Phillipson: Teachers cannot insist on gender-neutral Mx title
Ms Phillipson was pressed further on Thursday on comments she made earlier this week about the right of teachers to make such a request.
The Telegraph reported recently that a primary school in the south-east of England had listed a new teacher, who the newspaper said was male according to their biological sex, as Mx in a list of staff members.
Mx is described as a gender-neutral title for those who do not identify as being of a particular gender or do not wish to be identified by gender.
Speaking on Times Radio, Ms Phillipson said: 'A teacher can, of course, make that request, but you can't insist that it's followed.'
Asked whether she would call someone Mx, Ms Phillipson said: 'I think that's a hypothetical situation. I've never been asked to do that.
'As a matter of principle, on a wider point, I would usually seek to respond to someone in a way that they would prefer, but there is no obligation for people to do that.'
Asked by Nick Ferrari on LBC whether the issue will cause confusion, she said: 'Schools, as employers, have responsibilities for managing this, in that they have a responsibility to ensure that staff are treated with respect, but also that people with a range of viewpoints are also able to express their views and are treated with respect as well.'
Education Secretary Bridget Phillipson was asked about the use of gender-neutral titles for teachers (Lucy North/PA)
Ms Phillipson also said she 'can't put a timescale' on when long-awaited guidance for schools on gender-questioning children will be published.
The Government has previously said it will not be hurried into publishing guidance for schools, amid calls which came after the Supreme Court ruling on the legal definition of a woman in April.
Draft guidance for schools and colleges on how best to support pupils has been on hold since Labour entered Government. It was published by the Conservative government in December 2023, and a consultation ended in March last year.
On Thursday Ms Phillipson, who has previously said guidance would be issued later this year, said the priority is getting the guidance right.
She told LBC: 'I think it's more important that we get it right than we rush it, because these are serious and quite sensitive issues about children and young people and their wellbeing.
'I do know that schools are asking for guidance.
'We want to make sure they've got that guidance, but what matters most is that the guidance they get is workable and they find it practical and helpful in responding to what can be quite challenging issues for schools, when they're supporting young people who might be experiencing questions around distress or their wellbeing.'
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Telegraph
an hour ago
- Telegraph
Public think Labour will use new online laws for censorship
New laws will be used by the Government to censor content posted online, a majority of the public believe. There is strong backing for the aims of the Online Safety Act to protect children from online harms but deep scepticism about the consequences for people's privacy and whether it will work in practice, a major poll of more than 2,000 adults by Ipsos has revealed. While 69 per cent supported age verification for platforms hosting harmful content, half of those polled were not confident it will stop under-18s accessing it, according to the poll, published exclusively today by The Telegraph. More than six in 10 (61 per cent) believe the Act will lead to personal data being compromised and a similar proportion (58 per cent) expected increased government censorship. More than four in 10 say it will threaten free speech online. It follows The Telegraph's disclosure of a secretive 'spy' unit which has been used by the Government to target social media posts criticising migrant hotels and 'two tier policing'. Last week the US state department criticised the Online Safety Act over its potential impact on free speech as it warned the British Government had 'repeatedly intervened to chill speech' after the Southport attack. The Act also sparked a political row after Reform UK leader Nigel Farage pledged to repeal the Act as a threat to free speech, prompting Labour to accuse him of being on the side of sex offenders like Jimmy Savile. Keiran Pedley, Ipsos director of UK politics, said the poll exposed a 'significant paradox in public opinion'. 'While there is a clear and broad desire to protect children online, reflected in the strong support for age verification, this is matched by deep-seated scepticism about whether the Act can deliver on its promises,' he said. 'Data breaches and the potential for censorship are highlighted, as the public doubt these measures will be effective against tech-savvy young people. This creates a major challenge for platform operators and regulator, Ofcom: how to implement robust age assurance systems that the public actually trusts and is willing to use.' Nearly half (48 per cent) believe the Act will enable parents to better protect their children from online harms and 46 per cent said it will enable adults to more easily block inappropriate material. However, 44 per cent believe it will limit free speech online, against 40 per cent who do not. A similar proportion (43 per cent) fear it will limit adults' access to 'non-harmful' information online. Half of those polled (48 per cent) said they would be likely to submit proof of age to access a platform or website, against 30 per cent who would not. However, this dropped to 14 per cent for porn sites and 19 per cent for dating apps. More than half (56 per cent) were comfortable with using their email as proof of age but the public drew a line at financial information, with fewer than one in five saying they would use a credit card or banking information. Almost seven in 10 Britons (69 per cent) believed it would be easy for children and young people to get around safeguarding procedures by social media platforms. More than half (51 per cent) feared that it would lead to children using less safe parts of the internet such as the dark web. Nearly a quarter (24 per cent) admitted that they used a VPN when browsing the internet, a technology that enables users to encrypt their communications and hide their IP address. A similar proportion (22 per cent) said they had considered or downloaded a VPN since the introduction of the Online Safety Act. Despite this, four in 10 (40 per cent) believed the Act would prevent children and under 18s from seeing illegal or harmful material, although 52 per cent did not believe it would. While 37 per cent believed the legislation would make platforms and websites remove harmful and illegal content, 51 per cent did not.
