Clarksville gun shop fights to get Federal Firearms License back
CLARKSVILLE, Tenn. (WKRN) — A veteran-owned gun shop has been struggling to stay afloat after losing its Federal Firearms License in 2023.
A policy announced by President Joe Biden in June 2021 established 'zero tolerance for rogue gun dealers that willfully violate the law.' Under this policy, the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives was to revoke the licenses of dealers the first time that they violated federal law by willfully:
transferring a firearm to a prohibited person
failing to run a required background check
falsifying records, such as a firearms transaction form
failing to respond to an ATF tracing request
refusing to allow the ATF to conduct an inspection in violation of the law
In April, the Trump administration repealed the policy implemented by Biden.
The Tactical Edge, located on Fort Campbell Boulevard in Clarksville, has been in business for 13 years. At the end of 2022, shop owners William Boswell and Robert Snyder told News 2 that the ATF found 10 minor clerical errors among the nearly 2,500 forms the shop had filed.
MNPD: Wanted man dead after exchanging gunfire with officers on Division Street Bridge
Snyder said they had made similar mistakes in the past and were always able to fix things without getting their FFL revoked. They decided to hire Nashville-based attorney John Harris to help them try to get a stay but to no avail.
'[We] just financially couldn't afford to fight it anymore,' Snyder said. 'The government's got unlimited money. They can have an attorney in there every single day. We just can't do that. It cost us almost $100,000 in legal fees.'
On top of that, Boswell and Snyder had to shut down their manufacturing facility, which is where they made the majority of their revenue. The duo said their business has been hanging on by a thread ever since.
'[We've just] been trying to do our best with [selling] accessories, gear — stuff like that,' Boswell said. 'We have Fort Campbell right here, so we have a lot of gear and stuff that cater to the soldiers on post. Without the FFL, it has significantly cut down our ability to have an income here.'
In late April, Rep. Mark Green (R-Tennessee) sent a letter to Attorney General Pamela Bondi requesting a review of all revoked FFLs for gun dealers and gun store owners during the Biden administration.
'While I am grateful the Trump administration has ended this egregious and predatory enforcement, there are still hundreds of firearm dealers who had their FFLs unjustly revoked,' Green's letter said. 'I implore you to consider issuing an expedient review of all federal firearms licenses revoked under the Biden administration. In many cases, the Biden ATF revoked the FFLs of gun shops with little to no due process. It is time to make this right.'
As for Boswell and Snyder, they said they're hoping federal officials follow through with Green's request and that they get their FFL back. Even then, they admit it would be difficult to get back to where they once were.
READ MORE | Latest headlines from Clarksville and Montgomery County
'We were growing as a company for a long time, and then basically you have to stop in your track,' Snyder said. 'It would take us probably 10 years to get back to where we were at.'
News 2 reached out to the ATF for comment. The agency responded with the following statement.
'ATF is finalizing a new national policy to promote consistent, effective, and equitable responses to violations of the Gun Control Act of 1968 (GCA), as amended, 18 U.S.C. Chapter 44. When assessing which enforcement actions to take, ATF will be guided by this new policy to consider the nature of the violations, their impact on public safety, ATF's ability to reduce violent crime and respect for the rule of law.
Any pending administrative actions against FFLs related to previous policies will be reevaluated using the new policy before a decision is reached on what actions, if any, to take in the case.'
Public Affairs Division, Office of Public & Governmental Affairs, Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives
Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
New York Times
an hour ago
- New York Times
Obama Isn't Going to Save You
For those who are paying attention and care at all about human decency, the Trump administration's political chaos and social instability is a challenge that's making some well-meaning people say some strange things. One of the strangest can be attributed to Obama derangement syndrome. O.D.S. sounds sensible enough. Barack Obama was a popular president. His approval rating was a solid 59 percent when he left office. That was just a little off from his high of 69 percent in 2009. YouGov data from this year ranks him as the second-most-popular politician, after Jimmy Carter. More important than how much people still like Obama, is that a lot of people felt really good about themselves when he was president. Nostalgia is a heck of a drug. Compared with Joe Biden and President Trump, Obama looks healthy. His speech at the Democratic National Convention last year showed that he still has the juice. And the moment feels important. Trump took the country into dangerous territory this week. He attempted to take control of the California National Guard and has deployed a Marine battalion to rein in protesting Angelenos. Meanwhile, a line of tanks will soon fête the president in his Army birthday parade, a galling display of authoritarian theater. This week the writer Mark Leibovich leveled up dinner party and social media murmurs about Obama's whereabouts with an essay asking why the former president has been missing in action. The question speaks to an accepted truth: The Democratic Party lacks leadership. Senator Chris Murphy, Senator Cory Booker and Representative Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez offer glimmers of a charismatic party head waiting in the wings. But Obama is the complete package with a track record. That idea has enough common-sense appeal to feel right. Unfortunately, it is absolute madness. I don't know which Obama some of my peers remember, but the ex-president was fairly consistent. He governed as a moderate who, at one time, would have been recognizable as a Reaganite. Only in the rightward drift of today's Overton window does Obama's presidency seem radically leftist. As the Democratic Party's leader, he chastised those on the left, threw in the occasional respectability politics about young Black men and sagging pants and gave us an imperfect but critical stop on the road to universal health care. He was a decent president of historical import, but he was still very much a product of his times. Want all of The Times? Subscribe.
