Michelle Wolf review – pregnant comic delivers a smart, provocative set
As you'd imagine, there's plenty of material about that experience, including a riff on the cholestasis she developed in her first pregnancy, and another straining to justify (by characteristically blunt comparison) the 'placenta smoothie' she consumed at the birth of her first child. But, understandably for an act who generates half an hour's new standup every week for her podcast Thought Box, Wolf's show doesn't linger on any topic for too long, ranging across her life in a multiracial family, pigeon spies in the second world war, and the experience of being a conjoined twin.
It teeters on the edge of tastelessness, that last one, but a feature of Wolf's comedy is an aversion to right-thinking, a preparedness to alienate in pursuit of the joke. See a gag comparing drag queens to Belgian colonists in the Congo, or another refusing to engage in baby talk for fear of what her burbling tot might actually be saying. That's what gives the 40-year-old her edge: even generic routines (the one about women needing pockets, say) can swerve on to sensitive territory.
It's not always a show where the thinking develops: Wolf's routines, delivered with a mischievous perma-smile, can feel like gambits or provocations, thrown out to trigger a reaction or start a conversation – about how the village it takes to raise a child has been atomised, say, or about the limits of her, and her audience's, liberalism. Together, they make for a smart and sly set in which the tongue that lashed Donald Trump is turned instead on gender politics, Wolf's foibles, and our own.
At Pleasance Courtyard, Edinburgh, until 17 August
All our Edinburgh festival reviews
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Guardian
13 minutes ago
- The Guardian
Cheer up, Ice Cube, your War of the Worlds movie may be really bad, but it's not worthless
If the latest adaptation of HG Wells's 1898 novel The War of the Worlds, a movie starring Ice Cube and Eva Longoria, was designed to make us pause and ask questions, it has certainly succeeded. Unfortunately, what a lot of viewers have been asking is why it was inflicted on the public in the first place. Is War of the Worlds 'one of the worst movies ever made?', asked the BBC. 'Shockingly bad War of the Worlds is one of the worst movies of the decade,' said the New York Post. 'Amazon's War of the Worlds update should never have been released,' declared the Telegraph. The 2005 adaptation, starring Tom Cruise, was a smash hit. Now people are flocking to the remake to see just how bad a film can be – it's in the top 10 films watched in the UK and US on Amazon Prime. It seems that we have come to love 'bad' films almost as much as those deemed good. The website Rotten Tomatoes practically celebrates films that garner a 0% approval rating: Roberto Benigni's Pinocchio, reborn in 2002 as an Italian fantasy comedy-drama, is one such offender; Look Who's Talking Now in 1993, starring John Travolta and Kirstie Alley, replaced talking babies with talking dogs and was slated; while Travolta hit rock bottom in 2018 with Gotti, a movie about the New York mobster that was so gloriously awful it was nominated for six Razzies, the parody prize bestowed on Hollywood's biggest cinematic failures, including worst actor and worst picture. But Hollywood has no exclusive hold on the movie clunker machine. Bollywood has vast audiences both within India and outside. In 2023, it generated revenues of $1.3bn, securing its own chunk of the global movie market – and its own flops. In both cases, the biggest pitfalls seem to come with attempting to remake much-loved classics. Bollywood tried its own movie version of the US favourite TV sitcom The Archie Show, and really shouldn't have. The Archies, as the Indian version was called, featured wooden acting and misguided casting, not helped by controversy over the recruitment of nepo babies of already huge Bollywood actors such as Suhana Khan (daughter of Shah Rukh Khan) and Agastya Nanda. Some thought it engaging; most preferred not to think about it. Jab Harry Met Sejal was a remake of the popular When Harry met Sally. Its director, Imtiaz Ali, is usually lauded for his captivating storytelling – but not this time. 'A weak, meandering, near dishonest and awfully misrepresentative film,' was one critic's verdict. In his review, he wrote a lot about the interval and his journey to the toilet. But whether it is made in Hollywood or Bollywood, a bad film, no matter how boring, unrealistic or slow-paced, can still have value. The Archies led to discourse on nepo babies in Bollywood film, and for all its narratorial difficulties Jab Harry Met Sejal allowed Arijit Singh to perform his magic with hit song Hawayein. Animal, released in 2023, caused an outpouring of condemnation as Ranbir Kapoor's character consistently and crassly played on the belief that male dominance and female submission in a relationship is normal and necessary. It was bad, really bad – but the national conversation that ensued also educated audiences to became more aware and more critical of other films that also lauded misogyny. When I returned to the movie Ghilli, a Kollywood classic (Kollywood being the informal name for Tamil cinema) that I loved as a kid, I couldn't help but question why the story continues romantically, without question, after the heroine is slapped by the supposed love of her life. Even notoriously bad movies have the capacity to sharpen our sense of critique. The outrage you feel at a film like Animal heightens your sensitivities, and perhaps your recognition of wrongdoing in real life. When I watched 28 Years Later (the sequel to 28 Days Later and 28 Weeks Later), all I could think was: 28 years later and these zombies are still getting the better of the horror industry? I didn't leave it wondering what would happen 28 eons later, but neither do I regret the time spent watching the film, even if it didn't seem realistic. The sight of Teletubbies being watched by children spliced with images of humans