Leader Live
2 hours ago
- Leader Live
Broadcaster Selina Scott says she blames Sadiq Khan for her mugging
The 74-year-old revealed that in June she was surrounded near Waterstones on Piccadilly by a group of thieves who hit her on the back of the leg and stole her purse. She received an apology from the head of the Metropolitan Police Sir Mark Rowley after she said she could not find an officer to report the crime to, in an interview with the Telegraph saying she blames Sir Sadiq Khan for the incident. 'I actually blame the mayor of London,' Scott told the newspaper. 'More than I blame the police, actually, because the mayor of London took on the job to keep the people of London safe, the police come under him.' Recounting the incident, she said she ran from Piccadilly to Leicester Square without finding a police officer, despite seeing 'all kinds of security officers'. The nearby West End Central police station was closed four years ago and the day after the mugging officers failed to go to her home for a planned appointment because there was no available police car. In June, Sir Mark admitted on Nick Ferrari's show on LBC that the force could have given the broadcaster a better service. 'I can feel for her. She's obviously very upset. She's a 70-odd-year-old lady who had a very frightening experience,' he said. 'The officers weren't able to give the service that we would expect on that day. I'm sorry about that.' Scott said she had to walk miles home after the attack as the gang had taken her money. She said: 'I would say to anyone walking through central London, put 20 quid in your shoe or down a sock or in your knickers or somewhere, because the worst thing was not having any money. 'I'm fairly fit, so I could walk, but I did try to get on a bus.' After the attack, she told LBC she felt 'humiliated and angry'. She added: 'But most of all (I'm feeling) fearful for all those who are listening to Nick's show and feel that they can walk the streets of London safely, because I'm telling you, they can't.' 'Everywhere you go there is security for well-known people, the royal family have security,' she told the Telegraph. 'The mayor of London has security. So what's different? Why doesn't the public have security? Why don't I get it?' A spokeswoman for the mayor of London said: 'Nothing is more important to the Mayor than keeping Londoners safe. Sadiq is determined to do all he can to tackle crime and its complex causes, and build on progress that has been achieved in London, with the number of young people being injured with a knife down 26%, homicides down 17%, gun crime with lethal barrel discharges down 43% and burglary down 27% since 2016. 'The Mayor has doubled his annual investment in the Met Police from City Hall and will continue to invest record amounts in policing, as we know there is more to do. That is why, with City Hall funding, the West End will see a 50% increase in the number of police officers on the beat and an additional 90 police officers working in new or enhanced town centre teams in hotspot areas. These officers will focus on tackling shoplifting, anti-social behaviour and phone robbery.'
Daily Mirror
5 hours ago
- Daily Mirror
Donald Trump given '1 out of 10' for summit that gave Putin 'exactly what he wanted'
There was no ceasefire - but there were no "severe consequences" for Putin. A former UK Defence Secretary said Trump should get a 1 out of 10 rating for the summit Donald Trump's summit with Vladimir Putin has been given a 1 out of 10 by a former UK Defence Secretary. It comes after the US President walked away from talks in Alaska without a ceasefire. Trump had previously warned Putin that there would be "severe consequences" for Russia's ruthless dictator if a ceasefire deal was reached. But after the summit he said instead that all parties should push towards a final peace agreement rather than a temporary ceasefire. This has been Russia's stated position for months. It comes after Trump looked tired as he returned to Washington after the summit. Meanwhile, Former Defence Secretary, Sir Ben Wallace, has told Times Radio that he would give Trump a "one out of 10" for the summit. "Putin's probably got 10 out of 10, he got exactly what he wanted," he said. "He didn't change one iota his ambitions and his constant, to be fair to him, his constant position on Ukraine. "He got a red carpet treatment, which contrasted extremely differently from the treatment of President Zelensky when he met the US president." In a statement following the talks - and after a joint call with world leaders and Volodymyr Zelensky - KeirStarmer said Ukraine could count on Britain's "unwavering long as it takes." Starmer praised Trump's efforts, saying they have "have brought us closer than ever before to ending Russia 's illegal war in Ukraine. "His leadership in pursuit of an end to the killing should be commended." But he added: "While progress has been made, the next step must be further talks involving President Zelenskyy. The path to peace in Ukraine cannot be decided without him. "This morning, I spoke to President Zelenskyy, President Trump and other European partners, and we all stand ready to support this next phase. "I welcome the openness of the United States, alongside Europe, to provide robust security guarantees to Ukraine as part of any deal. This is important progress and will be crucial in deterring Putin from coming back for more." Following a call with President Trump, Volodymyr Zelensky wrote on X: "In my conversation with President Trump, I said that sanctions should be strengthened if there is no trilateral meeting or if Russia tries to evade an honest end to the war. "Sanctions are an effective tool. Security must be guaranteed reliably and in the long term, with the involvement of both Europe and the U.S. "All issues important to Ukraine must be discussed with Ukraine's participation, and no issue, particularly territorial ones, can be decided without Ukraine." Get Donald Trump updates straight to your WhatsApp! Putin last night gave no indication he'd given up on his long-held belief that Ukraine is not a real country, and is entirely Russian territory. At a press conference following the talks, he repeated his position that it is "sincerely interested in putting an end" to the war in Ukraine, but for that to happen, "all the root causes of the crisis ... must be eliminated." "All of Russia's legitimate concerns must be taken into account, and a fair balance in the security sphere in Europe and the world as a whole must be restored," Putin said.