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Editorial: Looking for government waste? Check DC this Saturday
It is altogether fitting that the nation should honor the 250th anniversary of the United States Army on June 14, 2025. That's a judgment that was shared by the Biden administration, under which planning for the recognition of the Army began. The United States could not survive without men and women willing to give and risk that last full measure of devotion to defeat foreign enemies. The world is filled with serpents and vultures. The strong do what they can and the weak suffer what they must is the iron law of international relations. Paying homage to our military, however, should still be informed by moderation. Extravagance should be eschewed. Resources are limited. An equal if not superior way of expressing our gratitude for men and women in the armed forces is generously funding the Department of Veterans Affairs, providing support and compensation for victims of Agent Orange, radiation poisoning or cancer from atomic testing and toxic exposure to burn pits including in Iraq and Afghanistan. The parade on the National Mall on Saturday happens to coincide with President Donald Trump's 79th birthday. Does that coincidence explain the estimated eye-popping $45 million cost? The military takes an oath to support and defend the Constitution of the United States, not the occupant of the White House. A big chunk of the parade budget will be diverted to street repairs in Washington, D.C. When Pierre Charles L'Enfant designed the street layout of the capital in 1791, he did not envision 120,000-pound M1 Abrams battle tanks rolling down Constitution Avenue. Even with occasional protective metal plates, street damage is likely to reach $16 million. Memorial Day and Veterans Day holidays already salute those who serve in our armed forces. We should not ape Prussia. It was disparaged as 'not a state with an army but an army with a state.' Let us remember that President Abraham Lincoln electrified and inspired the military with his 272-word Gettysburg Address that required nothing other than a brilliant mind and magnanimous character. _____
Hamilton Spectator
2 hours ago
- Hamilton Spectator
Defence spending boost can only go so far to lessen U.S. reliance: experts
MONTREAL - In early 2002, Glenn Cowan touched down in Kandahar province as part of the first wave of regular Canadian Army troops deployed to Afghanistan, serving in a U.S.-led brigade combat team. After joining Canada's elite special operations unit Joint Task Force 2 in 2003, he spent the next 13 years collaborating with American soldiers on raids, rescues and reconnaissance missions. 'If you're going to get into a fight with someone, you want the Americans on your side,' said Cowan, founder of ONE9. His Ottawa-based venture capital firm focuses on national security investments. The same might be said of the gear Canadian troops use, and the industry behind it. An infusion of fresh defence funding is poised to flood parts of Canada's aerospace, manufacturing and information technology sectors in a bid to reduce reliance on the United States, but experts say this country will remain firmly fastened to its neighbour as a military-industrial partner by necessity. While not a military powerhouse, Canada has expertise in areas ranging from flight simulation and shipbuilding to armoured vehicles and artificial intelligence. The $9.3-billion in additional defence spending announced by Prime Minister Mark Carney on Monday is poised to boost those sectors, with the goal of greater procurement from domestic companies. 'We're too reliant on the United States,' Carney said. 'We will ensure that every dollar is invested wisely, including by prioritizing made-in-Canada manufacturing and supply chains. We should no longer send three-quarters of our defence capital spending to America.' But a massive cash injection means Canada will have to scale up fast, including via foreign suppliers, said Jim Kilpatrick, in charge of global supply chain and network operations at Deloitte. 'Defence supply chains can often go 10 or 11 tiers deep,' he said, stressing their complex international reach. 'Canada will not be self-sufficient in defence products required by our military.' The country's relatively small production capacity means it will continue to shell out money on American equipment, technology and aircraft, including 88 U.S.-built F-35 fighter jets at a cost of tens of billions of dollars, experts say. However, some of that spending will go to American military giants that have a big presence on Canadian soil, even if the profits end up in pockets south of the border. General Dynamics churns out light armoured vehicles bristelling with turreted mortars and assault guns in London, Ont., as well as tactical communications systems in Ottawa. Lockheed Martin works on 'advanced technology systems' such as naval command software in five provinces. Defence contractor Raytheon counts 8,500 employees and 2,500 suppliers in Canada. 'The wider Canadian economy features a lot of branch plants,' noted David Perry, CEO of the Canadian Global Affairs Institute. While high-tech weapons and machinery come to mind at the mention of defence procurement, much of the extra funding this year may well go to more mundane items. Housing and infrastructure upgrades for Canadian troops make up some of the biggest priorities for Chief of the Defence Staff Gen. Jennie Carignan, she told Quebec radio host Patrick Lagacé on Thursday. Perry also highlighted the ripple effects of that spending for myriad business types beyond the purely military realm. 'Some of it is done through the big stuff — we think about fighter jets. But a lot of it pays for office furniture, software licenses, electricity contracts, snow removal, grass cutting.' Taking a step back, Perry framed defence investment in terms the prime minister, formerly the head of the Bank of Canada and the Bank of England, could appreciate. 'If you think of our defence relationships as an investment portfolio, the PM is saying we're way over-indexed in the Dow Jones and the S&P,' he said. 'Diversify.' This report by The Canadian Press was first published June 13, 2025.
