 71-year-old has frequently been in the news this year as she seeks the Trump administration's approval of a multibillion-dollar planned merger with Skydance Media and has given lawyers the green light to settle President Donald Trump's election interference lawsuit against CBS News, although no deal has been reached. Redstone wanted the opinion of doctors "about two months ago after experiencing fatigue and other symptoms," according to The New York Times, which first reported the diagnosis. She underwent surgery in May. The Times noted that she was quickly diagnosed and surgeons removed her thyroid gland but were unable to remove all the cancer cells because they'd spread to her vocal cords. Redstone controls more than three-quarters of Paramount's Class A voting shares through National Amusements, the company she took control of in 2016 when her media mogul father, Sumner Redstone, was deemed too incapacitated to run the company. He died in 2020. Redstone, who recused herself from settlement discussions related to the Trump lawsuit in February, isn't thrilled with being tied up in litigation with the sitting president and wants to get things resolved. Fox News Digital confirmed last week that Trump rejected a $15 million offer to settle his lawsuit. The talks are ongoing, but the president's legal team is demanding at least $25 million and an apology from CBS News. Many industry insiders believe the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) will wait until the lawsuit is in the rearview mirror before deciding if the planned merger with Skydance Media will be approved. Redstone is set for a significant windfall if she's able to flip Paramount to Skydance. Bloomberg reported last year that she would receive $180 million in severance on top of the roughly $350 million she would pocket from the merger. Skydance Media CEO David Ellison, who would take control of CBS as head of the newly formed Paramount Skydance Corp. if the merger is finalized, was aware of Redstone's cancer diagnosis, according to the Times.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store