beings savaged by other, more infected humans was more diverting than entertaining, but from my disappointment came conversation. Had I not watched it, I would not have had the story to tell; or the opportunity to discuss this and rather better horror films with friends. Bad films lead to dialogue, which almost inevitably opens a space for better ideas and new discourse. And failing that, at least a passionate rant about all the other better horror films, allowing people to enjoy a shared rage instead of turning against each other. Is there anything to learn from Ice Cube's War of the Worlds? Perhaps it's that some films made during Covid are better left there. Or that 'bad' comes in many forms, that 'bad' is in the eye of the beholder. Or perhaps it's just that bad art has merit in ways the creator may not have intended. Take the Razzie, Ice Cube, and be proud of all you have given us moviegoers. Saranka Maheswaran is a London-based student who also pursues journalism alongside her studies
BBC News
13 minutes ago
- BBC News
MasterChef: Second contestant edited out of Gregg Wallace and John Torode's final series
A second MasterChef contestant has been edited out of this year's scandal-hit series, BBC News can exclusively reveal.A spokesperson for the show's production company, Banijay, said: "One other contributor decided that given recent events they would like not to be included. We have of course accepted their wishes and edited them out of the show."Another contestant, Sarah Shafi, was also removed from the series after asking for it not to be broadcast, following a report which upheld claims against hosts Gregg Wallace and John BBC decided to still show this year's amateur series, which was filmed before the pair were sacked, saying it was "the right thing to do" for the chefs who took part. But it faced a backlash from some women who came forward, while the broadcast union Bectu said bad behaviour "should not be rewarded with prime-time coverage".Former Celebrity MasterChef contestant and BBC journalist Kirsty Wark also suggested the BBC could have refilmed the series without the two the event, both Wallace and Torode remain in the series, which began last week on BBC One and on the episodes appear to have been edited to include fewer jokes than usual, with less chat between them and the episode which would have featured the second contestant was broadcast on BBC One on Wednesday night, but only featured five chefs rather than the usual News understands the individual has asked not to be identified and they will not feature in the believed Shafi's episode has not yet BBC previously said it had not been "an easy decision" to run the series, adding that there was "widespread support" among the chefs for it going ahead."In showing the series, which was filmed last year, it in no way diminishes our view of the seriousness of the upheld findings against both presenters," it said."However, we believe that broadcasting this series is the right thing to do for these cooks who have given so much to the process. We want them to be properly recognised and give the audience the choice to watch the series."
The Sun
13 minutes ago
- The Sun
Love Island's Liberty Poole reveals reason for boyfriend split in emotional statement saying ‘life is not a fairytale'
HEARTBROKEN Liberty Poole has admitted "life is not a fairytale" after splitting from her boyfriend. The Sun last night revealed the Love Islander had ended her romance with Joshua Raybould after a year of dating. 5 5 The pair had known each other since they were 19 years old, and she had introduced him to her family. LIberty said the relationship broke down but there was no betrayal or "big scandal". Posting on her Instagram Story, she shared: "Hi guys, just wanted to address this one time only. "Josh and I are no longer together. I know I shared a lot of my relationship and happiness online I did that because I honestly believed this would be my happy ending, and was 'it' for me as far as dating went. "Unfortunately life's no fairytale. This was my 'first' for a lot. "First real love, first serious relationship, first time living with someone, first time making someone part of the family. "With that comes a lot of unexpected trials no relationship is 100% perfect. "There was no big scandal no cheating. Just an irreversible break down in communication. "Josh and I have parted amicably with fond memories of the love we shared. "I wish him all the best for the future and hope he finds love, peace and happiness. Love Island stars fuel dating rumours with 'giveaway' Insta posts "I won't be commenting on the situation further, but just focusing on my healing. "Yes I was going through a break up and launching my business at the same time. This isn't the end of my love story just a chapter. "I also just wanted to add thank you to any stranger that saw me out and said kind words this past month. "You lifted a girl up when she was down. I hope you can continue to support me in my boss babe, growth era. Lover girl out for now." Since the split, Liberty and Joshua have unfollowed each other on social media. Joshua has wiped his Instagram grid of all of his photos with Liberty, but has continued to post snaps of him on nights out and DJ'ing The pair, who went official last August, cooled things off a few weeks ago after they failed to see eye-to-eye on a few things. A source said: " Liberty and Joshua made the tough decision to end their relationship. "They had an amazing year together, especially in the early stages when they were attached at the hip and going on holidays. "They loved getting to know each other, despite concerns from her friends that he was using her for fame. "But once the honeymoon period was over, it was clear that they weren't a compatible match long-term. "Liberty is focusing on her new business and only wants people around her that are truly supportive. "It was fun while it lasted, but they both have different priorities and they couldn't make it work." Liberty is now focusing on promoting her new swimwear range Uplifted The Label. 5
