Child Q: Two Met Police officers committed gross misconduct over strip search of 15-year-old schoolgirl
Why you can trust Sky News
Two Metropolitan Police officers committed gross misconduct during the strip search of a 15-year-old schoolgirl wrongly suspected of possessing cannabis, a misconduct hearing has found.
PCs Kristina Linge, Victoria Wray and Rafal Szmydynski conducted the search of the black girl, known as Child Q, with no appropriate adult present at a school in Hackney, east London, in 2020.
Scotland Yard apologised, and the Children's Commissioner for England, Dame Rachel de Souza, described the case as "shocking" after details of the incident emerged in 2022.
PCs Linge, Wray and Szmydynski suspected that the girl was in possession of cannabis, but the police watchdog later determined that no drugs were found in her bags or outer clothing.
At a police misconduct hearing in London today, Linge and Szmydytnski were found to have committed gross misconduct. They could potentially be dismissed when the sanctions are decided.
Wray was cleared of gross misconduct, but found to have committed misconduct.
The panel found she became involved in a "situation where the decision had been decided already".
The case of Child Q drew outrage when it first came to light in March 2022, and sparked protests.
The officers had been accused of treating Child Q differently due to her race, but Commander Jason Prins, chair of the misconduct panel, said: "We do not draw any inference that race was an effective cause of this incident."
The panel found that concerns about drugs and potential gang involvement were initially raised by school staff.
"Like many cases where stop and search is used, here the subject of the search was identified to police officers by other professionals rather than being by officers in the street," Commander Prins added.
He said the problem was with the decision to conduct the strip search in the first place, finding it was "unnecessary" and "disproportionate".
"There should never have been a strip search in these circumstances," he said, accepting that Child Q found it "humiliating and degrading".
The panel did not find that any officer breached professional behaviour standards relating to equality and diversity, or honesty and integrity.
During the misconduct case, the three officers gave evidence and each said they were not influenced by subconscious bias.
Luke Ponte, for Linge, said they happened to be "three immigrant officers" who were "trying to do their best to their adopted country" as they were seeking to solve a problem.
Mr Ponte: "These officers must not bear the entire weight of Child Q where there has been wider dysfunction as to how this came about."
Breaches of the Met's standards of professional behaviour found to amount to gross misconduct can lead to dismissal or a final written warning, according to the IOPC.
A fourth officer will face a disciplinary meeting at a later date relating to no appropriate adult being present during the search. This is separate to this misconduct hearing and it's a lower level of discipline.
Please refresh the page for the latest version.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Edinburgh Reporter
24 minutes ago
- Edinburgh Reporter
Police Scotland win Best Recruitment Effectiveness Award at Talent Lab Awards
Police Scotland won the Best Recruitment Effectiveness Award at this year's Talent Lab Awards. The awards celebrate standout achievements in talent innovation, leadership, and impact. Police Scotland is responsible for policing the whole of Scotland with a unique range of urban, rural, island and remote communities. It is the second largest Police service in the UK after the Metropolitan Police with a workforce of 23,000 officers and staff working together for the people of Scotland. A Police Scotland spokesperson said: 'Last year, we launched its latest recruitment campaign – one that told real stories of our officers. 'Since then we are hiring faster, smarter and more inclusively than ever. In fact, our candidate satisfaction rate is now at 98.99%. 'Are you ready for a job like no other? View our current vacancies including roles for police officers, staff and volunteers.' Like this: Like Related
The Guardian
an hour ago
- The Guardian
Brain injuries hearing: ‘no safe number of times' a footballer can head the ball
There is 'no safe limit' for heading a football, the high court heard, as lawyers acting for former players who suffered permanent brain injuries sought to advance their case against the game's authorities. Claimants in the case argue that the authorities should have made players aware of the risks they were taking by heading a ball as far back as the 60s, claiming that information on the danger of repeated blows to the head was in the public domain. Speaking on behalf of the 23 former professional players, and the families of 10 deceased players who comprise the joint action, Susan Rodway KC told a pre-trial hearing in London on Thursday that 'it is the defendants' duty to outline what they did know' on the issue of injuries. 'The claimant position is that repeated heading and clashes and associated injuries have a cumulative effect,' she said. 'We are saying there is no safe number of times a player can head the ball. Do the defendants have experts that say there is a quantum under which safety is maintained? 'If that is the case, we say that the case continues but on the basis that the defendants will have exceeded even that safe level, unless they are going to say starkly that heading of the ball is safe, however much you do it.' The Football Association, English Football League and FA of Wales are joint defendants in the case and Michael Kent KC, acting on behalf of the EFL, said this definition meant the court was now hearing a 'completely different' case from one looking at individuals who had experienced concussion on the pitch. Analysing the risk of repeated heading meant that 'we are dealing with allegations related to something which would not at the time have produced any identifiable problem,' he said. 'It's a cumulative but invisible injury over a period, completely different from a case based on a huge number of references to concussions and their management.' Rodway said that a further 90 individuals have agreed to join the legal action and that 'we remain of the view that this could go as high as 150'. The claimants include the family of former England midfielder and 1966 World Cup winner, Nobby Stiles, who had dementia and died in 2020. A postmortem found he was suffering from chronic traumatic encephalopathy, a progressive brain condition caused by repeated blows to the head. Sign up to Football Daily Kick off your evenings with the Guardian's take on the world of football after newsletter promotion Both sides also challenged each other over perceived delays in bringing the case to trial, with Rodway asking for deadlines to be moved forward and defendants demanding extra information. 'It has been five years since the case started, and three years since generic elements of claim were submitted,' Rodway told the court. 'I very much hope that the court can take on board that enough is enough and we need to progress.' Martin Porter KC, representing the FA, said: 'I know her solicitor will tell anyone who listens that the FA is dragging its feet but we have had to go to strenuous efforts in order to discover what these cases are truly about.' Judge Amanda Stevens ruled that the parties should reconvene for a further pre-trial hearing on 29 July.
Reuters
an hour ago
- Reuters
UK health officials say patient's death partially down to cyberattack
WASHINGTON, June 26 (Reuters) - A cyberattack last year against British diagnostic services provider Synnovis contributed to the death of a London hospital patient, British health officials said, providing one of the first confirmations of a death tied to hacking activity. The patient at King's College Hospital in south London died in part because the hack caused a "long wait" for blood test results as well as other factors, the hospital's managing body said on Wednesday, without identifying what they were. The hospital said the patient's family had been informed but did not provide other details. Synnovis' CEO Mark Dollar said in a statement Wednesday: "We are deeply saddened to hear that last year's criminal cyberattack has been identified as one of the contributing factors that led to this patient's death." In the June 2024 hack - attributed to the Qilin ransomware gang - media reports said attackers demanded $50 million from Synnovis for its data. The company did not pay, and the stolen data was later published on the dark web, reports said. The attack disrupted the U.K. healthcare network, and snarled operations at some of London's busiest hospitals. In January Synnovis, opens new tabsaid the hack led to more than 32 million pounds ($43 million) in costs. Medical services providers have been hard hit by ransomware as hackers suspect they will pay quickly to avoid interruptions to healthcare. Deaths have been tied to past ransomware incidents, including a baby in Alabama in 2019, opens new tab and a 78-year-old woman in Germany in 2020, opens new tab, although direct causation can be difficult to establish. The Qilin hackers did not respond to a request for comment on the death. News of the U.K. death was first reported by British healthcare publication HSJ, opens new tab. ($1 = 0.7323 pounds)
